Articles | Volume 17, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3047-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3047-2024
Research article
 | 
21 May 2024
Research article |  | 21 May 2024

Full characterization and calibration of a transfer standard monitor for atmospheric radon measurements

Roger Curcoll, Claudia Grossi, Stefan Röttger, and Arturo Vargas

Related authors

Six years of greenhouse gas fluxes at Saclay, France, estimated with the Radon Tracer Method
Camille Yver-Kwok, Michel Ramonet, Léonard Rivier, Jinghui Lian, Claudia Grossi, Roger Curcoll, Dafina Kikaj, Edward Chung, and Ute Karstens
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3107,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3107, 2024
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary
Estimation of seasonal methane fluxes over a Mediterranean rice paddy area using the Radon Tracer Method (RTM)
Roger Curcoll, Josep-Anton Morguí, Alba Àgueda, Lídia Cañas, Sílvia Borràs, Arturo Vargas, and Claudia Grossi
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1370,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1370, 2024
Short summary
Modelling the impacts of emission changes on O3 sensitivity, atmospheric oxidation capacity, and pollution transport over the Catalonia region
Alba Badia, Veronica Vidal, Sergi Ventura, Roger Curcoll, Ricard Segura, and Gara Villalba
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 10751–10774, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-10751-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-10751-2023, 2023
Short summary
Characterizing the automatic radon flux transfer standard system Autoflux: laboratory calibration and field experiments
Claudia Grossi, Daniel Rabago, Scott Chambers, Carlos Sáinz, Roger Curcoll, Peter P. S. Otáhal, Eliška Fialová, Luis Quindos, and Arturo Vargas
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 2655–2672, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-2655-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-2655-2023, 2023
Short summary
Metrology for low-cost CO2 sensors applications: the case of a steady-state through-flow (SS-TF) chamber for CO2 fluxes observations
Roger Curcoll, Josep-Anton Morguí, Armand Kamnang, Lídia Cañas, Arturo Vargas, and Claudia Grossi
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 2807–2818, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-2807-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-2807-2022, 2022
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Gases | Technique: In Situ Measurement | Topic: Instruments and Platforms
The ASK-16 motorized glider: an airborne eddy covariance platform to measure turbulence, energy, and matter fluxes
Inge Wiekenkamp, Anna Katharina Lehmann, Alexander Bütow, Jörg Hartmann, Stefan Metzger, Thomas Ruhtz, Christian Wille, Mathias Zöllner, and Torsten Sachs
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 749–772, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-749-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-749-2025, 2025
Short summary
Development of a Peltier-based chilled-mirror hygrometer, SKYDEW, for tropospheric and lower-stratospheric water vapor measurements
Takuji Sugidachi, Masatomo Fujiwara, Kensaku Shimizu, Shin-Ya Ogino, Junko Suzuki, and Ruud J. Dirksen
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 509–531, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-509-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-509-2025, 2025
Short summary
Deployment and evaluation of an NH4+∕ H3O+ reagent ion switching chemical ionization mass spectrometer for the detection of reduced and oxygenated gas-phase organic compounds
Cort L. Zang and Megan D. Willis
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 17–35, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-17-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-17-2025, 2025
Short summary
An economical tunable diode laser spectrometer for fast-response measurements of water vapor in the atmospheric boundary layer
Emily D. Wein, Lars E. Kalnajs, and Darin W. Toohey
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 7097–7107, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-7097-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-7097-2024, 2024
Short summary
Observation of GHG vertical profile in the boundary layer of the Mount Qomolangma region using a multirotor UAV
Ying Zhou, Congcong Qiao, Minqiang Zhou, Yilong Wang, Xiangjun Tian, Yinghong Wang, and Minzheng Duan
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3478,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3478, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Arnold, D., Vargas, A., Vermeulen, A. T., Verheggen, B., and Seibert, P.: Analysis of radon origin by backward atmospheric transport modelling, Atmos. Environ., 44, 494–502, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.11.003, 2010. 
Baskaran, M.: Po-210 and Pb-210 as atmospheric tracers and global atmospheric Pb-210 fallout: a Review, J. Environ. Radioactiv., 102, 500–513, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2010.10.007, 2011. 
Baskaran, M.: Radon: A Tracer for Geological, Geophysical and Geochemical Studies, Springer, Cham, 167–188, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21329-3, 2016. 
BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ILAC, ISO, IUPAC, IUPAP, and OIML: Evaluation of measurement data – Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement, https://www.bipm.org/documents/20126/2071204/JCGM_100_2008_E.pdf/cb0ef43f-baa5-11cf-3f85-4dcd86f77bd6 (last access: 1 March 2024), 2008. 
Chambers, S., Williams, A. G., Zahorowski, W., Griffiths, A., and Crawford, J.: Separating remote fetch and local mixing influences on vertical radon measurements in the lower atmosphere, Tellus B, 63, 843–859, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2011.00565.x, 2011. 
Download
Short summary
This paper presents a new user-friendly version of the Atmospheric Radon MONitor (ARMON). The efficiency of the instrument is of 0.0057 s-1, obtained using different techniques at Spanish and German chambers. The total calculated uncertainty of the ARMON for hourly radon concentrations above 5 Bq m-3 is lower than 10 % (k = 1). Results confirm that the ARMON is suitable to measure low-level radon activity concentrations and to be used as a transfer standard to calibrate in situ radon monitors.
Share