Articles | Volume 16, issue 13
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-3421-2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-3421-2023
Research article
 | 
06 Jul 2023
Research article |  | 06 Jul 2023

Controlled-release testing of the static chamber methodology for direct measurements of methane emissions

James P. Williams, Khalil El Hachem, and Mary Kang

Related authors

Constructing a measurement-based spatially explicit inventory of US oil and gas methane emissions (2021)
Mark Omara, Anthony Himmelberger, Katlyn MacKay, James P. Williams, Joshua Benmergui, Maryann Sargent, Steven C. Wofsy, and Ritesh Gautam
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 3973–3991, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-3973-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-3973-2024, 2024
Short summary
Small emission sources disproportionately account for a large majority of total methane emissions from the US oil and gas sector
James P. Williams, Mark Omara, Anthony Himmelberger, Daniel Zavala-Araiza, Katlyn MacKay, Joshua Benmergui, Maryann Sargent, Steven C. Wofsy, Steven P. Hamburg, and Ritesh Gautam
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1402,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1402, 2024
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Gases | Technique: Laboratory Measurement | Topic: Validation and Intercomparisons
A nitrate ion chemical-ionization atmospheric-pressure-interface time-of-flight mass spectrometer (NO3 ToFCIMS) sensitivity study
Stéphanie Alage, Vincent Michoud, Sergio Harb, Bénédicte Picquet-Varrault, Manuela Cirtog, Avinash Kumar, Matti Rissanen, and Christopher Cantrell
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 4709–4724, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4709-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4709-2024, 2024
Short summary
Two new 222Rn emanation sources – a comparison study
Tanita J. Ballé, Stefan Röttger, Florian Mertes, Anja Honig, Petr Kovar, Petr P. S. Otáhal, and Annette Röttger
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 2055–2065, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2055-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2055-2024, 2024
Short summary
A traceable and continuous flow calibration method for gaseous elemental mercury at low ambient concentrations
Teodor D. Andron, Warren T. Corns, Igor Živković, Saeed Waqar Ali, Sreekanth Vijayakumaran Nair, and Milena Horvat
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 1217–1228, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1217-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1217-2024, 2024
Short summary
Measurements of atmospheric C10–C15 biogenic volatile organic compounds (BVOCs) with sorbent tubes
Heidi Hellén, Toni Tykkä, Simon Schallhart, Evdokia Stratigou, Thérèse Salameh, and Maitane Iturrate-Garcia
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 315–333, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-315-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-315-2024, 2024
Short summary
Results of a long-term international comparison of greenhouse gas and isotope measurements at the Global Atmosphere Watch (GAW) Observatory in Alert, Nunavut, Canada
Douglas E. J. Worthy, Michele K. Rauh, Lin Huang, Felix R. Vogel, Alina Chivulescu, Kenneth A. Masarie, Ray L. Langenfelds, Paul B. Krummel, Colin E. Allison, Andrew M. Crotwell, Monica Madronich, Gabrielle Pétron, Ingeborg Levin, Samuel Hammer, Sylvia Michel, Michel Ramonet, Martina Schmidt, Armin Jordan, Heiko Moossen, Michael Rothe, Ralph Keeling, and Eric J. Morgan
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 5909–5935, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-5909-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-5909-2023, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

Albertson, J. D., Harvey, T., Foderaro, G., Zhu, P., Zhou, X., Ferrari, S., Amin, M. S., Modrak, M., Brantley, H., and Thoma, E. D.: A mobile sensing approach for regional surveillance of fugitive methane emissions in oil and gas production, Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 2487–2497, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b05059, 2016. 
Allen, G., Shah, A., Williams, P. I., Ricketts, H., Hollingsworth, P., Kabbabe, K., Bourn, M., Pitt, J. R., Helmore, J., Lowry, D., and Robinson, R. A.: The development and validation of an unmanned aerial system (UAS) for the measurement of methane flux, AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts, Vol. 2017, A44F-05, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017AGUFM.A44F..05A (last access: 28 June 2023), 2017. 
Ars, S., Broquet, G., Yver Kwok, C., Roustan, Y., Wu, L., Arzoumanian, E., and Bousquet, P.: Statistical atmospheric inversion of local gas emissions by coupling the tracer release technique and local-scale transport modelling: a test case with controlled methane emissions, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 5017–5037, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-5017-2017, 2017. 
Aubrey, A. D., Thorpe, A. K., Christensen, L. E., Dinardo, S. Frankenberg, C., Rahn, T. A., and Dubey, M.: Demonstration of Technologies for Remote and in Situ Sensing of Atmospheric Methane Abundances-a Controlled Release Experiment, AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts, Vol. 2013, A44E-05, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013AGUFM.A44E..05A/abstract (last access: 28 June 2023), 2013. a
Download
Short summary
Methane is powerful greenhouse gas; thus, to reduce methane emissions, it is important that the methods used to measure methane are tested and validated. The static chamber method is an enclosure-based technique that directly measures methane emissions; however, it has not been thoroughly tested for the new variety of methane sources that it is currently being used for. We find that the static chamber method can accurately measure methane emissions under a wide range of methane emission rates.