Articles | Volume 16, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-433-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-433-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Review article
| Highlight paper
| 
26 Jan 2023
Review article | Highlight paper |
| 26 Jan 2023
| 26 Jan 2023
Atmospheric boundary layer height from ground-based remote sensing: a review of capabilities and limitations
Institut Pierre Simon Laplace (IPSL), CNRS, École Polytechnique, Institut Polytechnique de Paris, 91128 Palaiseau CEDEX, France
Juan Antonio Bravo-Aranda
Institut Pierre Simon Laplace (IPSL), CNRS, École Polytechnique, Institut Polytechnique de Paris, 91128 Palaiseau CEDEX, France
Department of Applied Physics, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain
Andalusian Institute for Earth System Research (IISTA-CEAMA), 18006 Granada, Spain
Martine Collaud Coen
Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology, MeteoSwiss, Payerne, Switzerland
Juan Luis Guerrero-Rascado
Department of Applied Physics, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain
Andalusian Institute for Earth System Research (IISTA-CEAMA), 18006 Granada, Spain
Maria João Costa
Earth Remote Sensing Laboratory (EaRSLab), Institute of Earth Sciences (ICT) – Institute for Advanced Studies and Research, University of Évora, Évora, Portugal
Department of Physics, School of Science and Technology, University of Évora, Évora, Portugal
Domenico Cimini
National Research Council of Italy, Institute of Methodologies for Environmental Analysis (CNR-IMAA), Potenza, Italy
CETEMPS, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
Ewan J. O'Connor
Finnish Meteorological Institute, Helsinki, Finland
Maxime Hervo
Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology, MeteoSwiss, Payerne, Switzerland
Lucas Alados-Arboledas
Department of Applied Physics, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain
Andalusian Institute for Earth System Research (IISTA-CEAMA), 18006 Granada, Spain
María Jiménez-Portaz
Department of Applied Physics, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain
Andalusian Institute for Earth System Research (IISTA-CEAMA), 18006 Granada, Spain
Lucia Mona
National Research Council of Italy, Institute of Methodologies for Environmental Analysis (CNR-IMAA), Potenza, Italy
Dominique Ruffieux
Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology, MeteoSwiss, Payerne, Switzerland
Anthony Illingworth
Department of Meteorology, University of Reading, Reading, United Kingdom
Martial Haeffelin
Institut Pierre Simon Laplace (IPSL), CNRS, École Polytechnique, Institut Polytechnique de Paris, 91128 Palaiseau CEDEX, France
Related authors
William Morrison, Dana Looschelders, Jonnathan Céspedes, Bernie Claxton, Marc-Antoine Drouin, Jean-Charles Dupont, Aurélien Faucheux, Martial Haeffelin, Christopher C. Holst, Simone Kotthaus, Valéry Masson, James McGregor, Jeremy Price, Matthias Zeeman, Sue Grimmond, and Andreas Christen
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 6507–6529, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-6507-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-6507-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We conducted research using sophisticated wind sensors to better understand wind patterns in Paris. By installing these sensors across the city, we gathered detailed data on wind speeds and directions from 2022 to 2024. This information helps improve weather and climate models, making them more accurate for city environments. Our findings offer valuable insights for scientists studying urban air and weather, improving predictions and understanding of city-scale atmospheric processes.
Laura Bouillon, Valérie Gros, Morgan Lopez, Nicolas Bonnaire, Carole Philippon, Camille Yver Kwok, Leslie David, Olivier Perrussel, Olivier Sanchez, Simone Kotthaus, Jean-Eudes Petit, Philippe Ciais, and Michel Ramonet
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-602, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-602, 2025
Preprint under review for ESSD
Short summary
Short summary
The Saclay observatory, 20 km southwest of Paris, monitored greenhouse and reactive gases, as well as aerosols, over 10 years to assess the impact of urban emissions. By comparing downwind and background conditions, the study revealed significant reductions in pollutants linked to traffic: -35.6 % for CO, -52.3 % for NOₓ, -56.7 % for eBC, and -15 % for CO2. These trends align with emission decrease estimates from AIRPARIF inventories over the same period.
Ludovico Di Antonio, Matthias Beekmann, Guillaume Siour, Vincent Michoud, Christopher Cantrell, Astrid Bauville, Antonin Bergé, Mathieu Cazaunau, Servanne Chevaillier, Manuela Cirtog, Joel F. de Brito, Paola Formenti, Cecile Gaimoz, Olivier Garret, Aline Gratien, Valérie Gros, Martial Haeffelin, Lelia N. Hawkins, Simone Kotthaus, Gael Noyalet, Diana L. Pereira, Jean-Eudes Petit, Eva Drew Pronovost, Véronique Riffault, Chenjie Yu, Gilles Foret, Jean-François Doussin, and Claudia Di Biagio
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 4803–4831, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-4803-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-4803-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The summer of 2022 has been considered a proxy for future climate scenarios due to its hot and dry conditions. In this paper, we use the measurements from the Atmospheric Chemistry of the Suburban Forest (ACROSS) campaign, conducted in the Paris area in June–July 2022, along with observations from existing networks, to evaluate a 3D chemistry transport model (WRF–CHIMERE) simulation. Results are shown to be satisfactory, allowing us to explain the gas and aerosol variability at the campaign sites.
Martial Haeffelin, Jean-François Ribaud, Jonnathan Céspedes, Jean-Charles Dupont, Aude Lemonsu, Valéry Masson, Tim Nagel, and Simone Kotthaus
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 14101–14122, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-14101-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-14101-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This study highlights how the state of the urban atmospheric boundary layer impacts urban park cooling effect intensity at night. Under summertime heat wave conditions, the urban atmosphere becomes stable at night, which inhibits turbulent motions. Under those specific conditions, urban parks and woods cool much more efficiently than the surrounding built-up neighbourhoods in the evening and through the night, providing cooler air temperatures by 4 to 6° C depending on park size.
Jonnathan Céspedes, Simone Kotthaus, Jana Preissler, Clément Toupoint, Ludovic Thobois, Marc-Antoine Drouin, Jean-Charles Dupont, Aurélien Faucheux, and Martial Haeffelin
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 11477–11496, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-11477-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-11477-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The low-level jet (LLJ) is common in Paris during summer. The LLJ core height and speed significantly influence vertical mixing in the urban boundary layer, which affects air temperature variations between the urban canopy layer and surrounding rural areas, determining the urban heat island (UHI) intensity. This study highlights the importance of wind profile observations for understanding urban boundary layer dynamics and near-surface atmospheric conditions relevant to health.
Ting Sun, Hamidreza Omidvar, Zhenkun Li, Ning Zhang, Wenjuan Huang, Simone Kotthaus, Helen C. Ward, Zhiwen Luo, and Sue Grimmond
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 91–116, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-91-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-91-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
For the first time, we coupled a state-of-the-art urban land surface model – Surface Urban Energy and Water Scheme (SUEWS) – with the widely-used Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model, creating an open-source tool that may benefit multiple applications. We tested our new system at two UK sites and demonstrated its potential by examining how human activities in various areas of Greater London influence local weather conditions.
Jinghui Lian, Thomas Lauvaux, Hervé Utard, François-Marie Bréon, Grégoire Broquet, Michel Ramonet, Olivier Laurent, Ivonne Albarus, Mali Chariot, Simone Kotthaus, Martial Haeffelin, Olivier Sanchez, Olivier Perrussel, Hugo Anne Denier van der Gon, Stijn Nicolaas Camiel Dellaert, and Philippe Ciais
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 8823–8835, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-8823-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-8823-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This study quantifies urban CO2 emissions via an atmospheric inversion for the Paris metropolitan area over a 6-year period from 2016 to 2021. Results show a long-term decreasing trend of about 2 % ± 0.6 % per year in the annual CO2 emissions over Paris. We conclude that our current capacity can deliver near-real-time CO2 emission estimates at the city scale in under a month, and the results agree within 10 % with independent estimates from multiple city-scale inventories.
Joanna E. Dyson, Lisa K. Whalley, Eloise J. Slater, Robert Woodward-Massey, Chunxiang Ye, James D. Lee, Freya Squires, James R. Hopkins, Rachel E. Dunmore, Marvin Shaw, Jacqueline F. Hamilton, Alastair C. Lewis, Stephen D. Worrall, Asan Bacak, Archit Mehra, Thomas J. Bannan, Hugh Coe, Carl J. Percival, Bin Ouyang, C. Nicholas Hewitt, Roderic L. Jones, Leigh R. Crilley, Louisa J. Kramer, W. Joe F. Acton, William J. Bloss, Supattarachai Saksakulkrai, Jingsha Xu, Zongbo Shi, Roy M. Harrison, Simone Kotthaus, Sue Grimmond, Yele Sun, Weiqi Xu, Siyao Yue, Lianfang Wei, Pingqing Fu, Xinming Wang, Stephen R. Arnold, and Dwayne E. Heard
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 5679–5697, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-5679-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-5679-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The hydroxyl (OH) and closely coupled hydroperoxyl (HO2) radicals are vital for their role in the removal of atmospheric pollutants. In less polluted regions, atmospheric models over-predict HO2 concentrations. In this modelling study, the impact of heterogeneous uptake of HO2 onto aerosol surfaces on radical concentrations and the ozone production regime in Beijing in the summertime is investigated, and the implications for emissions policies across China are considered.
Andreas Plach, Rolf Rüfenacht, Simone Kotthaus, and Markus Leuenberger
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-1019, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-1019, 2022
Preprint archived
Short summary
Short summary
Greenhouse gases emissions are contributing to global warming and it is essential to better understand where they originate from and how they are transported. In this study we analyze greenhouse gas observations at a Swiss tall tower where measurements are taken more than 200 m above ground and investigate their origin by looking at the condition of the atmosphere at the time of the observations. We find that most pollution at this site is caused from emissions transported from further away.
Mathew Lipson, Sue Grimmond, Martin Best, Winston T. L. Chow, Andreas Christen, Nektarios Chrysoulakis, Andrew Coutts, Ben Crawford, Stevan Earl, Jonathan Evans, Krzysztof Fortuniak, Bert G. Heusinkveld, Je-Woo Hong, Jinkyu Hong, Leena Järvi, Sungsoo Jo, Yeon-Hee Kim, Simone Kotthaus, Keunmin Lee, Valéry Masson, Joseph P. McFadden, Oliver Michels, Wlodzimierz Pawlak, Matthias Roth, Hirofumi Sugawara, Nigel Tapper, Erik Velasco, and Helen Claire Ward
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 5157–5178, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-5157-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-5157-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We describe a new openly accessible collection of atmospheric observations from 20 cities around the world, capturing 50 site years. The observations capture local meteorology (temperature, humidity, wind, etc.) and the energy fluxes between the land and atmosphere (e.g. radiation and sensible and latent heat fluxes). These observations can be used to improve our understanding of urban climate processes and to test the accuracy of urban climate models.
Jean-François Ribaud, Martial Haeffelin, Jean-Charles Dupont, Marc-Antoine Drouin, Felipe Toledo, and Simone Kotthaus
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 7893–7907, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-7893-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-7893-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
PARAFOG is a near-real-time decision tool that aims to retrieve pre-fog alert levels minutes to hours prior to fog onset. The second version of PARAFOG allows us to discriminate between radiation and stratus lowering fog situations. It is based upon the combination of visibility observations and automatic lidar and ceilometer measurements. The overall performance of the second version of PARAFOG over more than 300 fog cases at five different locations presents a good perfomance.
Michael Biggart, Jenny Stocker, Ruth M. Doherty, Oliver Wild, David Carruthers, Sue Grimmond, Yiqun Han, Pingqing Fu, and Simone Kotthaus
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 13687–13711, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-13687-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-13687-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Heat-related illnesses are of increasing concern in China given its rapid urbanisation and our ever-warming climate. We examine the relative impacts that land surface properties and anthropogenic heat have on the urban heat island (UHI) in Beijing using ADMS-Urban. Air temperature measurements and satellite-derived land surface temperatures provide valuable means of evaluating modelled spatiotemporal variations. This work provides critical information for urban planners and UHI mitigation.
Jinghui Lian, François-Marie Bréon, Grégoire Broquet, Thomas Lauvaux, Bo Zheng, Michel Ramonet, Irène Xueref-Remy, Simone Kotthaus, Martial Haeffelin, and Philippe Ciais
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 10707–10726, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-10707-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-10707-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Currently there is growing interest in monitoring city-scale CO2 emissions based on atmospheric CO2 measurements, atmospheric transport modeling, and inversion technique. We analyze the various sources of uncertainty that impact the atmospheric CO2 modeling and that may compromise the potential of this method for the monitoring of CO2 emission over Paris. Results suggest selection criteria for the assimilation of CO2 measurements into the inversion system that aims at retrieving city emissions.
Claire E. Reeves, Graham P. Mills, Lisa K. Whalley, W. Joe F. Acton, William J. Bloss, Leigh R. Crilley, Sue Grimmond, Dwayne E. Heard, C. Nicholas Hewitt, James R. Hopkins, Simone Kotthaus, Louisa J. Kramer, Roderic L. Jones, James D. Lee, Yanhui Liu, Bin Ouyang, Eloise Slater, Freya Squires, Xinming Wang, Robert Woodward-Massey, and Chunxiang Ye
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 6315–6330, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6315-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6315-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The impact of isoprene on atmospheric chemistry is dependent on how its oxidation products interact with other pollutants, specifically nitrogen oxides. Such interactions can lead to isoprene nitrates. We made measurements of the concentrations of individual isoprene nitrate isomers in Beijing and used a model to test current understanding of their chemistry. We highlight areas of uncertainty in understanding, in particular the chemistry following oxidation of isoprene by the nitrate radical.
Wenhua Wang, Longyi Shao, Claudio Mazzoleni, Yaowei Li, Simone Kotthaus, Sue Grimmond, Janarjan Bhandari, Jiaoping Xing, Xiaolei Feng, Mengyuan Zhang, and Zongbo Shi
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 5301–5314, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-5301-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-5301-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We compared the characteristics of individual particles at ground level and above the mixed-layer height. We found that the particles above the mixed-layer height during haze periods are more aged compared to ground level. More coal-combustion-related primary organic particles were found above the mixed-layer height. We suggest that the particles above the mixed-layer height are affected by the surrounding areas, and once mixed down to the ground, they might contribute to ground air pollution.
Roland Stirnberg, Jan Cermak, Simone Kotthaus, Martial Haeffelin, Hendrik Andersen, Julia Fuchs, Miae Kim, Jean-Eudes Petit, and Olivier Favez
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 3919–3948, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-3919-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-3919-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Air pollution endangers human health and poses a problem particularly in densely populated areas. Here, an explainable machine learning approach is used to analyse periods of high particle concentrations for a suburban site southwest of Paris to better understand its atmospheric drivers. Air pollution is particularly excaberated by low temperatures and low mixed layer heights, but processes vary substantially between and within seasons.
Lisa K. Whalley, Eloise J. Slater, Robert Woodward-Massey, Chunxiang Ye, James D. Lee, Freya Squires, James R. Hopkins, Rachel E. Dunmore, Marvin Shaw, Jacqueline F. Hamilton, Alastair C. Lewis, Archit Mehra, Stephen D. Worrall, Asan Bacak, Thomas J. Bannan, Hugh Coe, Carl J. Percival, Bin Ouyang, Roderic L. Jones, Leigh R. Crilley, Louisa J. Kramer, William J. Bloss, Tuan Vu, Simone Kotthaus, Sue Grimmond, Yele Sun, Weiqi Xu, Siyao Yue, Lujie Ren, W. Joe F. Acton, C. Nicholas Hewitt, Xinming Wang, Pingqing Fu, and Dwayne E. Heard
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 2125–2147, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-2125-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-2125-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
To understand how emission controls will impact ozone, an understanding of the sources and sinks of OH and the chemical cycling between peroxy radicals is needed. This paper presents measurements of OH, HO2 and total RO2 taken in central Beijing. The radical observations are compared to a detailed chemistry model, which shows that under low NO conditions, there is a missing OH source. Under high NOx conditions, the model under-predicts RO2 and impacts our ability to model ozone.
Rutambhara Joshi, Dantong Liu, Eiko Nemitz, Ben Langford, Neil Mullinger, Freya Squires, James Lee, Yunfei Wu, Xiaole Pan, Pingqing Fu, Simone Kotthaus, Sue Grimmond, Qiang Zhang, Ruili Wu, Oliver Wild, Michael Flynn, Hugh Coe, and James Allan
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 147–162, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-147-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-147-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Black carbon (BC) is a component of particulate matter which has significant effects on climate and human health. Sources of BC include biomass burning, transport, industry and domestic cooking and heating. In this study, we measured BC emissions in Beijing, finding a dominance of traffic emissions over all other sources. The quantitative method presented here has benefits for revising widely used emissions inventories and for understanding BC sources with impacts on air quality and climate.
William Morrison, Dana Looschelders, Jonnathan Céspedes, Bernie Claxton, Marc-Antoine Drouin, Jean-Charles Dupont, Aurélien Faucheux, Martial Haeffelin, Christopher C. Holst, Simone Kotthaus, Valéry Masson, James McGregor, Jeremy Price, Matthias Zeeman, Sue Grimmond, and Andreas Christen
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 6507–6529, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-6507-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-6507-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We conducted research using sophisticated wind sensors to better understand wind patterns in Paris. By installing these sensors across the city, we gathered detailed data on wind speeds and directions from 2022 to 2024. This information helps improve weather and climate models, making them more accurate for city environments. Our findings offer valuable insights for scientists studying urban air and weather, improving predictions and understanding of city-scale atmospheric processes.
Laura Bouillon, Valérie Gros, Morgan Lopez, Nicolas Bonnaire, Carole Philippon, Camille Yver Kwok, Leslie David, Olivier Perrussel, Olivier Sanchez, Simone Kotthaus, Jean-Eudes Petit, Philippe Ciais, and Michel Ramonet
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-602, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-602, 2025
Preprint under review for ESSD
Short summary
Short summary
The Saclay observatory, 20 km southwest of Paris, monitored greenhouse and reactive gases, as well as aerosols, over 10 years to assess the impact of urban emissions. By comparing downwind and background conditions, the study revealed significant reductions in pollutants linked to traffic: -35.6 % for CO, -52.3 % for NOₓ, -56.7 % for eBC, and -15 % for CO2. These trends align with emission decrease estimates from AIRPARIF inventories over the same period.
Elena Bazo, Olga Ruiz-Galera, Lucas Alados-Arboledas, Alexander Böhmländer, Kristina Höhler, Najin Kim, Larissa Lacher, Ottmar Möhler, Francisco José Olmo, Germán Perez Fogwill, Ana A. Piedehierro, Nsikanabasi S. Umo, André Welti, Gloria Titos, and Alberto Cazorla
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5212, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5212, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (AMT).
Short summary
Short summary
We evaluated different methods to obtain the ice nucleating particle (INP) concentration from ambient filters using GRAINS, the INP spectrometer at the AGORA Observatory. We first characterized GRAINS and compared it to other INP devices. Then, we sampled polycarbonate and quartz filters for three months and tested three different particle extraction methods, finding general good agreement but that the INP concentration is systematically higher when using quartz filters.
María Ángeles López-Cayuela, Carmen Córdoba-Jabonero, Michaël Sicard, Jesús Abril-Gago, Vanda Salgueiro, Adolfo Comerón, María José Granados-Muñoz, Maria João Costa, Constantino Muñoz-Porcar, Juan Antonio Bravo-Aranda, Daniele Bortoli, Alejandro Rodríguez-Gómez, Lucas Alados-Arboledas, and Juan Luis Guerrero-Rascado
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4905, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4905, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Due to the major radiative role of dust in Climate Change, a vertical assessment of the long-wave (and net) dust direct radiative effect of both fine and coarse dust, separately, is introduced. The study relies on an intense Saharan dust outbreak across the Iberian Peninsula, observed by five lidar stations with SW-centre-NE coverage. A comparative evaluation of the differences by considering the total dust (no separation) is also examined. It complements a similar study in the short-wave range.
Ana del Águila, Pablo Ortiz-Amezcua, Siham Tabik, Juan Antonio Bravo-Aranda, Sol Fernández-Carvelo, and Lucas Alados-Arboledas
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 12549–12567, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-12549-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-12549-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study applies machine learning (ML) techniques to classify aerosols using high-resolution multiwavelength lidar data from EARLINET network. We developed a reference dataset and evaluated six ML models, with LightGBM achieving over 90 % accuracy. Depolarization data proved critical for improving dust classification. Validated against independent datasets, our approach improves aerosol classification and may help refine lidar-based processing strategies.
Sasu Karttunen, Matthias Sühring, Ewan O'Connor, and Leena Järvi
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 5725–5757, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-5725-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-5725-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents PALM-SLUrb, a single-layer urban canopy model for the PALM model system, designed to simulate urban–atmosphere interactions without resolving flow around individual buildings. The model is described in detail and evaluated against grid-resolved urban canopy simulations, demonstrating its ability to model urban surfaces accurately. By bridging the gap between computational efficiency and physical detail, PALM-SLUrb broadens PALM's potential for urban climate research.
Martine Collaud Coen, Benjamin Tobias Brem, Martin Gysel-Beer, Robin Modini, Stephan Henne, Martin Steinbacher, Davide Putero, Maria I. Gini, and Kostantinos Eleftheriadis
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4162, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4162, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Saharan dust is transported over long distances by large-scale atmospheric circulation and it reaches 30 to 150 times per year the Jungfraujoch high-altitude station. The study analyzes the influence of the instrument types on SD detected by the single scattering albedo spectral dependence. This method is then compared to detection methods based on the size distribution and the back-trajectories. A source sensitivity and a 23-year climatology of the dust frequency and mass are also performed.
Simo Tukiainen, Tuomas Siipola, Niko Leskinen, and Ewan O'Connor
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 3797–3806, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-3797-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-3797-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Measurement campaigns are crucial for advancing the understanding of complex cloud–aerosol interactions in the atmosphere. Ground-based remote sensing measurements were conducted in Kenttärova, Finland, during the Pallas Cloud Experiment 2022 campaign. These measurements were processed using the Cloudnet methodology, and the data are available through the ACTRIS Cloudnet data portal.
Akriti Masoom, Stelios Kazadzis, Robin Lewis Modini, Martin Gysel-Beer, Julian Gröbner, Martine Collaud Coen, Francisco Navas-Guzman, Natalia Kouremeti, Benjamin Tobias Brem, Nora Kristina Nowak, Giovanni Martucci, Maxime Hervo, and Sophie Erb
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2755, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2755, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This article aims at providing details on the special aerosol properties observed during 2023 Canadian wildfire plume transport and exploring the synergism between remote sensing and in situ measurements for investigating the cause of the occurrence of the observations of special aerosol properties.
Jesús Yus-Díez, Luka Drinovec, Lucas Alados-Arboledas, Gloria Titos, Elena Bazo, Andrea Casans, Diego Patrón, Xavier Querol, Adolfo Gonzalez-Romero, Carlos Perez García-Pando, and Griša Močnik
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 3073–3093, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3073-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3073-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We have used absorption from a photothermal interferometer and scattering measurements to evaluate the most deployed filter photometers used to measure absorption for monitoring networks. We used soot- and dust-dominated aerosol samples in both laboratory and ambient settings. Our results indicated that one of these filter photometers, the MAAP (Multiangle Absorption Photometer), usually used as a pseudo-reference instrument, had 47 % higher absorption values than our reference measurements.
Masatomo Fujiwara, Bomin Sun, Anthony Reale, Domenico Cimini, Salvatore Larosa, Lori Borg, Christoph von Rohden, Michael Sommer, Ruud Dirksen, Marion Maturilli, Holger Vömel, Rigel Kivi, Bruce Ingleby, Ryan J. Kramer, Belay Demoz, Fabio Madonna, Fabien Carminati, Owen Lewis, Brett Candy, Christopher Thomas, David Edwards, Noersomadi, Kensaku Shimizu, and Peter Thorne
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 2919–2955, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-2919-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-2919-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We assess and illustrate the benefits of high-altitude attainment of balloon-borne radiosonde soundings up to and beyond 10 hPa level from various aspects. We show that the extra costs and technical challenges involved in consistent attainment of high ascents are more than outweighed by the benefits for a broad variety of real-time and delayed-mode applications. Consistent attainment of high ascents should therefore be pursued across the balloon observational network.
Elena Bazo, Daniel Pérez-Ramírez, Antonio Valenzuela, J. Vanderlei Martins, Gloria Titos, Alberto Cazorla, Fernando Rejano, Diego Patrón, Arlett Díaz-Zurita, Francisco José García-Izquierdo, David Fuertes, Lucas Alados-Arboledas, and Francisco José Olmo
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 6325–6352, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-6325-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-6325-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This works analyzes the aerosol scattering phase function for transported Saharan dust to the city of Granada – located in southwestern Europe. We use the novel technique polar imaging nephelometry that helps to determine the phase functions using a CMOS camera. The capability of measuring with polarized light helps to infer new properties about the mixture of Saharan dust particles with those of anthropogenic origin.
Lubna Dada, Benjamin T. Brem, Lidia-Marta Amarandi-Netedu, Martine Collaud Coen, Nikolaos Evangeliou, Christoph Hueglin, Nora Nowak, Robin Modini, Martin Steinbacher, and Martin Gysel-Beer
Aerosol Research, 3, 315–336, https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-3-315-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-3-315-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We investigated the sources of ultrafine particles (UFPs) in Payerne, Switzerland, highlighting the significant role of secondary processes in elevating UFP concentrations to levels comparable to urban areas. As the first study in rural midland Switzerland to analyze new particle formation events and secondary contributions, it offers key insights for air quality regulation and the role of agriculture in Switzerland and central Europe.
Teresa Laurita, Alessandro Mauceri, Francesco Cardellicchio, Emilio Lapenna, Benedetto De Rosa, Serena Trippetta, Michail Mytilinaios, Davide Amodio, Aldo Giunta, Ermann Ripepi, Canio Colangelo, Nikolaos Papagiannopoulos, Francesca Morrongiello, Claudio Dema, Simone Gagliardi, Carmela Cornacchia, Rosa Maria Petracca Altieri, Aldo Amodeo, Marco Rosoldi, Donato Summa, Gelsomina Pappalardo, and Lucia Mona
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 2373–2396, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-2373-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-2373-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This paper provides an overview of the CIAO Observatory in southern Italy, focusing on the upgrade of its aerosol in situ laboratory in compliance with ACTRIS standard operating procedures. The aim is to provide the aerosol research community with technical details and practical guidance for establishing an in situ aerosol observational site. The paper also discusses the importance of combining in situ and remote sensing measurements for a comprehensive understanding of atmospheric processes.
Ludovico Di Antonio, Matthias Beekmann, Guillaume Siour, Vincent Michoud, Christopher Cantrell, Astrid Bauville, Antonin Bergé, Mathieu Cazaunau, Servanne Chevaillier, Manuela Cirtog, Joel F. de Brito, Paola Formenti, Cecile Gaimoz, Olivier Garret, Aline Gratien, Valérie Gros, Martial Haeffelin, Lelia N. Hawkins, Simone Kotthaus, Gael Noyalet, Diana L. Pereira, Jean-Eudes Petit, Eva Drew Pronovost, Véronique Riffault, Chenjie Yu, Gilles Foret, Jean-François Doussin, and Claudia Di Biagio
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 4803–4831, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-4803-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-4803-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The summer of 2022 has been considered a proxy for future climate scenarios due to its hot and dry conditions. In this paper, we use the measurements from the Atmospheric Chemistry of the Suburban Forest (ACROSS) campaign, conducted in the Paris area in June–July 2022, along with observations from existing networks, to evaluate a 3D chemistry transport model (WRF–CHIMERE) simulation. Results are shown to be satisfactory, allowing us to explain the gas and aerosol variability at the campaign sites.
Domenico Cimini, Rémi Gandoin, Stephanie Fiedler, Claudia Acquistapace, Andrea Balotti, Sabrina Gentile, Edoardo Geraldi, Christine Knist, Pauline Martinet, Saverio T. Nilo, Giandomenico Pace, Bernhard Pospichal, and Filomena Romano
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 2041–2067, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-2041-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-2041-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Atmospheric stability indicates whether air vertical motion is dumped or amplified. This is important for wind energy applications as it affects wind turbine wakes and thus the yield of wind parks. The paper provides an assessment of stability metrics measured by ground-based microwave radiometers in different climatological conditions and instrument types, onshore and offshore. Results indicate that special precaution may be required offshore to achieve typical onshore performances.
Natalie E. Theeuwes, Janet F. Barlow, Antti Mannisenaho, Denise Hertwig, Ewan O'Connor, and Alan Robins
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 1355–1371, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1355-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1355-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
A Doppler lidar was placed in a highly built-up area in London to measure wakes from tall buildings during a period of 1 year. We were able to detect wakes and assess their dependence on wind speed, wind direction, and atmospheric stability.
María-Ángeles López-Cayuela, Carmen Córdoba-Jabonero, Michaël Sicard, Jesús Abril-Gago, Vanda Salgueiro, Adolfo Comerón, María José Granados-Muñoz, Maria João Costa, Constantino Muñoz-Porcar, Juan Antonio Bravo-Aranda, Daniele Bortoli, Alejandro Rodríguez-Gómez, Lucas Alados-Arboledas, and Juan Luis Guerrero-Rascado
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 3213–3231, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-3213-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-3213-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Due to the significant radiative role of dust in climate change, vertical assessments of the short-wave dust direct radiative effect of both fine and coarse dust particles are performed separately. The study is focused on an intense Saharan dust outbreak crossing the Iberian Peninsula in springtime monitored by five Iberian lidar stations with southwest–northeast coverage. A comparative study to evaluate the differences found by considering the total dust (no separation) is also examined.
Alexandre Bugnard, Martine Collaud Coen, Maxime Hervo, Daniel Leuenberger, Marco Arpagaus, and Samuel Monhart
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 1039–1061, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1039-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1039-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Temperature (T) and wind profiles were measured by a Doppler wind lidar and a microwave radiometer in Meiringen in a medium-sized Alpine valley. Ground-based T inversions and thermal winds were studied during the 10 months of the campaign. The comparison between the observations and the COSMO-1E model provides good model performance for monthly climatologies. T inversions are however frequently missed, and important differences for particular cases are found, especially for foehn events.
Martial Haeffelin, Jean-François Ribaud, Jonnathan Céspedes, Jean-Charles Dupont, Aude Lemonsu, Valéry Masson, Tim Nagel, and Simone Kotthaus
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 14101–14122, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-14101-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-14101-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This study highlights how the state of the urban atmospheric boundary layer impacts urban park cooling effect intensity at night. Under summertime heat wave conditions, the urban atmosphere becomes stable at night, which inhibits turbulent motions. Under those specific conditions, urban parks and woods cool much more efficiently than the surrounding built-up neighbourhoods in the evening and through the night, providing cooler air temperatures by 4 to 6° C depending on park size.
Fernando Rejano, Andrea Casans, Marta Via, Juan Andrés Casquero-Vera, Sonia Castillo, Hassan Lyamani, Alberto Cazorla, Elisabeth Andrews, Daniel Pérez-Ramírez, Andrés Alastuey, Francisco Javier Gómez-Moreno, Lucas Alados-Arboledas, Francisco José Olmo, and Gloria Titos
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 13865–13888, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-13865-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-13865-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This study provides valuable insights to improve cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) estimations at a high-altitude remote site which is influenced by nearby urban pollution. Understanding the factors that affect CCN estimations is essential to improve the CCN data coverage worldwide and assess aerosol–cloud interactions on a global scale. This is crucial for improving climate models, since aerosol–cloud interactions are the most important source of uncertainty in climate projections.
Jonnathan Céspedes, Simone Kotthaus, Jana Preissler, Clément Toupoint, Ludovic Thobois, Marc-Antoine Drouin, Jean-Charles Dupont, Aurélien Faucheux, and Martial Haeffelin
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 11477–11496, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-11477-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-11477-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The low-level jet (LLJ) is common in Paris during summer. The LLJ core height and speed significantly influence vertical mixing in the urban boundary layer, which affects air temperature variations between the urban canopy layer and surrounding rural areas, determining the urban heat island (UHI) intensity. This study highlights the importance of wind profile observations for understanding urban boundary layer dynamics and near-surface atmospheric conditions relevant to health.
Johanna Tjernström, Michael Gallagher, Jareth Holt, Gunilla Svensson, Matthew D. Shupe, Jonathan J. Day, Lara Ferrighi, Siri Jodha Khalsa, Leslie M. Hartten, Ewan O'Connor, Zen Mariani, and Øystein Godøy
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2088, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2088, 2024
Preprint archived
Short summary
Short summary
The value of numerical weather predictions can be enhanced in several ways, one is to improve the representations of small-scale processes in models. To understand what needs to be improved, the model results need to be evaluated. Following standardized principles, a file format has been defined to be as similar as possible for both observational and model data. Python packages and toolkits are presented as a community resource in the production of the files and evaluation analysis.
Stuart Fox, Vinia Mattioli, Emma Turner, Alan Vance, Domenico Cimini, and Donatello Gallucci
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 4957–4978, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4957-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4957-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Airborne observations are used to evaluate two models for absorption and emission by atmospheric gases, including water vapour and oxygen, at microwave and sub-millimetre wavelengths. These models are needed for the Ice Cloud Imager (ICI) on the next generation of European polar-orbiting weather satellites, which measures at frequencies up to 664 GHz. Both models can provide a good match to measurements from airborne radiometers and are sufficiently accurate for use with ICI.
Jutta Kesti, Ewan J. O'Connor, Anne Hirsikko, John Backman, Maria Filioglou, Anu-Maija Sundström, Juha Tonttila, Heikki Lihavainen, Hannele Korhonen, and Eija Asmi
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 9369–9386, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-9369-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-9369-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The study combines aerosol particle measurements at the surface and vertical profiling of the atmosphere with a scanning Doppler lidar to investigate how particle transportation together with boundary layer evolution can affect particle and SO2 concentrations at the surface in the Arabian Peninsula region. The instrumentation enabled us to see elevated nucleation mode particle and SO2 concentrations at the surface when air masses transported from polluted areas are mixed in the boundary layer.
Jonathan J. Day, Gunilla Svensson, Barbara Casati, Taneil Uttal, Siri-Jodha Khalsa, Eric Bazile, Elena Akish, Niramson Azouz, Lara Ferrighi, Helmut Frank, Michael Gallagher, Øystein Godøy, Leslie M. Hartten, Laura X. Huang, Jareth Holt, Massimo Di Stefano, Irene Suomi, Zen Mariani, Sara Morris, Ewan O'Connor, Roberta Pirazzini, Teresa Remes, Rostislav Fadeev, Amy Solomon, Johanna Tjernström, and Mikhail Tolstykh
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 5511–5543, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5511-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5511-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The YOPP site Model Intercomparison Project (YOPPsiteMIP), which was designed to facilitate enhanced weather forecast evaluation in polar regions, is discussed here, focussing on describing the archive of forecast data and presenting a multi-model evaluation at Arctic supersites during February and March 2018. The study highlights an underestimation in boundary layer temperature variance that is common across models and a related inability to forecast cold extremes at several of the sites.
Taneil Uttal, Leslie M. Hartten, Siri Jodha Khalsa, Barbara Casati, Gunilla Svensson, Jonathan Day, Jareth Holt, Elena Akish, Sara Morris, Ewan O'Connor, Roberta Pirazzini, Laura X. Huang, Robert Crawford, Zen Mariani, Øystein Godøy, Johanna A. K. Tjernström, Giri Prakash, Nicki Hickmon, Marion Maturilli, and Christopher J. Cox
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 5225–5247, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5225-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5225-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
A Merged Observatory Data File (MODF) format to systematically collate complex atmosphere, ocean, and terrestrial data sets collected by multiple instruments during field campaigns is presented. The MODF format is also designed to be applied to model output data, yielding format-matching Merged Model Data Files (MMDFs). MODFs plus MMDFs will augment and accelerate the synergistic use of model results with observational data to increase understanding and predictive skill.
Zen Mariani, Sara M. Morris, Taneil Uttal, Elena Akish, Robert Crawford, Laura Huang, Jonathan Day, Johanna Tjernström, Øystein Godøy, Lara Ferrighi, Leslie M. Hartten, Jareth Holt, Christopher J. Cox, Ewan O'Connor, Roberta Pirazzini, Marion Maturilli, Giri Prakash, James Mather, Kimberly Strong, Pierre Fogal, Vasily Kustov, Gunilla Svensson, Michael Gallagher, and Brian Vasel
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 3083–3124, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-3083-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-3083-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
During the Year of Polar Prediction (YOPP), we increased measurements in the polar regions and have made dedicated efforts to centralize and standardize all of the different types of datasets that have been collected to facilitate user uptake and model–observation comparisons. This paper is an overview of those efforts and a description of the novel standardized Merged Observation Data Files (MODFs), including a description of the sites, data format, and instruments.
Donatello Gallucci, Domenico Cimini, Emma Turner, Stuart Fox, Philip W. Rosenkranz, Mikhail Y. Tretyakov, Vinia Mattioli, Salvatore Larosa, and Filomena Romano
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 7283–7308, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-7283-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-7283-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Nowadays, atmospheric radiative transfer models are widely used to simulate satellite and ground-based observations. A meaningful comparison between observations and simulations requires an estimate of the uncertainty associated with both. This work quantifies the uncertainty in atmospheric radiative transfer models in the microwave range, providing the uncertainty associated with simulations of new-generation satellite microwave sensors.
Robin J. Hogan, Anthony J. Illingworth, Pavlos Kollias, Hajime Okamoto, and Ulla Wandinger
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3081–3083, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3081-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3081-2024, 2024
Salvatore Larosa, Domenico Cimini, Donatello Gallucci, Saverio Teodosio Nilo, and Filomena Romano
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2053–2076, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2053-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2053-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
PyRTlib is an attractive educational tool because it provides a flexible and user-friendly way to broadly simulate how electromagnetic radiation travels through the atmosphere as it interacts with atmospheric constituents (such as gases, aerosols, and hydrometeors). PyRTlib is a so-called radiative transfer model; these are commonly used to simulate and understand remote sensing observations from ground-based, airborne, or satellite instruments.
Viet Le, Hannah Lobo, Ewan J. O'Connor, and Ville Vakkari
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 921–941, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-921-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-921-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This study offers a long-term overview of aerosol particle depolarization ratio at the wavelength of 1565 nm obtained from vertical profiling measurements by Halo Doppler lidars during 4 years at four different locations across Finland. Our observations support the long-term usage of Halo Doppler lidar depolarization ratio such as the detection of aerosols that may pose a safety risk for aviation. Long-range Saharan dust transport and pollen transport are also showcased here.
Wenyue Wang, Klemens Hocke, Leonardo Nania, Alberto Cazorla, Gloria Titos, Renaud Matthey, Lucas Alados-Arboledas, Agustín Millares, and Francisco Navas-Guzmán
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 1571–1585, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-1571-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-1571-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The south-central interior of Andalusia experiences complex precipitation patterns as a result of the semi-arid Mediterranean climate and the influence of Saharan dust. This study monitored the inter-relations between aerosols, clouds, meteorological variables, and precipitation systems using ground-based remote sensing and in situ instruments.
Filippo Emilio Scarsi, Alessandro Battaglia, Frederic Tridon, Paolo Martire, Ranvir Dhillon, and Anthony Illingworth
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 499–514, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-499-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-499-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The WIVERN mission, one of the two candidates to be the ESA's Earth Explorer 11 mission, aims at providing measurements of horizontal winds in cloud and precipitation systems through a conically scanning W-band Doppler radar. This work discusses four methods that can be used to characterize and correct the Doppler velocity error induced by the antenna mispointing. The proposed methodologies can be extended to other Doppler concepts featuring conically scanning or slant viewing Doppler systems.
Ting Sun, Hamidreza Omidvar, Zhenkun Li, Ning Zhang, Wenjuan Huang, Simone Kotthaus, Helen C. Ward, Zhiwen Luo, and Sue Grimmond
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 91–116, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-91-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-91-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
For the first time, we coupled a state-of-the-art urban land surface model – Surface Urban Energy and Water Scheme (SUEWS) – with the widely-used Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model, creating an open-source tool that may benefit multiple applications. We tested our new system at two UK sites and demonstrated its potential by examining how human activities in various areas of Greater London influence local weather conditions.
Juan Andrés Casquero-Vera, Daniel Pérez-Ramírez, Hassan Lyamani, Fernando Rejano, Andrea Casans, Gloria Titos, Francisco José Olmo, Lubna Dada, Simo Hakala, Tareq Hussein, Katrianne Lehtipalo, Pauli Paasonen, Antti Hyvärinen, Noemí Pérez, Xavier Querol, Sergio Rodríguez, Nikos Kalivitis, Yenny González, Mansour A. Alghamdi, Veli-Matti Kerminen, Andrés Alastuey, Tuukka Petäjä, and Lucas Alados-Arboledas
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 15795–15814, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-15795-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-15795-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Here we present the first study of the effect of mineral dust on the inhibition/promotion of new particle formation (NPF) events in different dust-influenced areas. Unexpectedly, we show that the occurrence of NPF events is highly frequent during mineral dust outbreaks, occurring even during extreme dust outbreaks. We also show that the occurrence of NPF events during mineral dust outbreaks significantly affects the potential cloud condensation nuclei budget.
Cheikh Dione, Martial Haeffelin, Frédéric Burnet, Christine Lac, Guylaine Canut, Julien Delanoë, Jean-Charles Dupont, Susana Jorquera, Pauline Martinet, Jean-François Ribaud, and Felipe Toledo
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 15711–15731, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-15711-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-15711-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This paper documents the role of thermodynamics and turbulence in the fog life cycle over southwestern France. It is based on a unique dataset collected during the SOFOG3D field campaign in autumn and winter 2019–2020. The paper gives a threshold for turbulence driving the different phases of the fog life cycle and the role of advection in the night-time dissipation of fog. The results can be operationalised to nowcast fog and improve short-range forecasts in numerical weather prediction models.
Alexandra Tsekeri, Anna Gialitaki, Marco Di Paolantonio, Davide Dionisi, Gian Luigi Liberti, Alnilam Fernandes, Artur Szkop, Aleksander Pietruczuk, Daniel Pérez-Ramírez, Maria J. Granados Muñoz, Juan Luis Guerrero-Rascado, Lucas Alados-Arboledas, Diego Bermejo Pantaleón, Juan Antonio Bravo-Aranda, Anna Kampouri, Eleni Marinou, Vassilis Amiridis, Michael Sicard, Adolfo Comerón, Constantino Muñoz-Porcar, Alejandro Rodríguez-Gómez, Salvatore Romano, Maria Rita Perrone, Xiaoxia Shang, Mika Komppula, Rodanthi-Elisavet Mamouri, Argyro Nisantzi, Diofantos Hadjimitsis, Francisco Navas-Guzmán, Alexander Haefele, Dominika Szczepanik, Artur Tomczak, Iwona S. Stachlewska, Livio Belegante, Doina Nicolae, Kalliopi Artemis Voudouri, Dimitris Balis, Athena A. Floutsi, Holger Baars, Linda Miladi, Nicolas Pascal, Oleg Dubovik, and Anton Lopatin
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 6025–6050, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-6025-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-6025-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
EARLINET/ACTRIS organized an intensive observational campaign in May 2020, with the objective of monitoring the atmospheric state over Europe during the COVID-19 lockdown and relaxation period. The work presented herein focuses on deriving a common methodology for applying a synergistic retrieval that utilizes the network's ground-based passive and active remote sensing measurements and deriving the aerosols from anthropogenic activities over Europe.
Alessandro Bigi, Giorgio Veratti, Elisabeth Andrews, Martine Collaud Coen, Lorenzo Guerrieri, Vera Bernardoni, Dario Massabò, Luca Ferrero, Sergio Teggi, and Grazia Ghermandi
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 14841–14869, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-14841-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-14841-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Atmospheric particles include compounds that play a key role in the greenhouse effect and air toxicity. Concurrent observations of these compounds by multiple instruments are presented, following deployment within an urban environment in the Po Valley, one of Europe's pollution hotspots. The study compares these data, highlighting the impact of ground emissions, mainly vehicular traffic and biomass burning, on the absorption of sun radiation and, ultimately, on climate change and air quality.
Maria Filioglou, Ari Leskinen, Ville Vakkari, Ewan O'Connor, Minttu Tuononen, Pekko Tuominen, Samuli Laukkanen, Linnea Toiviainen, Annika Saarto, Xiaoxia Shang, Petri Tiitta, and Mika Komppula
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 9009–9021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-9009-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-9009-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Pollen impacts climate and public health, and it can be detected in the atmosphere by lidars which measure the linear particle depolarization ratio (PDR), a shape-relevant optical parameter. As aerosols also cause depolarization, surface aerosol and pollen observations were combined with measurements from ground-based lidars operating at different wavelengths to determine the optical properties of birch and pine pollen and quantify their relative contribution to the PDR.
Jinghui Lian, Thomas Lauvaux, Hervé Utard, François-Marie Bréon, Grégoire Broquet, Michel Ramonet, Olivier Laurent, Ivonne Albarus, Mali Chariot, Simone Kotthaus, Martial Haeffelin, Olivier Sanchez, Olivier Perrussel, Hugo Anne Denier van der Gon, Stijn Nicolaas Camiel Dellaert, and Philippe Ciais
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 8823–8835, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-8823-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-8823-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This study quantifies urban CO2 emissions via an atmospheric inversion for the Paris metropolitan area over a 6-year period from 2016 to 2021. Results show a long-term decreasing trend of about 2 % ± 0.6 % per year in the annual CO2 emissions over Paris. We conclude that our current capacity can deliver near-real-time CO2 emission estimates at the city scale in under a month, and the results agree within 10 % with independent estimates from multiple city-scale inventories.
Jesús Abril-Gago, Pablo Ortiz-Amezcua, Diego Bermejo-Pantaleón, Juana Andújar-Maqueda, Juan Antonio Bravo-Aranda, María José Granados-Muñoz, Francisco Navas-Guzmán, Lucas Alados-Arboledas, Inmaculada Foyo-Moreno, and Juan Luis Guerrero-Rascado
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 8453–8471, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-8453-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-8453-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Validation activities of Aeolus wind products were performed in Granada with different upward-probing instrumentation (Doppler lidar system and radiosondes) and spatiotemporal collocation criteria. Specific advantages and disadvantages of each instrument were identified, and an optimal comparison criterion is proposed. Aeolus was proven to provide reliable wind products, and the upward-probing instruments were proven to be useful for Aeolus wind product validation activities.
Alessandro Battaglia, Filippo Emilio Scarsi, Kamil Mroz, and Anthony Illingworth
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 3283–3297, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-3283-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-3283-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Some of the new generation of cloud and precipitation spaceborne radars will adopt conical scanning. This will make some of the standard calibration techniques impractical. This work presents a methodology to cross-calibrate radars in orbits by matching the reflectivity probability density function of ice clouds observed by the to-be-calibrated and by the reference radar in quasi-coincident locations. Results show that cross-calibration within 1 dB (26 %) is feasible.
Joanna E. Dyson, Lisa K. Whalley, Eloise J. Slater, Robert Woodward-Massey, Chunxiang Ye, James D. Lee, Freya Squires, James R. Hopkins, Rachel E. Dunmore, Marvin Shaw, Jacqueline F. Hamilton, Alastair C. Lewis, Stephen D. Worrall, Asan Bacak, Archit Mehra, Thomas J. Bannan, Hugh Coe, Carl J. Percival, Bin Ouyang, C. Nicholas Hewitt, Roderic L. Jones, Leigh R. Crilley, Louisa J. Kramer, W. Joe F. Acton, William J. Bloss, Supattarachai Saksakulkrai, Jingsha Xu, Zongbo Shi, Roy M. Harrison, Simone Kotthaus, Sue Grimmond, Yele Sun, Weiqi Xu, Siyao Yue, Lianfang Wei, Pingqing Fu, Xinming Wang, Stephen R. Arnold, and Dwayne E. Heard
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 5679–5697, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-5679-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-5679-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The hydroxyl (OH) and closely coupled hydroperoxyl (HO2) radicals are vital for their role in the removal of atmospheric pollutants. In less polluted regions, atmospheric models over-predict HO2 concentrations. In this modelling study, the impact of heterogeneous uptake of HO2 onto aerosol surfaces on radical concentrations and the ozone production regime in Beijing in the summertime is investigated, and the implications for emissions policies across China are considered.
Michail Mytilinaios, Sara Basart, Sergio Ciamprone, Juan Cuesta, Claudio Dema, Enza Di Tomaso, Paola Formenti, Antonis Gkikas, Oriol Jorba, Ralph Kahn, Carlos Pérez García-Pando, Serena Trippetta, and Lucia Mona
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 5487–5516, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-5487-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-5487-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Multiscale Online Non-hydrostatic AtmospheRe CHemistry model (MONARCH) dust reanalysis provides a high-resolution 3D reconstruction of past dust conditions, allowing better quantification of climate and socioeconomic dust impacts. We assess the performance of the reanalysis needed to reproduce dust optical depth using dust-related products retrieved from satellite and ground-based observations and show that it reproduces the spatial distribution and seasonal variability of atmospheric dust well.
Gillian Young McCusker, Jutta Vüllers, Peggy Achtert, Paul Field, Jonathan J. Day, Richard Forbes, Ruth Price, Ewan O'Connor, Michael Tjernström, John Prytherch, Ryan Neely III, and Ian M. Brooks
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 4819–4847, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-4819-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-4819-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, we show that recent versions of two atmospheric models – the Unified Model and Integrated Forecasting System – overestimate Arctic cloud fraction within the lower troposphere by comparison with recent remote-sensing measurements made during the Arctic Ocean 2018 expedition. The overabundance of cloud is interlinked with the modelled thermodynamic structure, with strong negative temperature biases coincident with these overestimated cloud layers.
Pyry Pentikäinen, Ewan J. O'Connor, and Pablo Ortiz-Amezcua
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 2077–2094, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2077-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2077-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We used Doppler lidar to evaluate the wind profiles generated by a weather forecast model. We first compared the Doppler lidar observations with co-located radiosonde profiles, and they agree well. The model performs best over marine and coastal locations. Larger errors were seen in locations where the surface was more complex, especially in the wind direction. Our results show that Doppler lidar is a suitable instrument for evaluating the boundary layer wind profiles in atmospheric models.
Konstantinos Matthaios Doulgeris, Ville Vakkari, Ewan J. O'Connor, Veli-Matti Kerminen, Heikki Lihavainen, and David Brus
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 2483–2498, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-2483-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-2483-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We investigated how different long-range-transported air masses can affect the microphysical properties of low-level clouds in a clean subarctic environment. A connection was revealed. Higher values of cloud droplet number concentrations were related to continental air masses, whereas the lowest values of number concentrations were related to marine air masses. These were characterized by larger cloud droplets. Clouds in all regions were sensitive to increases in cloud number concentration.
Konstantinos Michailidis, Maria-Elissavet Koukouli, Dimitris Balis, J. Pepijn Veefkind, Martin de Graaf, Lucia Mona, Nikolaos Papagianopoulos, Gesolmina Pappalardo, Ioanna Tsikoudi, Vassilis Amiridis, Eleni Marinou, Anna Gialitaki, Rodanthi-Elisavet Mamouri, Argyro Nisantzi, Daniele Bortoli, Maria João Costa, Vanda Salgueiro, Alexandros Papayannis, Maria Mylonaki, Lucas Alados-Arboledas, Salvatore Romano, Maria Rita Perrone, and Holger Baars
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 1919–1940, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-1919-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-1919-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Comparisons with ground-based correlative lidar measurements constitute a key component in the validation of satellite aerosol products. This paper presents the validation of the TROPOMI aerosol layer height (ALH) product, using archived quality assured ground-based data from lidar stations that belong to the EARLINET network. Comparisons between the TROPOMI ALH and co-located EARLINET measurements show good agreement over the ocean.
María Ángeles López-Cayuela, Carmen Córdoba-Jabonero, Diego Bermejo-Pantaleón, Michaël Sicard, Vanda Salgueiro, Francisco Molero, Clara Violeta Carvajal-Pérez, María José Granados-Muñoz, Adolfo Comerón, Flavio T. Couto, Rubén Barragán, María-Paz Zorzano, Juan Antonio Bravo-Aranda, Constantino Muñoz-Porcar, María João Costa, Begoña Artíñano, Alejandro Rodríguez-Gómez, Daniele Bortoli, Manuel Pujadas, Jesús Abril-Gago, Lucas Alados-Arboledas, and Juan Luis Guerrero-Rascado
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 143–161, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-143-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-143-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
An intense Saharan dust outbreak crossing the Iberian Peninsula in springtime was monitored to determinine the specific contribution of fine and coarse dust particles at five lidar stations, strategically covering its SW–central–NE pathway. Expected dust ageing along the transport started unappreciated. A different fine-dust impact on optical (~30 %) and mass (~10 %) properties was found. Use of polarized lidar measurements (mainly in elastic systems) for fine/coarse dust separation is crucial.
Andreas Plach, Rolf Rüfenacht, Simone Kotthaus, and Markus Leuenberger
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-1019, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-1019, 2022
Preprint archived
Short summary
Short summary
Greenhouse gases emissions are contributing to global warming and it is essential to better understand where they originate from and how they are transported. In this study we analyze greenhouse gas observations at a Swiss tall tower where measurements are taken more than 200 m above ground and investigate their origin by looking at the condition of the atmosphere at the time of the observations. We find that most pollution at this site is caused from emissions transported from further away.
Mathew Lipson, Sue Grimmond, Martin Best, Winston T. L. Chow, Andreas Christen, Nektarios Chrysoulakis, Andrew Coutts, Ben Crawford, Stevan Earl, Jonathan Evans, Krzysztof Fortuniak, Bert G. Heusinkveld, Je-Woo Hong, Jinkyu Hong, Leena Järvi, Sungsoo Jo, Yeon-Hee Kim, Simone Kotthaus, Keunmin Lee, Valéry Masson, Joseph P. McFadden, Oliver Michels, Wlodzimierz Pawlak, Matthias Roth, Hirofumi Sugawara, Nigel Tapper, Erik Velasco, and Helen Claire Ward
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 5157–5178, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-5157-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-5157-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We describe a new openly accessible collection of atmospheric observations from 20 cities around the world, capturing 50 site years. The observations capture local meteorology (temperature, humidity, wind, etc.) and the energy fluxes between the land and atmosphere (e.g. radiation and sensible and latent heat fluxes). These observations can be used to improve our understanding of urban climate processes and to test the accuracy of urban climate models.
Jenna Ritvanen, Ewan O'Connor, Dmitri Moisseev, Raisa Lehtinen, Jani Tyynelä, and Ludovic Thobois
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 6507–6519, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6507-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6507-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Doppler lidars and weather radars provide accurate wind measurements, with Doppler lidar usually performing better in dry weather conditions and weather radar performing better when there is precipitation. Operating both instruments together should therefore improve the overall performance. We investigate how well a co-located Doppler lidar and X-band radar perform with respect to various weather conditions, including changes in horizontal visibility, cloud altitude, and precipitation.
Enza Di Tomaso, Jerónimo Escribano, Sara Basart, Paul Ginoux, Francesca Macchia, Francesca Barnaba, Francesco Benincasa, Pierre-Antoine Bretonnière, Arnau Buñuel, Miguel Castrillo, Emilio Cuevas, Paola Formenti, María Gonçalves, Oriol Jorba, Martina Klose, Lucia Mona, Gilbert Montané Pinto, Michail Mytilinaios, Vincenzo Obiso, Miriam Olid, Nick Schutgens, Athanasios Votsis, Ernest Werner, and Carlos Pérez García-Pando
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 2785–2816, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-2785-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-2785-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
MONARCH reanalysis of desert dust aerosols extends the existing observation-based information for mineral dust monitoring by providing 3-hourly upper-air, surface and total column key geophysical variables of the dust cycle over Northern Africa, the Middle East and Europe, at a 0.1° horizontal resolution in a rotated grid, from 2007 to 2016. This work provides evidence of the high accuracy of this data set and its suitability for air quality and health and climate service applications.
Cyril Brunner, Benjamin T. Brem, Martine Collaud Coen, Franz Conen, Martin Steinbacher, Martin Gysel-Beer, and Zamin A. Kanji
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 7557–7573, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-7557-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-7557-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Microscopic particles called ice-nucleating particles (INPs) are essential for ice crystals to form in clouds. INPs are a tiny proportion of atmospheric aerosol, and their abundance is poorly constrained. We study how the concentration of INPs changes diurnally and seasonally at a mountaintop station in central Europe. Unsurprisingly, a diurnal cycle is only found when considering air masses that have had lower-altitude ground contact. The highest INP concentrations occur in spring.
Alessandro Battaglia, Paolo Martire, Eric Caubet, Laurent Phalippou, Fabrizio Stesina, Pavlos Kollias, and Anthony Illingworth
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 3011–3030, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3011-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3011-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We present an instrument simulator for a new sensor, WIVERN (WInd VElocity Radar Nephoscope), a conically scanning radar payload with Doppler capabilities, recently down-selected as one of the four candidates for the European Space Agency Earth Explorer 11 program. The mission aims at measuring horizontal winds in cloudy areas. The simulator is instrumental in the definition and consolidation of the mission requirements and the evaluation of mission performances.
Sasu Karttunen, Ewan O'Connor, Olli Peltola, and Leena Järvi
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 2417–2432, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-2417-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-2417-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
To study the complex structure of the lowest tens of metres of atmosphere in urban areas, measurement methods with great spatial and temporal coverage are needed. In our study, we analyse measurements with a promising and relatively new method, distributed temperature sensing, capable of providing detailed information on the near-surface atmosphere. We present multiple ways to utilise these kinds of measurements, as well as important considerations for planning new studies using the method.
Jesús Abril-Gago, Juan Luis Guerrero-Rascado, Maria João Costa, Juan Antonio Bravo-Aranda, Michaël Sicard, Diego Bermejo-Pantaleón, Daniele Bortoli, María José Granados-Muñoz, Alejandro Rodríguez-Gómez, Constantino Muñoz-Porcar, Adolfo Comerón, Pablo Ortiz-Amezcua, Vanda Salgueiro, Marta María Jiménez-Martín, and Lucas Alados-Arboledas
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 1425–1451, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-1425-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-1425-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
A validation of Aeolus reprocessed optical products is carried out via an intercomparison with ground-based measurements taken at several ACTRIS/EARLINET stations in western Europe. Case studies and a statistical analysis are presented. The stations are located in a hot spot between Africa and the rest of Europe, which guarantees a variety of aerosol types, from mineral dust layers to continental/anthropogenic aerosol, and allows us to test Aeolus performance under different scenarios.
Jutta Kesti, John Backman, Ewan J. O'Connor, Anne Hirsikko, Eija Asmi, Minna Aurela, Ulla Makkonen, Maria Filioglou, Mika Komppula, Hannele Korhonen, and Heikki Lihavainen
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 481–503, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-481-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-481-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
In this study we combined aerosol particle measurements at the surface with a scanning Doppler lidar providing vertical profiles of the atmosphere to study the effect of different boundary layer conditions on aerosol particle properties in the understudied Arabian Peninsula region. The instrumentation used in this study enabled us to identify periods when pollution from remote sources was mixed down to the surface and initiated new particle formation in the growing boundary layer.
Jean-François Ribaud, Martial Haeffelin, Jean-Charles Dupont, Marc-Antoine Drouin, Felipe Toledo, and Simone Kotthaus
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 7893–7907, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-7893-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-7893-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
PARAFOG is a near-real-time decision tool that aims to retrieve pre-fog alert levels minutes to hours prior to fog onset. The second version of PARAFOG allows us to discriminate between radiation and stratus lowering fog situations. It is based upon the combination of visibility observations and automatic lidar and ceilometer measurements. The overall performance of the second version of PARAFOG over more than 300 fog cases at five different locations presents a good perfomance.
Matthieu Plu, Guillaume Bigeard, Bojan Sič, Emanuele Emili, Luca Bugliaro, Laaziz El Amraoui, Jonathan Guth, Beatrice Josse, Lucia Mona, and Dennis Piontek
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 3731–3747, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-3731-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-3731-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Volcanic eruptions that spread out ash over large areas, like Eyjafjallajökull in 2010, may have huge economic consequences due to flight cancellations. In this article, we demonstrate the benefits of source term improvement and of data assimilation for quantifying volcanic ash concentrations. The work, which was supported by the EUNADICS-AV project, is the first one, to our knowledge, that demonstrates the benefit of the assimilation of ground-based lidar data over Europe during an eruption.
Cyril Brunner, Benjamin T. Brem, Martine Collaud Coen, Franz Conen, Maxime Hervo, Stephan Henne, Martin Steinbacher, Martin Gysel-Beer, and Zamin A. Kanji
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 18029–18053, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-18029-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-18029-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Special microscopic particles called ice-nucleating particles (INPs) are essential for ice crystals to form in the atmosphere. INPs are sparse and their atmospheric concentration and properties are not well understood. Mineral dust particles make up a significant fraction of INPs but how much remains unknown. Here, we address this knowledge gap by studying periods when mineral particles are present in large quantities at a mountaintop station in central Europe.
Clémence Rose, Martine Collaud Coen, Elisabeth Andrews, Yong Lin, Isaline Bossert, Cathrine Lund Myhre, Thomas Tuch, Alfred Wiedensohler, Markus Fiebig, Pasi Aalto, Andrés Alastuey, Elisabeth Alonso-Blanco, Marcos Andrade, Begoña Artíñano, Todor Arsov, Urs Baltensperger, Susanne Bastian, Olaf Bath, Johan Paul Beukes, Benjamin T. Brem, Nicolas Bukowiecki, Juan Andrés Casquero-Vera, Sébastien Conil, Konstantinos Eleftheriadis, Olivier Favez, Harald Flentje, Maria I. Gini, Francisco Javier Gómez-Moreno, Martin Gysel-Beer, Anna Gannet Hallar, Ivo Kalapov, Nikos Kalivitis, Anne Kasper-Giebl, Melita Keywood, Jeong Eun Kim, Sang-Woo Kim, Adam Kristensson, Markku Kulmala, Heikki Lihavainen, Neng-Huei Lin, Hassan Lyamani, Angela Marinoni, Sebastiao Martins Dos Santos, Olga L. Mayol-Bracero, Frank Meinhardt, Maik Merkel, Jean-Marc Metzger, Nikolaos Mihalopoulos, Jakub Ondracek, Marco Pandolfi, Noemi Pérez, Tuukka Petäjä, Jean-Eudes Petit, David Picard, Jean-Marc Pichon, Veronique Pont, Jean-Philippe Putaud, Fabienne Reisen, Karine Sellegri, Sangeeta Sharma, Gerhard Schauer, Patrick Sheridan, James Patrick Sherman, Andreas Schwerin, Ralf Sohmer, Mar Sorribas, Junying Sun, Pierre Tulet, Ville Vakkari, Pieter Gideon van Zyl, Fernando Velarde, Paolo Villani, Stergios Vratolis, Zdenek Wagner, Sheng-Hsiang Wang, Kay Weinhold, Rolf Weller, Margarita Yela, Vladimir Zdimal, and Paolo Laj
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 17185–17223, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-17185-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-17185-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Aerosol particles are a complex component of the atmospheric system the effects of which are among the most uncertain in climate change projections. Using data collected at 62 stations, this study provides the most up-to-date picture of the spatial distribution of particle number concentration and size distribution worldwide, with the aim of contributing to better representation of aerosols and their interactions with clouds in models and, therefore, better evaluation of their impact on climate.
Jean-Eudes Petit, Jean-Charles Dupont, Olivier Favez, Valérie Gros, Yunjiang Zhang, Jean Sciare, Leila Simon, François Truong, Nicolas Bonnaire, Tanguy Amodeo, Robert Vautard, and Martial Haeffelin
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 17167–17183, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-17167-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-17167-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The COVID-19 outbreak led to lockdowns at national scales in spring 2020. Large cuts in emissions occurred, but the quantitative assessment of their role from observations is hindered by weather and interannual variability. That is why we developed an innovative methodology in order to best characterize the impact of lockdown on atmospheric chemistry. We find that a local decrease in traffic-related pollutants triggered a decrease of secondary aerosols and an increase in ozone.
Anna Franck, Dmitri Moisseev, Ville Vakkari, Matti Leskinen, Janne Lampilahti, Veli-Matti Kerminen, and Ewan O'Connor
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 7341–7353, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-7341-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-7341-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We proposed a method to derive a convective boundary layer height, using insects in radar observations, and we investigated the consistency of these retrievals among different radar frequencies (5, 35 and 94 GHz). This method can be applied to radars at other measurement stations and serve as additional way to estimate the boundary layer height during summer. The entrainment zone was also observed by the 5 GHz radar above the boundary layer in the form of a Bragg scatter layer.
Hugues Brenot, Nicolas Theys, Lieven Clarisse, Jeroen van Gent, Daniel R. Hurtmans, Sophie Vandenbussche, Nikolaos Papagiannopoulos, Lucia Mona, Timo Virtanen, Andreas Uppstu, Mikhail Sofiev, Luca Bugliaro, Margarita Vázquez-Navarro, Pascal Hedelt, Michelle Maree Parks, Sara Barsotti, Mauro Coltelli, William Moreland, Simona Scollo, Giuseppe Salerno, Delia Arnold-Arias, Marcus Hirtl, Tuomas Peltonen, Juhani Lahtinen, Klaus Sievers, Florian Lipok, Rolf Rüfenacht, Alexander Haefele, Maxime Hervo, Saskia Wagenaar, Wim Som de Cerff, Jos de Laat, Arnoud Apituley, Piet Stammes, Quentin Laffineur, Andy Delcloo, Robertson Lennart, Carl-Herbert Rokitansky, Arturo Vargas, Markus Kerschbaum, Christian Resch, Raimund Zopp, Matthieu Plu, Vincent-Henri Peuch, Michel Van Roozendael, and Gerhard Wotawa
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 3367–3405, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-3367-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-3367-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The purpose of the EUNADICS-AV (European Natural Airborne Disaster Information and Coordination System for Aviation) prototype early warning system (EWS) is to develop the combined use of harmonised data products from satellite, ground-based and in situ instruments to produce alerts of airborne hazards (volcanic, dust, smoke and radionuclide clouds), satisfying the requirement of aviation air traffic management (ATM) stakeholders (https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/723986).
Mariana Adam, Iwona S. Stachlewska, Lucia Mona, Nikolaos Papagiannopoulos, Juan Antonio Bravo-Aranda, Michaël Sicard, Doina N. Nicolae, Livio Belegante, Lucja Janicka, Dominika Szczepanik, Maria Mylonaki, Christina-Anna Papanikolaou, Nikolaos Siomos, Kalliopi Artemis Voudouri, Luca Alados-Arboledas, Arnoud Apituley, Ina Mattis, Anatoli Chaikovsky, Constantino Muñoz-Porcar, Aleksander Pietruczuk, Daniele Bortoli, Holger Baars, Ivan Grigorov, and Zahary Peshev
Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2021-759, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2021-759, 2021
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Short summary
Results over 10 years of biomass burning events measured by EARLINET are analysed by means of the intensive parameters, based on the methodology described in Part I. Smoke type is characterized for each of the four geographical regions based on continental smoke origin. Relationships between intensive parameters or colour ratios are shown. The smoke is labelled in average as aged smoke.
Xiaoxia Shang, Tero Mielonen, Antti Lipponen, Elina Giannakaki, Ari Leskinen, Virginie Buchard, Anton S. Darmenov, Antti Kukkurainen, Antti Arola, Ewan O'Connor, Anne Hirsikko, and Mika Komppula
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 6159–6179, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-6159-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-6159-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The long-range-transported smoke particles from a Canadian wildfire event were observed with a multi-wavelength Raman polarization lidar and a ceilometer over Kuopio, Finland, in June 2019. The optical properties and the mass concentration estimations were reported for such aged smoke aerosols over northern Europe.
Michael Biggart, Jenny Stocker, Ruth M. Doherty, Oliver Wild, David Carruthers, Sue Grimmond, Yiqun Han, Pingqing Fu, and Simone Kotthaus
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 13687–13711, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-13687-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-13687-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Heat-related illnesses are of increasing concern in China given its rapid urbanisation and our ever-warming climate. We examine the relative impacts that land surface properties and anthropogenic heat have on the urban heat island (UHI) in Beijing using ADMS-Urban. Air temperature measurements and satellite-derived land surface temperatures provide valuable means of evaluating modelled spatiotemporal variations. This work provides critical information for urban planners and UHI mitigation.
Felipe Toledo, Martial Haeffelin, Eivind Wærsted, and Jean-Charles Dupont
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 13099–13117, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-13099-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-13099-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The article presents a new conceptual model to describe the temporal evolution of continental fog layers, developed based on 7 years of fog measurements performed at the SIRTA observatory, France. This new paradigm relates the visibility reduction caused by fog to its vertical thickness and liquid water path and provides diagnostic variables that could substantially improve the reliability of fog dissipation nowcasting at a local scale, based on real-time profiling observation.
Gloria Titos, María A. Burgos, Paul Zieger, Lucas Alados-Arboledas, Urs Baltensperger, Anne Jefferson, James Sherman, Ernest Weingartner, Bas Henzing, Krista Luoma, Colin O'Dowd, Alfred Wiedensohler, and Elisabeth Andrews
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 13031–13050, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-13031-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-13031-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This paper investigates the impact of water uptake on aerosol optical properties, in particular the aerosol light-scattering coefficient. Although in situ measurements are performed at low relative humidity (typically at
RH < 40 %), to address the climatic impact of aerosol particles it is necessary to take into account the effect that water uptake may have on the aerosol optical properties.
Paraskevi Georgakaki, Aikaterini Bougiatioti, Jörg Wieder, Claudia Mignani, Fabiola Ramelli, Zamin A. Kanji, Jan Henneberger, Maxime Hervo, Alexis Berne, Ulrike Lohmann, and Athanasios Nenes
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 10993–11012, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-10993-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-10993-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Aerosol and cloud observations coupled with a droplet activation parameterization was used to investigate the aerosol–cloud droplet link in alpine mixed-phase clouds. Predicted droplet number, Nd, agrees with observations and never exceeds a characteristic “limiting droplet number”, Ndlim, which depends solely on σw. Nd becomes velocity limited when it is within 50 % of Ndlim. Identifying when dynamical changes control Nd variability is central for understanding aerosol–cloud interactions.
Jinghui Lian, François-Marie Bréon, Grégoire Broquet, Thomas Lauvaux, Bo Zheng, Michel Ramonet, Irène Xueref-Remy, Simone Kotthaus, Martial Haeffelin, and Philippe Ciais
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 10707–10726, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-10707-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-10707-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Currently there is growing interest in monitoring city-scale CO2 emissions based on atmospheric CO2 measurements, atmospheric transport modeling, and inversion technique. We analyze the various sources of uncertainty that impact the atmospheric CO2 modeling and that may compromise the potential of this method for the monitoring of CO2 emission over Paris. Results suggest selection criteria for the assimilation of CO2 measurements into the inversion system that aims at retrieving city emissions.
Jose Antonio Benavent-Oltra, Juan Andrés Casquero-Vera, Roberto Román, Hassan Lyamani, Daniel Pérez-Ramírez, María José Granados-Muñoz, Milagros Herrera, Alberto Cazorla, Gloria Titos, Pablo Ortiz-Amezcua, Andrés Esteban Bedoya-Velásquez, Gregori de Arruda Moreira, Noemí Pérez, Andrés Alastuey, Oleg Dubovik, Juan Luis Guerrero-Rascado, Francisco José Olmo-Reyes, and Lucas Alados-Arboledas
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 9269–9287, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-9269-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-9269-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
In this paper, we use the GRASP algorithm combining different remote sensing measurements to obtain the aerosol vertical and column properties during the SLOPE I and II campaigns. We show an overview of aerosol properties retrieved by GRASP during these campaigns and evaluate the retrievals of aerosol properties using the in situ measurements performed at a high-altitude station and airborne flights. For the first time we present an evaluation of the absorption coefficient by GRASP.
Fabiola Ramelli, Jan Henneberger, Robert O. David, Johannes Bühl, Martin Radenz, Patric Seifert, Jörg Wieder, Annika Lauber, Julie T. Pasquier, Ronny Engelmann, Claudia Mignani, Maxime Hervo, and Ulrike Lohmann
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 6681–6706, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6681-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6681-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Orographic mixed-phase clouds are an important source of precipitation, but the ice formation processes within them remain uncertain. Here we investigate the origin of ice crystals in a mixed-phase cloud in the Swiss Alps using aerosol and cloud data from in situ and remote sensing observations. We found that ice formation primarily occurs in cloud top generating cells. Our results indicate that secondary ice processes are active in the feeder region, which can enhance orographic precipitation.
Claire E. Reeves, Graham P. Mills, Lisa K. Whalley, W. Joe F. Acton, William J. Bloss, Leigh R. Crilley, Sue Grimmond, Dwayne E. Heard, C. Nicholas Hewitt, James R. Hopkins, Simone Kotthaus, Louisa J. Kramer, Roderic L. Jones, James D. Lee, Yanhui Liu, Bin Ouyang, Eloise Slater, Freya Squires, Xinming Wang, Robert Woodward-Massey, and Chunxiang Ye
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 6315–6330, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6315-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6315-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The impact of isoprene on atmospheric chemistry is dependent on how its oxidation products interact with other pollutants, specifically nitrogen oxides. Such interactions can lead to isoprene nitrates. We made measurements of the concentrations of individual isoprene nitrate isomers in Beijing and used a model to test current understanding of their chemistry. We highlight areas of uncertainty in understanding, in particular the chemistry following oxidation of isoprene by the nitrate radical.
Ville Vakkari, Holger Baars, Stephanie Bohlmann, Johannes Bühl, Mika Komppula, Rodanthi-Elisavet Mamouri, and Ewan James O'Connor
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 5807–5820, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-5807-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-5807-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The depolarization ratio is a valuable parameter for aerosol categorization from remote sensing measurements. Here, we introduce particle depolarization ratio measurements at the 1565 nm wavelength, which is substantially longer than previously utilized wavelengths and enhances our capabilities to study the wavelength dependency of the particle depolarization ratio.
Ayham Alyosef, Domenico Cimini, Lorenzo Luini, Carlo Riva, Frank S. Marzano, Marianna Biscarini, Luca Milani, Antonio Martellucci, Sabrina Gentile, Saverio T. Nilo, Francesco Di Paola, Ayman Alkhateeb, and Filomena Romano
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 2737–2748, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-2737-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-2737-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Telecommunication is based on the propagation of radio signals through the atmosphere. The signal power diminishes along the path due to atmospheric attenuation, which needs to be estimated to be accounted for. In a study funded by the European Space Agency, we demonstrate an innovative method improving atmospheric attenuation estimates from ground-based radiometric measurements by 10–30 %. More accurate atmospheric attenuation estimates imply better telecommunication services in the future.
Wenhua Wang, Longyi Shao, Claudio Mazzoleni, Yaowei Li, Simone Kotthaus, Sue Grimmond, Janarjan Bhandari, Jiaoping Xing, Xiaolei Feng, Mengyuan Zhang, and Zongbo Shi
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 5301–5314, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-5301-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-5301-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We compared the characteristics of individual particles at ground level and above the mixed-layer height. We found that the particles above the mixed-layer height during haze periods are more aged compared to ground level. More coal-combustion-related primary organic particles were found above the mixed-layer height. We suggest that the particles above the mixed-layer height are affected by the surrounding areas, and once mixed down to the ground, they might contribute to ground air pollution.
Fabiola Ramelli, Jan Henneberger, Robert O. David, Annika Lauber, Julie T. Pasquier, Jörg Wieder, Johannes Bühl, Patric Seifert, Ronny Engelmann, Maxime Hervo, and Ulrike Lohmann
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 5151–5172, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-5151-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-5151-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Interactions between dynamics, microphysics and orography can enhance precipitation. Yet the exact role of these interactions is still uncertain. Here we investigate the role of low-level blocking and turbulence for precipitation by combining remote sensing and in situ observations. The observations show that blocked flow can induce the formation of feeder clouds and that turbulence can enhance hydrometeor growth, demonstrating the importance of local flow effects for orographic precipitation.
Steven Compernolle, Athina Argyrouli, Ronny Lutz, Maarten Sneep, Jean-Christopher Lambert, Ann Mari Fjæraa, Daan Hubert, Arno Keppens, Diego Loyola, Ewan O'Connor, Fabian Romahn, Piet Stammes, Tijl Verhoelst, and Ping Wang
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 2451–2476, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-2451-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-2451-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The high-resolution satellite Sentinel-5p TROPOMI observes several atmospheric gases. To account for cloud interference with the observations, S5P cloud data products (CLOUD OCRA/ROCINN_CAL, OCRA/ROCINN_CRB, and FRESCO) provide vital input: cloud fraction, cloud height, and cloud optical thickness. Here, S5P cloud parameters are validated by comparing with other satellite sensors (VIIRS, MODIS, and OMI) and with ground-based CloudNet data. The agreement depends on product type and cloud height.
Olli Peltola, Karl Lapo, Ilkka Martinkauppi, Ewan O'Connor, Christoph K. Thomas, and Timo Vesala
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 2409–2427, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-2409-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-2409-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We evaluated the suitability of fiber-optic distributed temperature sensing (DTS) for observing spatial (>25 cm) and temporal (>1 s) details of airflow within and above forests. The DTS measurements could discern up to third-order moments of the flow and observe spatial details of coherent flow motions. Similar measurements are not possible with more conventional measurement techniques. Hence, the DTS measurements will provide key insights into flows close to roughness elements, e.g. trees.
Roland Stirnberg, Jan Cermak, Simone Kotthaus, Martial Haeffelin, Hendrik Andersen, Julia Fuchs, Miae Kim, Jean-Eudes Petit, and Olivier Favez
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 3919–3948, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-3919-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-3919-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Air pollution endangers human health and poses a problem particularly in densely populated areas. Here, an explainable machine learning approach is used to analyse periods of high particle concentrations for a suburban site southwest of Paris to better understand its atmospheric drivers. Air pollution is particularly excaberated by low temperatures and low mixed layer heights, but processes vary substantially between and within seasons.
Annika Lauber, Jan Henneberger, Claudia Mignani, Fabiola Ramelli, Julie T. Pasquier, Jörg Wieder, Maxime Hervo, and Ulrike Lohmann
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 3855–3870, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-3855-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-3855-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
An accurate prediction of the ice crystal number concentration (ICNC) is important to determine the radiation budget, lifetime, and precipitation formation of clouds. Even though secondary-ice processes can increase the ICNC by several orders of magnitude, they are poorly constrained and lack a well-founded quantification. During measurements on a mountain slope, a high ICNC of small ice crystals was observed just below 0 °C, attributed to a secondary-ice process and parametrized in this study.
Konstantinos Michailidis, Maria-Elissavet Koukouli, Nikolaos Siomos, Dimitris Balis, Olaf Tuinder, L. Gijsbert Tilstra, Lucia Mona, Gelsomina Pappalardo, and Daniele Bortoli
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 3193–3213, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-3193-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-3193-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The aim of this study is to investigate the potential of the GOME-2 instrument aboard the MetOp-A, MetOp-B and MetOp-C platforms to deliver accurate geometrical features of lofted aerosol layers. For this purpose, we use archived ground-based data from lidar stations available from the EARLINET database. We show that for this well-developed and spatially well-spread aerosol layer, most GOME-2 retrievals fall within 1 km of the exact temporally collocated lidar observation.
Nikolaos Evangeliou, Stephen M. Platt, Sabine Eckhardt, Cathrine Lund Myhre, Paolo Laj, Lucas Alados-Arboledas, John Backman, Benjamin T. Brem, Markus Fiebig, Harald Flentje, Angela Marinoni, Marco Pandolfi, Jesus Yus-Dìez, Natalia Prats, Jean P. Putaud, Karine Sellegri, Mar Sorribas, Konstantinos Eleftheriadis, Stergios Vratolis, Alfred Wiedensohler, and Andreas Stohl
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 2675–2692, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-2675-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-2675-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Following the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 to Europe, social distancing rules were introduced to prevent further spread. We investigate the impacts of the European lockdowns on black carbon (BC) emissions by means of in situ observations and inverse modelling. BC emissions declined by 23 kt in Europe during the lockdowns as compared with previous years and by 11 % as compared to the period prior to lockdowns. Residential combustion prevailed in Eastern Europe, as confirmed by remote sensing data.
Giovanni Martucci, Francisco Navas-Guzmán, Ludovic Renaud, Gonzague Romanens, S. Mahagammulla Gamage, Maxime Hervo, Pierre Jeannet, and Alexander Haefele
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 1333–1353, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-1333-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-1333-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This article presents a validation of 1.5 years of pure rotational temperature data measured by the Raman lidar RALMO installed at the MeteoSwiss station of Payerne. The statistical results are in terms of bias and standard deviation with respect to two well-established radiosounding systems. The statistics are divided into daytime (bias = 0.28 K, SD = 0.62±0.03 K) and nighttime (bias = 0.29 K, SD = 0.66±0.06 K). The lidar temperature profiles are applied to cloud supersaturation studies.
Simone Brunamonti, Giovanni Martucci, Gonzague Romanens, Yann Poltera, Frank G. Wienhold, Maxime Hervo, Alexander Haefele, and Francisco Navas-Guzmán
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 2267–2285, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-2267-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-2267-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Lidar (light detection and ranging) is a class of remote-sensing instruments that are widely used for the monitoring of aerosol properties in the lower levels of the atmosphere, yet their measurements are affected by several sources of uncertainty. Here we present the first comparison of two lidar systems against a fully independent instrument carried by meteorological balloons. We show that both lidars achieve a good agreement with the high-precision balloon measurements up to 6 km altitude.
Lisa K. Whalley, Eloise J. Slater, Robert Woodward-Massey, Chunxiang Ye, James D. Lee, Freya Squires, James R. Hopkins, Rachel E. Dunmore, Marvin Shaw, Jacqueline F. Hamilton, Alastair C. Lewis, Archit Mehra, Stephen D. Worrall, Asan Bacak, Thomas J. Bannan, Hugh Coe, Carl J. Percival, Bin Ouyang, Roderic L. Jones, Leigh R. Crilley, Louisa J. Kramer, William J. Bloss, Tuan Vu, Simone Kotthaus, Sue Grimmond, Yele Sun, Weiqi Xu, Siyao Yue, Lujie Ren, W. Joe F. Acton, C. Nicholas Hewitt, Xinming Wang, Pingqing Fu, and Dwayne E. Heard
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 2125–2147, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-2125-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-2125-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
To understand how emission controls will impact ozone, an understanding of the sources and sinks of OH and the chemical cycling between peroxy radicals is needed. This paper presents measurements of OH, HO2 and total RO2 taken in central Beijing. The radical observations are compared to a detailed chemistry model, which shows that under low NO conditions, there is a missing OH source. Under high NOx conditions, the model under-predicts RO2 and impacts our ability to model ozone.
Rutambhara Joshi, Dantong Liu, Eiko Nemitz, Ben Langford, Neil Mullinger, Freya Squires, James Lee, Yunfei Wu, Xiaole Pan, Pingqing Fu, Simone Kotthaus, Sue Grimmond, Qiang Zhang, Ruili Wu, Oliver Wild, Michael Flynn, Hugh Coe, and James Allan
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 147–162, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-147-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-147-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Black carbon (BC) is a component of particulate matter which has significant effects on climate and human health. Sources of BC include biomass burning, transport, industry and domestic cooking and heating. In this study, we measured BC emissions in Beijing, finding a dominance of traffic emissions over all other sources. The quantitative method presented here has benefits for revising widely used emissions inventories and for understanding BC sources with impacts on air quality and climate.
Martine Collaud Coen, Elisabeth Andrews, Alessandro Bigi, Giovanni Martucci, Gonzague Romanens, Frédéric P. A. Vogt, and Laurent Vuilleumier
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 6945–6964, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-6945-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-6945-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The Mann–Kendall trend test requires prewhitening in the presence of serially correlated data. The effects of five prewhitening methods and time granularity, autocorrelation, temporal segmentation and length of the time series on the statistical significance and the slope are studies for seven atmospheric datasets. Finally, a new algorithm using three prewhitening methods is proposed in order to optimize the power of the test, the amount of erroneous false positive trends and the slope estimate.
Felipe Toledo, Julien Delanoë, Martial Haeffelin, Jean-Charles Dupont, Susana Jorquera, and Christophe Le Gac
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 6853–6875, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-6853-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-6853-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Cloud observations are essential to rainfall, fog and climate change forecasts. One key instrument for these observations is cloud radar. Yet, discrepancies are found when comparing radars from different ground stations or satellites. Our work presents a calibration methodology for cloud radars based on reference targets, including an analysis of the uncertainty sources. The method enables the calibration of reference instruments to improve the quality and value of the cloud radar network data.
Pauline Martinet, Domenico Cimini, Frédéric Burnet, Benjamin Ménétrier, Yann Michel, and Vinciane Unger
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 6593–6611, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-6593-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-6593-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Each year large human and economical losses are due to fog episodes. However, fog forecasts remain quite inaccurate, partly due to a lack of observations in the atmospheric boundary layer. The benefit of ground-based microwave radiometers has been investigated and has demonstrated their capability of significantly improving the initial state of temperature and liquid water content profiles in current numerical weather prediction models, paving the way for improved fog forecasts in the future.
Ourania Soupiona, Alexandros Papayannis, Panagiotis Kokkalis, Romanos Foskinis, Guadalupe Sánchez Hernández, Pablo Ortiz-Amezcua, Maria Mylonaki, Christina-Anna Papanikolaou, Nikolaos Papagiannopoulos, Stefanos Samaras, Silke Groß, Rodanthi-Elisavet Mamouri, Lucas Alados-Arboledas, Aldo Amodeo, and Basil Psiloglou
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 15147–15166, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-15147-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-15147-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
51 dust events over the Mediterranean from EARLINET were studied regarding the aerosol geometrical, optical and microphysical properties and radiative forcing. We found δp532 values of 0.24–0.28, LR532 values of 49–52 sr and AOT532 of 0.11–0.40. The aerosol mixing state was also examined. Depending on the dust properties, intensity and solar zenith angle, the estimated solar radiative forcing ranged from −59 to −22 W m−2 at the surface and from −24 to −1 W m−2 at the TOA (cooling effect).
Peggy Achtert, Ewan J. O'Connor, Ian M. Brooks, Georgia Sotiropoulou, Matthew D. Shupe, Bernhard Pospichal, Barbara J. Brooks, and Michael Tjernström
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 14983–15002, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-14983-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-14983-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We present observations of precipitating and non-precipitating Arctic liquid and mixed-phase clouds during a research cruise along the Russian shelf in summer and autumn of 2014. Active remote-sensing observations, radiosondes, and auxiliary measurements are combined in the synergistic Cloudnet retrieval. Cloud properties are analysed with respect to cloud-top temperature and boundary layer structure. About 8 % of all liquid clouds show a liquid water path below the infrared black body limit.
Cited articles
Abril-Gago, J., Guerrero-Rascado, J. L., Costa, M. J., Bravo-Aranda, J. A., Sicard, M., Bermejo-Pantaleón, D., Bortoli, D., Granados-Muñoz, M. J., Rodríguez-Gómez, A., Muñoz-Porcar, C., Comerón, A., Ortiz-Amezcua, P., Salgueiro, V., Jiménez-Martín, M. M., and Alados-Arboledas, L.: Statistical validation of Aeolus L2A particle backscatter coefficient retrievals over ACTRIS/EARLINET stations on the Iberian Peninsula, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 1425–1451, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-1425-2022, 2022. a
Allabakash, S., Yasodha, P., Bianco, L., Venkatramana Reddy, S., Srinivasulu,
P., and Lim, S.: Improved boundary layer height measurement using a fuzzy
logic method: diurnal and seasonal variabilities of the convective boundary
layer over a tropical station, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122, 9211–9232,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD027615, 2017. a
AMS,: American Meteorological Society Glossary of Meteorology, http://glossary.ametsoc.org/ (last access: 12 January 2023), 2017. a
Angelini, F., Barnaba, F., Landi, T. C., Caporaso, L., and Gobbi, G. P.: Study of atmospheric aerosols and mixing layer by LIDAR, Radiant. Prot. Dosim., 137, 275–279, https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncp219, 2009. a
Angevine, W., Senff, C., and Westwater, E.: Boundary layers/Observational
Techniques-Remote, in: Encyclopedia of Atmospheric Sciences, edited by:
Holton, J. R., Academic Press, Oxford, 271–279,
https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-12-227090-8/00089-0, 2003. a
Angevine, W. M., White, A. B., and Avery, S. K.: Boundary-layer depth and
entrainment zone characterization with a boundary-layer profiler,
Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 68, 375–385, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00706797, 1994. a
Ansmann, A., Wandinger, U., Riebesell, M., Weitkamp, C., and Michaelis, W.:
Independent measurement of extinction and backscatter profiles in cirrus
clouds by using a combined Raman elastic-backscatter lidar, Appl. Opt., 31,
7113–7131, 1992. a
Ao, C. O., Waliser, D. E., Chan, S. K., Li, J.-L., Tian, B., Xie, F., and
Mannucci, A. J.: Planetary boundary layer heights from GPS radio
occultation refractivity and humidity profiles, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
117, D16117, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD017598, 2012. a, b, c
Argentini, S., Viola, A., Sempreviva, A., and Petenko, I.: Summer
boundary-layer height at the plateau site of Dome C, Antarctica,
Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 115, 409–422, 2005. a
Aryee, J. N. A., Amekudzi, L. K., Preko, K., Atiah, W. A., and Danuor, S. K.: Estimation of planetary boundary layer height from radiosonde profiles over
West Africa during the AMMA field campaign: Intercomparison of different
methods, Sci. Afr., 7, e00228, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2019.e00228, 2020. a
Baars, H., Ansmann, A., Engelmann, R., and Althausen, D.: Continuous monitoring of the boundary-layer top with lidar, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 7281–7296, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-7281-2008, 2008. a
Baars, H., Kanitz, T., Engelmann, R., Althausen, D., Heese, B., Komppula, M., Preißler, J., Tesche, M., Ansmann, A., Wandinger, U., Lim, J.-H., Ahn, J. Y., Stachlewska, I. S., Amiridis, V., Marinou, E., Seifert, P., Hofer, J., Skupin, A., Schneider, F., Bohlmann, S., Foth, A., Bley, S., Pfüller, A., Giannakaki, E., Lihavainen, H., Viisanen, Y., Hooda, R. K., Pereira, S. N., Bortoli, D., Wagner, F., Mattis, I., Janicka, L., Markowicz, K. M., Achtert, P., Artaxo, P., Pauliquevis, T., Souza, R. A. F., Sharma, V. P., van Zyl, P. G., Beukes, J. P., Sun, J., Rohwer, E. G., Deng, R., Mamouri, R.-E., and Zamorano, F.: An overview of the first decade of PollyNET: an emerging network of automated Raman-polarization lidars for continuous aerosol profiling, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 5111–5137, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-5111-2016, 2016. a
Ballish, B. A., Kumar, V. K., Ballish, B. A., and Kumar, V. K.: Systematic
Differences in Aircraft and Radiosonde Temperatures, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 89, 1689–1708, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008BAMS2332.1, 2008. a
Balsley, B. B., Frehlich, R. G., Jensen, M. L., and Meillier, Y.:
High-resolution in situ profiling through the stable boundary layer: Examination of the SBL top in terms of minimum shear, maximum stratification, and turbulence decrease, J. Atmos. Sci., 63, 1291–1307,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3671.1, 2006. a
Banakh, V. A. and Smalikho, I. N.: Estimation of the turbulence energy
dissipation rate from pulsed Doppler lidar data, Atmos. Ocean. Opt., 10,
957–965, 1997. a
Banakh, V. A. and Smalikho, I. N.: Lidar observations of atmospheric internal waves in the boundary layer of the atmosphere on the coast of Lake Baikal, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 5239–5248, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-5239-2016, 2016. a
Banakh, V. A., Smalikho, I. N., Pichugina, E. L., and Brewer, W. A.:
Representativeness of measurements of the dissipation rate of turbulence
energy by scanning Doppler lidar, Atmos. Ocean. Opt., 23, 48–54,
https://doi.org/10.1134/S1024856010010100, 2010. a
Banks, R. F., Tiana-Alsina, J., Rocadenbosch, F., and Baldasano, J. M.:
Performance Evaluation of the Boundary-Layer Height from Lidar and the
Weather Research and Forecasting Model at an Urban Coastal Site in the
North-East Iberian Peninsula, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 157, 265–292,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-015-0056-2, 2015. a
Banta, R. M., Senff, C. J., White, A. B., Trainer, M., McNider, R. T., Valente, R. J., Mayor, S. D., Alvarez, R. J., Hardesty, R. M., Parrish, D., and Fehsenfeld, F. C.: Daytime buildup and nighttime transport of urban ozone in the boundary layer during a stagnation episode, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
103, 22519–22544, https://doi.org/10.1029/98JD01020, 1998. a
Banta, R. M., Pichugina, Y. L., and Brewer, W. A.: Turbulent velocity-variance profiles in the stable boundary layer generated by a nocturnal low-level jet, J. Atmos. Sci., 63, 2700–2719, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3776.1, 2006. a, b, c, d
Banta, R. M., Pichugina, Y. L., Kelley, N. D., Hardesty, R. M., and Brewer,
W. A.: Wind Energy Meteorology: Insight into Wind Properties in the
Turbine-Rotor Layer of the Atmosphere from High-Resolution Doppler Lidar,
B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 94, 883–902, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00057.1, 2013. a
Barlow, J., Best, M., Bohnenstengel, S. I., Clark, P., Grimmond, S., Lean, H., Christen, A., Emeis, S., Haeffelin, M., Harman, I. N., Lemonsu, A., Martilli, A., Pardyjak, E., Rotach, M. W., Ballard, S., Boutle, I., Brown, A., Cai, X., Carpentieri, M., Coceal, O., Crawford, B., Di Sabatino, S., Dou, J., Drew, D. R., Edwards, J. M., Fallmann, J., Fortuniak, K., Gornall, J., Gronemeier, T., Halios, C. H., Hertwig, D., Hirano, K., Holtslag, A. A. M., Luo, Z., Mills, G., Nakayoshi, M., Pain, K., Schlünzen, K. H., Smith, S., Soulhac, L., Steeneveld, G.-J., Sun, T., Theeuwes, N. E., Thomson, D., Voogt, J. A., Ward, H. C., Xie, Z.-T., Zhong, J., Barlow, J., Best, M., Bohnenstengel, S. I., Clark, P., Grimmond, S., Lean, H., Christen, A., Emeis, S., Haeffelin, M., Harman, I. N., Lemonsu, A., Martilli, A., Pardyjak, E., Rotach, M. W., Ballard, S., Boutle, I., Brown, A., Cai, X., Carpentieri, M., Coceal, O., Crawford, B., Sabatino, S. D., Dou, J., Drew, D. R., Edwards, J. M., Fallmann, J., Fortuniak, K., Gornall, J., Gronemeier, T., Halios, C. H., Hertwig, D., Hirano, K., Holtslag, A. A. M., Luo, Z., Mills, G., Nakayoshi, M., Pain, K., Schlünzen, K. H., Smith, S., Soulhac, L., Steeneveld, G.-J., Sun, T., Theeuwes, N. E., Thomson, D., Voogt, J. A., Ward, H. C., Xie, Z.-T., and Zhong, J.: Developing a Research Strategy to Better Understand, Observe, and Simulate Urban Atmospheric Processes at Kilometer to
Subkilometer Scales, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 98, ES261–ES264,
https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-17-0106.1, 2017. a
Barlow, J. F.: Progress in observing and modelling the urban boundary layer, Urban Clim., 10, 216–240, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2014.03.011, 2014. a
Barlow, J. F., Dunbar, T. M., Nemitz, E. G., Wood, C. R., Gallagher, M. W., Davies, F., O'Connor, E., and Harrison, R. M.: Boundary layer dynamics over London, UK, as observed using Doppler lidar during REPARTEE-II, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 2111–2125, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-2111-2011, 2011. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h
Barlow, J. F., Halios, C. H., Lane, S. E., and Wood, C. R.: Observations of
urban boundary layer structure during a strong urban heat island event,
Environ. Fluid Mach., 15, 373–398, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-014-9335-6, 2015. a
Basha, G. and Ratnam, M. V.: Identification of atmospheric boundary layer height over a tropical station using high-resolution radiosonde refractivity
profiles: Comparison with GPS radio occultation measurements, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, 16101, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011692, 2009. a
Behrendt, A., Wulfmeyer, V., Bauer, H.-S., Schaberl, T., Di Girolamo, P., Summa, D., Kiemle, C., Ehret, G., Whiteman, D. N., Demoz, B. B., Browell, E. V., Ismail, S., Ferrare, R., Kooi, S., and Wang, J.: Intercomparison of Water Vapor Data Measured with Lidar during IHOP_2002. Part I: Airborne
to Ground-Based Lidar Systems and Comparisons with Chilled-Mirror Hygrometer Radiosondes, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 24, 3–21,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH1924.1, 2007. a
Behrendt, A., Wulfmeyer, V., Hammann, E., Muppa, S. K., and Pal, S.: Profiles of second- to fourth-order moments of turbulent temperature fluctuations in the convective boundary layer: first measurements with rotational Raman lidar, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 5485–5500, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5485-2015, 2015. a
Behrendt, A., Wulfmeyer, V., Senff, C., Muppa, S. K., Späth, F., Lange, D., Kalthoff, N., and Wieser, A.: Observation of sensible and latent heat flux profiles with lidar, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 3221–3233, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3221-2020, 2020. a
Bennett, L. J., Weckwerth, T. M., Blyth, A. M., Geerts, B., Miao, Q., and Richardson, Y. P.: Observations of the evolution of the nocturnal and convective boundary layers and the structure of open-celled convection on 14
June 2002, Mon. Weather Rev., 138, 2589–2607, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010MWR3200.1, 2010. a
Berg, L. K., Newsom, R. K., and Turner, D. D.: Year-Long Vertical Velocity
Statistics Derived from Doppler Lidar Data for the Continental Convective
Boundary Layer, J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 56, 2441–2454,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-16-0359.1, 2017. a
Berkes, F., Neis, P., Schultz, M. G., Bundke, U., Rohs, S., Smit, H. G. J., Wahner, A., Konopka, P., Boulanger, D., Nédélec, P., Thouret, V., and Petzold, A.: In situ temperature measurements in the upper troposphere and lowermost stratosphere from 2 decades of IAGOS long-term routine observation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 12495–12508, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-12495-2017, 2017. a
Bessardon, G. E. Q., Fosu-Amankwah, K., Petersson, A., and Brooks, B. J.: Evaluation of Windsond S1H2 performance in Kumasi during the 2016 DACCIWA field campaign, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 1311–1324, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-1311-2019, 2019. a
Beyrich, F.: Mixing-height estimation in the convective boundary layer using
sodar data, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 74, 1–18, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00715708,
1995. a
Beyrich, F. and Görsdorf, U.: Composing the diurnal cycle of mixing
height from simultaneous sodar and wind profiler measurements,
Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 76, 387–394, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00709240, 1995. a
Beyrich, F. and Gryning, S.-E.: Estimation of the Entrainment Zone Depth in a Shallow Convective Boundary Layer from Sodar Data, J. Appl. Meteorol., 37,
255–268, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1998)037<0255:EOTEZD>2.0.CO;2, 1998. a
Bian, J., Chen, H., Vömel, H., Duan, Y., Xuan, Y., and Lü, D.: Intercomparison of humidity and temperature sensors: GTS1, Vaisala RS80, and
CFH, Adv. Atmos. Sci., 28, 139–146, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-010-9170-8,
2011. a
Bianco, L. and Wilczak, J. M.: Convective Boundary Layer Depth: Improved
Measurement by Doppler Radar Wind Profiler Using Fuzzy Logic Methods, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 19, 1745–1758,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(2002)019<1745:CBLDIM>2.0.CO;2, 2002. a
Bianco, L., Wilczak, J. M., and White, A. B.: Convective Boundary Layer Depth
Estimation from Wind Profilers: Statistical Comparison between an Automated
Algorithm and Expert Estimations, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 25,
1397–1413, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JTECHA981.1, 2008. a, b
Bianco, L., Friedrich, K., Wilczak, J. M., Hazen, D., Wolfe, D., Delgado, R., Oncley, S. P., and Lundquist, J. K.: Assessing the accuracy of microwave radiometers and radio acoustic sounding systems for wind energy applications, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 1707–1721, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-1707-2017, 2017. a, b
Bianco, L., Muradyan, P., Djalalova, I., Wilczak, J. M., Olson, J. B., Kenyon, J. S., Kotamarthi, R., Lantz, K., Long, C., and Turner, D.: Comparison of Observations and Predictions of Daytime Planetary-Boundary-Layer Heights and Surface Meteorological Variables in the Columbia River Gorge and Basin During the Second Wind Forecast Improvement Project, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 182, 147–172, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-021-00645-x, 2022. a
Blumberg, W., Turner, D., Löhnert, U., and Castleberry, S.: Ground-based temperature and humidity profiling using spectral infrared and microwave observations. Part II: Actual retrieval performance in clear-sky and cloudy
conditions, J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 54, 2305–2319,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-15-0005.1, 2015. a, b
Bodeker, G. E., Bojinski, S., Cimini, D., Dirksen, R. J., Haeffelin, M., Hannigan, J. W., Hurst, D. F., Leblanc, T., Madonna, F., Maturilli, M., Mikalsen, A. C., Philipona, R., Reale, T., Seidel, D. J., Tan, D. G. H., Thorne, P. W., Vömel, H., and Wang, J.: Reference Upper-Air Observations for
Climate: From Concept to Reality, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 97, 123–135,
https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00072.1, 2016. a
Bodini, N., Lundquist, J. K., and Newsom, R. K.: Estimation of turbulence dissipation rate and its variability from sonic anemometer and wind Doppler lidar during the XPIA field campaign, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 4291–4308, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-4291-2018, 2018. a
Bonin, T. A., Blumberg, W. G., Klein, P. M., and Chilson, P. B.: Thermodynamic and Turbulence Characteristics of the Southern Great Plains Nocturnal Boundary Layer Under Differing Turbulent Regimes, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 157, 401–420, https://doi.org/10.1007/S10546-015-0072-2, 2015. a
Bonin, T. A., Newman, J. F., Klein, P. M., Chilson, P. B., and Wharton, S.: Improvement of vertical velocity statistics measured by a Doppler lidar through comparison with sonic anemometer observations, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 5833–5852, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-5833-2016, 2016. a
Bonin, T. A., Choukulkar, A., Brewer, W. A., Sandberg, S. P., Weickmann, A. M., Pichugina, Y. L., Banta, R. M., Oncley, S. P., and Wolfe, D. E.: Evaluation of turbulence measurement techniques from a single Doppler lidar, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 3021–3039, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-3021-2017, 2017. a, b, c
Bonin, T. A., Carroll, B. J., Hardesty, R. M., Brewer, W. A., Hajny, K.,
Salmon, O. E., and Shepson, P. B.: Doppler Lidar Observations of the Mixing
Height in Indianapolis Using an Automated Composite Fuzzy Logic Approach,
J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 35, 473–490, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-17-0159.1,
2018. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j
Bonin, T. A., Klein, P. M., and Chilson, P. B.: Contrasting Characteristics
and Evolution of Southerly Low-Level Jets During Different Boundary-Layer
Regimes, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 174, 179–202,
https://doi.org/10.1007/S10546-019-00481-0, 2019. a
Bosveld, F. C., Baas, P., Beljaars, A. C., Holtslag, A. A., de Arellano, J.
V. G., and van de Wiel, B. J.: Fifty Years of Atmospheric Boundary-Layer
Research at Cabauw Serving Weather, Air Quality and Climate, Bound.-Lay.
Meteorol., 177, 583–612, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-020-00541-w, 2020. a
Boy, M., Thomson, E. S., Acosta Navarro, J.-C., Arnalds, O., Batchvarova, E., Bäck, J., Berninger, F., Bilde, M., Brasseur, Z., Dagsson-Waldhauserova, P., Castarède, D., Dalirian, M., de Leeuw, G., Dragosics, M., Duplissy, E.-M., Duplissy, J., Ekman, A. M. L., Fang, K., Gallet, J.-C., Glasius, M., Gryning, S.-E., Grythe, H., Hansson, H.-C., Hansson, M., Isaksson, E., Iversen, T., Jonsdottir, I., Kasurinen, V., Kirkevåg, A., Korhola, A., Krejci, R., Kristjansson, J. E., Lappalainen, H. K., Lauri, A., Leppäranta, M., Lihavainen, H., Makkonen, R., Massling, A., Meinander, O., Nilsson, E. D., Olafsson, H., Pettersson, J. B. C., Prisle, N. L., Riipinen, I., Roldin, P., Ruppel, M., Salter, M., Sand, M., Seland, Ø., Seppä, H., Skov, H., Soares, J., Stohl, A., Ström, J., Svensson, J., Swietlicki, E., Tabakova, K., Thorsteinsson, T., Virkkula, A., Weyhenmeyer, G. A., Wu, Y., Zieger, P., and Kulmala, M.: Interactions between the atmosphere, cryosphere, and ecosystems at northern high latitudes, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 2015–2061, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-2015-2019, 2019. a, b
Bradley, R. S., Keimig, F. T., and Diaz, H. F.: Recent changes in the North
American Arctic boundary layer in winter, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 98,
8851–8858, https://doi.org/10.1029/93JD00311, 1993. a
Bradley, S.: Atmospheric Acoustic Remote Sensing, CRC Press, Boca Raton, ISBN 9780429126239, 296 pp., https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420005288, 2007. a
Bravo-Aranda, J. A., Titos, G., Granados-Muñoz, M. J., Guerrero-Rascado,
J. L., Navas-Guzmán, F., Valenzuela, A., Lyamani, H., Olmo, F. J.,
Andrey, J., and Alados-Arboledas, L.: Study of mineral dust entrainment in
the planetary boundary layer by lidar depolarisation technique, Tellus B, 67, 26180, https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v67.26180, 2015. a
Bravo-Aranda, J. A., de Arruda Moreira, G., Navas-Guzmán, F., Granados-Muñoz, M. J., Guerrero-Rascado, J. L., Pozo-Vázquez, D., Arbizu-Barrena, C., Olmo Reyes, F. J., Mallet, M., and Alados Arboledas, L.: A new methodology for PBL height estimations based on lidar depolarization measurements: analysis and comparison against MWR and WRF model-based results, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 6839–6851, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-6839-2017, 2017. a, b, c, d
Brotzge, J. A., Wang, J., Thorncroft, C. D., Joseph, E., Bain, N., Bassill, N., Farruggio, N., Freedman, J. M., Hemker Jr., K., Johnston, D., Kane, E., McKim, S., Miller, S. D., Minder, J. R., Naple, P., Perez, S., Schwab, J. J., Schwab, M. J., and Sicker, J.: A technical overview of the New York State Mesonet standard network, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 37, 1827–1845, 2020. a
Cadeddu, M. P., Liljegren, J. C., and Turner, D. D.: The Atmospheric radiation measurement (ARM) program network of microwave radiometers: instrumentation, data, and retrievals, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 2359–2372, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-2359-2013, 2013. a
Caicedo, V., Rappenglück, B., Lefer, B., Morris, G., Toledo, D., and Delgado, R.: Comparison of aerosol lidar retrieval methods for boundary layer height detection using ceilometer aerosol backscatter data, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 1609–1622, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-1609-2017, 2017. a
Caicedo, V., Rappenglueck, B., Cuchiara, G., Flynn, J., Ferrare, R., Scarino,
A. J., Berkoff, T., Senff, C., Langford, A., and Lefer, B.: Bay Breeze and
Sea Breeze Circulation Impacts on the Planetary Boundary Layer and Air
Quality From an Observed and Modeled DISCOVER-AQ Texas Case Study, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 7359–7378, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD030523, 2019. a
Caicedo, V., Delgado, R., Sakai, R., Knepp, T., Williams, D., Cavender, K.,
Lefer, B., and Szykman, J.: An Automated Common Algorithm for Planetary
Boundary Layer Retrievals Using Aerosol Lidars in Support of the U.S. EPA
Photochemical Assessment Monitoring Stations Program, J. Atmos. Ocean.
Tech., 37, 1847–1864, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-20-0050.1, 2020. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m
Canny, J.: A Computational Approach to Edge Detection, IEEE T. Pattern
Anal., PAMI-8, 679–698, https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.1986.4767851, 1986. a
Caumont, O., Cimini, D., Löhnert, U., Alados-Arboledas, L., Bleisch, R., Buffa, F., Ferrario, M. E., Haefele, A., Huet, T., Madonna, F., and Pace, G.:
Assimilation of humidity and temperature observations retrieved from
ground-based microwave radiometers into a convective-scale NWP model,
Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 142, 2692–2704, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2860, 2016. a
Chan, K. M. and Wood, R.: The seasonal cycle of planetary boundary layer depth determined using COSMIC radio occultation data, J. Geophys. Res., 118, 422–434, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020147, 2013. a, b, c
Cimini, D., Hewison, T. J., Martin, L., Güldner, J., Gaffard, C., and
Marzano, F. S.: Temperature and humidity profile retrievals from ground-based microwave radiometers during TUC, Meteorol. Z., 15, 45–56,
https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2006/0099, 2006. a
Cimini, D., Campos, E., Ware, R., Albers, S., Giuliani, G.,
Oreamuno, J., Joe, P., Koch, S. E., Cober, S., and Westwater, E.:
Thermodynamic Atmospheric Profiling During the 2010 Winter Olympics Using
Ground-Based Microwave Radiometry, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 49,
4959–4969, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2011.2154337, 2011. a
Cimini, D., Nelson, M., Güldner, J., and Ware, R.: Forecast indices from a ground-based microwave radiometer for operational meteorology, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 315–333, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-315-2015, 2015. a, b
Cimini, D., Haeffelin, M., Kotthaus, S., Löhnert, U., Martinet, P.,
O'Connor, E., Walden, C., Collaud Coen, M., and Preissler, J.: Towards
the profiling of the atmospheric boundary layer at European scale –
introducing the COST Action PROBE, Bull. Atmos. Sci. Technol., 1,
23–42, https://doi.org/10.1007/s42865-020-00003-8, 2020. a, b, c
Cohen, A. E., Cavallo, S. M., Coniglio, M. C., and Brooks, H. E.: A Review of
Planetary Boundary Layer Parameterization Schemes and Their Sensitivity in
Simulating Southeastern U.S. Cold Season Severe Weather Environments, Weather Forecast., 30, 591–612, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-14-00105.1, 2015. a, b
Cohn, S. A.: Radar measurements of turbulent eddy dissipation rate in the
troposphere: A comparison of techniques, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 12,
85–95, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1995)012<0085:RMOTED>2.0.CO;2, 1995. a
Collaud Coen, M., Praz, C., Haefele, A., Ruffieux, D., Kaufmann, P., and Calpini, B.: Determination and climatology of the planetary boundary layer height above the Swiss plateau by in situ and remote sensing measurements as well as by the COSMO-2 model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 13205–13221, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-13205-2014, 2014. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m, n, o, p
Compton, J. C., Delgado, R., Berkoff, T. A., Hoff, R. M., Compton, J. C.,
Delgado, R., Berkoff, T. A., and Hoff, R. M.: Determination of Planetary
Boundary Layer Height on Short Spatial and Temporal Scales: A Demonstration
of the Covariance Wavelet Transform in Ground-Based Wind Profiler and Lidar
Measurements, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 30, 1566–1575,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-12-00116.1, 2013. a
Dang, R., Yang, Y., Hu, X.-M., Wang, Z., and Zhang, S.: A Review of Techniques for Diagnosing the Atmospheric Boundary Layer Height (ABLH) Using Aerosol Lidar Data, Remote Sens., 11, 1590, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11131590, 2019. a
Da Silva, M. P., Rocadenbosch, F., Tanamachi, R. L., and Saeed, U.: Motivating a Synergistic Mixing-Layer Height Retrieval Method Using Backscatter Lidar Returns and Microwave-Radiometer Temperature Observations,
IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 60, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2022.3158401, 2022. a
de Arruda Moreira, G., Guerrero-Rascado, J., Bravo-Aranda, J., Benavent-Oltra,
J., Ortiz-Amezcua, P., Róman, R., Bedoya-Velásquez, A., Landulfo, E., and
Alados-Arboledas, L.: Study of the planetary boundary layer by microwave
radiometer, elastic lidar and Doppler lidar estimations in Southern
Iberian Peninsula, Atmos. Res., 213, 185–195,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2018.06.007, 2018. a, b, c, d, e, f
de Arruda Moreira, G., Guerrero-Rascado, J. L., Benavent-Oltra, J. A., Ortiz-Amezcua, P., Román, R., E. Bedoya-Velásquez, A., Bravo-Aranda, J. A., Olmo Reyes, F. J., Landulfo, E., and Alados-Arboledas, L.: Analyzing the turbulent planetary boundary layer by remote sensing systems: the Doppler wind lidar, aerosol elastic lidar and microwave radiometer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 1263–1280, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-1263-2019, 2019. a, b, c, d
de Arruda Moreira, G., Guerrero-Rascado, J. L., Bravo-Aranda, J. A.,
Foyo-Moreno, I., Cazorla, A., Alados, I., Lyamani, H., Landulfo, E., and
Alados-Arboledas, L.: Study of the planetary boundary layer height in an
urban environment using a combination of microwave radiometer and ceilometer, Atmos. Res., 240, 104932, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2020.104932, 2020. a, b
de Arruda Moreira, G., Sánchez-Hernández, G., Guerrero-Rascado, J. L., Cazorla, A., and Alados-Arboledas, L.: Estimating the urban atmospheric boundary layer height from remote sensing applying machine learning techniques, Atmos. Res., 266, 105962, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2021.105962, 2022. a
de Haij, M., Wauben, W., and Klein Baltink, H.: Determination of mixing
layer height from ceilometer backscatter profiles, Remote Sens., 6362,
63620R, https://doi.org/10.1117/12.691050, 2006. a, b, c, d
de Moreira, G. A., Marques, M. T. A., Nakaema, W., de Moreira, A. C., and Landulfo, E.: Detecting the planetary boundary layer height from low-level jet with Doppler lidar measurements, in: Lidar Technologies, Techniques, and Measurements for Atmospheric Remote Sensing XI, International Society for Optics and Photonics, vol. 9645, 96450F, https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2195278, 2015. a
De Wekker, S. F. J. and Kossmann, M.: Convective Boundary Layer Heights Over Mountainous Terrain – A Review of Concepts, Front. Earth Sci., 3, 77,
https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2015.00077, 2015. a, b
Diémoz, H., Barnaba, F., Magri, T., Pession, G., Dionisi, D., Pittavino, S., Tombolato, I. K. F., Campanelli, M., Della Ceca, L. S., Hervo, M., Di Liberto, L., Ferrero, L., and Gobbi, G. P.: Transport of Po Valley aerosol pollution to the northwestern Alps – Part 1: Phenomenology, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 3065–3095, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-3065-2019, 2019a. a
Diémoz, H., Gobbi, G. P., Magri, T., Pession, G., Pittavino, S., Tombolato, I. K. F., Campanelli, M., and Barnaba, F.: Transport of Po Valley aerosol pollution to the northwestern Alps – Part 2: Long-term impact on air quality, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 10129–10160, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-10129-2019, 2019b. a, b
Dieudonné, E., Ravetta, F., Pelon, J., Goutail, F., and Pommereau, J.-P.: Linking NO2 surface concentration and integrated content in the urban developed atmospheric boundary layer, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 1247–1251, https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50242, 2013. a
Di Girolamo, P., De Rosa, B., Flamant, C., Summa, D., Bousquet, O.,
Chazette, P., Totems, J., and Cacciani, M.: Water vapor mixing ratio and
temperature inter-comparison results in the framework of the Hydrological
Cycle in the Mediterranean Experiment–Special Observation Period 1, Bull. Atmos. Sci. Technol., 1, 113–153, https://doi.org/10.1007/s42865-020-00008-3,
2020. a
Di Giuseppe, F., Riccio, A., Caporaso, L., Bonafé, G., Gobbi, G. P.,
and Angelini, F.: Automatic detection of atmospheric boundary layer height
using ceilometer backscatter data assisted by a boundary layer model, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 138, 649–663, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.964, 2012. a, b
Dirksen, R. J., Sommer, M., Immler, F. J., Hurst, D. F., Kivi, R., and Vömel, H.: Reference quality upper-air measurements: GRUAN data processing for the Vaisala RS92 radiosonde, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 4463–4490, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-4463-2014, 2014. a
Djalalova, I. V., Turner, D. D., Bianco, L., Wilczak, J. M., Duncan, J., Adler, B., and Gottas, D.: Improving thermodynamic profile retrievals from microwave radiometers by including radio acoustic sounding system (RASS) observations, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 521–537, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-521-2022, 2022. a
Duncan Jr., J. B., Bianco, L., Adler, B., Bell, T., Djalalova, I. V., Riihimaki, L., Sedlar, J., Smith, E. N., Turner, D. D., Wagner, T. J., and Wilczak, J. M.: Evaluating convective planetary boundary layer height estimations resolved by both active and passive remote sensing instruments during the CHEESEHEAD19 field campaign, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 2479–2502, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-2479-2022, 2022. a
Eberhard, W. L., Cupp, R. E., and Healy, K. R.: Doppler Lidar Measurement of Profiles of Turbulence and Momentum Flux, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 6, 809–819, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1989)006<0809:DLMOPO>2.0.CO;2, 1989. a
Ecklund, W. L., Carter, D. A., and Balsley, B. B.: A UHF wind profiler for
the boundary layer: Brief description and initial results, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 5, 432–441,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1988)005<0432:AUWPFT>2.0.CO;2, 1988. a
Emeis, S., Schäfer, K., and Münkel, C.: Surface-based remote
sensing of the mixing-layer height – A review, Meteorol. Z., 17, 621–630,
https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2008/0312, 2008. a, b, c, d
Emeis, S., Schäfer, K., and Münkel, C.: Observation of the
structure of the urban boundary layer with different ceilometers and
validation by RASS data, Meteorol. Z., 18, 149–154,
https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2009/0365, 2009. a
Engelbart, D. A. M. and Bange, J.: Determination of boundary-layer parameters
using wind profiler/RASS and sodar/RASS in the frame of the LITFASS
project, Theor. Appl. Climatol., 73, 53–65,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-002-0693-5, 2002. a
Eresmaa, N., Karppinen, A., Joffre, S. M., Räsänen, J., and Talvitie, H.: Mixing height determination by ceilometer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 1485–1493, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-1485-2006, 2006. a
Eresmaa, N., Härkönen, J., Joffre, S. M., Schultz, D. M., Karppinen,
A., and Kukkonen, J.: A three-step method for estimating the mixing height
using ceilometer data from the Helsinki testbed, J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 51, 2172–2187, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-12-058.1, 2012. a
Feltz, W. F. and Mecikalski, J. R.: Monitoring high-temporal-resolution convective stability indices using the ground-based Atmospheric Emitted Radiance Interferometer (AERI) during the 3 May 1999 Oklahoma–Kansas tornado
outbreak, Weather Forecast., 17, 445–455,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(2002)017<0445:MHTRCS>2.0.CO;2, 2002. a, b
Feltz, W. F., Smith, W. L., Howell, H. B., Knuteson, R. O., Woolf, H., and
Revercomb, H. E.: Near-Continuous Profiling of Temperature, Moisture, and
Atmospheric Stability Using the Atmospheric Emitted Radiance Interferometer
(AERI), J. Appl. Meteor., 42, 584–597,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(2003)042<0584:NPOTMA>2.0.CO;2, 2003. a
Finnigan, J. J., Einaudi, F., and Fua, D.: The interaction between an internal gravity wave and turbulence in the stably-stratified nocturnal boundary layer, J. Atmos. Sci., 41, 2409–2436,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1984)041<2409:TIBAIG>2.0.CO;2, 1984. a
Flamant, P., Cuesta, J., Denneulin, M.-L., Dabas, A., and Huber, D.:
ADM-Aeolus retrieval algorithms for aerosol and cloud products, Tellus A,
60A, 273–288, https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1600-0870.2007.00287.X, 2016. a
Fochesatto, G. J., Drobinski, P., Flamant, C., Guedalia, D., Sarrat, C.,
Flamant, P. H., and Pelon, J.: Evidence of dynamical coupling between the
residual layer and the developing convective boundary layer, Bound.-Lay.
Meteorol., 99, 451–464, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018935129006, 2001. a
Foken, T. (Ed.): Springer Handbook of Atmospheric Measurements, Springer
Handbooks, Springer International Publishing, Cham,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52171-4, 2021. a, b, c, d
Frehlich, R., Meillier, Y., Jensen, M. L., Balsley, B., and Sharman, R.:
Measurements of Boundary Layer Profiles in an Urban Environment, J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 45, 821–837, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAM2368.1, 2006. a
Frehlich, R., Meillier, Y., and Jensen, M. L.: Measurements of Boundary Layer
Profiles with In Situ Sensors and Doppler Lidar, J. Atmos. Ocean.
Tech., 25, 1328–1340, https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JTECHA963.1, 2008. a
Freudenthaler, V., Linné, H., Chaikovski, A., Rabus, D., and Groß, S.: EARLINET lidar quality assurance tools, Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss. [preprint], https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2017-395, in review, 2018. a
Fromm, M., Lindsey, D. T., Servranckx, R., Yue, G., Trickl, T., Sica, R.,
Doucet, P., and Godin-Beekmann, S.: The Untold Story of Pyrocumulonimbus,
B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 91, 1193–1210, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010BAMS3004.1,
2010. a
Gan, C. M., Wu, Y., Gross, B., and Moshary, F.: Statistical comparison between Hysplit sounding and lidar observation of planetary boundary layer
characteristics over New York City, in: Laser Radar Technology and
Applications XV, edited by: Turner, M. D. and Kamerman, G. W., International Society for Optics and Photonics, vol. 7684, 76841K,
https://doi.org/10.1117/12.849705, 2010. a, b
Gan, C.-M., Wu, Y., Madhavan, B., Gross, B., and Moshary, F.: Application of active optical sensors to probe the vertical structure of the urban boundary layer and assess anomalies in air quality model PM2.5 forecasts, Atmos. Environ., 45, 6613–6621, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.09.013, 2011. a
Garratt, J.: Review: the atmospheric boundary layer, Earth-Sci. Rev., 37,
89–134, https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-8252(94)90026-4, 1994. a, b, c
Geiß, A.: Automated calibration of ceilometer data and its applicability for quantitative aerosol monitoring, PhD thesis, LMU München,
https://edoc.ub.uni-muenchen.de/19930/1/Geiss_Alexander.pdf (last access: 12 January 2023), 2016. a
Geiß, A., Wiegner, M., Bonn, B., Schäfer, K., Forkel, R., von Schneidemesser, E., Münkel, C., Chan, K. L., and Nothard, R.: Mixing layer height as an indicator for urban air quality?, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 2969–2988, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-2969-2017, 2017. a, b, c, d
Gibert, F., Cuesta, J., Yano, J.-I., Arnault, N., and Flamant, P. H.: On the
Correlation between Convective Plume Updrafts and Downdrafts, Lidar
Reflectivity and Depolarization Ratio, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 125,
553–573, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-007-9205-6, 2007. a
Gibert, F., Xuéref-Rémy, I., Joly, L., Schmidt, M., Cuesta, J., Davis, K. J., Ramonet, M., Flamant, P. H., Parvitte, B., and Zéninari, V.: A Case Study of CO2, CO and Particles Content Evolution in the Suburban Atmospheric Boundary Layer Using a 2 µm Doppler DIAL, a 1 µm Backscatter Lidar and an Array of In-situ Sensors, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 128, 381–401, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-008-9296-8, 2008. a
Görsdorf, U. and Lehmann, V.: Enhanced Accuracy of RASS-Measured Temperatures Due to an Improved Range Correction, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 17, 406–416, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(2000)017<0406:EAORMT>2.0.CO;2, 2000. a
Gottschall, J., Courtney, M. S., Wagner, R., Jørgensen, H. E., and Antoniou, I.: Lidar profilers in the context of wind energy - a verification procedure for traceable measurements, Wind Energy, 15, 147–159, https://doi.org/10.1002/we.518, 2012. a
Granados-Muñoz, M., Navas-Guzmán, F., Bravo-Aranda, J., Guerrero-Rascado, J., Lyamani, H., Fernández-Gálvez, J., and Alados-Arboledas, L.: Automatic determination of the planetary boundary layer
height using Lidar: One-year analysis over southeastern Spain, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, D18208, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD017524, 2012. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i
Gryning, S.-E. and Batchvarova, E.: Parametrization of the depth of the
entrainment zone above the daytime mixed layer, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 120, 47–58, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712051505, 1994. a
Guerrero-Rascado, J. L., Olmo, F. J., Avilés-Rodríguez, I., Navas-Guzmán, F., Pérez-Ramírez, D., Lyamani, H., and Alados Arboledas, L.: Extreme Saharan dust event over the southern Iberian Peninsula in september 2007: active and passive remote sensing from surface and satellite, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 8453–8469, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-8453-2009, 2009. a
Guimarães, Ye, Batista, Barbosa, Ribeiro, Medeiros, Souza, and Martin:
Vertical Profiles of Ozone Concentration Collected by an Unmanned Aerial
Vehicle and the Mixing of the Nighttime Boundary Layer over an Amazonian
Urban Area, Atmosphere, 10, 599, https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos10100599, 2019. a
Güldner, J.: A model-based approach to adjust microwave observations for operational applications: results of a campaign at Munich Airport in winter 2011/2012, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 2879–2891, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-2879-2013, 2013. a
Guo, J., Miao, Y., Zhang, Y., Liu, H., Li, Z., Zhang, W., He, J., Lou, M., Yan, Y., Bian, L., and Zhai, P.: The climatology of planetary boundary layer height in China derived from radiosonde and reanalysis data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 13309–13319, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-13309-2016, 2016. a, b
Haeffelin, M., Angelini, F., Morille, Y., Martucci, G., Frey, S., Gobbi, G. P., Lolli, S., O'Dowd, C. D., Sauvage, L., Xueref-Rémy, I., Wastine, B., and, Feist, D. G.: Evaluation
of mixing-height retrievals from automatic profiling lidars and ceilometers
in view of future integrated networks in Europe, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol.,
143, 49–75, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-011-9643-z, 2012. a, b, c, d
Haid, M., Gohm, A., Umek, L., Ward, H. C., Muschinski, T., Lehner, L., and Rotach, M. W.: Foehn–cold pool interactions in the Inn Valley during PIANO
IOP2, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 146, 1232–1263,
https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3735, 2020. a
Halios, C. H. and Barlow, J. F.: Observations of the Morning Development of the Urban Boundary Layer Over London, UK, Taken During the ACTUAL Project, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 166, 1–28, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-017-0300-z, 2017. a, b
Haman, C. L., Lefer, B., Morris, G. A., Haman, C. L., Lefer, B., and Morris,
G. A.: Seasonal Variability in the Diurnal Evolution of the Boundary Layer
in a Near-Coastal Urban Environment, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 29,
697–710, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-11-00114.1, 2012. a, b, c
Han, S., Bian, H., Tie, X., Xie, Y., Sun, M., and Liu, A.: Impact of nocturnal planetary boundary layer on urban air pollutants: Measurements from a 250 m tower over Tianjin, China, J. Hazard. Mater., 162, 264–269,
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JHAZMAT.2008.05.056, 2009. a
Hanna, S. R.: The thickness of the planetary boundary layer, Atmos. Environ.,
3, 519–536, 1969. a
Harvey, N. J., Hogan, R. J., and Dacre, H. F.: A method to diagnose
boundary-layer type using Doppler lidar, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,
139, 1681–1693, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2068, 2013. a, b, c
Harvey, N. J., Hogan, R. J., and Dacre, H. F.: Evaluation of boundary-layer
type in a weather forecast model utilizing long-term Doppler lidar
observations, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 141, 1345–1353,
https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2444, 2015. a, b
Heese, B., Flentje, H., Althausen, D., Ansmann, A., and Frey, S.: Ceilometer lidar comparison: backscatter coefficient retrieval and signal-to-noise ratio determination, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 3, 1763–1770, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-1763-2010, 2010. a
Heffter, J. L.: Transport Layer Depth Calculations, in: 2nd Joint Conference on Applications of Air Pollution Modelling, 24–27 March 1980, New Orleans, LA, USA, American Meteorological Society, Boston, MA, USA, 787–791, 1980. a
Helbig, M., Gerken, T., Beamesderfer, E. R., Baldocchi, D. D., Banerjee, T., Biraud, S. C., Brown, W. O., Brunsell, N. A., Burakowski, E. A., Burns, S. P., Butterworth, B. J., Chan, W. S., Davis, K. J., Desai, A. R., Fuentes,
J. D., Hollinger, D. Y., Kljun, N., Mauder, M., Novick, K. A., Perkins,
J. M., Rahn, D. A., Rey-Sanchez, C., Santanello, J. A., Scott, R. L.,
Seyednasrollah, B., Stoy, P. C., Sullivan, R. C., de Arellano, J. V.-G.,
Wharton, S., Yi, C., and Richardson, A. D.: Integrating continuous
atmospheric boundary layer and tower-based flux measurements to advance
understanding of land-atmosphere interactions, Agric. For. Meteor., 307,
108509, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AGRFORMET.2021.108509, 2021. a
Helmis, C., Sgouros, G., Tombrou, M., Schäfer, K., Münkel, C.,
Bossioli, E., and Dandou, A.: A comparative study and evaluation of
mixing-height estimation based on sodar-RASS, ceilometer data and numerical
model simulations, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 145, 1–20,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-012-9743-4, 2012. a
Hennemuth, B. and Lammert, A.: Determination of the atmospheric boundary layer height from radiosonde and lidar backscatter, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 120, 181–200, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-005-9035-3, 2006. a, b, c, d
Hervo, M., Poltera, Y., and Haefele, A.: An empirical method to correct for temperature-dependent variations in the overlap function of CHM15k ceilometers, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 2947–2959, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-2947-2016, 2016. a, b
Hirsikko, A., O'Connor, E. J., Komppula, M., Korhonen, K., Pfüller, A., Giannakaki, E., Wood, C. R., Bauer-Pfundstein, M., Poikonen, A., Karppinen, T., Lonka, H., Kurri, M., Heinonen, J., Moisseev, D., Asmi, E., Aaltonen, V., Nordbo, A., Rodriguez, E., Lihavainen, H., Laaksonen, A., Lehtinen, K. E. J., Laurila, T., Petäjä, T., Kulmala, M., and Viisanen, Y.: Observing wind, aerosol particles, cloud and precipitation: Finland's new ground-based remote-sensing network, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 1351–1375, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-1351-2014, 2014. a, b
Ho, S.-P., Peng, L., Anthes, R. A., Kuo, Y.-H., and Lin, H.-C.: Marine Boundary Layer Heights and Their Longitudinal, Diurnal, and Interseasonal Variability in the Southeastern Pacific Using COSMIC, CALIOP, and Radiosonde Data, J. Climate, 28, 2856–2872, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00238.1, 2015. a
Ho, S.-P., Zhou, X., Shao, X., Zhang, B., Adhikari, L., Kireev, S., He, Y.,
Yoe, J. G., Xia-Serafino, W., and Lynch, E.: Initial assessment of the
COSMIC-2/FORMOSAT-7 neutral atmosphere data quality in NESDIS/STAR using in
situ and satellite data, Remote Sens., 12, 4099, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12244099, 2020. a
Hogan, R. J., Grant, A. L., Illingworth, A. J., Pearson, G. N., and O'Connor,
E. J.: Vertical velocity variance and skewness in clear and cloud-topped
boundary layers as revealed by Doppler lidar, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 135, 635–643, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.413, 2009. a, b, c
Holtslag, A. and Nieuwstadt, F.: Scaling the atmospheric boundary layer,
Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 36, 201–209, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00117468, 1986. a
Holzworth, G. C.: Estimates of mean maximum mixing depths in the contiguous
United States, Mon. Weather Rev., 92, 235–242,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1964)092<0235:EOMMMD>2.3.CO;2, 1964. a
Hooper, W. P. and Eloranta, E. W.: Lidar measurements of wind in the planetary boundary layer: the method, accuracy and results from joint measurements with radiosonde and kytoon, J. Climate Appl. Meteor., 25, 990–1001, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1986)025<0990:LMOWIT>2.0.CO;2, 1986. a
Hopkin, E., Illingworth, A. J., Charlton-Perez, C., Westbrook, C. D., and Ballard, S.: A robust automated technique for operational calibration of ceilometers using the integrated backscatter from totally attenuating liquid clouds, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 4131–4147, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-4131-2019, 2019. a
Hu, X. M., Klein, P. M., Xue, M., Lundquist, J. K., Zhang, F., and Qi, Y.:
Impact of low-level jets on the nocturnal urban heat island intensity in
Oklahoma city, J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 52, 1779–1802,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-12-0256.1, 2013. a
Huang, M., Gao, Z., Miao, S., Chen, F., LeMone, M. A., Li, J., Hu, F., and
Wang, L.: Estimate of Boundary-Layer Depth Over Beijing, China, Using
Doppler Lidar Data During SURF-2015, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 162,
503–52, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-016-0205-2, 2017. a, b
Huang, T., Yim, S. H. L., Yang, Y., Lee, O. S. M., Lam, D. H. Y., Cheng, J.
C. H., and Guo, J.: Observation of turbulent mixing characteristics in the
typical daytime cloud-topped boundary layer over Hong Kong in 2019, Remote
Sens., 12, 1533, https://doi.org/10.3390/RS12091533, 2020. a
Illingworth, A. J., Cimini, D., Gaffard, C., Haeffelin, M., Lehmann, V.,
Löhnert, U., O'Connor, E. J., and Ruffieux, D.: Exploiting existing
ground-based remote sensing networks to improve high-resolution weather
forecasts, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 96, 2107–2125,
https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00283.1, 2015. a
Illingworth, A. J., Cimini, D., Haefele, A., Haeffelin, M., Hervo, M.,
Kotthaus, S., Löhnert, U., Martinet, P., Mattis, I., O'Connor, E.,
and Potthast, R.: How Can Existing Ground-Based Profiling Instruments Improve European
Weather Forecasts?, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 100, 605–619,
https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-17-0231.1, 2019. a, b, c, d, e, f
Johansson, C. and Bergström, H.: An auxiliary tool to determine the
height of the boundary layer, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 115, 423–432,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-004-1424-5, 2005. a
Jordan, N. S., Hoff, R. M., and Bacmeister, J. T.: Validation of Goddard Earth Observing System-version 5 MERRA planetary boundary layer heights using
CALIPSO, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 115, D24218, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013777, 2010. a, b
Kavaya, M. J. and Suni, P. J. M.: Continuous wave coherent laser radar:
calculation of measurement location and volume, Appl. Opt., 30, 2634–2642,
1991. a
Keller, C. A., Huwald, H., Vollmer, M. K., Wenger, A., Hill, M., Parlange, M. B., and Reimann, S.: Fiber optic distributed temperature sensing for the determination of the nocturnal atmospheric boundary layer height, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 4, 143–149, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-143-2011, 2011. a
Ketterer, C., Zieger, P., Bukowiecki, N., Collaud Coen, M., Maier, O.,
Ruffieux, D., and Weingartner, E.: Investigation of the Planetary Boundary
Layer in the Swiss Alps Using Remote Sensing and In Situ Measurements,
Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 151, 317–334, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-013-9897-8,
2014. a, b
Klein, A., Ancellet, G., Ravetta, F., Thomas, J. L., and Pazmino, A.: Characterizing the seasonal cycle and vertical structure of ozone in Paris,
France using four years of ground based LIDAR measurements in the lowermost
troposphere, Atmos. Environ., 167, 603–615,
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ATMOSENV.2017.08.016, 2017. a
Klein, A., Ravetta, F., Thomas, J. L., Ancellet, G., Augustin, P., Wilson, R., Dieudonné, E., Fourmentin, M., Delbarre, H., and Pelon, J.: Influence of vertical mixing and nighttime transport on surface ozone variability in the morning in Paris and the surrounding region, Atmos. Environ., 197, 92–102, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.10.009, 2019. a
Knepp, T. N., Szykman, J. J., Long, R., Duvall, R. M., Krug, J., Beaver, M., Cavender, K., Kronmiller, K., Wheeler, M., Delgado, R., Hoff, R., Berkoff, T., Olson, E., Clark, R., Wolfe, D., Van Gilst, D., and Neil, D.: Assessment of mixed-layer height estimation from single-wavelength ceilometer profiles, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 3963–3983, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-3963-2017, 2017. a
Knuteson, R., Revercomb, H., Best, F., Ciganovich, N., Dedecker, R., Dirkx, T., Ellington, S., Feltz, W., Garcia, R., Howell, H., Smith, W. L., Short, J. F., and Tobin, D. C.: Atmospheric emitted
radiance interferometer. Part I: Instrument design, J. Atmos. Ocean.
Tech., 21, 1763–1776, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-1662.1, 2004a. a
Knuteson, R., Revercomb, H., Best, F., Ciganovich, N., Dedecker, R., Dirkx, T., Ellington, S., Feltz, W., Garcia, R., Howell, H., Smith, W. L., Short, J. F., and Tobin D. C.: Atmospheric emitted
radiance interferometer. Part II: Instrument performance, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 21, 1777–1789, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-1663.1, 2004b. a
Kokkalis, P., Alexiou, D., Papayannis, A., Rocadenbosch, F., Soupiona, O.,
Raptis, P. I., Mylonaki, M., Tzanis, C. G., and Christodoulakis, J.:
Application and Testing of the Extended-Kalman-Filtering Technique for
Determining the Planetary Boundary-Layer Height over Athens, Greece,
Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 176, 125–147, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-020-00514-z,
2020. a, b
Kotthaus, S. and Grimmond, C. S. B.: Atmospheric boundary-layer characteristics from ceilometer measurements. Part 2: Application to London's urban boundary layer, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 144, 1511–1524,
https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3298, 2018b. a
Kotthaus, S., O'Connor, E., Münkel, C., Charlton-Perez, C., Haeffelin, M., Gabey, A. M., and Grimmond, C. S. B.: Recommendations for processing atmospheric attenuated backscatter profiles from Vaisala CL31 ceilometers, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 3769–3791, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-3769-2016, 2016. a, b, c
Kotthaus, S., Haeffelin, M., Drouin, M.-A., Dupont, J.-C., Grimmond, S.,
Haefele, A., Hervo, M., Poltera, Y., and Wiegner, M.: Tailored Algorithms
for the Detection of the Atmospheric Boundary Layer Height from Common
Automatic Lidars and Ceilometers (ALC), Remote Sens., 12, 3259, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12193259, 2020. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i
Kouznetsov, R. D.: The summertime ABL structure over an antarctic oasis with a vertical Doppler sodar, Meteorol. Z., 18, 163–167,
https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2009/0369, 2009. a
Kramar, V. F., Baykova, E., Kallistratova, M., Kouznetsov, R., and Kulichkov,
S.: Ground-Based Remote Sensing of the ABL Structure in Moscow and Its
Use to Estimate Pollutant Surface Emission Rates, J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 53, 1272–1281, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-13-010.1, 2014. a
Krishnamurthy, R., Newsom, R. K., Berg, L. K., Xiao, H., Ma, P.-L., and Turner, D. D.: On the estimation of boundary layer heights: a machine learning approach, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 4403–4424, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-4403-2021, 2021. a, b, c
Lammert, A. and Bösenberg, J.: Determination of the convective
boundary-layer height with laser remote sensing, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol.,
119, 159–170, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-005-9020-x, 2006. a, b, c
Lange, D., Tiana-Alsina, J., Saeed, U., Tomas, S., and Rocadenbosch, F.:
Atmospheric boundary layer height monitoring using a Kalman filter and
backscatter lidar returns, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 52,
4717–4728, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2013.2284110, 2013. a
Lareau, N. P. and Clements, C. B.: Environmental controls on pyrocumulus and pyrocumulonimbus initiation and development, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 4005–4022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-4005-2016, 2016. a
Lauvaux, T., Miles, N. L., Deng, A., Richardson, S. J., Cambaliza, M. O.,
Davis, K. J., Gaudet, B., Gurney, K. R., Huang, J., O'Keefe, D., Song, Y.,
Karion, A., Oda, T., Patarasuk, R., Razlivanov, I., Sarmiento, D., Shepson,
P., Sweeney, C., Turnbull, J., and Wu, K.: High-resolution atmospheric
inversion of urban CO2 emissions during the dormant season of the
Indianapolis Flux Experiment (INFLUX), J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121,
5213–5236, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024473, 2016. a
Lee, J., Hong, J. W., Lee, K., Hong, J., Velasco, E., Lim, Y. J., Lee, J. B.,
Nam, K., and Park, J.: Ceilometer Monitoring of Boundary-Layer Height and
Its Application in Evaluating the Dilution Effect on Air Pollution,
Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 172, 435–455, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-019-00452-5,
2019. a, b
Lehmann, V. and Teschke, G.: Advanced intermittent clutter filtering for radar wind profiler: signal separation through a Gabor frame expansion and its statistics, Ann. Geophys., 26, 759–783, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-26-759-2008, 2008. a
Lehning, M., Richner, H., and Kok, G. L.: Transport of air pollutants from the boundary layer to the free tropospere over complex terrain, Phys. Chem. Earth, 23, 667–672, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-1946(98)00108-6, 1998. a
LeMone, M. A., Tewari, M., Chen, F., and Dudhia, J.: Objectively determined fair-weather CBL depths in the ARW-WRF model and their comparison to CASES-97 observations, Mon. Weather Rev., 141, 30–54, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-12-00106.1, 2013. a
Lemone, M. A., Tewari, M., Chen, F., and Dudhia, J.: Objectively determined
fair-weather NBL features in ARW-WRF and their comparison to CASES-97
observations, Mon. Weather Rev., 142, 2709–2732,
https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-13-00358.1, 2014. a, b, c, d
Lenschow, D. H., Wulfmeyer, V., and Senff, C.: Measuring Second- through Fourth-Order Moments in Noisy Data, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 17, 1330–1347,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(2000)017<1330:MSTFOM>2.0.CO;2, 2000. a
Lewis, J. R., Welton, E. J., Molod, A. M., and Joseph, E.: Improved boundary
layer depth retrievals from MPLNET, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118,
9870–9879, https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50570, 2013. a
Li, H., Yang, Y., Hu, X.-M., Huang, Z., and Wang, G.: Evaluation of retrieval
methods of daytime convective boundary layer height based on Lidar data, J. Geophys. Res., 122, 4578–4593, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025620, 2017. a
Liljegren, J. C., Boukabara, S. A., Cady-Pereira, K., and Clough, S. A.: The effect of the half-width of the 22 GHz water vapor line on retrievals of temperature and water vapor profiles with a 12-channel microwave radiometer,
IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 43, 1102–1108,
https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2004.839593, 2005. a, b
Liu, B., Ma, Y., Gong, W., Zhang, M., and Yang, J.: Determination of boundary layer top on the basis of the characteristics of atmospheric particles, Atmos. Environ., 178, 140–147, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ATMOSENV.2018.01.054, 2018. a, b
Liu, B., Ma, Y., Guo, J., Gong, W., Zhang, Y., Mao, F., Li, J., Guo, X., and
Shi, Y.: Boundary layer heights as derived from ground-based radar wind
profiler in Beijing, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 57, 8095–8104,
https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2019.2918301, 2019. a
Liu, B., Guo, J., Gong, W., Shi, L., Zhang, Y., and Ma, Y.: Characteristics and performance of wind profiles as observed by the radar wind profiler network of China, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 4589–4600, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-4589-2020, 2020. a
Liu, J., Huang, J., Chen, B., Zhou, T., Yan, H., Jin, H., Huang, Z., and Zhang, B.: Comparisons of PBL heights derived from CALIPSO and ECMWF
reanalysis data over China, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 153, 102–112,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2014.10.011, 2015. a, b
Liu, L., Sun, X.-J., Liu, X.-C., Gao, T.-C., and Zhao, S.-J.: Comparison of Cloud Base Height Derived from a Ground-Based Infrared Cloud Measurement and
Two Ceilometers, Adv. Meteorol., 2015, 1–8, https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/853861,
2015. a
Liu, S. and Liang, X. Z.: Observed diurnal cycle climatology of planetary
boundary layer height, J. Climate, 23, 5790–5809,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JCLI3552.1, 2010. a, b, c, d
Liu, Z., Barlow, J. F., Chan, P.-W., Fung, J., Li, Y., Ren, C., Mak, H., and
Ng, E.: A Review of Progress and Applications of Pulsed Doppler Wind
LiDARs, Remote Sens., 11, 2522, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11212522,
2019. a
Löhnert, U. and Maier, O.: Operational profiling of temperature using ground-based microwave radiometry at Payerne: prospects and challenges, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 5, 1121–1134, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-1121-2012, 2012. a
Löhnert, U., Turner, D. D., and Crewell, S.: Ground-Based Temperature and
Humidity Profiling Using Spectral Infrared and Microwave Observations. Part
I: Simulated Retrieval Performance in Clear-Sky Conditions, J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 48, 1017–1032, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JAMC2060.1, 2009. a, b
Lothon, M., Lenschow, D. H., and Mayor, S. D.: Coherence and Scale of Vertical Velocity in the Convective Boundary Layer from a Doppler Lidar,
Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 121, 521–536, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-006-9077-1,
2006. a
Lotteraner, C. and Piringer, M.: Mixing-Height Time Series from Operational
Ceilometer Aerosol-Layer Heights, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 161, 265–287,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-016-0169-2, 2016. a
Madonna, F., Kivi, R., Dupont, J.-C., Ingleby, B., Fujiwara, M., Romanens, G., Hernandez, M., Calbet, X., Rosoldi, M., Giunta, A., Karppinen, T., Iwabuchi, M., Hoshino, S., von Rohden, C., and Thorne, P. W.: Use of automatic radiosonde launchers to measure temperature and humidity profiles from the GRUAN perspective, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 3621–3649, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3621-2020, 2020. a
Madonna, F., Tramutola, E., Souleymane, S. Y., Serva, F., Proto, M., Rosoldi,
M., Gagliardi, S., Amato, F., Marra, F., Fassò, A., Gardiner, T., and
Thorne, P. W.: The New Radiosounding HARMonization (RHARM) Data Set of
Homogenized Radiosounding Temperature, Humidity, and Wind Profiles With
Uncertainties, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 127, e2021JD035220,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD035220, 2022. a
Mahrt, L.: Boundary-layer moisture regimes, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,
117, 151–176, https://doi.org/10.1002/QJ.49711749708, 1991. a
Mahrt, L., Heald, R. C., Lenschow, D. H., Stankov, B. B., and Troen, I. B.: An observational study of the structure of the nocturnal boundary layer,
Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 17, 247–264, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00117983, 1979. a, b
Manninen, A. J., O'Connor, E. J., Vakkari, V., and Petäjä, T.: A generalised background correction algorithm for a Halo Doppler lidar and its application to data from Finland, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 817–827, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-817-2016, 2016. a
Marke, T., Crewell, S., Schemann, V., Schween, J. H., and Tuononen, M.: Long-Term Observations and High-Resolution Modeling of Midlatitude Nocturnal
Boundary Layer Processes Connected to Low-Level Jets, J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 57, 1155–1170, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-17-0341.1, 2018. a
Markowicz, K. M., Flatau, P. J., Kardas, A. E., Remiszewska, J., Stelmaszczyk, K., Woeste, L., Markowicz, K. M., Flatau, P. J., Kardas, A. E., Remiszewska, J., Stelmaszczyk, K., and Woeste, L.: Ceilometer Retrieval of the Boundary Layer Vertical Aerosol Extinction Structure, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 25, 928–944, https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JTECHA1016.1, 2008. a
Marsik, F. J., Fischer, K. W., McDonald, T. D., Samson, P. J., Marsik, F. J.,
Fischer, K. W., McDonald, T. D., and Samson, P. J.: Comparison of Methods
for Estimating Mixing Height Used during the 1992 Atlanta Field Intensive,
J. Appl. Meteor., 34, 1802–1814,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1995)034<1802:COMFEM>2.0.CO;2, 1995. a, b
Martinet, P., Cimini, D., Burnet, F., Ménétrier, B., Michel, Y., and Unger, V.: Improvement of numerical weather prediction model analysis during fog conditions through the assimilation of ground-based microwave radiometer observations: a 1D-Var study, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 6593–6611, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-6593-2020, 2020. a
Martucci, G., Matthey, R., Mitev, V., and Richner, H.: Comparison between
backscatter lidar and radiosonde measurements of the diurnal and nocturnal
stratification in the lower troposphere, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 24,
1231–1244, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH2036.1, 2007. a, b
Martucci, G., Matthey, R., Mitev, V., and Richner, H.: Frequency of
Boundary-Layer-Top Fluctuations in Convective and Stable Conditions Using
Laser Remote Sensing, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 135, 313–331,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-010-9474-3, 2010a. a, b, c
Martucci, G., Milroy, C., and O'Dowd, C. D.: Detection of Cloud-Base Height
Using Jenoptik CHM15K and Vaisala CL31 Ceilometers, J. Atmos. Ocean.
Tech., 27, 305–318, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JTECHA1326.1, 2010b. a
Mather, J. H. and Voyles, J. W.: The ARM Climate Research Facility: A Review of Structure and Capabilities, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 94, 377–392,
https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00218.1, 2013. a
Menut, L., Flamant, C., Pelon, J., and Flamant, P. H.: Urban boundary-layer
height determination from lidar measurements over the Paris area, Appl. Opt., 38, 945–954, https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.38.000945, 1999. a, b, c
Millán, L., Lebsock, M., Fishbein, E., Kalmus, P., and Teixeira, J.:
Quantifying Marine Boundary Layer Water Vapor beneath Low Clouds with
Near-Infrared and Microwave Imagery, J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 55,
213–225, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-15-0143.1, 2016. a
Milroy, C., Martucci, G., Lolli, S., Loaec, S., Sauvage, L., Xueref-Remy, I., Lavrič, J. V., Ciais, P., Feist, D. G., Biavati, G., and O'Dowd, C. D.: An assessment of pseudo-operational ground-based light detection and ranging sensors to determine the boundary-layer structure in the coastal atmosphere,
Adv. Meteorol., 2012, 1–19, https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/929080, 2012. a, b, c, d, e
Moigne, P. L., Legain, D., Lagarde, F., Potes, M., Tzanos, D., Moulin, E., Barrié, J., Salgado, R., Messiaen, G., Fiandrino, A., Donier, S., Traullé, O., and Costa, M. J.: Evaluation
of the lake model FLake over a coastal lagoon during the THAUMEX field
campaign, Tellus A, 65, 20951, https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v65i0.20951, 2013. a
Molod, A., Salmun, H., and Dempsey, M.: Estimating Planetary Boundary Layer
Heights from NOAA Profiler Network Wind Profiler Data, J. Atmos. Ocean.
Tech., 32, 1545–1561, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-14-00155.1, 2015. a
Molod, A., Salmun, H., and Marquardt Collow, A. B.: Annual Cycle of Planetary Boundary Layer Heights Estimated From Wind Profiler Network Data,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 6207–6221, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD030102,
2019. a
Morille, Y., Haeffelin, M., Drobinski, P., and Pelon, J.: STRAT: An automated algorithm to retrieve the vertical structure of the atmosphere from
single-channel lidar data, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 24, 761–775,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH2008.1, 2007. a, b
Mues, A., Rupakheti, M., Münkel, C., Lauer, A., Bozem, H., Hoor, P., Butler, T., and Lawrence, M. G.: Investigation of the mixing layer height derived from ceilometer measurements in the Kathmandu Valley and implications for local air quality, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 8157–8176, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-8157-2017, 2017. a, b
Münkel, C.: Mixing height determination with lidar ceilometers–results
from Helsinki Testbed, Meteorol. Z., 16, 451–459,
https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2007/0221, 2007. a
Münkel, C.: Combining gradient and profile fit method for an advanced ceilometer-based boundary layer height detection algorithm, in: 18th International Symposium for the Advancement of Boundary-Layer Remote Sensing, ISARS2016, 8 June 2016, Varna, Bulgaria, 2016. a
Neisser, J., Adam, W., Beyrich, F., Leiterer, U., and Steinhagen, H.: Atmospheric boundary layer monitoring at the Meteorological Observatory Lindenberg as a part of the “Lindenberg Column”: Facilities and selected results, Meteorol. Z., 11, 241–253, https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2002/0011-0241,
2002. a
Newsom, R. K., Turner, D. D., Lehtinen, R., Münkel, C., Kallio, J., and
Roininen, R.: Evaluation of a Compact Broadband Differential Absorption
Lidar for Routine Water Vapor Profiling in the Atmospheric Boundary Layer,
J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 37, 47–65, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-18-0102.1,
2020. a
Nielsen-Gammon, J. W., Powell, C. L., Mahoney, M. J., Angevine, W. M., Senff,
C., White, A., Berkowitz, C., Doran, C., and Knupp, K.: Multisensor
estimation of mixing heights over a coastal city, J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 47, 27–43, https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JAMC1503.1, 2008. a
Nieuwstadt, F. and Duynkerke, P.: Turbulence in the atmospheric boundary layer, Atmos. Res., 40, 111–142, https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-8095(95)00034-8, 1996. a
O'Connor, E. J., Illingworth, A. J., and Hogan, R. J.: A Technique for
Autocalibration of Cloud Lidar, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 21, 777–786,
2004. a
O'Connor, E. J., Illingworth, A. J., Brooks, I. M., Westbrook, C. D., Hogan,
R. J., Davies, F., and Brooks, B. J.: A Method for Estimating the Turbulent
Kinetic Energy Dissipation Rate from a Vertically Pointing Doppler Lidar,
and Independent Evaluation from Balloon-Borne In Situ Measurements, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 27, 1652–1664, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JTECHA1455.1,
2010. a, b, c
Pal, S., Xueref-Remy, I., Ammoura, L., Chazette, P., Gibert, F., Royer, P., Dieudonné, E., Dupont, J. C., Haeffelin, M., Lac, C., Lopez, M., Morille, Y., and Ravetta, F.: Spatio-temporal variability of the atmospheric
boundary layer depth over the Paris agglomeration: An assessment of the
impact of the urban heat island intensity, Atmos. Environ., 63, 261–275,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.09.046, 2012. a
Pal, S., Haeffelin, M., and Batchvarova, E.: Exploring a geophysical process-based attribution technique for the determination of the atmospheric
boundary layer depth using aerosol lidar and near-surface meteorological
measurements, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 9277–9295,
https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50710, 2013. a, b, c
Palmén, E. H. and Newton, C. W.: Atmospheric circulation systems: their
structure and physical interpretation, vol. 13, Academic press, ISBN 978-0-12-544550-4, 1969. a
Pandolfi, M., Martucci, G., Querol, X., Alastuey, A., Wilsenack, F., Frey, S., O'Dowd, C. D., and Dall'Osto, M.: Continuous atmospheric boundary layer observations in the coastal urban area of Barcelona during SAPUSS, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 4983–4996, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-4983-2013, 2013. a, b, c
Pappalardo, G., Amodeo, A., Apituley, A., Comeron, A., Freudenthaler, V., Linné, H., Ansmann, A., Bösenberg, J., D'Amico, G., Mattis, I., Mona, L., Wandinger, U., Amiridis, V., Alados-Arboledas, L., Nicolae, D., and Wiegner, M.: EARLINET: towards an advanced sustainable European aerosol lidar network, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 2389–2409, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-2389-2014, 2014. a
Parikh, N. and Parikh, J.: Systematic tracking of boundary layer aerosols with laser radar, Opt. Laser Technol., 34, 177–185,
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0030-3992(01)00107-4, 2002. a
Park, M.-S., Park, S.-H., Chae, J.-H., Choi, M.-H., Song, Y., Kang, M., and Roh, J.-W.: High-resolution urban observation network for user-specific meteorological information service in the Seoul Metropolitan Area, South Korea, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 1575–1594, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-1575-2017, 2017. a
Päschke, E., Leinweber, R., and Lehmann, V.: An assessment of the performance of a 1.5 µm Doppler lidar for operational vertical wind profiling based on a 1-year trial, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 2251–2266, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-2251-2015, 2015. a
Pattantyús-Ábrahám, M., Mattis, I., Begbie, R., Bravo-Aranda, J., Brettle, M., Cermak, J., Drouin, M.-A., Geiß, A., Görsdorf, U., Haefele, A., Haeffelin, M., Hervo, M., Komínková, K., Leinweber, R., Münkel, C., Pönitz, K., Vande Hey, J., Wagner, F., and Wiegner, M.: The dataset of the CeiLinEx 2015 Ceilometer-Inter-comparison Experiment, Version v001, DWD [data set],
https://doi.org/10.5676/DWD/CEILINEX2015, 2017. a
Pearson, G., Davies, F., and Collier, C.: Remote sensing of the tropical rain forest boundary layer using pulsed Doppler lidar, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 5891–5901, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5891-2010, 2010. a, b
Peña, A., Gryning, S., and Hasager, C. B.: Measurements and modelling of
the wind speed profile in the marine atmospheric boundary layer,
Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 129, 479–495, 2008. a
Peña, A., Floors, R., Sathe, A., Gryning, S. E., Wagner, R., Courtney, M. S., Larsén, X. G., Hahmann, A. N., and Hasager, C. B.: Ten Years of Boundary-Layer and Wind-Power Meteorology at Høvsøre, Denmark, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 158, 1–26, https://doi.org/10.1007/S10546-015-0079-8, 2016. a
Peng, J., Grimmond, C., Fu, X., Chang, Y., Zhang, G., Guo, J., Tang, C., GAO,
J., Xu, X., Tan, J., Peng, J., Grimmond, C., Fu, X., Chang, Y., Zhang, G.,
Guo, J., Tang, C., GAO, J., Xu, X., and Tan, J.: Ceilometer based analysis
of Shanghai's boundary layer height (under rain and fog free conditions),
J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 34, 749–764, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-16-0132.1, 2017. a, b
Pentikäinen, P., O'Connor, E. J., Manninen, A. J., and Ortiz-Amezcua, P.: Methodology for deriving the telescope focus function and its uncertainty for a heterodyne pulsed Doppler lidar, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 2849–2863, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2849-2020, 2020. a
Petetin, H., Jeoffrion, M., Sauvage, B., Athier, G., Blot, R., Boulanger, D.,
Clark, H., Cousin, J. M., Gheusi, F., Nedelec, P., Steinbacher, M., and
Thouret, V.: Representativeness of the IAGOS airborne measurements in the
lower troposphere, Elementa, 6, 23, https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.280, 2018. a
Pichugina, Y. L. and Banta, R. M.: Stable boundary layer depth from
high-resolution measurements of the mean wind profile, J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 49, 20–35, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JAMC2168.1, 2010. a, b, c, d
Pichugina, Y. L., Tucker, S. C., Banta, R. M., Brewer, W. A., Kelley, N. D., Jonkman, B. J., and Newsom, R. K.: Horizontal-velocity and variance measurements in the stable boundary layer using Doppler lidar: Sensitivity to averaging procedures, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 25, 1307–1327,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JTECHA988.1, 2008. a
Pichugina, Y. L., Banta, R. M., Brewer, W. A., Sandberg, S. P., and Hardesty,
R. M.: Doppler Lidar–Based Wind-Profile Measurement System for Offshore
Wind-Energy and Other Marine Boundary Layer Applications, J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 51, 327–349, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-11-040.1, 2012. a
Piironen, A. K. and Eloranta, E. W.: Convective boundary layer mean depths and cloud geometrical properties obtained from volume imaging lidar data, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 100, 25569–25576, 1995. a
Piters, A. J. M., Boersma, K. F., Kroon, M., Hains, J. C., Van Roozendael, M., Wittrock, F., Abuhassan, N., Adams, C., Akrami, M., Allaart, M. A. F., Apituley, A., Beirle, S., Bergwerff, J. B., Berkhout, A. J. C., Brunner, D., Cede, A., Chong, J., Clémer, K., Fayt, C., Frieß, U., Gast, L. F. L., Gil-Ojeda, M., Goutail, F., Graves, R., Griesfeller, A., Großmann, K., Hemerijckx, G., Hendrick, F., Henzing, B., Herman, J., Hermans, C., Hoexum, M., van der Hoff, G. R., Irie, H., Johnston, P. V., Kanaya, Y., Kim, Y. J., Klein Baltink, H., Kreher, K., de Leeuw, G., Leigh, R., Merlaud, A., Moerman, M. M., Monks, P. S., Mount, G. H., Navarro-Comas, M., Oetjen, H., Pazmino, A., Perez-Camacho, M., Peters, E., du Piesanie, A., Pinardi, G., Puentedura, O., Richter, A., Roscoe, H. K., Schönhardt, A., Schwarzenbach, B., Shaiganfar, R., Sluis, W., Spinei, E., Stolk, A. P., Strong, K., Swart, D. P. J., Takashima, H., Vlemmix, T., Vrekoussis, M., Wagner, T., Whyte, C., Wilson, K. M., Yela, M., Yilmaz, S., Zieger, P., and Zhou, Y.: The Cabauw Intercomparison campaign for Nitrogen Dioxide measuring Instruments (CINDI): design, execution, and early results, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 5, 457–485, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-457-2012, 2012. a
Poltera, Y., Martucci, G., Collaud Coen, M., Hervo, M., Emmenegger, L., Henne, S., Brunner, D., and Haefele, A.: PathfinderTURB: an automatic boundary layer algorithm. Development, validation and application to study the impact on in situ measurements at the Jungfraujoch, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 10051–10070, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-10051-2017, 2017. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i
Pospichal, B., Küchler, N., Löhnert, U., and Güldner, J.: J-CAL (Joint microwave calibration) – Recommendations for operation and calibration of Microwave Radiometers (MWR) within a network, EU COST Action TOPROF,
http://www.toprof.imaa.cnr.it/images/toprof/pubs/TOPROF_MWR_recommendations_20160315.pdf (last access: 12 January 2023), 2016. a
Potes, M., Salgado, R., Costa, M. J., Morais, M., Bortoli, D., Kostadinov, I., and Mammarella, I.: Lake-atmosphere interactions at Alqueva reservoir: A case study in the summer of 2014, Tellus A, 69, 1272787, https://doi.org/10.1080/16000870.2016.1272787, 2017. a
Rahn, D. A. and Mitchell, C. J.: Diurnal Climatology of the Boundary Layer in Southern California Using AMDAR Temperature and Wind Profiles, J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 55, 1123–1137, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-15-0234.1, 2016. a, b
Ramon, J., Lledó, L., Pérez-Zanón, N., Soret, A., and Doblas-Reyes, F. J.: The Tall Tower Dataset: a unique initiative to boost wind energy research, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 12, 429–439, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-429-2020, 2020. a
Ravetta, F. and Ancellet, G.: Compact airborne lidar for tropospheric ozone:
description and field measurements, Appl. Opt., 37, 5509–5521,
https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.37.005509, 1998. a
Reitebuch, O., Strassburger, A., Emeis, S., and Kuttler, W.: Nocturnal
secondary ozone concentration maxima analysed by sodar observations and
surface measurements, Atmos. Environ., 34, 4315–4329,
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00185-0, 2000. a
Renju, R., Raju, C. S., Mishra, M. K., Mathew, N., Rajeev, K., and Moorthy,
K. K.: Atmospheric Boundary Layer Characterization Using Multiyear
Ground-Based Microwave Radiometric Observations Over a Tropical Coastal
Station, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 55, 6877–6882,
https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2017.2735626, 2017. a, b, c, d, e
Rieutord, T., Aubert, S., and Machado, T.: Deriving boundary layer height from aerosol lidar using machine learning: KABL and ADABL algorithms, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 4335–4353, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-4335-2021, 2021. a, b, c, d
Robinson, I., Jack, J. W., Rae, C. F., and Moncrieff, J. B.: A robust optical
parametric oscillator and receiver telescope for differential absorption
lidar of greenhouse gases, Proc. SPIE, 9645, 9645OU,
https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2197251, 2015. a
Rose, T., Crewell, S., Löhnert, U., and Simmer, C.: A network suitable microwave radiometer for operational monitoring of the cloudy atmosphere, Atmos. Res., 75, 183–200, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2004.12.005, 2005. a
Rotach, M. W. and Zardi, D.: On the boundary-layer structure over highly
complex terrain: Key findings from MAP, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,
133, 937–948, https://doi.org/10.1002/QJ.71, 2007. a
Rüfenacht, R., Haefele, A., Pospichal, B., Cimini, D., Bircher-Adrot, S.,
Turp, M., and Sugier, J.: EUMETNET opens to microwave radiometers for
operational thermodynamical profiling in Europe, Bull. Atmos. Sci.
Technol., 2, 231–261, https://doi.org/10.1007/s42865-021-00033-w, 2021. a
Ruffieux, D.: Evaluation of WMO-CBS Wind Profiler Survey, WIGOS Technical Report – No. 2014-03, World Meteorological Organisation,
https://library.wmo.int/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=16117#.Y8AX_xWZNPY (last access: 12 January 2023), 2014. a
Rye, B. J. and Hardesty, R. M.: Discrete spectral peak estimation in incoherent backscatter heterodyne lidar. I: Spectral accumulation and the Cramer-Rao lower bound, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 31, 16–27,
https://doi.org/10.1109/36.210440, 1993. a
Saeed, U., Rocadenbosch, F., and Crewell, S.: Adaptive estimation of the stable boundary layer height using combined lidar and microwave radiometer
observations, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 54, 6895–6906,
https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2016.2586298, 2016. a, b
Sathe, A. and Mann, J.: A review of turbulence measurements using ground-based wind lidars, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 3147–3167, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-3147-2013, 2013. a
Sathe, A., Mann, J., Vasiljevic, N., and Lea, G.: A six-beam method to measure turbulence statistics using ground-based wind lidars, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 729–740, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-729-2015, 2015. a
Sawyer, V. and Li, Z.: Detection, variations and intercomparison of the
planetary boundary layer depth from radiosonde, lidar and infrared
spectrometer, Atmos. Environ., 79, 518–528,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.07.019, 2013. a, b
Scarino, A. J., Obland, M. D., Fast, J. D., Burton, S. P., Ferrare, R. A., Hostetler, C. A., Berg, L. K., Lefer, B., Haman, C., Hair, J. W., Rogers, R. R., Butler, C., Cook, A. L., and Harper, D. B.: Comparison of mixed layer heights from airborne high spectral resolution lidar, ground-based measurements, and the WRF-Chem model during CalNex and CARES, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 5547–5560, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-5547-2014, 2014. a
Schäfer, K., Emeis, S. M., Rauch, A., Münkel, C., and Vogt, S.: Determination of the mixing layer height from ceilometer backscatter profiles, in: Remote Sensing of Clouds and the Atmosphere XI, edited by: Comeron, A., Carleer, M. R., Picard, R. H., and Sifakis, N. I., International Society for Optics and Photonics, 248–259, https://doi.org/10.1117/12.565592, 2004. a
Schmid, P. and Niyogi, D.: A Method for Estimating Planetary Boundary Layer
Heights and Its Application over the ARM Southern Great Plains Site, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 29, 316–322, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-11-00118.1,
2012. a, b
Schreiner, W. S., Weiss, J., Anthes, R. A., Braun, J., Chu, V., Fong, J., Hunt, D., Kuo, Y.-H., Meehan, T., Serafino, W., Sjoberg, J., Sokolovskiy, S., Talaat, E., Wee, T. K., and Zeng, Z.: COSMIC-2 radio occultation
constellation: First results, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2019GL086841, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL086841, 2020. a
Seibert, P., Beyrich, F., Gryning, S., Joffre, S., Rasmussen, A., and Tercier, P.: Mixing layer depth determination for dispersion modelling, in: COST Action 710-Final Report. Harmonisation of the pre-processing of meteorological data for atmospheric dispersion models, edited by: Fisher, B., Erbrink, J., Finardi, S., Jeannet, P., Jore, S., Morselli, M., Pechinger, U., Seibert, P., and Thomson, D., European Commission, Luxembourg, EUR 18195 EN, ISBN 92-828-3302-X, 1998. a
Seidel, D. J., Zhang, Y., Beljaars, A., Golaz, J.-C., Jacobson, A. R., and
Medeiros, B.: Climatology of the planetary boundary layer over the
continental United States and Europe, J. Geophys. Res., 117, D17106,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD018143, 2012. a, b, c, d
Serafin, S., Adler, B., Cuxart, J., De Wekker, S. F., Gohm, A., Grisogono,
B., Kalthoff, N., Kirshbaum, D. J., Rotach, M. W., Schmidli, J., Stiperski,
I., Večenaj, Ž., and Zardi, D.: Exchange Processes in the
Atmospheric Boundary Layer Over Mountainous Terrain, Atmosphere, 9, 102,
https://doi.org/10.3390/ATMOS9030102, 2018. a
Shi, Z., Vu, T., Kotthaus, S., Harrison, R. M., Grimmond, S., Yue, S., Zhu, T., Lee, J., Han, Y., Demuzere, M., Dunmore, R. E., Ren, L., Liu, D., Wang, Y., Wild, O., Allan, J., Acton, W. J., Barlow, J., Barratt, B., Beddows, D., Bloss, W. J., Calzolai, G., Carruthers, D., Carslaw, D. C., Chan, Q., Chatzidiakou, L., Chen, Y., Crilley, L., Coe, H., Dai, T., Doherty, R., Duan, F., Fu, P., Ge, B., Ge, M., Guan, D., Hamilton, J. F., He, K., Heal, M., Heard, D., Hewitt, C. N., Hollaway, M., Hu, M., Ji, D., Jiang, X., Jones, R., Kalberer, M., Kelly, F. J., Kramer, L., Langford, B., Lin, C., Lewis, A. C., Li, J., Li, W., Liu, H., Liu, J., Loh, M., Lu, K., Lucarelli, F., Mann, G., McFiggans, G., Miller, M. R., Mills, G., Monk, P., Nemitz, E., O'Connor, F., Ouyang, B., Palmer, P. I., Percival, C., Popoola, O., Reeves, C., Rickard, A. R., Shao, L., Shi, G., Spracklen, D., Stevenson, D., Sun, Y., Sun, Z., Tao, S., Tong, S., Wang, Q., Wang, W., Wang, X., Wang, X., Wang, Z., Wei, L., Whalley, L., Wu, X., Wu, Z., Xie, P., Yang, F., Zhang, Q., Zhang, Y., Zhang, Y., and Zheng, M.: Introduction to the special issue “In-depth study of air pollution sources and processes within Beijing and its surrounding region (APHH-Beijing)”, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 7519–7546, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-7519-2019, 2019. a
Shimizu, A., Nishizawa, T., Jin, Y., Kim, S.-W., Wang, Z., Batdorj, D., and
Sugimoto, N.: Evolution of a lidar network for tropospheric aerosol
detection in East Asia, SPIE. Optical Engineering, 56, 1–12, https://doi.org/10.1117/1.OE.56.3.031219, 2016. a
Shrestha, B., Brotzge, J., Wang, J., Bain, N., Thorncroft, C., Joseph, E., Freedman, J., and Perez, S.: Overview and Applications of the New York State
Mesonet Profiler Network, J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 60, 1591–1611,
2021. a
Sicard, M., Pérez, C., Rocadenbosch, F., Baldasano, J., and García-Vizcaino, D.: Mixed-layer depth determination in the Barcelona
coastal area from regular lidar measurements: methods, results and
limitations, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 119, 135–157,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-005-9005-9, 2006. a
Simeonov, V., Larcheveque, G., Quaglia, P., Van Den Bergh, H., and Calpini, B.: Influence of the photomultiplier tube spatial uniformity on lidar signals, Appl. Opt., 38, 5186–5190, https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.38.005186, 1999. a
Sinclair, V. A., Ritvanen, J., Urbancic, G., Statnaia, I., Batrak, Y., Moisseev, D., and Kurppa, M.: Boundary-layer height and surface stability at Hyytiälä, Finland, in ERA5 and observations, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 3075–3103, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3075-2022, 2022. a
Singal, S. P.: Acoustic Remote Sensing Applications, Springer Berlin
Heidelberg, ISBN 3-540-61612-8, 1997. a
Singh, N., Solanki, R., Ojha, N., Janssen, R. H. H., Pozzer, A., and Dhaka, S. K.: Boundary layer evolution over the central Himalayas from radio wind profiler and model simulations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 10559–10572, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-10559-2016, 2016. a
Smalikho, I. N. and Banakh, V. A.: Measurements of wind turbulence parameters by a conically scanning coherent Doppler lidar in the atmospheric boundary layer, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 4191–4208, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-4191-2017, 2017. a
Smith, E. N., Greene, B. R., Bell, T. M., Blumberg, W. G., Wakefield, R., Reif, D., Niu, Q., Wang, Q., and Turner, D. D.: Evaluation and Applications of Multi-Instrument Boundary-Layer Thermodynamic Retrievals, Bound.-Lay.
Meteorol., 181, 95–123, https://doi.org/10.1007/S10546-021-00640-2, 2021. a
Solheim, F., Godwin, J. R., Westwater, E. R., Han, Y., Keihm, S. J., Marsh, K., and Ware, R.: Radiometric profiling of temperature, water vapor and cloud
liquid water using various inversion methods, Radio Sci., 33, 393–404,
https://doi.org/10.1029/97RS03656, 1998. a
Sørensen, J., Rasmussen, A., and Svensmark, H.: Forecast of atmospheric
boundary-layer height utilised for ETEX real-time dispersion modelling,
Phys. Chem. Earth, 21, 435–439, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-1946(97)81138-X, 1996. a
Spirig, C., Guenther, A., Greenberg, J. P., Calanca, P., and Tarvainen, V.: Tethered balloon measurements of biogenic volatile organic compounds at a Boreal forest site, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 4, 215–229, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-4-215-2004, 2004. a
Stachlewska, I. S., Pia̧dłowski, M., Migacz, S., Szkop, A.,
Zielińska, A. J., and Swaczyna, P. L.: Ceilometer observations of the
boundary layer over Warsaw, Poland, Acta Geophys., 60, 1386–1412,
https://doi.org/10.2478/s11600-012-0054-4, 2012. a
Steeneveld, G. J., van de Wiel, B. J., and Holtslag, A. A.: Diagnostic
equations for the stable boundary layer height: Evaluation and dimensional
analysis, J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 46, 212–225,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAM2454.1, 2007. a
Steyn, D. G., Baldi, M., and Hoff, R. M.: The Detection of Mixed Layer Depth
and Entrainment Zone Thickness from Lidar Backscatter Profiles, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 16, 953–959,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1999)016<0953:TDOMLD>2.0.CO;2, 1999. a, b
Stirnberg, R., Cermak, J., Kotthaus, S., Haeffelin, M., Andersen, H., Fuchs, J., Kim, M., Petit, J.-E., and Favez, O.: Meteorology-driven variability of air pollution (PM1) revealed with explainable machine learning, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 3919–3948, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-3919-2021, 2021. a
Stohl, A., Forster, C., Frank, A., Seibert, P., and Wotawa, G.: Technical note: The Lagrangian particle dispersion model FLEXPART version 6.2, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 2461–2474, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-2461-2005, 2005. a
Straume, A., Rennie, M., Isaksen, L., de Kloe, J., Marseille, G.-J., Stoffelen, A., Flament, T., Stieglitz, H., Dabas, A., Huber, D., Reitebuch, O., Lemmerz, C., Lux, O., Marksteiner, U., Weiler, F., Witschas, B., Meringer, M., Schmidt, K., Nikolaus, I., Geiss, A., Flamant, P., Kanitz, T., Wernham, D., von Bismarck, J., Bley, S., Fehr, T., Floberghagen, R., and Parinello, T.: ESA's Space-Based Doppler Wind Lidar Mission Aeolus – First Wind and Aerosol Product Assessment Results, EPJ Web Conf., 237, 01007,
https://doi.org/10.1051/EPJCONF/202023701007, 2020. a
Su, T., Li, Z., Li, C., Li, J., Han, W., Shen, C., Tan, W., Wei, J., and Guo, J.: The significant impact of aerosol vertical structure on lower atmosphere stability and its critical role in aerosol–planetary boundary layer (PBL) interactions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 3713–3724, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-3713-2020, 2020. a
Sujatha, P., Mahalakshmi, D. V., Ramiz, A., Rao, P. V. N., and Naidu, C. V.:
Ventilation coefficient and boundary layer height impact on urban air
quality, Cog. Environ. Sci., 2, 1125284, https://doi.org/10.1080/23311843.2015.1125284, 2016. a
Tang, G., Zhang, J., Zhu, X., Song, T., Münkel, C., Hu, B., Schäfer, K., Liu, Z., Zhang, J., Wang, L., Xin, J., Suppan, P., and Wang, Y.: Mixing layer height and its implications for air pollution over Beijing, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 2459–2475, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-2459-2016, 2016. a, b, c, d, e
Tangborn, A., Demoz, B., Carroll, B. J., Santanello, J., and Anderson, J. L.: Assimilation of lidar planetary boundary layer height observations, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 1099–1110, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-1099-2021, 2021. a
Tennekes, H.: A Model for the Dynamics of the Inversion Above a Convective
Boundary Layer, J. Atmos. Sci., 30, 558–567,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1973)030<0558:AMFTDO>2.0.CO;2, 1973. a
Teschke, G. and Lehmann, V.: Mean wind vector estimation using the velocity–azimuth display (VAD) method: an explicit algebraic solution, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 3265–3271, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-3265-2017, 2017. a
Theeuwes, N. E., Barlow, J. F., Teuling, A. J., Grimmond, C. S. B., and Kotthaus, S.: Persistent cloud cover over mega-cities linked to surface heat
release, npj Clim. Atmos. Sci., 2, 1–15,
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-019-0072-x, 2019. a
Thobois, L., Freedman, J., Royer, P., Brotzge, J., and Joseph, E.: Validation
and deployment of the first Lidar based weather observation network in New
York State: The NYS MesoNet Project, EPJ Web Conf., 176, 09010,
https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201817609010, 2018. a, b
Thorne, P. W., Madonna, F., Schulz, J., Oakley, T., Ingleby, B., Rosoldi, M., Tramutola, E., Arola, A., Buschmann, M., Mikalsen, A. C., Davy, R., Voces, C., Kreher, K., De Maziere, M., and Pappalardo, G.: Making better sense of the mosaic of environmental measurement networks: a system-of-systems approach and quantitative assessment, Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 6, 453–472, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-6-453-2017, 2017. a
Toledo, D., Córdoba-Jabonero, C., and Gil-Ojeda, M.: Cluster Analysis: A New Approach Applied to Lidar Measurements for Atmospheric Boundary Layer
Height Estimation, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 31, 422–436,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-12-00253.1, 2014. a
Toledo, D., Córdoba-Jabonero, C., Adame, J. A., De La Morena, B., and
Gil-Ojeda, M.: Estimation of the atmospheric boundary layer height during
different atmospheric conditions: a comparison on reliability of several
methods applied to lidar measurements, Int. J. Remote Sens., 38,
3203–3218, https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2017.1292068, 2017. a, b
Tonttila, J., O'Connor, E. J., Hellsten, A., Hirsikko, A., O'Dowd, C., Järvinen, H., and Räisänen, P.: Turbulent structure and scaling of the inertial subrange in a stratocumulus-topped boundary layer observed by a Doppler lidar, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 5873–5885, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5873-2015, 2015. a
Träumner, K., Kottmeier, C., Corsmeier, U., and Wieser, A.: Convective Boundary-Layer Entrainment: Short Review and Progress using Doppler Lidar,
Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 141, 369–391, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-011-9657-6,
2011. a, b, c, d
Tsaknakis, G., Papayannis, A., Kokkalis, P., Amiridis, V., Kambezidis, H. D., Mamouri, R. E., Georgoussis, G., and Avdikos, G.: Inter-comparison of lidar and ceilometer retrievals for aerosol and Planetary Boundary Layer profiling over Athens, Greece, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 4, 1261–1273, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-1261-2011, 2011. a
Tucker, S. C., Senff, C. J., Weickmann, A. M., Brewer, W. A., Banta, R. M., Sandberg, S. P., Law, D. C., and Hardesty, R. M.: Doppler lidar estimation of
mixing height using turbulence, shear, and aerosol profiles, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 26, 673–688, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JTECHA1157.1, 2009. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i
Tuononen, M., O'Connor, E. J., Sinclair, V. A., and Vakkari, V.: Low-level
jets over Utö, Finland, based on Doppler lidar observations, J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 56, 2577–2594,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-16-0411.1, 2017. a, b
Turner, D. and Löhnert, U.: Information content and uncertainties in
thermodynamic profiles and liquid cloud properties retrieved from the
ground-based Atmospheric Emitted Radiance Interferometer (AERI), J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 53, 752–771, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-13-0126.1, 2014. a
Turner, D. D. and Blumberg, W. G.: Improvements to the AERIoe thermodynamic
profile retrieval algorithm, IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl., 12, 1339–1354,
https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2018.2874968, 2018. a
Turner, D. D. and Löhnert, U.: Ground-based temperature and humidity profiling: combining active and passive remote sensors, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 3033–3048, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-3033-2021, 2021. a
Vajda, A., Tuomenvirta, H., Jokinen, P., Luomaranta, A., Makkonen, L.,
Tikanmäki, M., Groenemeijer, P., Saarikivi, P., Michaelides, S.,
Papadakis, M., Tymvios, F., and Athanasatos, S.: Probabilities of adverse
weather affecting transport in Europe: Climatology and scenarios up to the
2050s, Clin. Epigenetics, ISBN 978-951-697-762-4, https://helda.helsinki.fi/handle/10138/28592 (last access: 12 January 2023), 2011. a
Vakkari, V., Manninen, A. J., O'Connor, E. J., Schween, J. H., van Zyl, P. G., and Marinou, E.: A novel post-processing algorithm for Halo Doppler lidars, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 839–852, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-839-2019, 2019. a
Vivone, G., D'Amico, G., Summa, D., Lolli, S., Amodeo, A., Bortoli, D., and Pappalardo, G.: Atmospheric boundary layer height estimation from aerosol lidar: a new approach based on morphological image processing techniques, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 4249–4265, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-4249-2021, 2021. a
Vogelezang, D. H. P. and Holtslag, A. A. M.: Evaluation and model impacts of
alternative boundary-layer height formulations, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 81,
245–269, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02430331, 1996. a
von Engeln, A. and Teixeira, J.: A planetary boundary layer height climatology derived from ECMWF reanalysis data, J. Climate, 26, 6575–6590,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00385.1, 2013. a
von Engeln, A., Teixeira, J., Wickert, J., and Buehler, S. A.: Using CHAMP
radio occultation data to determine the top altitude of the Planetary
Boundary Layer, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, 1–4, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL022168, 2005. a
Wærsted, E. G., Haeffelin, M., Dupont, J.-C., Delanoë, J., and Dubuisson, P.: Radiation in fog: quantification of the impact on fog liquid water based on ground-based remote sensing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 10811–10835, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-10811-2017, 2017. a
Wagner, T. J., Feltz, W. F., and Ackerman, S. A.: The temporal evolution of
convective indices in storm-producing environments, Weather Forecast., 23,
786–794, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008WAF2007046.1, 2008. a, b
Wagner, T. J., Klein, P. M., and Turner, D. D.: A new generation of
ground-based mobile platforms for active and passive profiling of the
boundary layer, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 100, 137–153,
https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-17-0165.1, 2019. a
Wang, D., Stachlewska, I. S., Song, X., Heese, B., and Nemuc, A.: Variability
of the Boundary Layer Over an Urban Continental Site Based on 10 Years of
Active Remote Sensing Observations in Warsaw, Remote Sens., 12, 340,
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12020340, 2020. a
Wang, X. Y. and Wang, K. C.: Estimation of atmospheric mixing layer height from radiosonde data, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 1701–1709, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-1701-2014, 2014. a
Weckwerth, T. M., Weber, K. J., Turner, D. D., and Spuler, S. M.: Validation of a water vapor micropulse differential absorption lidar (DIAL), J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 33, 2353–2372, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-16-0119.1, 2016. a
Weitkamp, C.: LiDAR: introduction, in: Laser remote sensing, CRC
Press, 19–54, ISBN 9780429135743, 2005. a
Welton, E. J., Stewart, S. A., Lewis, J. R., Belcher, L. R., Campbell, J. R.,
and Lolli, S.: Status of the NASA Micro Pulse Lidar Network (MPLNET):
overview of the network and future plans, new version 3 data products, and
the polarized MPL, EPJ Web Conf., 176, 09003,
https://doi.org/10.1051/EPJCONF/201817609003, 2018. a
White, A.: Mixing depth detection using 915-MHz radar reflectivity data, in: 8th Symposium on Meteorological Observations and Instrumentation, 17–22 January 1993, Anaheim, CA, USA, American Meteorological Society, Boston MA, 248–250, 1993. a
Wiegner, M. and Geiß, A.: Aerosol profiling with the Jenoptik ceilometer CHM15kx, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 5, 1953–1964, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-1953-2012, 2012. a
Wiegner, M., Emeis, S., Freudenthaler, V., Heese, B., Junkermann, W.,
Münkel, C., Schäfer, K., Seefeldner, M., and Vogt, S.: Mixing layer
height over Munich, Germany: Variability and comparisons of different
methodologies, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, 13201, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006593, 2006. a, b, c
Wilczak, J. M., Cancillo, M. L., and King, C. W.: A wind profiler climatology
of boundary layer structure above the boreal forest, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 102, 29083–29100, https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD02315, 1997. a, b
Wildmann, N., Bodini, N., Lundquist, J. K., Bariteau, L., and Wagner, J.: Estimation of turbulence dissipation rate from Doppler wind lidars and in situ instrumentation for the Perdigão 2017 campaign, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 6401–6423, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-6401-2019, 2019. a
WMO: GCOS, 144. Guide to the GCOS Surface Network (GSN) and GCOS Upper-Air Network (GUAN) World Meteorological Organization (WMO), Tech. Rep. GCOS–144, WMO/TD No. 1558, https://library.wmo.int/doc_num.php?explnum_id=3855 (last access: 12 January 2023), 2010. a
WMO: The GCOS Reference Upper-Air Network (GRUAN): Guide, WMO, WIGOS technical report No. 2013-03, GCOS-171,
https://library.wmo.int/doc_num.php?explnum_id=7196 (last access: 12 January 2023), 2013. a
WMO: Workshop on the Review of the GCOS Surface Network (GSN), GCOS Upper-Air Network (GUAN) and related atmospheric networks, WMO, https://library.wmo.int/doc_num.php?explnum_id=4013 (last access: 12 January 2023), 2014. a
WMO: WMO Global Observing System Upper-air observations, WMO,
https://public.wmo.int/en/programmes/global-observing-system (last access: 12 January 2023), 2017. a
WMO: GCOS Upper Air Network (GUAN) Radiosonde Observations Past, Present and Future, WMO, https://www.wmocimo.net/wp-content/uploads/O3_3_Oakley_GUAN-Past-Present-and-Future-extended-abstract.pdf (last access: 12 January 2023), 2018. a
Wood, R.: Stratocumulus clouds, Mon. Weather Rev., 140, 2373–2423,
https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-11-00121.1, 2012. a
Wulfmeyer, V., Pal, S., Turner, D. D., and Wagner, E.: Can Water Vapour Raman Lidar Resolve Profiles of Turbulent Variables in the Convective Boundary Layer?, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 136, 253–284,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-010-9494-z, 2010.
a
Wulfmeyer, V., Hardesty, R. M., Turner, D. D., Behrendt, A., Cadeddu, M. P., Di Girolamo, P., Schlüssel, P., Van Baelen, J., and Zus, F.: A review of
the remote sensing of lower tropospheric thermodynamic profiles and its
indispensable role for the understanding and the simulation of water and
energy cycles, Rev. Geophys., 53, 819–895, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014RG000476,
2015. a
Xie, F., Wu, D. L., Ao, C. O., Mannucci, A. J., and Kursinski, E. R.: Advances and limitations of atmospheric boundary layer observations with GPS occultation over southeast Pacific Ocean, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 903–918, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-903-2012, 2012. a, b, c
Yang, S., Petersen, G. N., von Löwis, S., Preißler, J., and Finger, D. C.: Determination of eddy dissipation rate by Doppler lidar in Reykjavik,
Iceland, Meteor. Appl., 27, e1951, https://doi.org/10.1002/met.1951, 2020. a
Yang, T., Wang, Z., Zhang, W., Gbaguidi, A., Sugimoto, N., Wang, X., Matsui, I., and Sun, Y.: Technical note: Boundary layer height determination from lidar for improving air pollution episode modeling: development of new algorithm and evaluation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 6215–6225, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-6215-2017, 2017. a, b
Yim, S. H. L.: Development of a 3D Real-Time Atmospheric Monitoring System
(3DREAMS) Using Doppler LiDARs and Applications for Long-Term Analysis
and Hot-and-Polluted Episodes, Remote Sens., 12, 1036,
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12061036, 2020. a
Zhang, H., Zhang, X., Li, Q., Cai, X., Fan, S., Song, Y., Hu, F., Che, H.,
Quan, J., Kang, L., and Zhu, T.: Research Progress on Estimation of the
Atmospheric Boundary Layer Height, J. Meteorol. Res., 34, 482–498,
https://doi.org/10.1007/S13351-020-9910-3, 2020. a
Zhang, W., Guo, J., Miao, Y., Liu, H., Zhang, Y., Li, Z., and Zhai, P.: Planetary boundary layer height from CALIOP compared to radiosonde over China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 9951–9963, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-9951-2016, 2016. a, b
Zhang, Y. and Klein, S. A.: Mechanisms affecting the transition from shallow to deep convection over land: Inferences from observations of the diurnal cycle collected at the ARM Southern Great Plains site, J. Atmos. Sci., 67,
2943–2959, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JAS3366.1, 2010. a
Zilitinkevich, S. and Baklanov, A.: Calculation of the height of the stable
boundary layer in practical applications, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 105,
389–409, 2002. a
Executive editor
I agree with the handling editor Dr. Laura Bianco and the reviewer Dr. Frank Beyrich that this is a very good paper and that it is of general interest and relevance.
I agree with the handling editor Dr. Laura Bianco and the reviewer Dr. Frank Beyrich that this...
Short summary
Profile observations of the atmospheric boundary layer now allow for layer heights and characteristics to be derived at high temporal and vertical resolution. With novel high-density ground-based remote-sensing measurement networks emerging, horizontal information content is also increasing. This review summarises the capabilities and limitations of various sensors and retrieval algorithms which need to be considered during the harmonisation of data products for high-impact applications.
Profile observations of the atmospheric boundary layer now allow for layer heights and...
