Blanchard, C. L., Tanenbaum, S., and Lawson, D. R.: Differences between weekday and weekend air pollutant levels in Atlanta; Baltimore; Chicago; Dallas–Fort Worth; Denver; Houston; New York; Phoenix; Washington, DC; and surrounding areas, J. Air Waste Manage., 58, 1598–1615, 2008. a
Bureau, U. C.: US Census Bureau: Public Database,
https://www.census.gov/geo/maps-data/data/tallies/tractblock.html (last access: 9 January 2023), 2021. a
Castell, N., Dauge, F. R., Schneider, P., Vogt, M., Lerner, U., Fishbain, B., Broday, D., and Bartonova, A.: Can commercial low-cost sensor platforms contribute to air quality monitoring and exposure estimates?, Environ. Int., 99, 293–302, 2017.
a,
b,
c
Chaipitakporn, C., Athavale, P., Kumar, V., Sathiyakumar, T., Budisic, M., Sur, S., and Mondal, S.: COVID-19 in the United States during pre-vaccination period: Shifting impact of sociodemographic factors and air pollution, Front. Epidemiol., 2, 48, ISSN 2674-1199,
https://doi.org/10.3389/fepid.2022.927189, 2022.
a
Choi, Y.-S., Ho, C.-H., Chen, D., Noh, Y.-H., and Song, C.-K.: Spectral analysis of weekly variation in PM
10 mass concentration and meteorological conditions over China, Atmos. Environ., 42, 655–666, 2008.
a,
b
Commodore, A., Wilson, S., Muhammad, O., Svendsen, E., and Pearce, J.: Community-based participatory research for the study of air pollution: A review of motivations, approaches, and outcomes, Environ. Monit. Assess., 189, 1–30, 2017. a
Dilmaghani, S.: Spectral analysis of air quality data, Ph.D. thesis, University of Southern California, 2007. a
EPA: US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Publically available air quality data API,
https://aqs.epa.gov/aqsweb/documents/data_api.html (last access: 20 October 2022), 2021. a
Eskridge, R. E., Ku, J. Y., Rao, S. T., Porter, P. S., and Zurbenko, I. G.: Separating different scales of motion in time series of meteorological variables, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 78, 1473–1484, 1997. a
ESRI: Esri. “Navigation” [basemap], Scale Not Given, “World Navigation Map”,
http://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=30e5fe3149c34df1ba922e6f5bbf808f (last access: 9 January 2023), 2021. a
Fang, C., Qiu, J., Li, J., and Wang, J.: Analysis of the meteorological impact on PM
2.5 pollution in Changchun based on KZ filter and WRF-CMAQ, Atmos. Environ., 271, 118924, ISSN 1352-2310,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118924, 2022.
a
Giordano, M. R., Malings, C., Pandis, S. N., Presto, A. A., McNeill, V. F., Westervelt, D. M., Beekmann, M., and Subramanian, R.: From low-cost sensors to high-quality data: A summary of challenges and best practices for effectively calibrating low-cost particulate matter mass sensors, J. Aerosol Sci., 158, 105833,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2021.105833, 2021.
a
Gupta, P., Doraiswamy, P., Levy, R., Pikelnaya, O., Maibach, J., Feenstra, B., Polidori, A., Kiros, F., and Mills, K.: Impact of California fires on local and regional air quality: the role of a low-cost sensor network and satellite observations, GeoHealth, 2, 172–181, 2018. a
Hadeed, S. J., O'Rourke, M. K., Burgess, J. L., Harris, R. B., and Canales, R. A.: Imputation methods for addressing missing data in short-term monitoring of air pollutants, Sci. Total Environ., 730, 139–140, 2020. a
He, M., Kuerbanjiang, N., and Dhaniyala, S.: Performance characteristics of the low-cost Plantower PMS optical sensor, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 54, 232–241, 2020.
a,
b
Hies, T., Treffeisen, R., Sebald, L., and Reimer, E.: Spectral analysis of air pollutants. Part 1: elemental carbon time series, Atmos. Environ., 34, 3495–3502, 2000.
a,
b
Hirabayashi, S. and Kroll, C. N.: Single imputation method of missing air quality data for i-tree eco analyses in the conterminous united states, Retrieved 1 January 2021,
http://www.itreetools.org/eco/resources/Single_imputation_method_of_missing_air_quality_data_for_i-Tree_Eco_analyses_in_the_conterminous_United_States.pdf (last access: 1 December 2021), 2017. a
Hogrefe, C., Rao, S. T., Zurbenko, I. G., and Porter, P. S.: Interpreting the information in ozone observations and model predictions relevant to regulatory policies in the eastern United States, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 81, 2083–2106, 2000. a
Hollaway, M., Wild, O., Yang, T., Sun, Y., Xu, W., Xie, C., Whalley, L., Slater, E., Heard, D., and Liu, D.: Photochemical impacts of haze pollution in an urban environment, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 9699–9714,
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-9699-2019, 2019.
a
IQAIR: Air quality in Chicago: Public Database,
https://www.iqair.com/us/usa/illinois/chicago (last access: 20 October 2022), 2020. a
James, G., Witten, D., Hastie, T., and Tibshirani, R.: An introduction to statistical learning, Vol. 112, Springer, 2013. a
Jia, M., Zhao, T., Cheng, X., Gong, S., Zhang, X., Tang, L., Liu, D., Wu, X., Wang, L., and Chen, Y.: Inverse relations of PM
2.5 and O
3 in air compound pollution between cold and hot seasons over an urban area of east China, Atmosphere, 8, 59,
https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos8030059, 2017.
a
Kang, D., Mathur, R., Rao, S. T., and Yu, S.: Bias adjustment techniques for improving ozone air quality forecasts, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, D23308,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2008jd010151, 2008.
a
Kelly, K., Whitaker, J., Petty, A., Widmer, C., Dybwad, A., Sleeth, D., Martin, R., and Butterfield, A.: Ambient and laboratory evaluation of a low-cost particulate matter sensor, Environ. Pollut., 221, 491–500, 2017.
a,
b
Kim, T., Kim, J., Yang, W., Lee, H., and Choo, J.: Missing Value Imputation of Time-Series Air-Quality Data via Deep Neural Networks, Int. J. Environ. Res. Pu., 18, 12213,
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182212213, 2021.
a
Kumar, V.: vijaykumar18/Airquality-Spectral-Analysis,
Airquality-Spectral-Analysis, GitHub [data set],
https://github.com/vijaykumar18/Airquality-Spectral-Analysis (last access: 29 February 2023), 2023. a
Kuula, J., Mäkelä, T., Hillamo, R., and Timonen, H.: Response characterization of an inexpensive aerosol sensor, Sensors, 17, 2915,
https://doi.org/10.3390/s17122915, 2017.
a
Kuula, J., Mäkelä, T., Aurela, M., Teinilä, K., Varjonen, S., González, Ó., and Timonen, H.: Laboratory evaluation of particle-size selectivity of optical low-cost particulate matter sensors, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 2413–2423,
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2413-2020, 2020.
a
Landrigan, P. J., Fuller, R., Acosta, N. J. R., Adeyi, O., Arnold, R., Basu, N. N., Baldé, A. B., Bertollini, R., Bose-O’Reilly, S., Boufford, J. I., Breysse, P. N., Chiles, T., Mahidol, C., Coll-Seck, A. M., Cropper, M. L., Fobil, J., Fuster, V., Greenstone, M., Haines, A., Hanrahan, D., Hunter, D., Khare, M., Krupnick, A., Lanphear, B., Lohani, B., Martin, K., Mathiasen, K. V., McTeer, M. A., Murray, C. J. L., Ndahimananjara, J. D., Perera, F., Potoˇcnik, J., Preker, A. S., Ramesh, J., Rockström, J., Salinas, C., Samson, L. D., Sandilya, K., Sly, P. D., Smith, K. R., Steiner, A., Stewart, R. B., Suk, W. A., van Schayck, O. C. P., Yadama, G. N., Yumkella, K., and Zhong, M.: The Lancet Commission on pollution and health, The Lancet, 391, 462–512,
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(17)32345-0, 2018.
a
Lewis, T. C., Robins, T. G., Dvonch, J. T., Keeler, G. J., Yip, F. Y., Mentz, G. B., Lin, X., Parker, E. A., Israel, B. A., Gonzalez, L., and Hill, Y.: Air Pollution–Associated Changes in Lung Function among Asthmatic Children in Detroit, Environ. Health Perspect., 113, 1068–1075, https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.7533, 2005. a
Li, L., Losser, T., Yorke, C., and Piltner, R.: Fast inverse distance weighting-based spatiotemporal interpolation: a web-based application of interpolating daily fine particulate matter PM
2.5 in the contiguous US using parallel programming and kd tree, Int. J. Environ. Res. Pub. Health, 11, 9101–9141, 2014. a
Li, T., Hu, R., Chen, Z., Li, Q., Huang, S., Zhu, Z., and Zhou, L.-F.: Fine particulate matter (PM
2.5): The culprit for chronic lung diseases in China, Chronic Diseases and Translational Medicine, 4, 176–186, 2018. a
Lian, L. and Ma, H.: FDI and economic growth in western region of China and dynamic mechanism: Based on time-series data from 1986 to 2010, International Business Research, 6, 180, 2013. a
Magi, B. I., Cupini, C., Francis, J., Green, M., and Hauser, C.: Evaluation of PM
2.5 measured in an urban setting using a low-cost optical particle counter and a Federal Equivalent Method Beta Attenuation Monitor, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 54, 147–159, 2020. a
Marr, L. C. and Harley, R. A.: Spectral analysis of weekday–weekend differences in ambient ozone, nitrogen oxide, and non-methane hydrocarbon time series in California, Atmos. Environ., 36, 2327–2335, 2002.
a,
b
Mei, H., Han, P., Wang, Y., Zeng, N., Liu, D., Cai, Q., Deng, Z., Wang, Y., Pan, Y., and Tang, X.: Field evaluation of low-cost particulate matter sensors in Beijing, Sensors, 20, 4381,
https://doi.org/10.3390/s20164381, 2020.
a
Milando, C., Huang, L., and Batterman, S.: Trends in PM
2.5 emissions, concentrations and apportionments in Detroit and Chicago, Atmos. Environ., 129, 197–209, 2016. a
Mondal, S., Chaipitakporn, C., Kumar, V., Wangler, B., Gurajala, S., Dhaniyala, S., and Sur, S.: COVID-19 in New York state: Effects of demographics and air quality on infection and fatality, Sci. Total Environ., 807, 150536,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150536, 2022.
a
Noble, C. A., Vanderpool, R. W., Peters, T. M., McElroy, F. F., Gemmill, D. B., and Wiener, R. W.: Federal reference and equivalent methods for measuring fine particulate matter, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 34, 457–464, 2001. a
Ostro, B., Broadwin, R., Green, S., Feng, W.-Y., and Lipsett, M.: Fine particulate air pollution and mortality in nine California counties: results from CALFINE, Environ. Health Persp., 114, 29–33, 2006. a
Ouimette, J. R., Malm, W. C., Schichtel, B. A., Sheridan, P. J., Andrews, E., Ogren, J. A., and Arnott, W. P.: Evaluating the PurpleAir monitor as an aerosol light scattering instrument, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 655–676,
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-655-2022, 2022.
a,
b
Ouimette, J. R., Malm, W. C., Schichtel, B. A., Sheridan, P. J., Andrews, E., Ogren, J. A., and Arnott, W. P.: Evaluating the PurpleAir monitor as an aerosol light scattering instrument, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 15, 655–676, 2022. a
PA: Purple Air: Public Database of sensors installed in entire world,
https://map.purpleair.com/1/mAQI/a10/p604800/cC0#11.44/41.8363/-87.6973 (last access: 10 February 2023), 2021. a
PurpleAir: PurpleAir: PublicLab,
https://publiclab.org/wiki/purpleair (last access: 10 February 2023), 2020. a
Raaschou-Nielsen, O., Andersen, Z. J., Beelen, R., Samoli, E., Stafoggia, M., Weinmayr, G., Hoffmann, B., Fischer, P., Nieuwenhuijsen, M.J., Brunekreef, B., Xun, W. W., Katsouyanni, K., Dimakopoulou, K., Sommar, J., Forsberg, B., Modig, L., Oudin, A., Oftedal, B., Schwarze, P. E., and Nafstad, P.: Air pollution and lung cancer incidence in 17 European cohorts: prospective analyses from the European Study of Cohorts for Air Pollution Effects (ESCAPE). The Lancet Oncology, [online] 14, 813–822,
https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(13)70279-1, 2013.
a
Rao, S., Zurbenko, I., Neagu, R., Porter, P., Ku, J., and Henry, R.: Space and time scales in ambient ozone data, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 78, 2153–2166, 1997.
a,
b
Rao, S. T. and Zurbenko, I. G.: Detecting and tracking changes in ozone air quality, Air & Waste, 44, 1089–1092, 1994.
a,
b
Rivera-Muñoz, L. M., Gallego-Villada, J. D., Giraldo-Forero, A. F., and Martinez-Vargas, J. D.: Missing data estimation in a low-cost sensor network for measuring air quality: A case study in Aburrá Valley, Water, Air, Soil Pollut., 232, 1–15, 2021. a
Sá, E., Tchepel, O., Carvalho, A., and Borrego, C.: Meteorological driven changes on air quality over Portugal: a KZ filter application, Atmos. Pollut. Res., 6, 979–989, 2015. a
Samoli, E., Analitis, A., Touloumi, G., Schwartz, J., Anderson, H. R., Sunyer, J., Bisanti, L., Zmirou, D., Vonk, J. M., Pekkanen, J., Goodman, P., Paldy, A., Schindler, C., and Klea, K.: Estimating the exposure–response relationships between particulate matter and mortality within the APHEA multicity project, Environ. Health Perspect., 113, 88–95,
https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.7387, 2005
a
Saputra, M. D., Hadi, A. F., Riski, A., and Anggraeni, D.: Handling Missing Values and Unusual Observations in Statistical Downscaling Using Kalman Filter, J. Phys. Conference Series, 1863, 012 035,
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1863/1/012035, 2021.
a
Sayahi, T., Kaufman, D., Becnel, T., Kaur, K., Butterfield, A., Collingwood, S., Zhang, Y., Gaillardon, P.-E., and Kelly, K.: Development of a calibration chamber to evaluate the performance of low-cost particulate matter sensors, Environ. Pollut., 255, 113131,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113131, 2019.
a
Stavroulas, I., Grivas, G., Michalopoulos, P., Liakakou, E., Bougiatioti, A., Kalkavouras, P., Fameli, K. M., Hatzianastassiou, N., Mihalopoulos, N., and Gerasopoulos, E.: Field Evaluation of Low-Cost PM Sensors (Purple Air PA-II) Under Variable Urban Air Quality Conditions, in Greece, Atmosphere, 11, 926,
https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11090926, 2020.
a
Sun, L.: Spectral and time-frequency analyses of freeway traffic flow, J. Adv. Transport., 48, 821–857, 2014. a
Tchepel, O. and Borrego, C.: Frequency analysis of air quality time series for traffic related pollutants, J. Environ. Monit., 12, 544–550, 2010.
a,
b,
c
Tryner, J., Mehaffy, J., Miller-Lionberg, D., and Volckens, J.: Effects of aerosol type and simulated aging on performance of low-cost PM sensors, J. Aerosol Sci., 150, 105654,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2020.105654, 2020.
a
Wallace, L., Bi, J., Ott, W. R., Sarnat, J., and Liu, Y.: Calibration of low-cost PurpleAir outdoor monitors using an improved method of calculating PM
2.5, Atmos. Environ., 256, 118432,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118432, 2021.
a
Wang, X., Wang, L., Liu, Y., Hu, S., Liu, X., and Dong, Z.: A data-driven air quality assessment method based on unsupervised machine learning and median statistical analysis: The case of China, J. Clean. Product., 328, 129531, ISSN 0959-6526,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129531, 2021.
a
Wang, Y., Li, J., Jing, H., Zhang, Q., Jiang, J., and Biswas, P.: Laboratory evaluation and calibration of three low-cost particle sensors for particulate matter measurement, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 49, 1063–1077, 2015. a
Wijesekara, W. M. L. K. N. and Liyanage, L.: Comparison of imputation methods for missing values in air pollution data: Case study on Sydney air quality index, in: Advances in Information and Communication: Proceedings of the 2020 Future of Information and Communication Conference (FICC), Volume 2, 257–269 pp., Springer International Publishing, 2020. a
Wise, E. K. and Comrie, A. C.: Meteorologically adjusted urban air quality trends in the Southwestern United States, Atmos. Environ., 39, 2969–2980, 2005.
a,
b
Woodall, G. M., Hoover, M. D., Williams, R., Benedict, K., Harper, M., Soo, J.-C., Jarabek, A. M., Stewart, M. J., Brown, J. S., Hulla, J. E., Caudill, M., Clements, A. L., Kaufman, A., Parker, A. J., Keating, M., Balshaw, D., Garrahan, K., Burton, L., Batka, S., Limaye, V. S., Hakkinen, P. J., and Thompson, B.: Interpreting mobile and handheld air sensor readings in relation to air quality standards and health effect reference values: Tackling the challenges, Atmosphere, 8, 182,
https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos8100182, 2017.
a
Wu, X., Nethery, R. C., Sabath, B. M., Braun, D., and Dominici, F.: Exposure to air pollution and COVID-19 mortality in the United States. MedRxiv,
https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.05.20054502, 2020.
a
Xing, Y.-F., Xu, Y.-H., Shi, M.-H., and Lian, Y.-X.: The impact of PM
2.5 on the human respiratory system, J. Thorac. Dis., 8, E69,
https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2016.01.19, 2016.
a
Zheng, T., Bergin, M. H., Johnson, K. K., Tripathi, S. N., Shirodkar, S., Landis, M. S., Sutaria, R., and Carlson, D. E.: Field evaluation of low-cost particulate matter sensors in high- and low-concentration environments, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 4823–4846,
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-4823-2018, 2018.
a
Zhou, X., Josey, K., Kamareddine, L., Caine, M. C., Liu, T., Mickley, L. J., Cooper, M., and Dominici, F.: Excess of COVID-19 cases and deaths due to fine particulate matter exposure during the 2020 wildfires in the United States, Sci. Adv., 7, eabi8789,
https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abi8789, 2021.
a
