Articles | Volume 8, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-2291-2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-2291-2015
Research article
 | 
04 Jun 2015
Research article |  | 04 Jun 2015

Evaporation from weighing precipitation gauges: impacts on automated gauge measurements and quality assurance methods

R. D. Leeper and J. Kochendorfer

Related authors

The quantification and correction of wind-induced precipitation measurement errors
John Kochendorfer, Roy Rasmussen, Mareile Wolff, Bruce Baker, Mark E. Hall, Tilden Meyers, Scott Landolt, Al Jachcik, Ketil Isaksen, Ragnar Brækkan, and Ronald Leeper
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 1973–1989, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-1973-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-1973-2017, 2017
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Others (Wind, Precipitation, Temperature, etc.) | Technique: In Situ Measurement | Topic: Instruments and Platforms
High-resolution wind speed measurements with quadcopter uncrewed aerial systems: calibration and verification in a wind tunnel with an active grid
Johannes Kistner, Lars Neuhaus, and Norman Wildmann
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 4941–4955, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4941-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4941-2024, 2024
Short summary
High-altitude balloon-launched uncrewed aircraft system measurements of atmospheric turbulence and qualitative comparison with infrasound microphone response
Anisa N. Haghighi, Ryan D. Nolin, Gary D. Pundsack, Nick Craine, Aliaksei Stratsilatau, and Sean C. C. Bailey
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 4863–4889, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4863-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4863-2024, 2024
Short summary
Evaluation of the hyperspectral radiometer (HSR1) at the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Southern Great Plains (SGP) site
Kelly A. Balmes, Laura D. Riihimaki, John Wood, Connor Flynn, Adam Theisen, Michael Ritsche, Lynn Ma, Gary B. Hodges, and Christian Herrera
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3783–3807, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3783-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3783-2024, 2024
Short summary
Cost-effective off-grid automatic precipitation samplers for pollutant and biogeochemical atmospheric deposition
Alessia A. Colussi, Daniel Persaud, Melodie Lao, Bryan K. Place, Rachel F. Hems, Susan E. Ziegler, Kate A. Edwards, Cora J. Young, and Trevor C. VandenBoer
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3697–3718, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3697-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3697-2024, 2024
Short summary
The ratio of transverse to longitudinal turbulent velocity statistics for aircraft measurements
Jakub L. Nowak, Marie Lothon, Donald H. Lenschow, and Szymon P. Malinowski
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1366,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1366, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Aaltonen, A., Elomaa, E., Touminen, A., and Valkovuori, P.: Measurement of Precipitation. Proc. Symp. On Precipitation and Evaporation, Vol. 1, Slovak Hydrometeorical Institute and Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Bratislava, Slovakia, 42–46, 1993.
Baker, B. C., Buckner, R., and Collins, W.: Calculation of USCRN precipitation from Geonor weighing precipitation gauge, NOAA Technical Note, Rep. USCRN-05-1, NOAA, Asheville, USA, 2005.
Duchon C. E.: Using vibrating-wire technology for precipitation measurements, in: Precipitation Advances in Measurement, Estimation and Prediction, edited by: Michaelides, S. C., Springer, Germany, 33–58, 2008.
Duchon, C. E. and Essenberg, G. R.: Comparative rainfall observations from pit and aboveground rain gauges with and without wind shields, Water Resour. Res., 37, 3253–3263, 2001.
Dunne, T. and Leopold, L. B.: Water loss from lakes, in: Water in Environmental Planning, W. H. Freemand and Company, San Francisco, USA, 95–125, 1978.
Download
Short summary
Evaporation from precipitation gauges can bias measurements lower. The use of evaporation suppressants may not always be practical, considering the added cost of maintenance, transport, and disposal of the gauge additive. In this field study, two quality assurance methods used to evaluate depth change for the US Climate Reference Network were compared. Results from this study indicate calculation techniques can reduce the impact of gauge evaporation on precipitation measurements.