Articles | Volume 15, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-701-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-701-2022
Research article
 | 
09 Feb 2022
Research article |  | 09 Feb 2022

Analysis of improvements in MOPITT observational coverage over Canada

Heba S. Marey, James R. Drummond, Dylan B. A. Jones, Helen Worden, Merritt N. Deeter, John Gille, and Debbie Mao

Related authors

Spatial and temporal variation in CO over Alberta using measurements from satellites, aircraft, and ground stations
H. S. Marey, Z. Hashisho, L. Fu, and J. Gille
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 3893–3908, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-3893-2015,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-3893-2015, 2015
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Clouds | Technique: Remote Sensing | Topic: Data Processing and Information Retrieval
Riming-dependent snowfall rate and ice water content retrievals for W-band cloud radar
Nina Maherndl, Alessandro Battaglia, Anton Kötsche, and Maximilian Maahn
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 3287–3304, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3287-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3287-2025, 2025
Short summary
Radiative closure assessment of retrieved cloud and aerosol properties for the EarthCARE mission: the ACMB-DF product
Howard W. Barker, Jason N. S. Cole, Najda Villefranque, Zhipeng Qu, Almudena Velázquez Blázquez, Carlos Domenech, Shannon L. Mason, and Robin J. Hogan
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 3095–3107, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3095-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3095-2025, 2025
Short summary
Satellite-based detection of deep-convective clouds: the sensitivity of infrared methods and implications for cloud climatology
Andrzej Z. Kotarba and Izabela Wojciechowska
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 2721–2738, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-2721-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-2721-2025, 2025
Short summary
Infrared radiometric image classification and segmentation of cloud structures using a deep-learning framework from ground-based infrared thermal camera observations
Kélian Sommer, Wassim Kabalan, and Romain Brunet
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 2083–2101, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-2083-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-2083-2025, 2025
Short summary
Algorithm for continual monitoring of fog based on geostationary satellite imagery
Babak Jahani, Steffen Karalus, Julia Fuchs, Tobias Zech, Marina Zara, and Jan Cermak
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 1927–1941, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1927-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1927-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Ackerman, S. A., Stabala, K. I., Menzel, W. P., Frey, R. A., Moeller, C., and Gumley, L. E.: Discriminating clear sky from clouds with MODIS, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 32141–32157, https://doi.org/10.1029/1998JD200032, 1998. 
Ackerman, S. A., Holz, R. E., Frey, R., Eloranta, E. W., Maddux, B., and McGill, M. J.: Cloud detection with MODIS: Part II. Validation, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 25, 1073–1086, 2008. 
Barré, J., Gaubert, B., Arellano, A. F., Worden, H. M., Edwards, D. P., Deeter, M. N., Anderson, J. L., Raeder, K., Collins, N., Tilmes, S., Clerbaux, C., Emmons, L. K., Pfister, G. G., Francis, G., and Hurtmans, D.: Assessing the impacts of assimilating IASI and MOPITT CO retrievals using CESM-CAM-chem and DART, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 10–501, 2015. 
Buchholz, R. R., Deeter, M. N., Worden, H. M., Gille, J., Edwards, D. P., Hannigan, J. W., Jones, N. B., Paton-Walsh, C., Griffith, D. W. T., Smale, D., Robinson, J., Strong, K., Conway, S., Sussmann, R., Hase, F., Blumenstock, T., Mahieu, E., and Langerock, B.: Validation of MOPITT carbon monoxide using ground-based Fourier transform infrared spectrometer data from NDACC, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 1927–1956, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-1927-2017, 2017. 
Download
Short summary
In this study, an analysis has been performed to understand the improvements in observational coverage over Canada in the new MOPITT V9 product. Temporal and spatial analysis of V9 indicates a general coverage gain of 15–20 % relative to V8, which varies regionally and seasonally; e.g., the number of successful MOPITT retrievals in V9 was doubled over Canada in winter. Also, comparison with the corresponding IASI instrument indicated generally good agreement, with about a 5–10 % positive bias.
Share