Articles | Volume 12, issue 9
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 5161–5181, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-5161-2019
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 5161–5181, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-5161-2019
Research article
26 Sep 2019
Research article | 26 Sep 2019

Gaussian process regression model for dynamically calibrating and surveilling a wireless low-cost particulate matter sensor network in Delhi

Tongshu Zheng et al.

Related authors

Field evaluation of low-cost particulate matter sensors in high- and low-concentration environments
Tongshu Zheng, Michael H. Bergin, Karoline K. Johnson, Sachchida N. Tripathi, Shilpa Shirodkar, Matthew S. Landis, Ronak Sutaria, and David E. Carlson
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 4823–4846, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-4823-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-4823-2018, 2018
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Aerosols | Technique: In Situ Measurement | Topic: Data Processing and Information Retrieval
Regularized inversion of aerosol hygroscopic growth factor probability density function: application to humidity-controlled fast integrated mobility spectrometer measurements
Jiaoshi Zhang, Yang Wang, Steven Spielman, Susanne Hering, and Jian Wang
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 2579–2590, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-2579-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-2579-2022, 2022
Short summary
A systematic re-evaluation of methods for quantification of bulk particle-phase organic nitrates using real-time aerosol mass spectrometry
Douglas A. Day, Pedro Campuzano-Jost, Benjamin A. Nault, Brett B. Palm, Weiwei Hu, Hongyu Guo, Paul J. Wooldridge, Ronald C. Cohen, Kenneth S. Docherty, J. Alex Huffman, Suzane S. de Sá, Scot T. Martin, and Jose L. Jimenez
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 459–483, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-459-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-459-2022, 2022
Short summary
Revisiting matrix-based inversion of scanning mobility particle sizer (SMPS) and humidified tandem differential mobility analyzer (HTDMA) data
Markus D. Petters
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 7909–7928, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-7909-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-7909-2021, 2021
Short summary
Data imputation in in situ-measured particle size distributions by means of neural networks
Pak Lun Fung, Martha Arbayani Zaidan, Ola Surakhi, Sasu Tarkoma, Tuukka Petäjä, and Tareq Hussein
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 5535–5554, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-5535-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-5535-2021, 2021
Short summary
Analysis of mobile monitoring data from the microAeth® MA200 for measuring changes in black carbon on the roadside in Augsburg
Xiansheng Liu, Hadiatullah Hadiatullah, Xun Zhang, L. Drew Hill, Andrew H. A. White, Jürgen Schnelle-Kreis, Jan Bendl, Gert Jakobi, Brigitte Schloter-Hai, and Ralf Zimmermann
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 5139–5151, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-5139-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-5139-2021, 2021
Short summary

Cited articles

Austin, E., Novosselov, I., Seto, E., and Yost, M. G.: Laboratory evaluation of the Shinyei PPD42NS low-cost particulate matter sensor, PLoS One, 10, 1–17, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137789, 2015. 
Breunig, M. M., Kriegel, H. P., Ng, R. T., and Sander, J.: LOF: Identifying Density-Based Local Outliers, available at: http://www.dbs.ifi.lmu.de/Publikationen/Papers/LOF.pdf (last access: 10 December 2018), 2000. 
Byrd, R. H., Lu, P., Nocedal, J., and Zhu, C.: A limited memory algorithm for bound constrained optimization, available at: http://users.iems.northwestern.edu/~nocedal/PDFfiles/limited.pdf (last access: 10 December 2018), 1994. 
CPCB: Air quality monitoring, emission inventory, and source apportionment studies for Delhi, available at: http://cpcb.nic.in/cpcbold/Delhi.pdf, (last access: 10 December 2018), 2009. 
Crilley, L. R., Shaw, M., Pound, R., Kramer, L. J., Price, R., Young, S., Lewis, A. C., and Pope, F. D.: Evaluation of a low-cost optical particle counter (Alphasense OPC-N2) for ambient air monitoring, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 709–720, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-709-2018, 2018. 
Download
Short summary
Here we present a simultaneous Gaussian process regression (GPR) and linear regression pipeline to calibrate and monitor dense wireless low-cost particulate matter sensor networks (WLPMSNs) on the fly by using all available reference monitors across an area. Our approach can achieve an overall 30 % prediction error at a 24 h scale, can differentiate malfunctioning nodes, and track drift. Our solution can substantially reduce manual labor for managing WLPMSNs and prolong their lifetimes.