Articles | Volume 11, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1833-2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1833-2018
Research article
 | 
29 Mar 2018
Research article |  | 29 Mar 2018

COCAP: a carbon dioxide analyser for small unmanned aircraft systems

Martin Kunz, Jost V. Lavric, Christoph Gerbig, Pieter Tans, Don Neff, Christine Hummelgård, Hans Martin, Henrik Rödjegård, Burkhard Wrenger, and Martin Heimann

Related authors

Surface flux estimates derived from UAS-based mole fraction measurements by means of a nocturnal boundary layer budget approach
Martin Kunz, Jost V. Lavric, Rainer Gasche, Christoph Gerbig, Richard H. Grant, Frank-Thomas Koch, Marcus Schumacher, Benjamin Wolf, and Matthias Zeeman
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 1671–1692, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1671-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1671-2020, 2020
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Gases | Technique: In Situ Measurement | Topic: Instruments and Platforms
Advances in an OH reactivity instrument for airborne field measurements
Hendrik Fuchs, Aaron Stainsby, Florian Berg, René Dubus, Michelle Färber, Andreas Hofzumahaus, Frank Holland, Kelvin H. Bates, Steven S. Brown, Matthew M. Coggon, Glenn S. Diskin, Georgios I. Gkatzelis, Christopher M. Jernigan, Jeff Peischl, Michael A. Robinson, Andrew W. Rollins, Nell B. Schafer, Rebecca H. Schwantes, Chelsea E. Stockwell, Patrick R. Veres, Carsten Warneke, Eleanor M. Waxman, Lu Xu, Kristen Zuraski, Andreas Wahner, and Anna Novelli
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 881–895, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-881-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-881-2025, 2025
Short summary
The ASK-16 motorized glider: an airborne eddy covariance platform to measure turbulence, energy, and matter fluxes
Inge Wiekenkamp, Anna Katharina Lehmann, Alexander Bütow, Jörg Hartmann, Stefan Metzger, Thomas Ruhtz, Christian Wille, Mathias Zöllner, and Torsten Sachs
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 749–772, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-749-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-749-2025, 2025
Short summary
Development of a Peltier-based chilled-mirror hygrometer, SKYDEW, for tropospheric and lower-stratospheric water vapor measurements
Takuji Sugidachi, Masatomo Fujiwara, Kensaku Shimizu, Shin-Ya Ogino, Junko Suzuki, and Ruud J. Dirksen
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 509–531, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-509-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-509-2025, 2025
Short summary
Deployment and evaluation of an NH4+∕ H3O+ reagent ion switching chemical ionization mass spectrometer for the detection of reduced and oxygenated gas-phase organic compounds
Cort L. Zang and Megan D. Willis
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 17–35, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-17-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-17-2025, 2025
Short summary
An economical tunable diode laser spectrometer for fast-response measurements of water vapor in the atmospheric boundary layer
Emily D. Wein, Lars E. Kalnajs, and Darin W. Toohey
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 7097–7107, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-7097-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-7097-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Allan, D. W.: Should the Classical Variance Be Used as a Basic Measure in Standards Metrology?, IEEE T. Instrum. Meas., IM-36, 646–654, https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.1987.6312761, 1987.
Arzoumanian, E., Bastos, A., Gaynullin, B., Martin, H., Hjern, L., Laurent, O., and Vogel, F. R.: An Evaluation of Commercial NDIR Sensors for a Potential Use in Future Urban GHG Monitoring Systems, abstract B33H-0705 presented at 2016 Fall Meeting, AGU, San Francisco, Calif., 12–16 December 2016, available at: https://agu.confex.com/agu/fm16/meetingapp.cgi/Paper/141542 (last access: March 2017), 2016.
Berman, E. S. F., Fladeland, M., Liem, J., Kolyer, R., and Gupta, M.: Greenhouse Gas Analyzer for Measurements of Carbon Dioxide, Methane, and Water Vapor Aboard an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle, Sensor. Actuat. B-Chem., 169, 128–135, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2012.04.036, 2012.
Brady, J. M., Stokes, M. D., Bonnardel, J., and Bertram, T. H.: Characterization of a Quadrotor Unmanned Aircraft System for Aerosol-Particle-Concentration Measurements, Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 1376–1383, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b05320, 2016.
Ciais, P., Rayner, P., Chevallier, F., Bousquet, P., Logan, M., Peylin, P., and Ramonet, M.: Atmospheric Inversions for Estimating CO2 Fluxes: Methods and Perspectives, Clim. Change, 103, 69–92, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-010-9909-3, 2010.
Download
Short summary
Unmanned aircraft could provide a cost-effective way to close gaps in the observation of the carbon cycle, provided that small yet accurate analysers are available. We have developed a COmpact Carbon dioxide analyser for Airborne Platforms (COCAP). During validation of its CO2 measurements in simulated and real flights we found a measurement error of 1.2 μmol mol−1 or better with no indication of bias. COCAP is a self-contained package that has proven well suited for operation on board UASs.
Share