Articles | Volume 15, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-701-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-701-2022
Research article
 | 
09 Feb 2022
Research article |  | 09 Feb 2022

Analysis of improvements in MOPITT observational coverage over Canada

Heba S. Marey, James R. Drummond, Dylan B. A. Jones, Helen Worden, Merritt N. Deeter, John Gille, and Debbie Mao

Related authors

Spatial and temporal variation in CO over Alberta using measurements from satellites, aircraft, and ground stations
H. S. Marey, Z. Hashisho, L. Fu, and J. Gille
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 3893–3908, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-3893-2015,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-3893-2015, 2015
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Clouds | Technique: Remote Sensing | Topic: Data Processing and Information Retrieval
3D cloud masking across a broad swath using multi-angle polarimetry and deep learning
Sean R. Foley, Kirk D. Knobelspiesse, Andrew M. Sayer, Meng Gao, James Hays, and Judy Hoffman
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 7027–7047, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-7027-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-7027-2024, 2024
Short summary
Dual-frequency (Ka-band and G-band) radar estimates of liquid water content profiles in shallow clouds
Juan M. Socuellamos, Raquel Rodriguez Monje, Matthew D. Lebsock, Ken B. Cooper, and Pavlos Kollias
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 6965–6981, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6965-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6965-2024, 2024
Short summary
Retrieval of cloud fraction and optical thickness of liquid water clouds over the ocean from multi-angle polarization observations
Claudia Emde, Veronika Pörtge, Mihail Manev, and Bernhard Mayer
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 6769–6789, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6769-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6769-2024, 2024
Short summary
Severe-hail detection with C-band dual-polarisation radars using convolutional neural networks
Vincent Forcadell, Clotilde Augros, Olivier Caumont, Kévin Dedieu, Maxandre Ouradou, Cloé David, Jordi Figueras i Ventura, Olivier Laurantin, and Hassan Al-Sakka
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 6707–6734, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6707-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6707-2024, 2024
Short summary
Retrieval of cloud fraction using machine learning algorithms based on FY-4A AGRI observations
Jinyi Xia and Li Guan
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 6697–6706, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6697-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6697-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Ackerman, S. A., Stabala, K. I., Menzel, W. P., Frey, R. A., Moeller, C., and Gumley, L. E.: Discriminating clear sky from clouds with MODIS, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 32141–32157, https://doi.org/10.1029/1998JD200032, 1998. 
Ackerman, S. A., Holz, R. E., Frey, R., Eloranta, E. W., Maddux, B., and McGill, M. J.: Cloud detection with MODIS: Part II. Validation, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 25, 1073–1086, 2008. 
Barré, J., Gaubert, B., Arellano, A. F., Worden, H. M., Edwards, D. P., Deeter, M. N., Anderson, J. L., Raeder, K., Collins, N., Tilmes, S., Clerbaux, C., Emmons, L. K., Pfister, G. G., Francis, G., and Hurtmans, D.: Assessing the impacts of assimilating IASI and MOPITT CO retrievals using CESM-CAM-chem and DART, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 10–501, 2015. 
Buchholz, R. R., Deeter, M. N., Worden, H. M., Gille, J., Edwards, D. P., Hannigan, J. W., Jones, N. B., Paton-Walsh, C., Griffith, D. W. T., Smale, D., Robinson, J., Strong, K., Conway, S., Sussmann, R., Hase, F., Blumenstock, T., Mahieu, E., and Langerock, B.: Validation of MOPITT carbon monoxide using ground-based Fourier transform infrared spectrometer data from NDACC, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 1927–1956, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-1927-2017, 2017. 
Download
Short summary
In this study, an analysis has been performed to understand the improvements in observational coverage over Canada in the new MOPITT V9 product. Temporal and spatial analysis of V9 indicates a general coverage gain of 15–20 % relative to V8, which varies regionally and seasonally; e.g., the number of successful MOPITT retrievals in V9 was doubled over Canada in winter. Also, comparison with the corresponding IASI instrument indicated generally good agreement, with about a 5–10 % positive bias.