Articles | Volume 18, issue 11
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-2523-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-2523-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
13 Jun 2025
Research article |
| 13 Jun 2025
| 13 Jun 2025
Using neural networks for near-real-time aerosol retrievals from OMPS Limb Profiler measurements
Michael D. Himes
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA
NASA Postdoctoral Program, Greenbelt, MD, USA
Morgan State University, Baltimore, MD, USA
Ghassan Taha
Morgan State University, Baltimore, MD, USA
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA
Daniel Kahn
Science Systems and Applications, Inc., Lanham, MD, USA
Tong Zhu
Science Systems and Applications, Inc., Lanham, MD, USA
Natalya A. Kramarova
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA
Related authors
No articles found.
Nigel A. D. Richards, Natalya A. Kramarova, Stacey M. Frith, Sean M. Davis, and Yue Jia
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4117, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4117, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (AMT).
Short summary
Short summary
The Montreal Protocol has led to a slow recovery in the Earth's ozone layer. To detect such changes, and to monitor the health of the ozone layer, long term global observations are needed. The OMPS Limb Profiler (LP) series of satellite sensors are designed to meet this need. We validate the latest version OMPS LP ozone profiles against other satellite and ground based measurements. We find that OMPS LP ozone is consistent with other data sources and is suitable for use in ozone trend studies.
Robert James Duncan Spurr, Matt Christi, Nickolay Anatoly Krotkov, Won-Ei Choi, Simon Carn, Can Li, Natalya Kramarova, David Haffner, Eun-Su Yang, Nick Gorkavyi, Alexander Vasilkov, Krzysztof Wargan, Omar Torres, Diego Loyola, Serena Di Pede, Joris Pepijn Veefkind, and Pawan Kumar Bhartia
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2938, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2938, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (AMT).
Short summary
Short summary
An eruption of the submarine Hunga volcano injected a massive plume of water vapor, sulfur dioxide and aerosols into the Southern tropical stratosphere. The high-altitude Hunga aerosol plume showed up as strongly enhanced solar backscattered ultraviolet (BUV) radiation compromising satellite BUV ozone retrievals. In this paper, we have developed a new technique to retrieve the aerosol amount and height, based on satellite solar BUV radiances from the TROPOMI and OMPS nadir profiler instruments.
Clair Duchamp, Bernard Legras, Aurélien Podglajen, Pasquale Sellitto, Adam E. Bourassa, Alexei Rozanov, Ghassan Taha, and Daniel J. Zawada
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3355, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3355, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (AMT).
Short summary
Short summary
We analyzed the stratospheric aerosol plume from the 2022 Hunga eruption using satellite lidar data. We implemented a method to retrieve some aerosol properties, as standard products failed in this case. We found very high optical depth values in the days following the eruption, which decreased rapidly but remained elevated for months. Our results are broadly validated, though some satellite products underestimate the values due, in part, to the unusual aerosol size distribution in the plume.
Selena Zhang, Susan Solomon, Chris D. Boone, and Ghassan Taha
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 11727–11736, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-11727-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-11727-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This paper investigates the vertical impacts of the anomalous 2023 Canadian wildfire season using multiple satellite instruments. Our results highlight that despite a record-breaking area burned, only a small amount of smoke managed to enter the stratosphere. This shows that the conditions for deep convection were rarely met in the 2023 wildfire season, suggesting that even a massive area burned is not necessarily an indicator of stratospheric perturbations.
Yi Wang, Mark Schoeberl, and Ghassan Taha
Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2023-267, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2023-267, 2024
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Short summary
The OMPS-LP satellite instrument assesses aerosol scattering in the atmospheric limb. Using a dual-wavelength extinction coefficient algorithm, we extract stratospheric aerosol vertical profiles from OMPS-LP data. Our study addresses uncertainties and validates these profiles against in-situ balloon data and SAGE-III/ISS retrievals. Investigating the Raikoke and Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha'apai eruptions, we analyze the evolution of aerosol size and concentration, confirming our method's reliability.
Yi Wang, Mark Schoeberl, Ghassan Taha, Daniel Zawada, and Adam Bourassa
Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2023-36, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2023-36, 2023
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Short summary
The OMPS-LP satellite instrument measures aerosol scattering properties across the atmospheric limb. Adopting an algorithm that uses extinction at two wavelengths, we retrieve vertical profiles of particle size and concentration. We demonstrate that these profiles are consistent with in-situ balloon and SAGE-III/ISS satellite measurements. We also show how aerosol size and concentration evolve during Reikoke and Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha'apai eruptions.
Sarah A. Strode, Ghassan Taha, Luke D. Oman, Robert Damadeo, David Flittner, Mark Schoeberl, Christopher E. Sioris, and Ryan Stauffer
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 6145–6161, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6145-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6145-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We use a global atmospheric chemistry model simulation to generate scaling factors that account for the daily cycle of NO2 and ozone. These factors facilitate comparisons between sunrise and sunset observations from SAGE III/ISS and observations from other instruments. We provide the scaling factors as monthly zonal means for different latitudes and altitudes. We find that applying these factors yields more consistent comparisons between observations from SAGE III/ISS and other instruments.
Klaus-Peter Heue, Diego Loyola, Fabian Romahn, Walter Zimmer, Simon Chabrillat, Quentin Errera, Jerry Ziemke, and Natalya Kramarova
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 5563–5579, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-5563-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-5563-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
To retrieve tropospheric ozone column information, we subtract stratospheric column data of BASCOE from TROPOMI/S5P total ozone columns.
The new S5P-BASCOE data agree well with existing tropospheric data like OMPS-MERRA-2. The data are also compared to ozone soundings.
The tropospheric ozone columns show the expected temporal and spatial patterns. We will also apply the algorithm to future UV nadir missions like Sentinel 4 or 5 or to recent and ongoing missions like GOME_2 or OMI.
John T. Sullivan, Arnoud Apituley, Nora Mettig, Karin Kreher, K. Emma Knowland, Marc Allaart, Ankie Piters, Michel Van Roozendael, Pepijn Veefkind, Jerry R. Ziemke, Natalya Kramarova, Mark Weber, Alexei Rozanov, Laurence Twigg, Grant Sumnicht, and Thomas J. McGee
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 11137–11153, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-11137-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-11137-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
A TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI) validation campaign (TROLIX-19) was held in the Netherlands in September 2019. The research presented here focuses on using ozone lidars from NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center to better evaluate the characterization of ozone throughout TROLIX-19 as compared to balloon-borne, space-borne and ground-based passive measurements, as well as a global coupled chemistry meteorology model.
Nick Gorkavyi, Nickolay Krotkov, Can Li, Leslie Lait, Peter Colarco, Simon Carn, Matthew DeLand, Paul Newman, Mark Schoeberl, Ghassan Taha, Omar Torres, Alexander Vasilkov, and Joanna Joiner
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 7545–7563, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-7545-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-7545-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The 21 June 2019 eruption of the Raikoke volcano produced significant amounts of volcanic aerosols (sulfate and ash) and sulfur dioxide (SO2) gas that penetrated into the lower stratosphere. We showed that the amount of SO2 decreases with a characteristic period of 8–18 d and the peak of sulfate aerosol lags the initial peak of SO2 by 1.5 months. We also examined the dynamics of an unusual stratospheric coherent circular cloud of SO2 and aerosol observed from 18 July to 22 September 2019.
Jerald R. Ziemke, Gordon J. Labow, Natalya A. Kramarova, Richard D. McPeters, Pawan K. Bhartia, Luke D. Oman, Stacey M. Frith, and David P. Haffner
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 6407–6418, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-6407-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-6407-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Seasonal and interannual ozone profile climatologies are produced from combined MLS and MERRA-2 GMI ozone for the general public. Both climatologies extend from pole to pole at altitudes of 0–80 km (1 km spacing) for the time record from 1970 to 2018. These climatologies are important for use as a priori information in satellite ozone retrieval algorithms, as validation of other measured and model-simulated ozone, and in radiative transfer studies of the atmosphere.
Sampa Das, Peter R. Colarco, Luke D. Oman, Ghassan Taha, and Omar Torres
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 12069–12090, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-12069-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-12069-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Interactions of extreme fires with weather systems can produce towering smoke plumes that inject aerosols at very high altitudes (> 10 km). Three such major injections, largest at the time in terms of emitted aerosol mass, took place over British Columbia, Canada, in August 2017. We model the transport and impacts of injected aerosols on the radiation balance of the atmosphere. Our model results match the satellite-observed plume transport and residence time at these high altitudes very closely.
Lily N. Zhang, Susan Solomon, Kane A. Stone, Jonathan D. Shanklin, Joshua D. Eveson, Steve Colwell, John P. Burrows, Mark Weber, Pieternel F. Levelt, Natalya A. Kramarova, and David P. Haffner
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 9829–9838, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-9829-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-9829-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
In the 1980s, measurements at the British Antarctic Survey station in Halley, Antarctica, led to the discovery of the ozone hole. The Halley total ozone record continues to be uniquely valuable for studies of long-term changes in Antarctic ozone. Environmental conditions in 2017 forced a temporary cessation of operations, leading to a gap in the historic record. We develop and test a method for filling in the Halley record using satellite data and find evidence to further support ozone recovery.
Ghassan Taha, Robert Loughman, Tong Zhu, Larry Thomason, Jayanta Kar, Landon Rieger, and Adam Bourassa
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 1015–1036, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-1015-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-1015-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This work describes the newly released OMPS LP aerosol extinction profile multi-wavelength Version 2.0 algorithm and dataset. It is shown that the V2.0 aerosols exhibit significant improvements in OMPS LP retrieval performance in the Southern Hemisphere and at lower altitudes. The new product is compared to the SAGE III/ISS, OSIRIS and CALIPSO missions and shown to be of good quality and suitable for scientific studies.
Corinna Kloss, Gwenaël Berthet, Pasquale Sellitto, Felix Ploeger, Ghassan Taha, Mariam Tidiga, Maxim Eremenko, Adriana Bossolasco, Fabrice Jégou, Jean-Baptiste Renard, and Bernard Legras
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 535–560, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-535-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-535-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The year 2019 was particularly rich for the stratospheric aerosol layer due to two volcanic eruptions (at Raikoke and Ulawun) and wildfire events. With satellite observations and models, we describe the exceptionally complex situation following the Raikoke eruption. The respective plume overwhelmed the Northern Hemisphere stratosphere in terms of aerosol load and resulted in the highest climate impact throughout the past decade.
Cited articles
Abadi, M., Barham, P., Chen, J., Chen, Z., Davis, A., Dean, J., Devin, M., Ghemawat, S., Irving, G., Isard, M., et al.: Tensorflow: a system for large-scale machine learning, in: OSDI, 16, 265–283, 2016. a
Barnes, J. E. and Hofmann, D. J.: Lidar measurements of stratospheric aerosol over Mauna Loa Observatory, Geophys. Res. Lett., 24, 1923–1926, https://doi.org/10.1029/97GL01943, 1997. a
Baydin, A. G., Heinrich, L., Bhimji, W., Shao, L., Naderiparizi, S., Munk, A., Liu, J., Gram-Hansen, B., Louppe, G., Meadows, L., Torr, P., Lee, V., Prabhat, Cranmer, K., and Wood, F.: Efficient Probabilistic Inference in the Quest for Physics Beyond the Standard Model, in: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 33, https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2019/file/6d19c113404cee55b4036fce1a37c058-Paper.pdf (last access: 10 June 2025), 2019. a
Borrmann, S., Kunkel, D., Weigel, R., Minikin, A., Deshler, T., Wilson, J. C., Curtius, J., Volk, C. M., Homan, C. D., Ulanovsky, A., Ravegnani, F., Viciani, S., Shur, G. N., Belyaev, G. V., Law, K. S., and Cairo, F.: Aerosols in the tropical and subtropical UT/LS: in-situ measurements of submicron particle abundance and volatility, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 5573–5592, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5573-2010, 2010. a
Brock, C. A., Schröder, F., Kärcher, B., Petzold, A., Busen, R., and Fiebig, M.: Ultrafine particle size distributions measured in aircraft exhaust plumes, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 26555–26568, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900360, 2000. a
Chouza, F., Leblanc, T., Barnes, J., Brewer, M., Wang, P., and Koon, D.: Long-term (1999–2019) variability of stratospheric aerosol over Mauna Loa, Hawaii, as seen by two co-located lidars and satellite measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 6821–6839, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-6821-2020, 2020. a
Christian, K., Wang, J., Ge, C., Peterson, D., Hyer, E., Yorks, J., and McGill, M.: Radiative Forcing and Stratospheric Warming of Pyrocumulonimbus Smoke Aerosols: First Modeling Results With Multisensor (EPIC, CALIPSO, and CATS) Views from Space, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 10061–10071, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL082360, 2019. a
Chu, W. P., McCormick, M. P., Lenoble, J., Brogniez, C., and Pruvost, P.: SAGE II inversion algorithm, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 94, 8339–8351, https://doi.org/10.1029/JD094iD06p08339, 1989. a
Cranmer, K., Brehmer, J., and Louppe, G.: The frontier of simulation-based inference, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 117, 30055–30062, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1912789117, 2020. a
Das, S., Colarco, P. R., Oman, L. D., Taha, G., and Torres, O.: The long-term transport and radiative impacts of the 2017 British Columbia pyrocumulonimbus smoke aerosols in the stratosphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 12069–12090, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-12069-2021, 2021. a
Fiocco, G. and Grams, G.: Observations of the Aerosol Layer at 20 km by Optical Radar, J. Atmos. Sci., 21, 323–323, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1964)021<0323:OOTALA>2.0.CO;2, 1964. a
Flynn, L. E., Seftor, C. J., Larsen, J. C., and Xu, P.: The Ozone Mapping and Profiler Suite, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 279–296, ISBN 978-3-540-37293-6, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-37293-6_15, 2006. a
Global Volcanism Program: Report on Ruang (Indonesia), in: Weekly Volcanic Activity Report, 17 April–23 April 2024, edited by: Sennert, S., Smithsonian Institution and US Geological Survey, https://volcano.si.edu/showreport.cfm?wvar=GVP.WVAR20240417-267010 (last access: 13 June 2024), 2024. a
Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., and Courville, A.: Deep Learning, MIT Press, http://www.deeplearningbook.org (last access: 10 June 2025), 2016. a
Hayashida, S., Saitoh, N., Kagawa, A., Yokota, T., Suzuki, M., Nakajima, H., and Sasano, Y.: Arctic polar stratospheric clouds observed with the Improved Limb Atmospheric Spectrometer during winter 1996/1997, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 105, 24715–24730, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900228, 2000. a
Hermann, M. and Wiedensohler, A.: Counting efficiency of condensation particle counters at low-pressures with illustrative data from the upper troposphere, J. Aerosol Sci., 32, 975–991, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-8502(01)00037-4, 2001. a
Hervig, M. E., Russell III, J. M., Gordley, L. L., Park, J. H., Drayson, S. R., and Deshler, T.: Validation of aerosol measurements from the Halogen Occultation Experiment, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 101, 10267–10275, https://doi.org/10.1029/95JD02464, 1996. a
Himes, M. D.: MARGE, GitHub, https://github.com/exosports/MARGE (last access: 13 June 2024), 2022. a
Himes, M. D.: OMPS-NPP LP NRT Aerosol Extinction Vertical Profile swath multi-wavelength orbital 3slit, Greenbelt, MD, USA, NASA Ozone Monitoring Instrument Science Investigator-led Processing System (OMI SIPS), https://cmr.earthdata.nasa.gov/search/concepts/C3186057053-OMINRT.html (last access: 13 June 2024), 2024. a
Himes, M. D., Harrington, J., Cobb, A. D., Güneş Baydin, A., Soboczenski, F., O'Beirne, M. D., Zorzan, S., Wright, D. C., Scheffer, Z., Domagal-Goldman, S. D., and Arney, G. N.: Accurate Machine-learning Atmospheric Retrieval via a Neural-network Surrogate Model for Radiative Transfer, Planetary Science Journal, 3, 91, https://doi.org/10.3847/PSJ/abe3fd, 2022. a, b, c, d, e, f
Himes, M. D., Taha, G., Kahn, D., Zhu, T., and Kramarova, N. A.: Research Compendium for Himes et al. (2024): “Using neural networks for near-real-time aerosol retrievals from OMPS Limb Profiler measurements”, Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11477425, 2024a. a
Himes, M. D., Taha, G., Kahn, D., Zhu, T., and Kramarova, N. A.: Video Supplement for Himes et al. (2024): “Using neural networks for near-real-time aerosol retrievals from OMPS Limb Profiler measurements”, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14623952, 2024b. a, b
Hofmann, D. J., Rosen, J. M., Pepin, T. J., and Pinnick, R. G.: Stratospheric aerosol measurements. I – Time variations at northern midlatitudes, J. Atmos. Sci., 32, 1446–1456, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1975)032<1446:SAMITV>2.0.CO;2, 1975. a
Jäger, H.: Long-term record of lidar observations of the stratospheric aerosol layer at Garmisch-Partenkirchen, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 110, D08106, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005506, 2005. a
Jaross, G.: OMPS-NPP L1G LP Radiance EV Wavelength-Altitude Grid swath orbital 3slit V2.6, Greenbelt, MD, USA, Goddard Earth Sciences Data and Information Services Center (GES DISC) [data set], https://doi.org/10.5067/YVE3FSNJ59RQ, 2023. a, b
Jonsson, H., Wilson, J., Brock, C., Knollenberg, R., Newton, T., Dye, J., Baumgardner, D., Borrmann, S., Ferry, G., Pueschel, R., Woods, D. C., and Pitts, M. C.: Performance of a Focused Cavity Aerosol Spectrometer for Measurements in the Stratosphere of Particle Size in the 0.06–2.0-µm-Diameter Range, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 12, 115–129, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1995)012<0115:POAFCA>2.0.CO;2, 1995. a
Junge, C. E., Chagnon, C. W., and Manson, J. E.: A World-wide Stratospheric Aerosol Layer, Science, 133, 1478–1479, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.133.3463.1478.a, 1961. a
Kar, J., Lee, K.-P., Vaughan, M. A., Tackett, J. L., Trepte, C. R., Winker, D. M., Lucker, P. L., and Getzewich, B. J.: CALIPSO level 3 stratospheric aerosol profile product: version 1.00 algorithm description and initial assessment, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 6173–6191, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-6173-2019, 2019. a
Kasim, M. F., Watson-Parris, D., Deaconu, L., Oliver, S., Hatfield, P., Froula, D. H., Gregori, G., Jarvis, M., Khatiwala, S., Korenaga, J., Topp-Mugglestone, J., Viezzer, E., and Vinko, S. M.: Building high accuracy emulators for scientific simulations with deep neural architecture search, Machine Learning: Science and Technology, 3, 015013, https://doi.org/10.1088/2632-2153/ac3ffa, 2021. a
Kremser, S., Thomason, L. W., von Hobe, M., Hermann, M., Deshler, T., Timmreck, C., Toohey, M., Stenke, A., Schwarz, J. P., Weigel, R., Fueglistaler, S., Prata, F. J., Vernier, J.-P., Schlager, H., Barnes, J. E., Antuña-Marrero, J.-C., Fairlie, D., Palm, M., Mahieu, E., Notholt, J., Rex, M., Bingen, C., Vanhellemont, F., Bourassa, A., Plane, J. M. C., Klocke, D., Carn, S. A., Clarisse, L., Trickl, T., Neely, R., James, A. D., Rieger, L., Wilson, J. C., and Meland, B.: Stratospheric aerosol-Observations, processes, and impact on climate, Rev. Geophys., 54, 278–335, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015RG000511, 2016. a
Llewellyn, E. J., Lloyd, N. D., Degenstein, D. A., Gattinger, R. L., Petelina, S. V., Bourassa, A. E., Wiensz, J. T., Ivanov, E. V., McDade, I. C., Solheim, B. H., McConnell, J. C., Haley, C. S., von Savigny, C., Sioris, C. E., McLinden, C. A., Griffioen, E., Kaminski, J., Evans, W. F., Puckrin, E., Strong, K., Wehrle, V., Hum, R. H., Kendall, D. J., Matsushita, J., Murtagh, D. P., Brohede, S., Stegman, J., Witt, G., Barnes, G., Payne, W. F., Piché, L., Smith, K., Warshaw, G., Deslauniers, D. L., Marchand, P., Richardson, E. H., King, R. A., Wevers, I., McCreath, W., Kyrölä, E., Oikarinen, L., Leppelmeier, G. W., Auvinen, H., Mégie, G., Hauchecorne, A., Lefèvre, F., de La Nöe, J., Ricaud, P., Frisk, U., Sjoberg, F., von Schéele, F., and Nordh, L.: The OSIRIS instrument on the Odin spacecraft, Can. J. Phys., 82, 411–422, https://doi.org/10.1139/p04-005, 2004. a
Loughman, R., Bhartia, P. K., Chen, Z., Xu, P., Nyaku, E., and Taha, G.: The Ozone Mapping and Profiler Suite (OMPS) Limb Profiler (LP) Version 1 aerosol extinction retrieval algorithm: theoretical basis, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 2633–2651, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-2633-2018, 2018. a
Loughman, R. P., Griffioen, E., Oikarinen, L., Postylyakov, O. V., Rozanov, A., Flittner, D. E., and Rault, D. F.: Comparison of radiative transfer models for limb-viewing scattered sunlight measurements, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003854, 2004. a
Lucchesi, R.: File Specification for GEOS-5 FP-IT, Tech. Rep. GMAO Office Note No. 2, NASA Global Modeling and Assimilation Office, https://gmao.gsfc.nasa.gov/pubs/docs/Lucchesi865.pdf (last access: 13 June 2024), 2015. a
Lumpe, J. D., Bevilacqua, R. M., Hoppel, K. W., and Randall, C. E.: POAM III retrieval algorithm and error analysis, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 107, ACH 5-1–ACH 5-32, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002137, 2002. a
McCormick, M. P., Steele, H. M., Hamill, P., Chu, W. P., and Swissler, T. J.: Polar Stratospheric Cloud Sightings by SAM II., J. Atmos. Sci., 39, 1387–1397, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1982)039<1387:PSCSBS>2.0.CO;2, 1982. a
McElroy, C. T., Nowlan, C. R., Drummond, J. R., Bernath, P. F., Barton, D. V., Dufour, D. G., Midwinter, C., Hall, R. B., Ogyu, A., Ullberg, A., Wardle, D. I., Kar, J., Zou, J., Nichitiu, F., Boone, C. D., Walker, K. A., and Rowlands, N.: The ACE-MAESTRO instrument on SCISAT: description, performance, and preliminary results, Appl. Opt., 46, 4341–4356, https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.46.004341, 2007. a
Munk, A., Åšcibior, A., Güneş Baydin, A., Stewart, A., Fernlund, G., Poursartip, A., and Wood, F.: Deep Probabilistic Surrogate Networks for Universal Simulator Approximation, in: International Conference on Probabilistic Programming (PROBPROG 2020), Cambridge, MA, United States, https://probprog.cc/ (last access: 13 June 2024), 2020. a
NASA Ozone & Atmospheric Composition: Data – Aerosols: Multi-mission aerosol measurements, https://ozoneaq.gsfc.nasa.gov/data/aerosols/#tab=image&prods=158&view=1, last access: 23 April 2025. a
NASA Worldview: https://worldview.earthdata.nasa.gov/, last access: 23 April 2025. a
Osborn, M. T., DeCoursey, R. J., Trepte, C. R., Winker, D. M., and Woods, D. C.: Evolution of the Pinatubo volcanic cloud over Hampton, Virginia, Geophys. Res. Lett., 22, 1101–1104, https://doi.org/10.1029/95GL00815, 1995. a
Peterson, D. A., Fromm, M. D., McRae, R. H. D., Campbell, J. R., Hyer, E. J., Taha, G., Camacho, C. P., Kablick, G. P., Schmidt, C. C., and DeLand, M. T.: Australia's Black Summer pyrocumulonimbus super outbreak reveals potential for increasingly extreme stratospheric smoke events, npj Climate and Atmospheric Science, 4, 38, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-021-00192-9, 2021. a
Poole, L. R. and McCormick, M. P.: Airborne lidar observations of Arctic polar stratospheric clouds: Indications of two distinct growth stages, Geophys. Res. Lett., 15, 21–23, https://doi.org/10.1029/GL015i001p00021, 1988. a
Rault, D. F. and Taha, G.: Validation of ozone profiles retrieved from Stratospheric Aerosol and Gas Experiment III limb scatter measurements, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007679, 2007. a
Santer, B. D., Bonfils, C., Painter, J. F., Zelinka, M. D., Mears, C., Solomon, S., Schmidt, G. A., Fyfe, J. C., Cole, J. N. S., Nazarenko, L., Taylor, K. E., and Wentz, F. J.: Volcanic contribution to decadal changes in tropospheric temperature, Nat. Geosci., 7, 185–189, https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2098, 2014. a
Schoeberl, M. R., Wang, Y., Ueyama, R., Dessler, A., Taha, G., and Yu, W.: The Estimated Climate Impact of the Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha'apai Eruption Plume, Geophys. Res. Lett., 50, e2023GL104634, https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL104634, 2023. a
Smith, L. N.: Cyclical Learning Rates for Training Neural Networks, arXiv [preprint], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1506.01186, 3 June 2015. a
Solomon, S., Daniel, J. S., Neely, R. R., Vernier, J.-P., Dutton, E. G., and Thomason, L. W.: The Persistently Variable “Backgroun” Stratospheric Aerosol Layer and Global Climate Change, Science, 333, 866–870, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1206027, 2011. a
Taha, G.: OMPS-NPP L2 LP Aerosol Extinction Vertical Profile swath daily 3slit V2, Greenbelt, MD, USA, Goddard Earth Sciences Data and Information Services Center (GES DISC) [data set], https://doi.org/10.5067/CX2B9NW6FI27, 2020. a
Taha, G., Rault, D. F., Loughman, R. P., Bourassa, A. E., and von Savigny, C.: SCIAMACHY stratospheric aerosol extinction profile retrieval using the OMPS/LP algorithm, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 4, 547–556, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-547-2011, 2011. a
Taha, G., Loughman, R., Colarco, P. R., Zhu, T., Thomason, L. W., and Jaross, G.: Tracking the 2022 Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha'apai Aerosol Cloud in the Upper and Middle Stratosphere Using Space-Based Observations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 49, e2022GL100091, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL100091, 2022. a, b, c, d, e, f
Thomason, L. W. and Taha, G.: SAGE III aerosol extinction measurements: Initial results, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL017317, 2003. a
Vernier, J.-P., Thomason, L. W., and Kar, J.: CALIPSO detection of an Asian tropopause aerosol layer, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL046614, 2011. a
von Savigny, C., Ernst, F., Rozanov, A., Hommel, R., Eichmann, K.-U., Rozanov, V., Burrows, J. P., and Thomason, L. W.: Improved stratospheric aerosol extinction profiles from SCIAMACHY: validation and sample results, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 5223–5235, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-5223-2015, 2015. a
Werner, F., Livesey, N. J., Millán, L. F., Read, W. G., Schwartz, M. J., Wagner, P. A., Daffer, W. H., Lambert, A., Tolstoff, S. N., and Santee, M. L.: Applying machine learning to improve the near-real-time products of the Aura Microwave Limb Sounder, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 2733–2751, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-2733-2023, 2023. a
Zawada, D. J., Rieger, L. A., Bourassa, A. E., and Degenstein, D. A.: Tomographic retrievals of ozone with the OMPS Limb Profiler: algorithm description and preliminary results, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 2375–2393, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-2375-2018, 2018. a
Short summary
The Ozone Mapping and Profiler Suite's Limb Profiler (OMPS LP) yields near-global coverage and information about how aerosols from volcanic eruptions and major wildfires is vertically distributed through the atmosphere. We developed a machine learning method to characterize aerosols using OMPS LP measurements about 60 times faster than the current approach.
The Ozone Mapping and Profiler Suite's Limb Profiler (OMPS LP) yields near-global coverage and...
