Articles | Volume 15, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-701-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-701-2022
Research article
 | 
09 Feb 2022
Research article |  | 09 Feb 2022

Analysis of improvements in MOPITT observational coverage over Canada

Heba S. Marey, James R. Drummond, Dylan B. A. Jones, Helen Worden, Merritt N. Deeter, John Gille, and Debbie Mao

Related authors

Spatial and temporal variation in CO over Alberta using measurements from satellites, aircraft, and ground stations
H. S. Marey, Z. Hashisho, L. Fu, and J. Gille
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 3893–3908, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-3893-2015,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-3893-2015, 2015
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Clouds | Technique: Remote Sensing | Topic: Data Processing and Information Retrieval
Retrieving cloud-base height and geometric thickness using the oxygen A-band channel of GCOM-C/SGLI
Takashi M. Nagao, Kentaroh Suzuki, and Makoto Kuji
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 773–792, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-773-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-773-2025, 2025
Short summary
Discriminating between “drizzle or rain” and sea salt aerosols in Cloudnet for measurements over the Barbados Cloud Observatory
Johanna Roschke, Jonas Witthuhn, Marcus Klingebiel, Moritz Haarig, Andreas Foth, Anton Kötsche, and Heike Kalesse-Los
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 487–508, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-487-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-487-2025, 2025
Short summary
Cancellation of cloud shadow effects in the absorbing aerosol index retrieval algorithm of TROPOMI
Victor J. H. Trees, Ping Wang, Piet Stammes, Lieuwe G. Tilstra, David P. Donovan, and A. Pier Siebesma
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 73–91, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-73-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-73-2025, 2025
Short summary
Optimal estimation of cloud properties from thermal infrared observations with a combination of deep learning and radiative transfer simulation
He Huang, Quan Wang, Chao Liu, and Chen Zhou
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 7129–7141, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-7129-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-7129-2024, 2024
Short summary
3D cloud masking across a broad swath using multi-angle polarimetry and deep learning
Sean R. Foley, Kirk D. Knobelspiesse, Andrew M. Sayer, Meng Gao, James Hays, and Judy Hoffman
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 7027–7047, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-7027-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-7027-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Ackerman, S. A., Stabala, K. I., Menzel, W. P., Frey, R. A., Moeller, C., and Gumley, L. E.: Discriminating clear sky from clouds with MODIS, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 32141–32157, https://doi.org/10.1029/1998JD200032, 1998. 
Ackerman, S. A., Holz, R. E., Frey, R., Eloranta, E. W., Maddux, B., and McGill, M. J.: Cloud detection with MODIS: Part II. Validation, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 25, 1073–1086, 2008. 
Barré, J., Gaubert, B., Arellano, A. F., Worden, H. M., Edwards, D. P., Deeter, M. N., Anderson, J. L., Raeder, K., Collins, N., Tilmes, S., Clerbaux, C., Emmons, L. K., Pfister, G. G., Francis, G., and Hurtmans, D.: Assessing the impacts of assimilating IASI and MOPITT CO retrievals using CESM-CAM-chem and DART, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 10–501, 2015. 
Buchholz, R. R., Deeter, M. N., Worden, H. M., Gille, J., Edwards, D. P., Hannigan, J. W., Jones, N. B., Paton-Walsh, C., Griffith, D. W. T., Smale, D., Robinson, J., Strong, K., Conway, S., Sussmann, R., Hase, F., Blumenstock, T., Mahieu, E., and Langerock, B.: Validation of MOPITT carbon monoxide using ground-based Fourier transform infrared spectrometer data from NDACC, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 1927–1956, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-1927-2017, 2017. 
Download
Short summary
In this study, an analysis has been performed to understand the improvements in observational coverage over Canada in the new MOPITT V9 product. Temporal and spatial analysis of V9 indicates a general coverage gain of 15–20 % relative to V8, which varies regionally and seasonally; e.g., the number of successful MOPITT retrievals in V9 was doubled over Canada in winter. Also, comparison with the corresponding IASI instrument indicated generally good agreement, with about a 5–10 % positive bias.
Share