Articles | Volume 12, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-1207-2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-1207-2019
Research article
 | 
26 Feb 2019
Research article |  | 26 Feb 2019

Evaluation of cation exchange membrane performance under exposure to high Hg0 and HgBr2 concentrations

Matthieu B. Miller, Sarrah M. Dunham-Cheatham, Mae Sexauer Gustin, and Grant C. Edwards

Related authors

Reactive mercury flux measurements using cation exchange membranes
Matthieu B. Miller, Mae S. Gustin, and Grant C. Edwards
Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2018-360,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2018-360, 2018
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Aggregated particles caused by instrument artifact
Ashley M. Pierce, S. Marcela Loría-Salazar, W. Patrick Arnott, Grant C. Edwards, Matthieu B. Miller, and Mae S. Gustin
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 2225–2237, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-2225-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-2225-2018, 2018
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Gases | Technique: Laboratory Measurement | Topic: Validation and Intercomparisons
Calibration of hydroxyacetonitrile (HOCH2CN) and methyl isocyanate (CH3NCO) isomers using I chemical ionization mass spectrometry (CIMS)
Zachary Finewax, Aparajeo Chattopadhyay, J. Andrew Neuman, James M. Roberts, and James B. Burkholder
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 6865–6873, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6865-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6865-2024, 2024
Short summary
Development of accurate and stable primary standard gas mixtures for global atmospheric acetonitrile monitoring: evaluating adsorption loss and long-term stability
Baigali Tsogt, Ji Hwan Kang, Seok-Young Oh, and Sangil Lee
Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2024-132,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2024-132, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for AMT
Short summary
A nitrate ion chemical-ionization atmospheric-pressure-interface time-of-flight mass spectrometer (NO3 ToFCIMS) sensitivity study
Stéphanie Alage, Vincent Michoud, Sergio Harb, Bénédicte Picquet-Varrault, Manuela Cirtog, Avinash Kumar, Matti Rissanen, and Christopher Cantrell
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 4709–4724, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4709-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4709-2024, 2024
Short summary
Two new 222Rn emanation sources – a comparison study
Tanita J. Ballé, Stefan Röttger, Florian Mertes, Anja Honig, Petr Kovar, Petr P. S. Otáhal, and Annette Röttger
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 2055–2065, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2055-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2055-2024, 2024
Short summary
A traceable and continuous flow calibration method for gaseous elemental mercury at low ambient concentrations
Teodor D. Andron, Warren T. Corns, Igor Živković, Saeed Waqar Ali, Sreekanth Vijayakumaran Nair, and Milena Horvat
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 1217–1228, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1217-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1217-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Bloom, N., Prestbo, E., and VonderGeest, E.: Determination of atmospheric gaseous Hg(II) at the pg/m 3 level by collection onto cation exchange membranes, followed by dual amalgamation/cold vapor atomic fluorescence spectrometry, 4th International Conference on Mercury as a Global Pollutant, Hamburg, 1996. 
Dumarey, R., Dams, R., and Hoste, J.: Comparison of the collection and desorption efficiency of activated charcoal, silver, and gold for the determination of vapor phase atmospheric mercury, Anal. Chem., 57, 2638–2643, https://doi.org/10.1021/ac00290a047, 1985. 
Gustin, M. S., Huang, J., Miller, M. B., Peterson, C., Jaffe, D. A., Ambrose, J., Finley, B. D., Lyman, S. N., Call, K., Talbot, R., Feddersen, D., Mao, H., and Lindberg, S. E.: Do We Understand What the Mercury Speciation Instruments Are Actually Measuring? Results of RAMIX, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 7295–7306, https://doi.org/10.1021/es3039104, 2013. 
Gustin, M. S., Amos, H. M., Huang, J., Miller, M. B., and Heidecorn, K.: Measuring and modeling mercury in the atmosphere: a critical review, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 5697–5713, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5697-2015, 2015. 
Download
Short summary
This study was undertaken to demonstrate that a cation exchange membrane (CEM) material used for sampling reactive mercury (RM) does not possess an inherent tendency to collect gaseous elemental mercury (GEM). Using a custom-built mercury vapor permeation system, we found that the CEM material has a very small GEM uptake of approximately 0.004 %, too small to create a significant artifact. We also found that a representative RM compound was collected by the CEM material with high efficiency.