Articles | Volume 11, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-3661-2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-3661-2018
Research article
 | 
26 Jun 2018
Research article |  | 26 Jun 2018

Homogenizing and estimating the uncertainty in NOAA's long-term vertical ozone profile records measured with the electrochemical concentration cell ozonesonde

Chance W. Sterling, Bryan J. Johnson, Samuel J. Oltmans, Herman G. J. Smit, Allen F. Jordan, Patrick D. Cullis, Emrys G. Hall, Anne M. Thompson, and Jacquelyn C. Witte

Related authors

South Pole Station ozonesondes: variability and trends in the springtime Antarctic ozone hole 1986–2021
Bryan J. Johnson, Patrick Cullis, John Booth, Irina Petropavlovskikh, Glen McConville, Birgit Hassler, Gary A. Morris, Chance Sterling, and Samuel Oltmans
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 3133–3146, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-3133-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-3133-2023, 2023
Short summary
The Fires, Asian, and Stratospheric Transport–Las Vegas Ozone Study (FAST-LVOS)
Andrew O. Langford, Christoph J. Senff, Raul J. Alvarez II, Ken C. Aikin, Sunil Baidar, Timothy A. Bonin, W. Alan Brewer, Jerome Brioude, Steven S. Brown, Joel D. Burley, Dani J. Caputi, Stephen A. Conley, Patrick D. Cullis, Zachary C. J. Decker, Stéphanie Evan, Guillaume Kirgis, Meiyun Lin, Mariusz Pagowski, Jeff Peischl, Irina Petropavlovskikh, R. Bradley Pierce, Thomas B. Ryerson, Scott P. Sandberg, Chance W. Sterling, Ann M. Weickmann, and Li Zhang
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 1707–1737, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-1707-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-1707-2022, 2022
Short summary
Characterizing sources of high surface ozone events in the southwestern US with intensive field measurements and two global models
Li Zhang, Meiyun Lin, Andrew O. Langford, Larry W. Horowitz, Christoph J. Senff, Elizabeth Klovenski, Yuxuan Wang, Raul J. Alvarez II, Irina Petropavlovskikh, Patrick Cullis, Chance W. Sterling, Jeff Peischl, Thomas B. Ryerson, Steven S. Brown, Zachary C. J. Decker, Guillaume Kirgis, and Stephen Conley
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 10379–10400, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-10379-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-10379-2020, 2020
Short summary
Variations in the vertical profile of ozone at four high-latitude Arctic sites from 2005 to 2017
Shima Bahramvash Shams, Von P. Walden, Irina Petropavlovskikh, David Tarasick, Rigel Kivi, Samuel Oltmans, Bryan Johnson, Patrick Cullis, Chance W. Sterling, Laura Thölix, and Quentin Errera
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 9733–9751, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-9733-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-9733-2019, 2019
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Gases | Technique: In Situ Measurement | Topic: Instruments and Platforms
An overview of outdoor low-cost gas-phase air quality sensor deployments: current efforts, trends, and limitations
Kristen Okorn and Laura T. Iraci
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 6425–6457, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6425-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6425-2024, 2024
Short summary
Multiphysical description of atmospheric pressure interface chemical ionisation in MION2 and Eisele type inlets
Henning Finkenzeller, Jyri Mikkilä, Cecilia Righi, Paxton Juuti, Mikko Sipilä, Matti Rissanen, Douglas Worsnop, Aleksei Shcherbinin, Nina Sarnela, and Juha Kangasluoma
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 5989–6001, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5989-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5989-2024, 2024
Short summary
A portable nitrogen dioxide instrument using cavity-enhanced absorption spectroscopy
Steven A. Bailey, Reem A. Hannun, Andrew K. Swanson, and Thomas F. Hanisco
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 5903–5910, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5903-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5903-2024, 2024
Short summary
Development and deployment of a mid-cost CO2 sensor monitoring network to support atmospheric inverse modeling for quantifying urban CO2 emissions in Paris
Jinghui Lian, Olivier Laurent, Mali Chariot, Luc Lienhardt, Michel Ramonet, Hervé Utard, Thomas Lauvaux, François-Marie Bréon, Grégoire Broquet, Karina Cucchi, Laurent Millair, and Philippe Ciais
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 5821–5839, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5821-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5821-2024, 2024
Short summary
UAV-based in situ measurements of CO2 and CH4 fluxes over complex natural ecosystems
Abdullah Bolek, Martin Heimann, and Mathias Göckede
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 5619–5636, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5619-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5619-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Bartel, A. W. and Temple, J. W.: Ozone in Los Angeles and Surrounding Areas, Rubber Chem. Technol., 25, 945–955, https://doi.org/10.1021/ie50508a043, 1952. 
Basher, R. E.: Review of the Dobson Spectrophotometer and Its Accuracy, Global Ozone Research and Monitoring Projects, 13, 387–391, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5313-0_78, 1985. 
Birdsall, C. M., Jenkins, A. C., and Spadinger, E.: Iodometric Determination of Ozone, Anal. Chem., 24, 662–664, https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60064a013, 1952. 
Bojkov, R. D.: Surface Ozone during the 2nd-half of the 19th-Century, J. Clim. Appl. Meteorol., 25, 343–352, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1986)025<0343:sodtsh>2.0.co;2, 1986. 
Boyd, A. W., Willis, C., and Cyr, R.: New determination of stoichiometry of the iodometric method for ozone analysis at pH 7.0, Anal. Chem., 42, 670–672, 1970. 
Download
Short summary
The electrochemical concentration cell ozonesonde is a balloon-borne instrument that measures ozone to an altitude of ~30 km. This work summarizes the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's 50+ year, eight-site ozonesonde network history, the processing techniques utilized to account for instrumental changes, and the uncertainty of the measurement. The ozonesonde measurements were compared to satellite measurements and agreed well. This important data set is more useful and robust.