Articles | Volume 9, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-2669-2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-2669-2016
Research article
 | 
24 Jun 2016
Research article |  | 24 Jun 2016

Water vapor inhibits hydrogen sulfide detection in pulsed fluorescence sulfur monitors

Anders B. Bluhme, Jonas L. Ingemar, Carl Meusinger, and Matthew S. Johnson

Related authors

Opinion: A research roadmap for exploring atmospheric methane removal via iron salt aerosol
Katrine A. Gorham, Sam Abernethy, Tyler R. Jones, Peter Hess, Natalie M. Mahowald, Daphne Meidan, Matthew S. Johnson, Maarten M. J. W. van Herpen, Yangyang Xu, Alfonso Saiz-Lopez, Thomas Röckmann, Chloe A. Brashear, Erika Reinhardt, and David Mann
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 5659–5670, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-5659-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-5659-2024, 2024
Short summary
Photocatalytic chloride-to-chlorine conversion by ionic iron in aqueous aerosols: a combined experimental, quantum chemical, and chemical equilibrium model study
Marie K. Mikkelsen, Jesper B. Liisberg, Maarten M. J. W. van Herpen, Kurt V. Mikkelsen, and Matthew S. Johnson
Aerosol Research, 2, 31–47, https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-2-31-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-2-31-2024, 2024
Short summary
Are dense networks of low-cost nodes really useful for monitoring air pollution? A case study in Staffordshire
Louise Bøge Frederickson, Ruta Sidaraviciute, Johan Albrecht Schmidt, Ole Hertel, and Matthew Stanley Johnson
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 13949–13965, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13949-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13949-2022, 2022
Short summary
Photochemical method for removing methane interference for improved gas analysis
Merve Polat, Jesper Baldtzer Liisberg, Morten Krogsbøll, Thomas Blunier, and Matthew S. Johnson
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 8041–8067, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-8041-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-8041-2021, 2021
Short summary
Chemical and isotopic composition of secondary organic aerosol generated by α-pinene ozonolysis
Carl Meusinger, Ulrike Dusek, Stephanie M. King, Rupert Holzinger, Thomas Rosenørn, Peter Sperlich, Maxime Julien, Gerald S. Remaud, Merete Bilde, Thomas Röckmann, and Matthew S. Johnson
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 6373–6391, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-6373-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-6373-2017, 2017
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Gases | Technique: In Situ Measurement | Topic: Instruments and Platforms
Observing low-altitude features in ozone concentrations in a shoreline environment via uncrewed aerial systems
Josie K. Radtke, Benjamin N. Kies, Whitney A. Mottishaw, Sydney M. Zeuli, Aidan T. H. Voon, Kelly L. Koerber, Grant W. Petty, Michael P. Vermeuel, Timothy H. Bertram, Ankur R. Desai, Joseph P. Hupy, R. Bradley Pierce, Timothy J. Wagner, and Patricia A. Cleary
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 2833–2847, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2833-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2833-2024, 2024
Short summary
An integrated uncrewed aerial vehicle platform with sensing and sampling systems for the measurement of air pollutant concentrations
Chen-Wei Liang and Chang-Hung Shen
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 2671–2686, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2671-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2671-2024, 2024
Short summary
Design and evaluation of a low-cost sensor node for near-background methane measurement
Daniel Furuta, Bruce Wilson, Albert A. Presto, and Jiayu Li
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 2103–2121, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2103-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2103-2024, 2024
Short summary
Development of a Multichannel Organics In situ enviRonmental Analyzer (MOIRA) for mobile measurements of volatile organic compounds
Audrey J. Dang, Nathan M. Kreisberg, Tyler L. Cargill, Jhao-Hong Chen, Sydney Hornitschek, Remy Hutheesing, Jay R. Turner, and Brent J. Williams
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 2067–2087, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2067-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2067-2024, 2024
Short summary
Evaluation of Aeris mid-infrared absorption (MIRA), Picarro CRDS (cavity ring-down spectroscopy) G2307, and dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH)-based sampling for long-term formaldehyde monitoring efforts
Asher P. Mouat, Zelda A. Siegel, and Jennifer Kaiser
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 1979–1994, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1979-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1979-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Akdeniz, N., Janni, K. A., and Salnikov, I. A.: Biofilter Performance of Pine Nuggets and Lava Rock as Media, Bioresource Technol., 102, 4974–4980, 2011.
Akdeniz, N., Jacobson, L. D., Hetchler, B. P., Bereznicki, S. D., A. J. Heber, Koziel, J. A., Cai, L., Zhang, S., and Parker, D. B.: Odor and Odorous Chemical Emissions from Animal Buildings: Part 6. Odor Activity Value, Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 55, 2357–2368, 2012.
Blume, A. B., Ingemar, J. I., Meusinger, C., and Johnson, M. S.: Supplementary Information: Water vapor inhibits hydrogen sulfide detection in pulsed fluorescence sulfur monitors, http://hdl.handle.net/109.1.1/10151, 2016
Blunden, J. and Aneja, V. P.: Characterizing Ammonia and Hydrogen Sulfide Emissions from a Swine Waste Treatment Lagoon in North Carolina, Atmos. Environ., 42, 3277–3290, 2008.
Diehl, C. A., Bogan, B. W., Grant, R. H., and Boehm, M. T.: EPA Standard Operating Procedure G5: Measurement of Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S) with the Thermo Electron Corporation Model 450I Pulsed-Fluorescence Analyzer, Tech. rep., Agricultural and Biological Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA, 2006.
Download
Short summary
Hydrogen sulfide (H2S) is a malodorous, very poisonous, and flammable gas. It can be detected as SO2 using fluorescence after conversion using a hot catalyst. This technique is well established and as such also recommended by authorities such as the EPA. Our paper describes how at a relative humidity as low as 5 %, significant amounts of H2S pass the instrument undetected. At ambient levels of relative humidity, up to 1/3 of all H2S passes the instrument unnoticed.