Articles | Volume 17, issue 19
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5903-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5903-2024
Research article
 | 
08 Oct 2024
Research article |  | 08 Oct 2024

A portable nitrogen dioxide instrument using cavity-enhanced absorption spectroscopy

Steven A. Bailey, Reem A. Hannun, Andrew K. Swanson, and Thomas F. Hanisco

Related authors

A cavity-enhanced ultraviolet absorption instrument for high-precision, fast-time-response ozone measurements
Reem A. Hannun, Andrew K. Swanson, Steven A. Bailey, Thomas F. Hanisco, T. Paul Bui, Ilann Bourgeois, Jeff Peischl, and Thomas B. Ryerson
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 6877–6887, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-6877-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-6877-2020, 2020
Short summary
A new airborne laser-induced fluorescence instrument for in situ detection of formaldehyde throughout the troposphere and lower stratosphere
M. Cazorla, G. M. Wolfe, S. A. Bailey, A. K. Swanson, H. L. Arkinson, and T. F. Hanisco
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 541–552, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-541-2015,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-541-2015, 2015
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Gases | Technique: In Situ Measurement | Topic: Instruments and Platforms
Development and deployment of a mid-cost CO2 sensor monitoring network to support atmospheric inverse modeling for quantifying urban CO2 emissions in Paris
Jinghui Lian, Olivier Laurent, Mali Chariot, Luc Lienhardt, Michel Ramonet, Hervé Utard, Thomas Lauvaux, François-Marie Bréon, Grégoire Broquet, Karina Cucchi, Laurent Millair, and Philippe Ciais
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 5821–5839, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5821-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5821-2024, 2024
Short summary
UAV-based in situ measurements of CO2 and CH4 fluxes over complex natural ecosystems
Abdullah Bolek, Martin Heimann, and Mathias Göckede
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 5619–5636, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5619-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5619-2024, 2024
Short summary
A new aerial approach for quantifying and attributing methane emissions: implementation and validation
Jonathan F. Dooley, Kenneth Minschwaner, Manvendra K. Dubey, Sahar H. El Abbadi, Evan D. Sherwin, Aaron G. Meyer, Emily Follansbee, and James E. Lee
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 5091–5111, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5091-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5091-2024, 2024
Short summary
Drone CO2 measurements during the Tajogaite volcanic eruption
John Ericksen, Tobias P. Fischer, G. Matthew Fricke, Scott Nowicki, Nemesio M. Pérez, Pedro Hernández Pérez, Eleazar Padrón González, and Melanie E. Moses
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 4725–4736, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4725-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4725-2024, 2024
Short summary
Multi-decadal atmospheric carbon dioxide measurements in Hungary, central Europe
László Haszpra
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 4629–4647, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4629-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4629-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Bailey, S.: PCAND instrument data for AMT paper, V1, Harvard Dataverse [data set], https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/5ISIE2, 2024. 
Ball, S. M., Langridge, J. M., and Jones, R. L.: Broadband cavity enhanced absorption spectroscopy using light emitting diodes, Chem. Phys. Lett., 398, 68–74, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2004.08.144, 2004. 
Bucholtz, A.: Rayleigh-scattering calculations for the terrestrial atmosphere, Appl. Optics, 34, 2765–2773, https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.34.002765, 1995. 
Cersosimo, A., Serio, C., and Masiello, G.: TROPOMI NO2 Tropospheric Column Data: Regridding to 1 km Grid-Resolution and Assessment of their Consistency with In Situ Surface Observations, Remote Sens.-Basel, 12, 2212, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12142212, 2020. 
Cooper, M. J., Martin, R. V., Henze, D. K., and Jones, D. B. A.: Effects of a priori profile shape assumptions on comparisons between satellite NO2 columns and model simulations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 7231–7241, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-7231-2020, 2020a. 
Download
Short summary
We have developed a portable, optically based instrument that measures NO2. It consumes less than 6 W of power, so it can easily run off a small battery. This instrument has made both balloon and UAV flights. NO2 measurement results compare favorably with other known NO2 instruments. We find this instrument to be stable with repeatable results compared with calibration sources. Material cost to build a single instrument is around USD 4000. This could be lowered with economies of scale.