Articles | Volume 15, issue 16
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4709-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4709-2022
Research article
 | 
19 Aug 2022
Research article |  | 19 Aug 2022

Balloon-borne aerosol–cloud interaction studies (BACIS): field campaigns to understand and quantify aerosol effects on clouds

Varaha Ravi Kiran, Madineni Venkat Ratnam, Masatomo Fujiwara, Herman Russchenberg, Frank G. Wienhold, Bomidi Lakshmi Madhavan, Mekalathur Roja Raman, Renju Nandan, Sivan Thankamani Akhil Raj, Alladi Hemanth Kumar, and Saginela Ravindra Babu

Related authors

Cloud vertical structure over a tropical station obtained using long-term high-resolution radiosonde measurements
Nelli Narendra Reddy, Madineni Venkat Ratnam, Ghouse Basha, and Varaha Ravikiran
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 11709–11727, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11709-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11709-2018, 2018
Short summary
Evaluation of black carbon emission inventories using a Lagrangian dispersion model – a case study over southern India
H. S. Gadhavi, K. Renuka, V. Ravi Kiran, A. Jayaraman, A. Stohl, Z. Klimont, and G. Beig
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 1447–1461, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1447-2015,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1447-2015, 2015
Short summary
Role of Coarse and Fine Mode Aerosols in MODIS AOD Retrieval: a case study over southern India
M. N. Sai Suman, H. Gadhavi, V. Ravi Kiran, A. Jayaraman, and S. V. B. Rao
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 907–917, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-907-2014,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-907-2014, 2014

Related subject area

Subject: Aerosols | Technique: In Situ Measurement | Topic: Validation and Intercomparisons
Seasonal effects in the application of the MOment MAtching (MOMA) remote calibration tool to outdoor PM2.5 air sensors
Lena Francesca Weissert, Geoff Stephen Henshaw, Andrea Lee Clements, Rachelle Monique Duvall, and Carry Croghan
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 3635–3645, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3635-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3635-2025, 2025
Short summary
A view on recent ice-nucleating particle intercomparison studies: why the uncertainty of the activation temperature matters
Jann Schrod and Heinz G. Bingemer
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 2591–2605, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-2591-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-2591-2025, 2025
Short summary
Performance of a low-cost optical particle counter (Alphasense OPC-N3) in estimating size-resolved dust emission flux using eddy covariance
Sylvain Dupont, Eric Lamaud, Mark R. Irvine, Jean-Marc Bonnefond, Adolfo González-Romero, Andrés Alastuey, Cristina González-Flórez, Xavier Querol, Konrad Kandler, Martina Klose, and Carlos Pérez García-Pando
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 2183–2200, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-2183-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-2183-2025, 2025
Short summary
Intercomparison of online and offline XRF spectrometers for determining the PM10 elemental composition of ambient aerosol
Laura Cadeo, Beatrice Biffi, Benjamin Chazeau, Cristina Colombi, Rosario Cosenza, Eleonora Cuccia, Manousos-Ioannis Manousakas, Kaspar R. Daellenbach, André S. H. Prévôt, and Roberta Vecchi
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-110,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-110, 2025
Short summary
Field intercomparison of ice nucleation measurements: the Fifth International Workshop on Ice Nucleation Phase 3 (FIN-03)
Paul J. DeMott, Jessica A. Mirrielees, Sarah Suda Petters, Daniel J. Cziczo, Markus D. Petters, Heinz G. Bingemer, Thomas C. J. Hill, Karl Froyd, Sarvesh Garimella, A. Gannet Hallar, Ezra J. T. Levin, Ian B. McCubbin, Anne E. Perring, Christopher N. Rapp, Thea Schiebel, Jann Schrod, Kaitlyn J. Suski, Daniel Weber, Martin J. Wolf, Maria Zawadowicz, Jake Zenker, Ottmar Möhler, and Sarah D. Brooks
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 639–672, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-639-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-639-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Abbott, T. H. and Cronin, T. W.: Aerosol invigoration of atmospheric convection through increases in humidity, Science, 371, 83–85, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abc5181, 2021. 
Albrecht, B. A.: Aerosols, Cloud Microphysics, and Fractional Cloudiness, Science, 245, 24–29, 1989. 
Brabec, M., Wienhold, F. G., Luo, B. P., Vömel, H., Immler, F., Steiner, P., Hausammann, E., Weers, U., and Peter, T.: Particle backscatter and relative humidity measured across cirrus clouds and comparison with microphysical cirrus modelling, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 9135–9148, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-9135-2012, 2012. 
Brunamonti, S., Jorge, T., Oelsner, P., Hanumanthu, S., Singh, B. B., Kumar, K. R., Sonbawne, S., Meier, S., Singh, D., Wienhold, F. G., Luo, B. P., Boettcher, M., Poltera, Y., Jauhiainen, H., Kayastha, R., Karmacharya, J., Dirksen, R., Naja, M., Rex, M., Fadnavis, S., and Peter, T.: Balloon-borne measurements of temperature, water vapor, ozone and aerosol backscatter on the southern slopes of the Himalayas during StratoClim 2016–2017, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 15937–15957, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-15937-2018, 2018. 
Brunamonti, S., Martucci, G., Romanens, G., Poltera, Y., Wienhold, F. G., Hervo, M., Haefele, A., and Navas-Guzmán, F.: Validation of aerosol backscatter profiles from Raman lidar and ceilometer using balloon-borne measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 2267–2285, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-2267-2021, 2021. 
Download
Short summary
We proposed and conducted the multi-instrumental BACIS (Balloon-borne Aerosol–Cloud Interaction Studies) field campaigns using balloon-borne in situ measurements and ground-based and space-borne remote sensing instruments. Aerosol-cloud interaction is quantified for liquid clouds by segregating aerosol and cloud information in a balloon profile. Overall, the observational approach proposed here demonstrated its capability for understanding the aerosol–cloud interaction process.
Share