Articles | Volume 17, issue 17
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5091-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5091-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
04 Sep 2024
Research article |
| 04 Sep 2024
| 04 Sep 2024
A new aerial approach for quantifying and attributing methane emissions: implementation and validation
Jonathan F. Dooley
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Department of Physics, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, NM 87801, USA
Kenneth Minschwaner
Department of Physics, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, NM 87801, USA
Manvendra K. Dubey
Earth and Environmental Sciences, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA
Sahar H. El Abbadi
Department of Energy Science & Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
present address: Sustainable Energy Department, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
Evan D. Sherwin
Department of Energy Science & Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
present address: Sustainable Energy Department, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
Aaron G. Meyer
Earth and Environmental Sciences, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA
present address: Energy & Geoscience Institute, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
Emily Follansbee
Earth and Environmental Sciences, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA
James E. Lee
Earth and Environmental Sciences, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA
Related authors
No articles found.
Daniel Cusworth, Daniel Varon, Dylan Jervis, Jason McKeever, Alexander Turner, Christian Frankenberg, John Worden, Andrew Thorpe, Jay Fahlen, Sudhanshu Pandey, Joannes Maasakkers, Ilse Aben, Annmarie Eldering, Riley Duren, Bradley Conrad, Tia Scarpelli, Daniel Bon, Mackenzie Huffman, Itziar Irakulis-Loitxate, Luis Guanter, Jason Schroeder, Benjamin Hmiel, Evan Sherwin, Sean Crowell, Eric Kort, Adam Brandt, Frances Reuland, Maryann Sargent, James East, and Daniel Jacob
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-6060, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-6060, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary
Short summary
In this review, we summarize the current and anticipated state of satellite remote sensing for point sources. In particular, we are provide and update to the fleet of point source imaging satellites, summarize the nuance around data availability and revisit, detail data processing pipelines and validation procedures, describe how to benchmark detection performance, and finally, describe demonstrated use-cases for satellite point source observations.
Marc N. Fiddler, Vaios Moschos, Megan M. McRee, Abu Sayeed Md Shawon, Kyle Gorkowski, James E. Lee, Nevil A. Franco, Katherine B. Benedict, Samir Kattel, Chelia Thompson, Manvendra K. Dubey, and Solomon Bililign
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 19, 307–321, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-19-307-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-19-307-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
The study used a photoacoustic spectrometer as a reference instrument to determine the multiple-scattering correction factor Cλ for an AE33 aethalometer at three wavelengths, which we believe is critical for aerosol absorption measurements using aethalometer. This is an important parametrization of Cλ specifically geared towards BB aerosol from African fuels under different aging states, and is of particular importance for future field work in that continent which is at present least studied.
Emily Follansbee, James E. Lee, Mohit L. Dubey, Jonathan F. Dooley, Curtis Shuck, Ken Minschwaner, Andre Santos, Sebastien C. Biraud, and Manvendra K. Dubey
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 4527–4542, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-4527-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-4527-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This work uses ambient methane and wind measurements to quantify methane emissions from a leaking orphaned oil and gas well using Gaussian plume inversions. Our analysis shows that existing Gaussian plume methods that assume atmospheric stability are prone to large errors. We report a more robust analysis that determines plume dispersion coefficients from our in situ observations. Our technique enables more accurate methane quantification of orphaned oil and gas wells to prioritize plugging.
Mohit L. Dubey, Andre Santos, Andrew B. Moyes, Ken Reichl, James E. Lee, Manvendra K. Dubey, Corentin LeYhuelic, Evan Variano, Emily Follansbee, Fotini K. Chow, and Sébastien C. Biraud
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 2987–3007, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-2987-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-2987-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Orphaned wells, meaning wells lacking responsible owners, pose a significant and poorly understood environmental challenge. We propose, develop and test a novel method for estimating emissions from orphaned wells using a forced advection sampling technique (FAST) that can overcome many of the limitations in current methods (cost, accuracy, safety). Our results suggest that the FAST method can provide a low-cost alternative to existing methods over a range of leak rates.
Kavitha Mottungan, Chayan Roychoudhury, Vanessa Brocchi, Benjamin Gaubert, Wenfu Tang, Mohammad Amin Mirrezaei, John McKinnon, Yafang Guo, David W. T. Griffith, Dietrich G. Feist, Isamu Morino, Mahesh K. Sha, Manvendra K. Dubey, Martine De Mazière, Nicholas M. Deutscher, Paul O. Wennberg, Ralf Sussmann, Rigel Kivi, Tae-Young Goo, Voltaire A. Velazco, Wei Wang, and Avelino F. Arellano Jr.
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 5861–5885, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5861-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5861-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
A combination of data analysis techniques is introduced to separate local and regional influences on observed levels of carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, and methane from an established ground-based remote sensing network. We take advantage of the covariations in these trace gases to identify the dominant type of sources driving these levels. Applying these methods in conjunction with existing approaches to other datasets can better address uncertainties in identifying sources and sinks.
Zihan Zhu, Javier González-Rocha, Yifan Ding, Isis Frausto-Vicencio, Sajjan Heerah, Akula Venkatram, Manvendra Dubey, Don Collins, and Francesca M. Hopkins
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3883–3895, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3883-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3883-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Increases in agriculture, oil and gas, and waste management activities have contributed to the increase in atmospheric methane levels and resultant climate warming. In this paper, we explore the use of small uncrewed aircraft systems (sUASs) and AirCore technology to detect and quantify methane emissions. Results from field experiments demonstrate that sUASs and AirCore technology can be effective for detecting and quantifying methane emissions in near real time.
Ryan N. Farley, James E. Lee, Laura-Hélèna Rivellini, Alex K. Y. Lee, Rachael Dal Porto, Christopher D. Cappa, Kyle Gorkowski, Abu Sayeed Md Shawon, Katherine B. Benedict, Allison C. Aiken, Manvendra K. Dubey, and Qi Zhang
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 3953–3971, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-3953-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-3953-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The black carbon aerosol composition and mixing state were characterized using a soot particle aerosol mass spectrometer. Single-particle measurements revealed the major role of atmospheric processing in modulating the black carbon mixing state. A significant fraction of soot particles were internally mixed with oxidized organic aerosol and sulfate, with implications for activation as cloud nuclei.
Evan D. Sherwin, Sahar H. El Abbadi, Philippine M. Burdeau, Zhan Zhang, Zhenlin Chen, Jeffrey S. Rutherford, Yuanlei Chen, and Adam R. Brandt
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 765–782, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-765-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-765-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Countries and companies increasingly rely on a growing fleet of satellites to find large emissions of climate-warming methane, particularly from oil and natural gas systems across the globe. We independently assessed the performance of nine such systems by releasing controlled, undisclosed amounts of methane as satellites passed overhead. The tested systems produced reliable detection and quantification results, including the smallest-ever emission detected from space in such a test.
Apisada Chulakadabba, Maryann Sargent, Thomas Lauvaux, Joshua S. Benmergui, Jonathan E. Franklin, Christopher Chan Miller, Jonas S. Wilzewski, Sébastien Roche, Eamon Conway, Amir H. Souri, Kang Sun, Bingkun Luo, Jacob Hawthrone, Jenna Samra, Bruce C. Daube, Xiong Liu, Kelly Chance, Yang Li, Ritesh Gautam, Mark Omara, Jeff S. Rutherford, Evan D. Sherwin, Adam Brandt, and Steven C. Wofsy
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 5771–5785, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-5771-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-5771-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We show that MethaneAIR, a precursor to the MethaneSAT satellite, demonstrates accurate point source quantification during controlled release experiments and regional observations in 2021 and 2022. Results from our two independent quantification methods suggest the accuracy of our sensor and algorithms is better than 25 % for sources emitting 200 kg h−1 or more. Insights from these measurements help establish the capabilities of MethaneSAT and MethaneAIR.
Michaela Mühl, Jochen Schmitt, Barbara Seth, James E. Lee, Jon S. Edwards, Edward J. Brook, Thomas Blunier, and Hubertus Fischer
Clim. Past, 19, 999–1025, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-19-999-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-19-999-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Our ice core measurements show that methane, ethane, and propane concentrations are significantly elevated above their past atmospheric background for Greenland ice samples containing mineral dust. The underlying co-production process happens during the classical discrete wet extraction of air from the ice sample and affects previous reconstructions of the inter-polar difference of methane as well as methane stable isotope records derived from dust-rich Greenland ice.
Isis Frausto-Vicencio, Sajjan Heerah, Aaron G. Meyer, Harrison A. Parker, Manvendra Dubey, and Francesca M. Hopkins
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 4521–4543, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-4521-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-4521-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Wildfires are increasing in the western USA, making it critical to understand the impacts of greenhouse gases and air pollutants on the atmosphere. We used a ground-based remote sensing technique to measure the greenhouse gases and aerosol in the atmosphere. We isolate a large smoke plume from a nearby wildfire and calculate variables to understand the fuel properties and combustion phases. We find that a significant amount of methane is emitted from the 2020 California wildfire season.
Brendan Byrne, David F. Baker, Sourish Basu, Michael Bertolacci, Kevin W. Bowman, Dustin Carroll, Abhishek Chatterjee, Frédéric Chevallier, Philippe Ciais, Noel Cressie, David Crisp, Sean Crowell, Feng Deng, Zhu Deng, Nicholas M. Deutscher, Manvendra K. Dubey, Sha Feng, Omaira E. García, David W. T. Griffith, Benedikt Herkommer, Lei Hu, Andrew R. Jacobson, Rajesh Janardanan, Sujong Jeong, Matthew S. Johnson, Dylan B. A. Jones, Rigel Kivi, Junjie Liu, Zhiqiang Liu, Shamil Maksyutov, John B. Miller, Scot M. Miller, Isamu Morino, Justus Notholt, Tomohiro Oda, Christopher W. O'Dell, Young-Suk Oh, Hirofumi Ohyama, Prabir K. Patra, Hélène Peiro, Christof Petri, Sajeev Philip, David F. Pollard, Benjamin Poulter, Marine Remaud, Andrew Schuh, Mahesh K. Sha, Kei Shiomi, Kimberly Strong, Colm Sweeney, Yao Té, Hanqin Tian, Voltaire A. Velazco, Mihalis Vrekoussis, Thorsten Warneke, John R. Worden, Debra Wunch, Yuanzhi Yao, Jeongmin Yun, Andrew Zammit-Mangion, and Ning Zeng
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 963–1004, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-963-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-963-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Changes in the carbon stocks of terrestrial ecosystems result in emissions and removals of CO2. These can be driven by anthropogenic activities (e.g., deforestation), natural processes (e.g., fires) or in response to rising CO2 (e.g., CO2 fertilization). This paper describes a dataset of CO2 emissions and removals derived from atmospheric CO2 observations. This pilot dataset informs current capabilities and future developments towards top-down monitoring and verification systems.
Zhan Zhang, Evan D. Sherwin, Daniel J. Varon, and Adam R. Brandt
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 7155–7169, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-7155-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-7155-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This work developed a multi-band–multi-pass–multi-comparison-date Sentinel-2 methane retrieval algorithm, and the method was calibrated by data from a controlled release test. To our knowledge, this is the first study that validates the performance of a Sentinel-2 methane detection algorithm by calibration with a ground-truth testing. It illustrates the potential for additional validation with systematic future experiments wherein algorithms can be tuned to meet different detection expectations.
Joshin Kumar, Theo Paik, Nishit J. Shetty, Patrick Sheridan, Allison C. Aiken, Manvendra K. Dubey, and Rajan K. Chakrabarty
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 4569–4583, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4569-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4569-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Accurate long-term measurement of aerosol light absorption is vital for assessing direct aerosol radiative forcing. Light absorption by aerosols at the US Department of Energy long-term climate monitoring SGP site is measured using the Particle Soot Absorption Photometer (PSAP), which suffers from artifacts and biases difficult to quantify. Machine learning offers a promising path forward to correct for biases in the long-term absorption dataset at the SGP site and similar Class-I areas.
Vicki Kelsey, Sarah Riley, and Kenneth Minschwaner
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 1563–1576, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-1563-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-1563-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
In the interior western USA there are distances of hundreds of kilometers between weather balloon launch sites for weather forecasting. Satellite coverage can also be sparse or with poor resolution. Using infrared thermometers, clear-sky temperatures were collected and compared with data from weather balloons. A correlation between clear-sky temperatures and precipitable water measurements from weather balloons was found. This means that citizen scientists can collect data.
Thomas E. Taylor, Christopher W. O'Dell, David Crisp, Akhiko Kuze, Hannakaisa Lindqvist, Paul O. Wennberg, Abhishek Chatterjee, Michael Gunson, Annmarie Eldering, Brendan Fisher, Matthäus Kiel, Robert R. Nelson, Aronne Merrelli, Greg Osterman, Frédéric Chevallier, Paul I. Palmer, Liang Feng, Nicholas M. Deutscher, Manvendra K. Dubey, Dietrich G. Feist, Omaira E. García, David W. T. Griffith, Frank Hase, Laura T. Iraci, Rigel Kivi, Cheng Liu, Martine De Mazière, Isamu Morino, Justus Notholt, Young-Suk Oh, Hirofumi Ohyama, David F. Pollard, Markus Rettinger, Matthias Schneider, Coleen M. Roehl, Mahesh Kumar Sha, Kei Shiomi, Kimberly Strong, Ralf Sussmann, Yao Té, Voltaire A. Velazco, Mihalis Vrekoussis, Thorsten Warneke, and Debra Wunch
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 325–360, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-325-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-325-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We provide an analysis of an 11-year record of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations derived using an optimal estimation retrieval algorithm on measurements made by the GOSAT satellite. The new product (version 9) shows improvement over the previous version (v7.3) as evaluated against independent estimates of CO2 from ground-based sensors and atmospheric inversion systems. We also compare the new GOSAT CO2 values to collocated estimates from NASA's Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2.
Nicole Jacobs, William R. Simpson, Kelly A. Graham, Christopher Holmes, Frank Hase, Thomas Blumenstock, Qiansi Tu, Matthias Frey, Manvendra K. Dubey, Harrison A. Parker, Debra Wunch, Rigel Kivi, Pauli Heikkinen, Justus Notholt, Christof Petri, and Thorsten Warneke
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 16661–16687, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-16661-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-16661-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Spatial patterns of carbon dioxide seasonal cycle amplitude and summer drawdown timing derived from the OCO-2 satellite over northern high latitudes agree well with corresponding estimates from two models. The Asian boreal forest is anomalous with the largest amplitude and earliest seasonal drawdown. Modeled land contact tracers suggest that accumulated CO2 exchanges during atmospheric transport play a major role in shaping carbon dioxide seasonality in northern high-latitude regions.
Cited articles
Barbieri, L., Kral, S., Bailey, S., Frazier, A., Jacob, J., Reuder, J., Brus, D., Chilson, P., Crick, C., Detweiler, C., Doddi, A., Elston, J., Foroutan, H., González-Rocha, J., Greene, B., Guzman, M., Houston, A., Islam, A., Kemppinen, O., Lawrence, D., Pillar-Little, E., Ross, S., Sama, M., Schmale, D., Schuyler, T., Shankar, A., Smith, S., Waugh, S., Dixon, C., Borenstein, S., and De Boer, G.: Intercomparison of Small Unmanned Aircraft System (sUAS) Measurements for Atmospheric Science during the LAPSE-RATE Campaign, Sensors, 19, 2179, https://doi.org/10.3390/s19092179, 2019. a
Barchyn, T. E., Hugenholtz, C. H., and Fox, T. A.: Plume detection modeling of a drone-based natural gas leak detection system, Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene, 7, 41, https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.379, 2019. a, b
Bel Hadj Ali, N., Abichou, T., and Green, R.: Comparing estimates of fugitive landfill methane emissions using inverse plume modeling obtained with Surface Emission Monitoring (SEM), Drone Emission Monitoring (DEM), and Downwind Plume Emission Monitoring (DWPEM), J. Air Waste Manage., 70, 410–424, https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2020.1728423, 2020. a
Bhattacharya, R.: Atmospheric Dispersion, Webinar, https://ansn.iaea.org/Common/Topics/OpenTopic.aspx?ID=13012 (last access: 20 March 2024), 2013. a
Bogner, J. and Matthews, E.: Global methane emissions from landfills: New methodology and annual estimates 1980–1996, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 17, 2002GB001913, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GB001913, 2003. a
Burgués, J. and Marco, S.: Environmental chemical sensing using small drones: A review, Sci. Total Environ., 748, 141172, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141172, 2020. a, b, c
Cheewaphongphan, P., Chatani, S., and Saigusa, N.: Exploring Gaps between Bottom-Up and Top-Down Emission Estimates Based on Uncertainties in Multiple Emission Inventories: A Case Study on CH4 Emissions in China, Sustainability, 11, 2054, https://doi.org/10.3390/su11072054, 2019. a, b, c
Chen, Z., El Abbadi, S. H., Sherwin, E. D., Burdeau, P. M., Rutherford, J. S., Chen, Y., Zhang, Z., and Brandt, A. R.: Comparing Continuous Methane Monitoring Technologies for High-Volume Emissions: A Single-Blind Controlled Release Study, ACS ES&T Air, p. acsestair.4c00015, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.4c00015, 2024. a
Dooley, J. F.: nmt_uas_background_estimate, GitHub [software], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13309038, 2024a. a
Dooley, J. F.: nmt_uas_public, GitHub [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13309002, 2024b. a
Dooley, J. F.: nmt_uas_wind_direction, 1.0.0, GitHub [software], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13309036, 2024c. a
Duren, R. M., Thorpe, A. K., Foster, K. T., Rafiq, T., Hopkins, F. M., Yadav, V., Bue, B. D., Thompson, D. R., Conley, S., Colombi, N. K., Frankenberg, C., McCubbin, I. B., Eastwood, M. L., Falk, M., Herner, J. D., Croes, B. E., Green, R. O., and Miller, C. E.: California's methane super-emitters, Nature, 575, 180–184, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1720-3, 2019. a
El Abbadi, S. H., Chen, Z., Burdeau, P. M., Rutherford, J. S., Chen, Y., Zhang, Z., Sherwin, E. D., and Brandt, A. R.: Technological Maturity of Aircraft-Based Methane Sensing for Greenhouse Gas Mitigation, Environ. Sci. Technol., 58, 9591–9600, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c02439, 2024. a, b, c, d, e, f, g
Etiope, G. and Sherwood Lollar, B.: Abiotic Methane On Earth, Rev. Geophys., 51, 276–299, https://doi.org/10.1002/rog.20011, 2013. a
Federal Aviation Administration: Remote Pilot – Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems Airman Certification Standards, 14 CRF Part 107, https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-14/part-107 (last access: 8 August 2024), 2021. a
Follansbee, E., Lee, J. E., Dubey, M. L., Dooley, J., Schuck, C., Minschwaner, K., Santos, A., Biraud, S. C., and Dubey, M. K.: Quantifying Methane Fluxes from Super-Emitting Orphan Wells to Report Carbon Credits and Prioritize Remediation, https://doi.org/10.22541/essoar.171781163.39594276/v1, 2024. a, b, c, d, e
Frankenberg, C., Meirink, J. F., Van Weele, M., Platt, U., and Wagner, T.: Assessing Methane Emissions from Global Space-Borne Observations, Science, 308, 1010–1014, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1106644, 2005. a, b
Frankenberg, C., Thorpe, A. K., Thompson, D. R., Hulley, G., Kort, E. A., Vance, N., Borchardt, J., Krings, T., Gerilowski, K., Sweeney, C., Conley, S., Bue, B. D., Aubrey, A. D., Hook, S., and Green, R. O.: Airborne methane remote measurements reveal heavy-tail flux distribution in Four Corners region, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 9734–9739, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1605617113, 2016. a, b, c
Gålfalk, M., Nilsson Påledal, S., and Bastviken, D.: Sensitive Drone Mapping of Methane Emissions without the Need for Supplementary Ground-Based Measurements, ACS Earth Space Chem., 5, 2668–2676, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.1c00106, 2021. a
Germain-Piaulenne, E., Paris, J.-D., Gros, V., Quéhé, P.-Y., Pikridas, M., Baisnée, D., Berchet, A., Sciare, J., and Bourtsoukidis, E.: Middle East oil and gas methane emissions signature captured at a remote site using light hydrocarbon tracers, Atmos. Environ. X, 22, 100523, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeaoa.2024.100253, 2024. a
Gisi, M., Hase, F., Dohe, S., Blumenstock, T., Simon, A., and Keens, A.: XCO2-measurements with a tabletop FTS using solar absorption spectroscopy, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 5, 2969–2980, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-2969-2012, 2012. a, b, c
Glasby, G. P.: Abiogenic Origin of Hydrocarbons: An Historical Overview, Resour. Geol., 56, 83–96, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-3928.2006.tb00271.x, 2006. a, b
Hansen, J., Sato, M., Ruedy, R., Lacis, A., and Oinas, V.: Global warming in the twenty-first century: An alternative scenario, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 97, 9875–9880, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.170278997, 2000. a
Heath, G., Warner, E., Steinberg, D., and Brandt, A.: Estimating U. S. Methane Emissions from the Natural Gas Supply Chain, Approaches, Uncertainties, Current Estimates, and Future Studies, Tech. Rep. NREL/TP–6A50-62820, 1226158, Joint Institute for Strategic Energy Analysis, http://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1226158/ (last access: 20 March 2024), 2015. a, b
Heerah, S., Frausto-Vicencio, I., Jeong, S., Marklein, A. R., Ding, Y., Meyer, A. G., Parker, H. A., Fischer, M. L., Franklin, J. E., Hopkins, F. M., and Dubey, M.: Dairy Methane Emissions in California's San Joaquin Valley Inferred With Ground-Based Remote Sensing Observations in the Summer and Winter, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 126, e2021JD034785, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD034785, 2021. a
Hodnebrog, Ø., Dalsøren, S. B., and Myhre, G.: Lifetimes, direct and indirect radiative forcing, and global warming potentials of ethane (C2H6), propane (C3H8), and butane (C4H10), Atmos. Sci. Lett., 19, e804, https://doi.org/10.1002/asl.804, 2018. a, b
Hollenbeck, D., Nunez, G., Christensen, L. E., and Chen, Y.: Wind Measurement and Estimation with Small Unmanned Aerial Systems (sUAS) Using On-Board Mini Ultrasonic Anemometers, in: 2018 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS), Dallas, TX, June 2018, IEEE, 285–292, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICUAS.2018.8453418, 2018. a, b, c, d, e, f
Holmes, C. D., Prather, M. J., Søvde, O. A., and Myhre, G.: Future methane, hydroxyl, and their uncertainties: key climate and emission parameters for future predictions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 285–302, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-285-2013, 2013. a
Jacob, D. J., Varon, D. J., Cusworth, D. H., Dennison, P. E., Frankenberg, C., Gautam, R., Guanter, L., Kelley, J., McKeever, J., Ott, L. E., Poulter, B., Qu, Z., Thorpe, A. K., Worden, J. R., and Duren, R. M.: Quantifying methane emissions from the global scale down to point sources using satellite observations of atmospheric methane, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 9617–9646, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-9617-2022, 2022. a, b, c
Johnson, D., Heltzel, R., and Oliver, D.: Temporal Variations in Methane Emissions from an Unconventional Well Site, ACS Omega, 4, 3708–3715, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.8b03246, 2019. a, b, c, d
Karion, A., Sweeney, C., Kort, E. A., Shepson, P. B., Brewer, A., Cambaliza, M., Conley, S. A., Davis, K., Deng, A., Hardesty, M., Herndon, S. C., Lauvaux, T., Lavoie, T., Lyon, D., Newberger, T., Pétron, G., Rella, C., Smith, M., Wolter, S., Yacovitch, T. I., and Tans, P.: Aircraft-Based Estimate of Total Methane Emissions from the Barnett Shale Region, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49, 8124–8131, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b00217, 2015. a, b
Kort, E. A., Frankenberg, C., Costigan, K. R., Lindenmaier, R., Dubey, M. K., and Wunch, D.: Four corners: The largest US methane anomaly viewed from space, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 6898–6903, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL061503, 2014. a
Kutcherov, V. G. and Krayushkin, V. A.: Deep-seated abiogenic origin of petroleum: From geological assessment to physical theory, Rev. Geophys., 48, RG1001, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008RG000270, 2010. a, b
Lan, X., Talbot, R., Laine, P., and Torres, A.: Characterizing Fugitive Methane Emissions in the Barnett Shale Area Using a Mobile Laboratory, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49, 8139–8146, https://doi.org/10.1021/es5063055, 2015. a
Lavoie, T. N., Shepson, P. B., Cambaliza, M. O. L., Stirm, B. H., Karion, A., Sweeney, C., Yacovitch, T. I., Herndon, S. C., Lan, X., and Lyon, D.: Aircraft-Based Measurements of Point Source Methane Emissions in the Barnett Shale Basin, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49, 7904–7913, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b00410, 2015. a
Lavoie, T. N., Shepson, P. B., Cambaliza, M. O. L., Stirm, B. H., Conley, S., Mehrotra, S., Faloona, I. C., and Lyon, D.: Spatiotemporal Variability of Methane Emissions at Oil and Natural Gas Operations in the Eagle Ford Basin, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 8001–8009, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b00814, 2017. a
Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai, P., Pirani, A., Connors, S., Péan, C., Berger, S., Caud, N., Chen, Y., Goldfarb, L., Gomis, M., Huang, M., Leitzell, K., Lonnoy, E., Matthews, J., Maycock, T., Yu, R., and Zhou, B.: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 1st edn., Cambridge University Press, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896, 2023. a, b
McKinney, K. A., Wang, D., Ye, J., de Fouchier, J.-B., Guimarães, P. C., Batista, C. E., Souza, R. A. F., Alves, E. G., Gu, D., Guenther, A. B., and Martin, S. T.: A sampler for atmospheric volatile organic compounds by copter unmanned aerial vehicles, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 3123–3135, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-3123-2019, 2019. a, b, c, d, e, f
Meyer, A. G., Lindenmaier, R., Heerah, S., Benedict, K. B., Kort, E. A., Peischl, J., and Dubey, M. K.: Using Multiscale Ethane/Methane Observations to Attribute Coal Mine Vent Emissions in the San Juan Basin From 2013 to 2021, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 127, e2022JD037092, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD037092, 2022. a, b, c, d
Olaguer, E. P., Jeltema, S., Gauthier, T., Jermalowicz, D., Ostaszewski, A., Batterman, S., Xia, T., Raneses, J., Kovalchick, M., Miller, S., Acevedo, J., Lamb, J., Benya, J., Wendling, A., and Zhu, J.: Landfill Emissions of Methane Inferred from Unmanned Aerial Vehicle and Mobile Ground Measurements, Atmosphere, 13, 983, https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13060983, 2022. a, b, c
Parker, R., Boesch, H., Cogan, A., Fraser, A., Feng, L., Palmer, P. I., Messerschmidt, J., Deutscher, N., Griffith, D. W. T., Notholt, J., Wennberg, P. O., and Wunch, D.: Methane observations from the Greenhouse Gases Observing SATellite: Comparison to ground-based TCCON data and model calculations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, 2011GL047871, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL047871, 2011. a
Peischl, J., Eilerman, S. J., Neuman, J. A., Aikin, K. C., De Gouw, J., Gilman, J. B., Herndon, S. C., Nadkarni, R., Trainer, M., Warneke, C., and Ryerson, T. B.: Quantifying Methane and Ethane Emissions to the Atmosphere From Central and Western U. S. Oil and Natural Gas Production Regions, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123, 7725–7740, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD028622, 2018. a, b, c
Pétron, G., Miller, B., Vaughn, B., Thorley, E., Kofler, J., Mielke-Maday, I., Sherwood, O., Dlugokencky, E., Hall, B., Schwietzke, S., Conley, S., Peischl, J., Lang, P., Moglia, E., Crotwell, M., Crotwell, A., Sweeney, C., Newberger, T., Wolter, S., Kitzis, D., Bianco, L., King, C., Coleman, T., White, A., Rhodes, M., Tans, P., and Schnell, R.: Investigating large methane enhancements in the U. S. San Juan Basin, Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene, 8, 038, https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.038, 2020. a
Saad, K. M., Wunch, D., Toon, G. C., Bernath, P., Boone, C., Connor, B., Deutscher, N. M., Griffith, D. W. T., Kivi, R., Notholt, J., Roehl, C., Schneider, M., Sherlock, V., and Wennberg, P. O.: Derivation of tropospheric methane from TCCON CH4 and HF total column observations, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 2907–2918, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-2907-2014, 2014. a
Scherer, J. J.: Next-Generation Laser-Based Natural Gas Leak Detection, Aeris Technologies Inc, https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2017-11/documents/16.scherer.aeris_2017aiw.pdf (last access: 20 March 2024), 2017. a
Schneising, O., Buchwitz, M., Reuter, M., Vanselow, S., Bovensmann, H., and Burrows, J. P.: Remote sensing of methane leakage from natural gas and petroleum systems revisited, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 9169–9182, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9169-2020, 2020. a, b, c
Schwietzke, S., Pétron, G., Conley, S., Pickering, C., Mielke-Maday, I., Dlugokencky, E. J., Tans, P. P., Vaughn, T., Bell, C., Zimmerle, D., Wolter, S., King, C. W., White, A. B., Coleman, T., Bianco, L., and Schnell, R. C.: Improved Mechanistic Understanding of Natural Gas Methane Emissions from Spatially Resolved Aircraft Measurements, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 7286–7294, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b01810, 2017. a, b
Shah, A., Allen, G., Pitt, J. R., Ricketts, H., Williams, P. I., Helmore, J., Finlayson, A., Robinson, R., Kabbabe, K., Hollingsworth, P., Rees-White, T. C., Beaven, R., Scheutz, C., and Bourn, M.: A Near-Field Gaussian Plume Inversion Flux Quantification Method, Applied to Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Sampling, Atmosphere, 10, 396, https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos10070396, 2019. a, b, c, d
Simpson, I. J., Sulbaek Andersen, M. P., Meinardi, S., Bruhwiler, L., Blake, N. J., Helmig, D., Rowland, F. S., and Blake, D. R.: Long-term decline of global atmospheric ethane concentrations and implications for methane, Nature, 488, 490–494, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11342, 2012. a
Solomon, S., Qin, D., Manning, M., Chen, Z., Marquis, M., Averyt, K., Tignor, M., and Miller, H.: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis, Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2007. a, b, c, d, e
Song, C., Zhu, J.-J., Willis, J. L., Moore, D. P., Zondlo, M. A., and Ren, Z. J.: Methane Emissions from Municipal Wastewater Collection and Treatment Systems, Environ. Sci. Technol., 57, 2248–2261, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c04388, 2023. a
Space Studies Board, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, and National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine: Thriving on Our Changing Planet: A Decadal Strategy for Earth Observation from Space: An Overview for Decision Makers and the Public, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, https://www.nap.edu/catalog/25437 (last access: 20 March 2024), 2019. a, b
Stockie, J. M.: The Mathematics of Atmospheric Dispersion Modelling, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics Review, 349–372, https://doi.org/10.1137/10080991X, 2012. a, b
Stolper, D. A., Lawson, M., Formolo, M. J., Davis, C. L., Douglas, P. M. J., and Eiler, J. M.: The utility of methane clumped isotopes to constrain the origins of methane in natural gas accumulations, Geol. Soc. Spec. Publ., 468, 23–52, https://doi.org/10.1144/SP468.3, 2018. a
Taylor, J. R.: An Introduction to Error Analysis: The Study of Uncertainties in Physical Measurements, 2nd edn., University Science Books, ISBN 978-0-935702-75-0, 1996. a
Travis, B., Dubey, M., and Sauer, J.: Neural networks to locate and quantify fugitive natural gas leaks for a MIR detection system, Atmospheric Environment: X, 8, 100092, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeaoa.2020.100092, 2020. a
Turner, A. J., Jacob, D. J., Wecht, K. J., Maasakkers, J. D., Lundgren, E., Andrews, A. E., Biraud, S. C., Boesch, H., Bowman, K. W., Deutscher, N. M., Dubey, M. K., Griffith, D. W. T., Hase, F., Kuze, A., Notholt, J., Ohyama, H., Parker, R., Payne, V. H., Sussmann, R., Sweeney, C., Velazco, V. A., Warneke, T., Wennberg, P. O., and Wunch, D.: Estimating global and North American methane emissions with high spatial resolution using GOSAT satellite data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 7049–7069, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-7049-2015, 2015. a
Vaughn, T. L., Bell, C. S., Pickering, C. K., Schwietzke, S., Heath, G. A., Pétron, G., Zimmerle, D. J., Schnell, R. C., and Nummedal, D.: Temporal variability largely explains top-down/bottom-up difference in methane emission estimates from a natural gas production region, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 115, 11712–11717, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1805687115, 2018. a, b, c, d
Short summary
Methane is a powerful greenhouse gas originating from both natural and human activities. We describe a new uncrewed aerial system (UAS) designed to measure methane emission rates over a wide range of scales. This system has been used for direct quantification of point sources and distributed emitters over scales of up to 1 km. The system uses simultaneous measurements of methane and ethane to distinguish between different kinds of natural and human-related emission sources.
Methane is a powerful greenhouse gas originating from both natural and human activities. We...
