Articles | Volume 17, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3047-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3047-2024
Research article
 | 
21 May 2024
Research article |  | 21 May 2024

Full characterization and calibration of a transfer standard monitor for atmospheric radon measurements

Roger Curcoll, Claudia Grossi, Stefan Röttger, and Arturo Vargas

Related authors

Six years of greenhouse gas fluxes at Saclay, France, estimated with the Radon Tracer Method
Camille Yver-Kwok, Michel Ramonet, Léonard Rivier, Jinghui Lian, Claudia Grossi, Roger Curcoll, Dafina Kikaj, Edward Chung, and Ute Karstens
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3107,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3107, 2024
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary
Estimation of seasonal methane fluxes over a Mediterranean rice paddy area using the Radon Tracer Method (RTM)
Roger Curcoll, Josep-Anton Morguí, Alba Àgueda, Lídia Cañas, Sílvia Borràs, Arturo Vargas, and Claudia Grossi
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1370,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1370, 2024
Short summary
Modelling the impacts of emission changes on O3 sensitivity, atmospheric oxidation capacity, and pollution transport over the Catalonia region
Alba Badia, Veronica Vidal, Sergi Ventura, Roger Curcoll, Ricard Segura, and Gara Villalba
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 10751–10774, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-10751-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-10751-2023, 2023
Short summary
Characterizing the automatic radon flux transfer standard system Autoflux: laboratory calibration and field experiments
Claudia Grossi, Daniel Rabago, Scott Chambers, Carlos Sáinz, Roger Curcoll, Peter P. S. Otáhal, Eliška Fialová, Luis Quindos, and Arturo Vargas
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 2655–2672, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-2655-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-2655-2023, 2023
Short summary
Metrology for low-cost CO2 sensors applications: the case of a steady-state through-flow (SS-TF) chamber for CO2 fluxes observations
Roger Curcoll, Josep-Anton Morguí, Armand Kamnang, Lídia Cañas, Arturo Vargas, and Claudia Grossi
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 2807–2818, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-2807-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-2807-2022, 2022
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Gases | Technique: In Situ Measurement | Topic: Instruments and Platforms
Multiphysical description of atmospheric pressure interface chemical ionisation in MION2 and Eisele type inlets
Henning Finkenzeller, Jyri Mikkilä, Cecilia Righi, Paxton Juuti, Mikko Sipilä, Matti Rissanen, Douglas Worsnop, Aleksei Shcherbinin, Nina Sarnela, and Juha Kangasluoma
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 5989–6001, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5989-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5989-2024, 2024
Short summary
A portable nitrogen dioxide instrument using cavity-enhanced absorption spectroscopy
Steven A. Bailey, Reem A. Hannun, Andrew K. Swanson, and Thomas F. Hanisco
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 5903–5910, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5903-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5903-2024, 2024
Short summary
Development and deployment of a mid-cost CO2 sensor monitoring network to support atmospheric inverse modeling for quantifying urban CO2 emissions in Paris
Jinghui Lian, Olivier Laurent, Mali Chariot, Luc Lienhardt, Michel Ramonet, Hervé Utard, Thomas Lauvaux, François-Marie Bréon, Grégoire Broquet, Karina Cucchi, Laurent Millair, and Philippe Ciais
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 5821–5839, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5821-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5821-2024, 2024
Short summary
UAV-based in situ measurements of CO2 and CH4 fluxes over complex natural ecosystems
Abdullah Bolek, Martin Heimann, and Mathias Göckede
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 5619–5636, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5619-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5619-2024, 2024
Short summary
A new aerial approach for quantifying and attributing methane emissions: implementation and validation
Jonathan F. Dooley, Kenneth Minschwaner, Manvendra K. Dubey, Sahar H. El Abbadi, Evan D. Sherwin, Aaron G. Meyer, Emily Follansbee, and James E. Lee
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 5091–5111, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5091-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5091-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Arnold, D., Vargas, A., Vermeulen, A. T., Verheggen, B., and Seibert, P.: Analysis of radon origin by backward atmospheric transport modelling, Atmos. Environ., 44, 494–502, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.11.003, 2010. 
Baskaran, M.: Po-210 and Pb-210 as atmospheric tracers and global atmospheric Pb-210 fallout: a Review, J. Environ. Radioactiv., 102, 500–513, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2010.10.007, 2011. 
Baskaran, M.: Radon: A Tracer for Geological, Geophysical and Geochemical Studies, Springer, Cham, 167–188, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21329-3, 2016. 
BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ILAC, ISO, IUPAC, IUPAP, and OIML: Evaluation of measurement data – Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement, https://www.bipm.org/documents/20126/2071204/JCGM_100_2008_E.pdf/cb0ef43f-baa5-11cf-3f85-4dcd86f77bd6 (last access: 1 March 2024), 2008. 
Chambers, S., Williams, A. G., Zahorowski, W., Griffiths, A., and Crawford, J.: Separating remote fetch and local mixing influences on vertical radon measurements in the lower atmosphere, Tellus B, 63, 843–859, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2011.00565.x, 2011. 
Download
Short summary
This paper presents a new user-friendly version of the Atmospheric Radon MONitor (ARMON). The efficiency of the instrument is of 0.0057 s-1, obtained using different techniques at Spanish and German chambers. The total calculated uncertainty of the ARMON for hourly radon concentrations above 5 Bq m-3 is lower than 10 % (k = 1). Results confirm that the ARMON is suitable to measure low-level radon activity concentrations and to be used as a transfer standard to calibrate in situ radon monitors.