Articles | Volume 11, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-5657-2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-5657-2018
Research article
 | 
17 Oct 2018
Research article |  | 17 Oct 2018

Level 1b error budget for MIPAS on ENVISAT

Anne Kleinert, Manfred Birk, Gaétan Perron, and Georg Wagner

Related authors

Ammonia (NH3) in the UTLS: GLORIA airborne measurements for CAMS model evaluation in the Asian Monsoon and in biomass burning plumes above the South Atlantic
Sören Johansson, Michael Höpfner, Felix Friedl-Vallon, Norbert Glatthor, Thomas Gulde, Vincent Huijnen, Anne Kleinert, Erik Kretschmer, Guido Maucher, Tom Neubert, Hans Nordmeyer, Christof Piesch, Peter Preusse, Martin Riese, Björn-Martin Sinnhuber, Jörn Ungermann, Gerald Wetzel, and Wolfgang Woiwode
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-77,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-77, 2024
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary
TUNER-compliant error estimation for MIPAS: methodology
Thomas von Clarmann, Norbert Glatthor, Udo Grabowski, Bernd Funke, Michael Kiefer, Anne Kleinert, Gabriele P. Stiller, Andrea Linden, and Sylvia Kellmann
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 6991–7018, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6991-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6991-2022, 2022
Short summary
Long-term validation of MIPAS ESA operational products using MIPAS-B measurements
Gerald Wetzel, Michael Höpfner, Hermann Oelhaf, Felix Friedl-Vallon, Anne Kleinert, Guido Maucher, Miriam Sinnhuber, Janna Abalichin, Angelika Dehn, and Piera Raspollini
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 6669–6704, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6669-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6669-2022, 2022
Short summary
Quantification and mitigation of the instrument effects and uncertainties of the airborne limb imaging FTIR GLORIA
Jörn Ungermann, Anne Kleinert, Guido Maucher, Irene Bartolomé, Felix Friedl-Vallon, Sören Johansson, Lukas Krasauskas, and Tom Neubert
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 2503–2530, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-2503-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-2503-2022, 2022
Short summary
Biomass burning pollution in the South Atlantic upper troposphere: GLORIA trace gas observations and evaluation of the CAMS model
Sören Johansson, Gerald Wetzel, Felix Friedl-Vallon, Norbert Glatthor, Michael Höpfner, Anne Kleinert, Tom Neubert, Björn-Martin Sinnhuber, and Jörn Ungermann
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 3675–3691, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-3675-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-3675-2022, 2022
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Gases | Technique: Remote Sensing | Topic: Instruments and Platforms
Offshore methane detection and quantification from space using sun glint measurements with the GHGSat constellation
Jean-Philippe W. MacLean, Marianne Girard, Dylan Jervis, David Marshall, Jason McKeever, Antoine Ramier, Mathias Strupler, Ewan Tarrant, and David Young
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 863–874, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-863-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-863-2024, 2024
Short summary
Novel use of an adapted ultraviolet double monochromator for measurements of global and direct irradiance, ozone, and aerosol
Alexander Geddes, Ben Liley, Richard McKenzie, Michael Kotkamp, and Richard Querel
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 827–838, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-827-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-827-2024, 2024
Short summary
Geostationary Environment Monitoring Spectrometer (GEMS) polarization characteristics and correction algorithm
Haklim Choi, Xiong Liu, Ukkyo Jeong, Heesung Chong, Jhoon Kim, Myung Hwan Ahn, Dai Ho Ko, Dong-Won Lee, Kyung-Jung Moon, and Kwang-Mog Lee
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 145–164, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-145-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-145-2024, 2024
Short summary
An open-path observatory for greenhouse gases based on near-infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy
Tobias D. Schmitt, Jonas Kuhn, Ralph Kleinschek, Benedikt A. Löw, Stefan Schmitt, William Cranton, Martina Schmidt, Sanam N. Vardag, Frank Hase, David W. T. Griffith, and André Butz
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 6097–6110, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-6097-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-6097-2023, 2023
Short summary
Ground-to-UAV, laser-based emissions quantification of methane and acetylene at long standoff distances
Kevin C. Cossel, Eleanor M. Waxman, Eli Hoenig, Daniel Hesselius, Christopher Chaote, Ian Coddington, and Nathan R. Newbury
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 5697–5707, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-5697-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-5697-2023, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

Birk, M. and Wagner, G.: Complete in-flight detector non-linearity characterisation of MIPAS/Envisat, available at: https://earth.esa.int/documents/700255/707720/Technical+note+DLR+on+MIPAS+non_linearity_0810.pdf (last access: 12 October 2018), technical note, Issue 1A, 18 October 2010, 2010. a, b, c
Blumstein, D., Tournier, B., Cayla, F. R., Phulpin, T., Fjortoft, R., Buil, C., and Ponce, G.: In-flight performance of the infrared atmospheric sounding interferometer (IASI) on METOP-A, Proc. SPIE, 6684, 66840H, https://doi.org/10.1117/12.734162, 2007. a
Châteauneuf, F., Fortin, S., Dubé, S., and Perron, G.: MIPAS L1B/IECF Algorithm Performance Summary, technical note, PO-TN-BOM-GS-0014, Iss. 1, 7 May 2001, 2001. a
De Laurentis, M.: ENVISAT MIPAS MONTHLY REPORT: APRIL 2012, available at: https://earth.esa.int/sppa-reports/envisat/mipas/monthly/2012-04-01/MIPAS_MR_20120401_20120430.pdf (last access: 12 October 2018), 2012. a
Eckert, E., von Clarmann, T., Kiefer, M., Stiller, G. P., Lossow, S., Glatthor, N., Degenstein, D. A., Froidevaux, L., Godin-Beekmann, S., Leblanc, T., McDermid, S., Pastel, M., Steinbrecht, W., Swart, D. P. J., Walker, K. A., and Bernath, P. F.: Drift-corrected trends and periodic variations in MIPAS IMK/IAA ozone measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 2571–2589, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2571-2014, 2014. a
Download
Short summary
We present the error budget for the calibrated and geolocated spectra of the MIPAS limb sounder which flew on the ENVISAT satellite from 2002 to 2012. The impact of the different error sources on the spectra is characterized in terms of spectral, vertical, and temporal correlation. The radiometric error is in the order of 1 to 2.4 %, the spectral accuracy is better than 0.3 ppm, and the line of sight accuracy at the tangent point is around 400 m. All errors are well within the requirements.