Articles | Volume 16, issue 21
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-5415-2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-5415-2023
Research article
 | 
13 Nov 2023
Research article |  | 13 Nov 2023

Spectral analysis approach for assessing the accuracy of low-cost air quality sensor network data

Vijay Kumar, Dinushani Senarathna, Supraja Gurajala, William Olsen, Shantanu Sur, Sumona Mondal, and Suresh Dhaniyala

Related authors

Performance characterization of a laminar gas inlet
Da Yang, Margarita Reza, Roy Mauldin, Rainer Volkamer, and Suresh Dhaniyala
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 1463–1474, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1463-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1463-2024, 2024
Short summary
Observations of bromine monoxide transport in the Arctic sustained on aerosol particles
Peter K. Peterson, Denis Pöhler, Holger Sihler, Johannes Zielcke, Stephan General, Udo Frieß, Ulrich Platt, William R. Simpson, Son V. Nghiem, Paul B. Shepson, Brian H. Stirm, Suresh Dhaniyala, Thomas Wagner, Dana R. Caulton, Jose D. Fuentes, and Kerri A. Pratt
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 7567–7579, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-7567-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-7567-2017, 2017
Short summary
Aircraft testing of the new Blunt-body Aerosol Sampler (BASE)
A. Moharreri, L. Craig, P. Dubey, D. C. Rogers, and S. Dhaniyala
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 3085–3093, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-3085-2014,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-3085-2014, 2014

Related subject area

Subject: Aerosols | Technique: In Situ Measurement | Topic: Validation and Intercomparisons
Comparison of the imaginary part of the atmospheric refractive index structure parameter and aerosol flux based on different measurement methods
Renmin Yuan, Hongsheng Zhang, Jiajia Hua, Hao Liu, Peizhe Wu, Xingyu Zhu, and Jianning Sun
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2677,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2677, 2023
Short summary
Challenges and solutions in determining dilution ratios and emission factors from chase measurements of passenger vehicles
Ville Leinonen, Miska Olin, Sampsa Martikainen, Panu Karjalainen, and Santtu Mikkonen
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 5075–5089, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-5075-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-5075-2023, 2023
Short summary
Seasonally optimized calibrations improve low-cost sensor performance: long-term field evaluation of PurpleAir sensors in urban and rural India
Mark Joseph Campmier, Jonathan Gingrich, Saumya Singh, Nisar Baig, Shahzad Gani, Adithi Upadhya, Pratyush Agrawal, Meenakshi Kushwaha, Harsh Raj Mishra, Ajay Pillarisetti, Sreekanth Vakacherla, Ravi Kant Pathak, and Joshua S. Apte
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 4357–4374, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-4357-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-4357-2023, 2023
Short summary
Performance evaluation of portable dual-spot micro-aethalometers for source identification of black carbon aerosols: application to wildfire smoke and traffic emissions in the Pacific Northwest
Mrinmoy Chakraborty, Amanda Giang, and Naomi Zimmerman
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 2333–2352, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-2333-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-2333-2023, 2023
Short summary
Further validation of the estimates of the downwelling solar radiation at ground level in cloud-free conditions provided by the McClear service: the case of Sub-Saharan Africa and the Maldives Archipelago
William Wandji Nyamsi, Yves-Marie Saint-Drenan, Antti Arola, and Lucien Wald
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 2001–2036, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-2001-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-2001-2023, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

Afrifa-Yamoah, E., Mueller, U. A., Taylor, S., and Fisher, A.: Missing data imputation of high-resolution temporal climate time series data, Meteorol. Appl., 27, e1873, https://doi.org/10.1002/met.1873, 2020. a
Ardon-Dryer, K., Dryer, Y., Williams, J. N., and Moghimi, N.: Measurements of PM2.5 with PurpleAir under atmospheric conditions, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 5441–5458, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-5441-2020, 2020. a, b, c, d, e
Bai, H., Gao, W., Zhang, Y., and Wang, L.: Assessment of health benefit of PM2.5 reduction during COVID-19 lockdown in China and separating contributions from anthropogenic emissions and meteorology, J. Environ. Sci., 115, 422–431, 2022. a, b
Barkjohn, K. K., Gantt, B., and Clements, A. L.: Development and application of a United States-wide correction for PM2.5 data collected with the PurpleAir sensor, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 4617–4637, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-4617-2021, 2021. a, b, c, d, e, f, g
Bi, J., Wildani, A., Chang, H. H., and Liu, Y.: Incorporating low-cost sensor measurements into high-resolution PM2.5 modeling at a large spatial scale, Environ. Sci. Technol., 54, 2152–2162, 2020. a
Download
Short summary
Low-cost sensors are becoming increasingly important in air quality monitoring due to their affordability and ease of deployment. While low-cost sensors have the potential to democratize air quality monitoring, their use must be accompanied by careful interpretation and validation of the data. Analysis of their long-term data record clearly shows that the reported data from low-cost sensors may not be equally sensitive to all emission sources, which can complicate policy-making.