Articles | Volume 12, issue 9
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-5161-2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-5161-2019
Research article
 | 
26 Sep 2019
Research article |  | 26 Sep 2019

Gaussian process regression model for dynamically calibrating and surveilling a wireless low-cost particulate matter sensor network in Delhi

Tongshu Zheng, Michael H. Bergin, Ronak Sutaria, Sachchida N. Tripathi, Robert Caldow, and David E. Carlson

Related authors

Field evaluation of low-cost particulate matter sensors in high- and low-concentration environments
Tongshu Zheng, Michael H. Bergin, Karoline K. Johnson, Sachchida N. Tripathi, Shilpa Shirodkar, Matthew S. Landis, Ronak Sutaria, and David E. Carlson
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 4823–4846, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-4823-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-4823-2018, 2018
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Aerosols | Technique: In Situ Measurement | Topic: Data Processing and Information Retrieval
Numerical investigation on retrieval errors of mixing states of fractal black carbon aerosols using single-particle soot photometer based on Mie scattering and the effects on radiative forcing estimation
Jia Liu, Guangya Wang, Cancan Zhu, Donghui Zhou, and Lin Wang
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 4961–4974, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-4961-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-4961-2023, 2023
Short summary
Performance evaluation of MOMA (MOment MAtching) – a remote network calibration technique for PM2.5 and PM10 sensors
Lena Francesca Weissert, Geoff Steven Henshaw, David Edward Williams, Brandon Feenstra, Randy Lam, Ashley Collier-Oxandale, Vasileios Papapostolou, and Andrea Polidori
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 4709–4722, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-4709-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-4709-2023, 2023
Short summary
Mapping the performance of a versatile water-based condensation particle counter (vWCPC) with numerical simulation and experimental study
Weixing Hao, Fan Mei, Susanne Hering, Steven Spielman, Beat Schmid, Jason Tomlinson, and Yang Wang
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 3973–3986, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-3973-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-3973-2023, 2023
Short summary
A searchable database and mass spectral comparison tool for aerosol mass spectrometry (AMS) and aerosol chemical speciation monitor (ACSM)
Sohyeon Jeon, Michael J. Walker, Donna T. Sueper, Douglas A. Day, Anne V. Handschy, Jose L. Jimenez, and Brent J. Williams
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1129,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1129, 2023
Short summary
Development and evaluation of an improved offline aerosol mass spectrometry technique
Christina N. Vasilakopoulou, Kalliopi Florou, Christos Kaltsonoudis, Iasonas Stavroulas, Nikolaos Mihalopoulos, and Spyros N. Pandis
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 2837–2850, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-2837-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-2837-2023, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

Austin, E., Novosselov, I., Seto, E., and Yost, M. G.: Laboratory evaluation of the Shinyei PPD42NS low-cost particulate matter sensor, PLoS One, 10, 1–17, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137789, 2015. 
Breunig, M. M., Kriegel, H. P., Ng, R. T., and Sander, J.: LOF: Identifying Density-Based Local Outliers, available at: http://www.dbs.ifi.lmu.de/Publikationen/Papers/LOF.pdf (last access: 10 December 2018), 2000. 
Byrd, R. H., Lu, P., Nocedal, J., and Zhu, C.: A limited memory algorithm for bound constrained optimization, available at: http://users.iems.northwestern.edu/~nocedal/PDFfiles/limited.pdf (last access: 10 December 2018), 1994. 
CPCB: Air quality monitoring, emission inventory, and source apportionment studies for Delhi, available at: http://cpcb.nic.in/cpcbold/Delhi.pdf, (last access: 10 December 2018), 2009. 
Crilley, L. R., Shaw, M., Pound, R., Kramer, L. J., Price, R., Young, S., Lewis, A. C., and Pope, F. D.: Evaluation of a low-cost optical particle counter (Alphasense OPC-N2) for ambient air monitoring, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 709–720, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-709-2018, 2018. 
Download
Short summary
Here we present a simultaneous Gaussian process regression (GPR) and linear regression pipeline to calibrate and monitor dense wireless low-cost particulate matter sensor networks (WLPMSNs) on the fly by using all available reference monitors across an area. Our approach can achieve an overall 30 % prediction error at a 24 h scale, can differentiate malfunctioning nodes, and track drift. Our solution can substantially reduce manual labor for managing WLPMSNs and prolong their lifetimes.