Articles | Volume 14, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-6619-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-6619-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Behavior of KCl sorbent traps and KCl trapping solutions used for atmospheric mercury speciation: stability and specificity
Jan Gačnik
Jožef Stefan International Postgraduate School, Jamova Cesta 39, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
Department of Environmental Sciences, Jožef Stefan Institute,
Jamova Cesta 39, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
Igor Živković
Department of Environmental Sciences, Jožef Stefan Institute,
Jamova Cesta 39, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
Sergio Ribeiro Guevara
Laboratorio de Análisis por Activación Neutrónica, Centro Atómico Bariloche, Av. Bustillo km 9.5, 8400 Bariloche, Argentina
Radojko Jaćimović
Department of Environmental Sciences, Jožef Stefan Institute,
Jamova Cesta 39, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
Jože Kotnik
Jožef Stefan International Postgraduate School, Jamova Cesta 39, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
Department of Environmental Sciences, Jožef Stefan Institute,
Jamova Cesta 39, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
Gianmarco De Feo
P S Analytical Ltd, Arthur House, Main Road, Orpington, Kent, BR5 3HP, UK
Matthew A. Dexter
P S Analytical Ltd, Arthur House, Main Road, Orpington, Kent, BR5 3HP, UK
Warren T. Corns
P S Analytical Ltd, Arthur House, Main Road, Orpington, Kent, BR5 3HP, UK
Milena Horvat
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Jožef Stefan International Postgraduate School, Jamova Cesta 39, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
Department of Environmental Sciences, Jožef Stefan Institute,
Jamova Cesta 39, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
Related authors
Sreekanth Vijayakumaran Nair, Saeed Waqar Ali, Jan Gačnik, Igor Živković, Teodor-Daniel Andron, Oleg Travnikov, and Milena Horvat
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2451, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2451, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (AMT).
Short summary
Short summary
We studied how well two widely used methods capture oxidized mercury from the air, a key step for its quantification. Our research showed that denuders can lose a significant amount of mercury during sampling, leading to underestimation, while cation exchange membranes were more reliable in retaining mercury. These results highlight the need for improved measurement techniques to ensure accurate data, which is essential for evaluating mercury pollution and shaping environmental policy.
Iris de Krom, Wijnand Bavius, Ruben Ziel, Elizabeth A. McGhee, Richard J. C. Brown, Igor Živković, Jan Gačnik, Vesna Fajon, Jože Kotnik, Milena Horvat, and Hugo Ent
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 2317–2326, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-2317-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-2317-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
To demonstrate the robustness and comparability of the novel primary mercury gas standard, the results of comparisons are presented with current calibration methods maintained, using the bell jar in combination with the Dumarey equation or NIST liquid standard reference material. The results show that the primary standard and the NIST reference material are comparable, whereas a difference of −8 % exists between results traceable to the primary standard and the Dumarey equation.
Sreekanth Vijayakumaran Nair, Saeed Waqar Ali, Jan Gačnik, Igor Živković, Teodor-Daniel Andron, Oleg Travnikov, and Milena Horvat
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2451, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2451, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (AMT).
Short summary
Short summary
We studied how well two widely used methods capture oxidized mercury from the air, a key step for its quantification. Our research showed that denuders can lose a significant amount of mercury during sampling, leading to underestimation, while cation exchange membranes were more reliable in retaining mercury. These results highlight the need for improved measurement techniques to ensure accurate data, which is essential for evaluating mercury pollution and shaping environmental policy.
Teodor D. Andron, Warren T. Corns, Igor Živković, Saeed Waqar Ali, Sreekanth Vijayakumaran Nair, and Milena Horvat
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 1217–1228, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1217-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1217-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Atmospheric mercury monitoring is an important activity in order to model the global trajectory of this toxic element and to assess if certain areas are polluted or not in accordance to global guidelines. One of the analysers tested in this work is globally used in this regard due to its practicality compared with other devices. Because it is only calibrated by the manufacturer at very high concentrations, we wanted to see how it performs at ambient mercury concentrations.
Iris de Krom, Wijnand Bavius, Ruben Ziel, Elizabeth A. McGhee, Richard J. C. Brown, Igor Živković, Jan Gačnik, Vesna Fajon, Jože Kotnik, Milena Horvat, and Hugo Ent
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 2317–2326, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-2317-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-2317-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
To demonstrate the robustness and comparability of the novel primary mercury gas standard, the results of comparisons are presented with current calibration methods maintained, using the bell jar in combination with the Dumarey equation or NIST liquid standard reference material. The results show that the primary standard and the NIST reference material are comparable, whereas a difference of −8 % exists between results traceable to the primary standard and the Dumarey equation.
Cited articles
Andersson, M. E., Gårdfeldt, K., Wängberg, I., and Strömberg,
D.: Determination of Henry's law constant for elemental mercury,
Chemosphere, 73, 587–592, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.05.067, 2008.
ASTM International: ASTM D6784-16, Standard Test Method for Elemental,
Oxidized, Particle-Bound and Total Mercury in Flue Gas Generated from
Coal-Fired Stationary Sources (Ontario Hydro Method), available at: http://www.astm.org (last access: 15 April 2021), 2016.
Bu, X., Zhang, H., Lv, G., Lin, H., Chen, L., Yin, X., Shen, G., Yuan, W.,
Zhang, W., Wang, X., and Tong, Y.: Comparison of Reactive Gaseous Mercury
Collection by Different Sampling Methods in a Laboratory Test and Field
Monitoring, Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett., 5, 600–607,
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.8b00439, 2018.
Dumarey, R.: Comparison of the collection and desorption efficiency of
activated charcoal, silver, and gold for the determination of vapor-phase
atmospheric mercury, Anal. Chem., 57, 2644–2646, 1985.
Dumarey, R., Brown, R. J. C., Corns, W. T., Brown, A. S., and Stockwell, P.
B.: Elemental mercury vapour in air: The origins and validation of the
“Dumarey equation” describing the mass concentration at saturation,
Accredit. Qual. Assur., 15, 409–414,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-010-0645-1, 2010.
Dunham-Cheatham, S. M., Lyman, S., and Gustin, M. S.: Evaluation of sorption
surface materials for reactive mercury compounds, Atmos. Environ., 242,
117836, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117836, 2020.
Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI): Guidelines for Speciated Mercury
Field Measurements, Palo Alto, California, USA, 2015.
Gačnik, J., Živković, I., Guevara, S. R., Jaćimović, R.,
Kotnik, J., and Horvat, M.: Validating an evaporative calibrator for gaseous
oxidized mercury, Sensors, 21, 2501, https://doi.org/10.3390/s21072501, 2021.
Gustin, M. and Jaffe, D.: Reducing the uncertainty in measurement and
understanding of mercury in the atmosphere, Environ. Sci. Technol., 44,
2222–2227, https://doi.org/10.1021/es902736k, 2010.
Gustin, M. S., Huang, J., Miller, M. B., Peterson, C., Jaffe, D. A.,
Ambrose, J., Finley, B. D., Lyman, S. N., Call, K., Talbot, R., Feddersen,
D., Mao, H., and Lindberg, S. E.: Do we understand what the mercury
speciation instruments are actually measuring? Results of RAMIX, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 47, 7295–7306, https://doi.org/10.1021/es3039104, 2013.
Gustin, M. S., Dunham-Cheatham, S. M., and Zhang, L.: Comparison of 4 Methos
for Measurement of Reactive, Gaseous Oxiize, an Particulate Bound Mercury,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 53, 14489–14495,
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b04648, 2019.
Gustin, M. S., Dunham-Cheatham, S. M., Zhang, L., Lyman, S., Choma, N., and
Castro, M.: Use of Membranes and Detailed HYSPLIT Analyses to Understand
Atmospheric Particulate, Gaseous Oxidized, and Reactive Mercury Chemistry,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 55, 893–901,
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c07876, 2021.
Huang, J. and Gustin, M. S.: Uncertainties of gaseous oxidized mercury
measurements using KCl-coated denuders, cation-exchange membranes, and nylon
membranes: Humidity influences, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49, 6102–6108,
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b00098, 2015.
Huang, J., Miller, M. B., Weiss-Penzias, P., and Gustin, M. S.: Comparison
of gaseous oxidized Hg measured by KCl-coated denuders, and nylon and cation
exchange membranes, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 7307–7316,
https://doi.org/10.1021/es4012349, 2013.
International Organization for Standardization: ISO 8573-1:2010 Compressed
air – Part 1: Contaminants and purity classes, available at:
https://www.iso.org/standard/46418.html (last access: 28 March 2021), 2010.
Jaffe, D. A., Lyman, S., Amos, H. M., Gustin, M. S., Huang, J., Selin, N.
E., Levin, L., Ter Schure, A., Mason, R. P., Talbot, R., Rutter, A., Finley,
B., Jaeglé, L., Shah, V., McClure, C., Ambrose, J., Gratz, L., Lindberg,
S., Weiss-Penzias, P., Sheu, G. R., Feddersen, D., Horvat, M., Dastoor, A.,
Hynes, A. J., Mao, H., Sonke, J. E., Slemr, F., Fisher, J. A., Ebinghaus,
R., Zhang, Y., and Edwards, G.: Progress on understanding atmospheric
mercury hampered by uncertain measurements, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48,
7204–7206, https://doi.org/10.1021/es5026432, 2014.
Koron, N., Bratkič, A., Ribeiro Guevara, S., Vahčič, M., and
Horvat, M.: Mercury methylation and reduction potentials in marine water: An
improved methodology using 197Hg radiotracer, Appl. Radiat. Isot., 70,
46–50, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2011.07.015, 2012.
Lide, D. R.: CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 88th edn., edited by:
Lide, D. R., Taylor & Francis, Bosa Roca, USA, 2007.
Lyman, S., Jones, C., O'Neil, T., Allen, T., Miller, M., Gustin, M. S.,
Pierce, A. M., Luke, W., Ren, X., and Kelley, P.: Automated calibration of
atmospheric oxidized mercury measurements, Environ. Sci. Technol., 50,
12911–12927, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b04211, 2016.
Lyman, S. N., Jaffe, D. A., and Gustin, M. S.: Release of mercury halides from KCl denuders in the presence of ozone, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 8197–8204, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-8197-2010, 2010.
McClure, C. D., Jaffe, D. A., and Edgerton, E. S.: Evaluation of the KCl
denuder method for gaseous oxidized mercury using HgBr2 at an
in-service AMNet site, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48, 11437–11444,
https://doi.org/10.1021/es502545k, 2014.
Prestbo, E. M. and Bloom, N. S.: Mercury Speciation Adsorption (Mesa) Method for Combustion Flue Gas: Methodology, Artifacts, Intercomparison, and Atmospheric Implications, Water Air Soil Pollut., 80, 145–158, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01189663, 1995.
Ribeiro Guevara, S. and Horvat, M.: Stability and behaviour of low level
spiked inorganic mercury in natural water samples, Anal. Methods, 5,
1996–2006, https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ay26496c, 2013.
Ribeiro Guevara, S., Jereb, V., Arribére, M. A., Pérez Catán,
S., and Horvat, M.: The production and use of 197Hg g radiotracer
to study mercury transformation processes in environmental matrices, RMZ
Mater. Geoenvironment J., 51, 1928–1931, 2004.
Ribeiro Guevara, S., Žižek, S., Repinc, U., Catán, S. P.,
Jaćimović, R., and Horvat, M.: Novel methodology for the study of
mercury methylation and reduction in sediments and water using 197Hg
radiotracer, Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 387, 2185–2197,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-006-1040-y, 2007.
Saxholm, S., Rajamäki, T., Hämäläinen, J., and Hildén,
P.: Dynamic calibration method for reactive gases, Meas. Sci. Technol., 31, 034001, https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/ab4d68, 2020.
Shafawi, A., Ebdon, L., Foulkes, M., Stockwell, P., and Corns, W.:
Determination of total mercury in hydrocarbons and natural gas condensate by
atomic fluorescence spectrometry, Analyst, 124, 185–189,
https://doi.org/10.1039/a809679a, 1999.
United Nations Environment Programme: Global mercury assessment 2018, available at: https://www.unep.org/resources/publication/global-mercury-assessment-2018 (last access: 9 April 2021), 2019.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA): IO Compendium Method IO-5: Compendium of Methods for the Determination of Inorganic Compounds in Ambient Air: Sampling and Analysis for Vapor and Particle Phase Mercury in Ambient Air Utilizing Cold Vapor Atomic Fluorescence Spectrometry (CVAFS), available at: https://www.epa.gov/esam/epa-io-inorganic-compendium-method-io-5-sampling-and-analysis
-vapor-and-particle-phase-mercury (last access: 15 February 2021), 1999.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA): Method 30A – Determination Of Total Vapor Phase Mercury Emissions From Stationary Sources (Instrumental Analyzer Procedure), available at: https://www.epa.gov/emc/method-30a-mercury-instrumental-procedure (last access: 20 February 2021), 2017.
Wang, S., Holsen, T. M., Huang, J., and Han, Y.-J.: Evaluation of various methods to measure particulate bound mercury and associated artifacts, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 13, 8585–8614, https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-13-8585-2013, 2013.
Zhang, H., Fu, X., Wang, X., and Feng, X.: Measurements and Distribution of
Atmospheric Particulate-Bound Mercury: A Review, Bull. Environ. Contam.
Toxicol., 103, 48–54, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-019-02663-5, 2019.
Download
The requested paper has a corresponding corrigendum published. Please read the corrigendum first before downloading the article.
- Article
(418 KB) - Full-text XML
- Corrigendum
-
Supplement
(305 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Short summary
Atmospheric mercury and knowledge of its transformations and processes are of great importance for lowering its anthropogenic emissions. To ensure that, it is crucial to have a tested and validated measurement procedure. Since this is not always the case, we performed experiments that provided insight into commonly used atmospheric mercury sampling methods. The results showed that some sampling methods are unsuitable, and some are useful if we consider the results obtained from this work.
Atmospheric mercury and knowledge of its transformations and processes are of great importance...