Articles | Volume 13, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1921-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1921-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
16 Apr 2020
Research article |
| 16 Apr 2020
| 16 Apr 2020
A new lidar inversion method using a surface reference target applied to the backscattering coefficient and lidar ratio retrievals of a fog-oil plume at short range
Florian Gaudfrin
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
ONERA, DOTA, Université de Toulouse, 31055 Toulouse, France
Univ. Lille, UMR 8518 - LOA - Laboratoire d'Optique Atmosphérique, 59000 Lille, France
LEUKOS SARL, 37 Rue Henri Giffard, 87280 Limoges, France
Olivier Pujol
Univ. Lille, UMR 8518 - LOA - Laboratoire d'Optique Atmosphérique, 59000 Lille, France
Romain Ceolato
ONERA, DOTA, Université de Toulouse, 31055 Toulouse, France
Guillaume Huss
LEUKOS SARL, 37 Rue Henri Giffard, 87280 Limoges, France
Nicolas Riviere
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
ONERA, DOTA, Université de Toulouse, 31055 Toulouse, France
Related authors
No articles found.
Anna Gialitaki, Alexandra Tsekeri, Vassilis Amiridis, Romain Ceolato, Lucas Paulien, Anna Kampouri, Antonis Gkikas, Stavros Solomos, Eleni Marinou, Moritz Haarig, Holger Baars, Albert Ansmann, Tatyana Lapyonok, Anton Lopatin, Oleg Dubovik, Silke Groß, Martin Wirth, Maria Tsichla, Ioanna Tsikoudi, and Dimitris Balis
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 14005–14021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-14005-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-14005-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Stratospheric smoke particles are found to significantly depolarize incident light, while this effect is also accompanied by a strong spectral dependence. We utilize scattering simulations to show that this behaviour can be attributed to the near-spherical shape of the particles. We also examine whether an extension of the current AERONET scattering model to include the near-spherical shapes could be of benefit to the AERONET retrieval for stratospheric smoke associated with enhanced PLDR.
Y. Boucher, A. Amiez, P. Barillot, C. Chatelard, C. Coudrain, P. Déliot, N. Rivière, T. Rivière, and L. Roupioz
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-1, 65–70, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-1-65-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-1-65-2018, 2018
Related subject area
Subject: Aerosols | Technique: Remote Sensing | Topic: Data Processing and Information Retrieval
Ground-based remote sensing of aerosol properties using high-resolution infrared emission and lidar observations in the High Arctic
The CALIPSO version 4.5 stratospheric aerosol subtyping algorithm
POLIPHON conversion factors for retrieving dust-related cloud condensation nuclei and ice-nucleating particle concentration profiles at oceanic sites
Volcanic cloud detection using Sentinel-3 satellite data by means of neural networks: the Raikoke 2019 eruption test case
The impact and estimation of uncertainty correlation for multi-angle polarimetric remote sensing of aerosols and ocean color
HETEAC – The Hybrid End-To-End Aerosol Classification model for EarthCARE
The new MISR research aerosol retrieval algorithm: a multi-angle, multi-spectral, bounded-variable least squares retrieval of aerosol particle properties over both land and water
DeLiAn – a growing collection of depolarization ratio, lidar ratio and Ångström exponent for different aerosol types and mixtures from ground-based lidar observations
The classification of atmospheric hydrometeors and aerosols from the EarthCARE radar and lidar: the A-TC, C-TC and AC-TC products
Algorithm for vertical distribution of boundary layer aerosol components in remote-sensing data
Atmospheric visibility inferred from continuous-wave Doppler wind lidar
Identification of smoke and sulfuric acid aerosol in SAGE III/ISS extinction spectra
Combining Mie–Raman and fluorescence observations: a step forward in aerosol classification with lidar technology
Effective uncertainty quantification for multi-angle polarimetric aerosol remote sensing over ocean
Employing relaxed smoothness constraints on imaginary part of refractive index in AERONET aerosol retrieval algorithm
Observation of bioaerosol transport using wideband integrated bioaerosol sensor and coherent Doppler lidar
Retrieval of UVB aerosol extinction profiles from the ground-based Langley Mobile Ozone Lidar (LMOL) system
Enhancing MAX-DOAS atmospheric state retrievals by multispectral polarimetry – studies using synthetic data
Assessing the benefits of Imaging Infrared Radiometer observations for the CALIOP version 4 cloud and aerosol discrimination algorithm
A semi-automated procedure for the emitter–receiver geometry characterization of motor-controlled lidars
Aerosol optical characteristics in the urban area of Rome, Italy, and their impact on the UV index
Aerosol models from the AERONET database: application to surface reflectance validation
Continuous mapping of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) air quality in East Asia at daily 6 × 6 km2 resolution by application of a random forest algorithm to 2011–2019 GOCI geostationary satellite data
Deep-learning-based post-process correction of the aerosol parameters in the high-resolution Sentinel-3 Level-2 Synergy product
Retrieval of UV–visible aerosol absorption using AERONET and OMI–MODIS synergy: spatial and temporal variability across major aerosol environments
Estimating cloud condensation nuclei concentrations from CALIPSO lidar measurements
Ash particle refractive index model for simulating the brightness temperature spectrum of volcanic ash clouds from satellite infrared sounder measurements
Retrieval of aerosol properties using relative radiance measurements from an all-sky camera
Optimization of Aeolus' aerosol optical properties by maximum-likelihood estimation
A Bayesian parametric approach to the retrieval of the atmospheric number size distribution from lidar data
Biomass burning aerosol heating rates from the ORACLES (ObseRvations of Aerosols above CLouds and their intEractionS) 2016 and 2017 experiments
Aeolus L2A aerosol optical properties product: standard correct algorithm and Mie correct algorithm
Methodology to obtain highly resolved SO2 vertical profiles for representation of volcanic emissions in climate models
Inferring the absorption properties of organic aerosol in Siberian biomass burning plumes from remote optical observations
Mass concentration estimates of long-range-transported Canadian biomass burning aerosols from a multi-wavelength Raman polarization lidar and a ceilometer in Finland
Retrievals of dust-related particle mass and ice-nucleating particle concentration profiles with ground-based polarization lidar and sun photometer over a megacity in central China
Introducing the MISR level 2 near real-time aerosol product
Estimation of PM2.5 concentration in China using linear hybrid machine learning model
Species correlation measurements in turbulent flare plumes: considerations for field measurements
Retrieval of aerosol microphysical properties from atmospheric lidar sounding: an investigation using synthetic measurements and data from the ACEPOL campaign
Integration of GOCI and AHI Yonsei aerosol optical depth products during the 2016 KORUS-AQ and 2018 EMeRGe campaigns
Deriving boundary layer height from aerosol lidar using machine learning: KABL and ADABL algorithms
Efficient multi-angle polarimetric inversion of aerosols and ocean color powered by a deep neural network forward model
Quantitative comparison of measured and simulated O4 absorptions for one day with extremely low aerosol load over the tropical Atlantic
A Dark Target research aerosol algorithm for MODIS observations over eastern China: increasing coverage while maintaining accuracy at high aerosol loading
Optimal use of the Prede POM sky radiometer for aerosol, water vapor, and ozone retrievals
Analysis of simultaneous aerosol and ocean glint retrieval using multi-angle observations
Model-enforced post-process correction of satellite aerosol retrievals
Explicit and consistent aerosol correction for visible wavelength satellite cloud and nitrogen dioxide retrievals based on optical properties from a global aerosol analysis
Reducing cloud contamination in aerosol optical depth (AOD) measurements
Denghui Ji, Mathias Palm, Christoph Ritter, Philipp Richter, Xiaoyu Sun, Matthias Buschmann, and Justus Notholt
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 1865–1879, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-1865-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-1865-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
To measuring aerosol components, a Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (FTIS) and a lidar are operated in Ny-Ålesund, Spitsbergen (78° N, 11° E). Using the FTIS, a retrieval algorithm is developed for dust, sea salt, black carbon, and sulfate. The distribution of aerosols or clouds is provided by lidar and used as an indicator for aerosol or cloud retrieval with the FTS. Thus, a two-instrument joint-observation scheme is designed and is used on the data measured from 2019 to the present.
Jason L. Tackett, Jayanta Kar, Mark A. Vaughan, Brian J. Getzewich, Man-Hae Kim, Jean-Paul Vernier, Ali H. Omar, Brian E. Magill, Michael C. Pitts, and David M. Winker
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 745–768, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-745-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-745-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The accurate identification of aerosol types in the stratosphere is important to characterize their impacts on the Earth climate system. The space-borne lidar on board CALIPSO is well-posed to identify aerosols in the stratosphere from volcanic eruptions and major wildfire events. This paper describes improvements implemented in the version 4.5 CALIPSO data release to more accurately discriminate between volcanic ash, sulfate, and smoke within the stratosphere.
Yun He, Zhenping Yin, Albert Ansmann, Fuchao Liu, Longlong Wang, Dongzhe Jing, and Huijia Shen
Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2023-4, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2023-4, 2023
Revised manuscript accepted for AMT
Short summary
Short summary
With the AERONET database, this study derives dust-related conversion factors at oceanic sites used in POLIPHON method, which can convert lidar-retrieved dust extinction into INP- and CCN- relevant parameters. Particle linear depolarization ratio in AERONET aerosol inversion product is used to identify dust data points. The derived conversion factors can be applied to inverse 3-D global distribution of dust-related INP and CCN concentrations.
Ilaria Petracca, Davide De Santis, Matteo Picchiani, Stefano Corradini, Lorenzo Guerrieri, Fred Prata, Luca Merucci, Dario Stelitano, Fabio Del Frate, Giorgia Salvucci, and Giovanni Schiavon
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 7195–7210, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-7195-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-7195-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The authors propose a near-real-time procedure for the detection of volcanic clouds by means of Sentinel-3 satellite data and neural networks. The algorithm results in an automatic image classification where ashy pixels are distinguished from other surfaces with remarkable accuracy. The model is considerably faster if compared to other approaches which are time consuming, case specific, and not automatic. The algorithm can be significantly helpful for emergency management during eruption events.
Meng Gao, Kirk Knobelspiesse, Bryan A. Franz, Peng-Wang Zhai, Brian Cairns, Xiaoguang Xu, and J. Vanderlei Martins
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-1413, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-1413, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Multi-angle polarimetric measurements have been shown to greatly improve the remote sensing capability of aerosols and help atmospheric correction for ocean color retrievals. However, the uncertainties in the measurements among different angles are often correlated, which have not been well characterized. In this work, we provide a practical framework to evaluate the impact of the angular uncertainty correlation and a method to directly estimate correlation strength from retrieval residuals.
Ulla Wandinger, Athena Augusta Floutsi, Holger Baars, Moritz Haarig, Albert Ansmann, Anja Hünerbein, Nicole Docter, David Donovan, Gerd-Jan van Zadelhoff, Shannon Mason, and Jason Cole
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-1241, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-1241, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We introduce an aerosol classification model that has been developed for the Earth Clouds, Aerosols and Radiation Explorer (EarthCARE). The model provides a consistent description of microphysical, optical, and radiative properties of common aerosol types such as dust, sea salt, pollution, and smoke. It is used for aerosol classification and assessment of radiation effects based on the synergy of active and passive observations with lidar, imager, and radiometer of the multi-instrument platform.
James A. Limbacher, Ralph A. Kahn, and Jaehwa Lee
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 6865–6887, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6865-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6865-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Launched in December 1999, NASA’s Multi-angle Imaging SpectroRadiometer (MISR) has given researchers qualitative constraints on aerosol particle properties for the past 22 years. Here, we present a new MISR research aerosol retrieval algorithm (RA) that utilizes over-land surface reflectance data from the Multi-Angle Implementation of Atmospheric Correction (MAIAC) to address limitations of the MISR operational aerosol retrieval algorithm and improve retrievals of aerosol particle properties.
Athena Augusta Floutsi, Holger Baars, Ronny Engelmann, Dietrich Althausen, Albert Ansmann, Stephanie Bohlmann, Birgit Heese, Julian Hofer, Thomas Kanitz, Moritz Haarig, Kevin Ohneiser, Martin Radenz, Patric Seifert, Annett Skupin, Zhenping Yin, Sabur F. Abdullaev, Mika Komppula, Maria Filioglou, Elina Giannakaki, Iwona S. Stachlewska, Lucja Janicka, Daniele Bortoli, Eleni Marinou, Vassilis Amiridis, Anna Gialitaki, Rodanthi-Elisavet Mamouri, Boris Barja, and Ulla Wandinger
Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2022-306, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2022-306, 2022
Revised manuscript accepted for AMT
Short summary
Short summary
DeLiAn is a collection of lidar-derived aerosol intensive optical properties for several aerosol types, namely the particle linear depolarization ratio, the extinction-to-backscatter ratio (lidar ratio), and the Ångström exponent. The data collection is based on globally distributed, long-term, ground-based, multiwavelength, Raman and polarisation lidar measurements and currently covers two wavelengths, 355 and 532 nm, for 13 aerosol categories ranging from basic aerosol types to mixtures.
Abdanour Irbah, Julien Delanoë, Gerd-Jan van Zadelhoff, David P. Donovan, Pavlos Kollias, Bernat Puigdomènech Treserras, Shannon Mason, Robin J. Hogan, and Aleksandra Tatarevic
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-1217, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-1217, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The Cloud Profiling Radar (CPR) and Atmospheric Lidar (ATLID) aboard the EarthCare satellite are used to probe the Earth's atmosphere by measuring cloud and aerosol profiles. ATLID is sensitive to aerosols and small cloud particles and CPR to large ice particles, snowflakes and raindrops. It is the synergy of the measurements of these two instruments allowing a better classification of the atmospheric targets and the description of the associated products, which are the subject of this paper.
Futing Wang, Ting Yang, Zifa Wang, Haibo Wang, Xi Chen, Yele Sun, Jianjun Li, Guigang Tang, and Wenxuan Chai
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 6127–6144, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6127-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6127-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We develop a new algorithm to get the vertical mass concentration profiles of fine aerosol components based on the synergy of ground-based remote sensing for the first time. The comparisons with in situ observations and chemistry transport models validate the performance of the algorithm. Uncertainties caused by input parameters are also assessed in this paper. We expected that the algorithm can provide a new idea for lidar inversion and promote the development of aerosol component profiles.
Manuel Queißer, Michael Harris, and Steven Knoop
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 5527–5544, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-5527-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-5527-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Visibility is how well we can see something. Visibility sensors, such as employed in meteorological observatories and airports, measure at a point at the instrument location, which may not be representative of visibilities further away, e.g. near the sea surface during sea spray. Light detecting and ranging (lidar) can measure visibility further away. We find wind lidar to be a viable tool to measure visibility with low accuracy, which could suffice for safety-uncritical applications.
Travis N. Knepp, Larry Thomason, Mahesh Kovilakam, Jason Tackett, Jayanta Kar, Robert Damadeo, and David Flittner
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 5235–5260, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-5235-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-5235-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We used aerosol profiles from the SAGE III/ISS instrument to develop an aerosol classification method that was tested on four case-study events (two volcanic, two fire) and supported with CALIOP aerosol products. The method worked well in identifying smoke and volcanic aerosol in the stratosphere for these events. Raikoke is presented as a demonstration of the limitations of this method.
Igor Veselovskii, Qiaoyun Hu, Philippe Goloub, Thierry Podvin, Boris Barchunov, and Mikhail Korenskii
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 4881–4900, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4881-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4881-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
An approach to reveal variability in aerosol type at a high spatiotemporal resolution, by combining fluorescence and Mie–Raman lidar data, is presented. We applied this new classification scheme to lidar data obtained by LOA, University of Lille, in 2020–2021. It is demonstrated that the separation of the main particle types, such as smoke, dust, pollen, and urban, can be performed with a height resolution of 60 m and temporal resolution better than 10 min for the current lidar configuration.
Meng Gao, Kirk Knobelspiesse, Bryan A. Franz, Peng-Wang Zhai, Andrew M. Sayer, Amir Ibrahim, Brian Cairns, Otto Hasekamp, Yongxiang Hu, Vanderlei Martins, P. Jeremy Werdell, and Xiaoguang Xu
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 4859–4879, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4859-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4859-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
In this work, we assessed the pixel-wise retrieval uncertainties on aerosol and ocean color derived from multi-angle polarimetric measurements. Standard error propagation methods are used to compute the uncertainties. A flexible framework is proposed to evaluate how representative these uncertainties are compared with real retrieval errors. Meanwhile, to assist operational data processing, we optimized the computational speed to evaluate the retrieval uncertainties based on neural networks.
Alexander Sinyuk, Brent N. Holben, Thomas F. Eck, David M. Giles, Ilya Slutsker, Oleg Dubovik, Joel S. Schafer, Alexander Smirnov, and Mikhail Sorokin
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 4135–4151, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4135-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4135-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This paper describes modification of smoothness constraints on the imaginary part of the refractive index employed in the AERONET aerosol retrieval algorithm. This modification is termed relaxed due to the weaker strength of this new smoothness constraint. Applying the modified version of the smoothness constraint results in a significant reduction of retrieved light absorption by brown-carbon-containing aerosols.
Dawei Tang, Tianwen Wei, Jinlong Yuan, Haiyun Xia, and Xiankang Dou
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 2819–2838, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-2819-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-2819-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
During 11–20 March 2020, three aerosol transport events were investigated by a lidar system and an online bioaerosol detection system in Hefei, China.
Observation results reveal that the events not only contributed to high particulate matter pollution but also to the transport of external bioaerosols, resulting in changes in the fraction of fluorescent biological aerosol particles.
This detection method improved the time resolution and provided more parameters for aerosol detection.
Liqiao Lei, Timothy A. Berkoff, Guillaume Gronoff, Jia Su, Amin R. Nehrir, Yonghua Wu, Fred Moshary, and Shi Kuang
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 2465–2478, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-2465-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-2465-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Aerosol extinction in the UVB (280–315 nm) is difficult to retrieve using simple lidar techniques due to the lack of lidar ratios at those wavelengths. The 2018 Long Island Sound Tropospheric Ozone Study (LISTOS) in the New York City region provided the opportunity to characterize the lidar ratio for UVB aerosol retrieval for the Langley Mobile Ozone Lidar (LMOL). A 292 nm aerosol product comparison between the NASA Langley High Altitude Lidar Observatory (HALO) and LMOL was also carried out.
Jan-Lukas Tirpitz, Udo Frieß, Robert Spurr, and Ulrich Platt
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 2077–2098, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-2077-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-2077-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
MAX-DOAS is a widely used measurement technique for the remote detection of atmospheric aerosol and trace gases. It relies on the analysis of ultra-violet and visible radiation spectra of skylight. To date, information contained in the skylight's polarisation state has not been utilised. On the basis of synthetic data, we carried out sensitivity analyses to assess the potential of polarimetry for MAX-DOAS applications.
Thibault Vaillant de Guélis, Gérard Ancellet, Anne Garnier, Laurent C.-Labonnote, Jacques Pelon, Mark A. Vaughan, Zhaoyan Liu, and David M. Winker
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 1931–1956, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-1931-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-1931-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
A new IIR-based cloud and aerosol discrimination (CAD) algorithm is developed using the IIR brightness temperature differences for cloud and aerosol features confidently identified by the CALIOP version 4 CAD algorithm. IIR classifications agree with the majority of V4 cloud identifications, reduce the ambiguity in a notable fraction of
not confidentV4 cloud classifications, and correct a few V4 misclassifications of cloud layers identified as dense dust or elevated smoke layers by CALIOP.
Marco Di Paolantonio, Davide Dionisi, and Gian Luigi Liberti
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 1217–1231, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-1217-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-1217-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
A procedure for the characterization of the lidar transmitter–receiver geometry was developed. This characterization is currently implemented in the Rome RMR lidar to optimize the telescope/beam alignment, retrieve the overlap function, and estimate the absolute and relative tilt of the laser beam. This procedure can be potentially used to complement the standard EARLINET quality assurance tests.
Monica Campanelli, Henri Diémoz, Anna Maria Siani, Alcide di Sarra, Anna Maria Iannarelli, Rei Kudo, Gabriele Fasano, Giampietro Casasanta, Luca Tofful, Marco Cacciani, Paolo Sanò, and Stefano Dietrich
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 1171–1183, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-1171-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-1171-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The aerosol optical depth (AOD) characteristics in an urban area of Rome were retrieved over a period of 11 years (2010–2020) to determine, for the first time, their effect on the incoming ultraviolet (UV) solar radiation. The surface forcing efficiency shows that the AOD is the primary parameter affecting the surface irradiance in Rome, and it is found to be greater for smaller zenith angles and for larger and more absorbing particles in the UV range (such as, e.g., mineral dust).
Jean-Claude Roger, Eric Vermote, Sergii Skakun, Emilie Murphy, Oleg Dubovik, Natacha Kalecinski, Bruno Korgo, and Brent Holben
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 1123–1144, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-1123-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-1123-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
From measurements of the sky performed by AERONET, we determined the microphysical properties of the atmospheric particles (aerosols) for each AERONET site. We used the aerosol optical thickness and its variation over the visible spectrum. This allows us to determine an aerosol model useful for (but not only) the validation of the surface reflectance satellite-derived product. The impact of the aerosol model uncertainties on the surface reflectance validation has been found to be 1 % to 3 %.
Drew C. Pendergrass, Shixian Zhai, Jhoon Kim, Ja-Ho Koo, Seoyoung Lee, Minah Bae, Soontae Kim, Hong Liao, and Daniel J. Jacob
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 1075–1091, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-1075-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-1075-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This paper uses a machine learning algorithm to infer high-resolution maps of particulate air quality in eastern China, Japan, and the Korean peninsula, using data from a geostationary satellite along with meteorology. We then perform an extensive evaluation of this inferred air quality and use it to diagnose trends in the region. We hope this paper and the associated data will be valuable to other scientists interested in epidemiology, air quality, remote sensing, and machine learning.
Antti Lipponen, Jaakko Reinvall, Arttu Väisänen, Henri Taskinen, Timo Lähivaara, Larisa Sogacheva, Pekka Kolmonen, Kari Lehtinen, Antti Arola, and Ville Kolehmainen
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 895–914, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-895-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-895-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We have developed a machine-learning-based model that can be used to correct the Sentinel-3 satellite-based aerosol parameter data of the Synergy data product. The strength of the model is that the original satellite data processing does not have to be carried out again but the correction can be carried out with the data already available. We show that the correction significantly improves the accuracy of the satellite aerosol parameters.
Vinay Kayetha, Omar Torres, and Hiren Jethva
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 845–877, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-845-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-845-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Existing measurements of spectral aerosol absorption are limited, particularly in the UV region. We use the synergy of satellite and ground measurements to derive spectral single scattering albedo of aerosols from the UV–visible spectrum. The resulting spectral SSAs are used to investigate seasonality in absorption for carbonaceous, dust, and urban aerosols. Regional aerosol absorption models that could be used to make reliable assumptions in satellite remote sensing of aerosols are derived.
Goutam Choudhury and Matthias Tesche
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 639–654, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-639-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-639-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Aerosols are tiny particles suspended in the atmosphere. A fraction of these particles can form clouds and are called cloud condensation nuclei (CCN). Measurements of such aerosol particles are necessary to study the aerosol–cloud interactions and reduce the uncertainty in our future climate predictions. We present a novel methodology to estimate global 3D CCN concentrations from the CALIPSO satellite measurements. The final data set will be used to study the aerosol–cloud interactions.
Hiroshi Ishimoto, Masahiro Hayashi, and Yuzo Mano
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 435–458, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-435-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-435-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Using data from the Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometer (IASI) measurements of volcanic ash clouds (VACs) and radiative transfer calculations, we attempt to simulate the measured brightness temperature spectra (BTS) of volcanic ash aerosols in the infrared region. In particular, the dependence on the ash refractive index (RI) model is investigated.
Roberto Román, Juan C. Antuña-Sánchez, Victoria E. Cachorro, Carlos Toledano, Benjamín Torres, David Mateos, David Fuertes, César López, Ramiro González, Tatyana Lapionok, Marcos Herreras-Giralda, Oleg Dubovik, and Ángel M. de Frutos
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 407–433, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-407-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-407-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
An all-sky camera is used to obtain the relative sky radiance, and this radiance is used as input in an inversion code to obtain aerosol properties. This paper is really interesting because it pushes forward the use and capability of sky cameras for more advanced science purposes. Enhanced aerosol properties can be retrieved with accuracy using only an all-sky camera, but synergy with other instruments providing aerosol optical depth could even increase the power of these low-cost instruments.
Frithjof Ehlers, Thomas Flament, Alain Dabas, Dimitri Trapon, Adrien Lacour, Holger Baars, and Anne Grete Straume-Lindner
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 185–203, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-185-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-185-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The Aeolus satellite observes the Earth and can vertically detect any kind of particles (aerosols or clouds) in the atmosphere below it. These observations are typically very noisy, which needs to be accounted for. This work dampens the noise in Aeolus' aerosol and cloud data, which are provided publicly by the ESA, so that the scientific community can make better use of it. This makes the data potentially more useful for weather prediction and climate research.
Alberto Sorrentino, Alessia Sannino, Nicola Spinelli, Michele Piana, Antonella Boselli, Valentino Tontodonato, Pasquale Castellano, and Xuan Wang
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 149–164, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-149-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-149-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We present a novel approach that can be used to obtain microphysical properties of atmospheric aerosol, up to several kilometers in the atmosphere, from lidar measurements taken from the ground. Our approach provides accurate reconstructions under many different experimental conditions. Our results can contribute to the expansion of the use of remote sensing techniques for air quality monitoring and atmospheric science in general.
Sabrina P. Cochrane, K. Sebastian Schmidt, Hong Chen, Peter Pilewskie, Scott Kittelman, Jens Redemann, Samuel LeBlanc, Kristina Pistone, Michal Segal Rozenhaimer, Meloë Kacenelenbogen, Yohei Shinozuka, Connor Flynn, Rich Ferrare, Sharon Burton, Chris Hostetler, Marc Mallet, and Paquita Zuidema
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 61–77, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-61-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-61-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This work presents heating rates derived from aircraft observations from the 2016 and 2017 field campaigns of ORACLES (ObseRvations of Aerosols above CLouds and their intEractionS). We separate the total heating rates into aerosol and gas (primarily water vapor) absorption and explore some of the co-variability of heating rate profiles and their primary drivers, leading to the development of a new concept: the heating rate efficiency (HRE; the heating rate per unit aerosol extinction).
Thomas Flament, Dimitri Trapon, Adrien Lacour, Alain Dabas, Frithjof Ehlers, and Dorit Huber
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 7851–7871, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-7851-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-7851-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents the main algorithms of the Aeolus Level 2 aerosol optical properties product. The processing chain was developed under contract with ESA.
We show that the ALADIN instrument, although primarily designed to retrieve atmospheric winds, is also able to provide valuable information about aerosol and cloud optical properties. The algorithms are detailed, and validation on simulated and real examples is shown.
Oscar S. Sandvik, Johan Friberg, Moa K. Sporre, and Bengt G. Martinsson
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 7153–7165, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-7153-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-7153-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
A method to form SO2 profiles in the stratosphere with high vertical resolution following volcanic eruptions is introduced. The method combines space-based high-resolution vertical aerosol profiles and SO2 measurements the first 2 weeks after an eruption with air mass trajectory analyses. The SO2 is located at higher altitude than in most previous studies. The detailed resolution of the SO2 profile is unprecedented compared to other methods.
Igor B. Konovalov, Nikolai A. Golovushkin, Matthias Beekmann, Mikhail V. Panchenko, and Meinrat O. Andreae
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 6647–6673, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-6647-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-6647-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The absorption of solar light by organic matter, known as brown carbon (BrC), contributes significantly to the radiative budget of the Earth’s atmosphere, but its representation in atmospheric models is uncertain. This paper advances a methodology to constrain model parameters characterizing BrC absorption of atmospheric aerosol originating from biomass burning with the available remote ground-based observations of atmospheric aerosol.
Xiaoxia Shang, Tero Mielonen, Antti Lipponen, Elina Giannakaki, Ari Leskinen, Virginie Buchard, Anton S. Darmenov, Antti Kukkurainen, Antti Arola, Ewan O'Connor, Anne Hirsikko, and Mika Komppula
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 6159–6179, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-6159-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-6159-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The long-range-transported smoke particles from a Canadian wildfire event were observed with a multi-wavelength Raman polarization lidar and a ceilometer over Kuopio, Finland, in June 2019. The optical properties and the mass concentration estimations were reported for such aged smoke aerosols over northern Europe.
Yun He, Yunfei Zhang, Fuchao Liu, Zhenping Yin, Yang Yi, Yifan Zhan, and Fan Yi
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 5939–5954, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-5939-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-5939-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The POLIPHON method can retrieve the height profiles of dust-related particle mass and ice-nucleating particle (INP) concentrations. Applying a dust case data set screening scheme based on the lidar-derived depolarization ratio (rather than Ångström exponent for 440–870 nm and AOD at 532 nm), the mixed-dust-related conversion factors are retrieved from sun photometer observations over Wuhan, China. This method may potentially be extended to regions influenced by mixed dust.
Marcin L. Witek, Michael J. Garay, David J. Diner, Michael A. Bull, Felix C. Seidel, Abigail M. Nastan, and Earl G. Hansen
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 5577–5591, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-5577-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-5577-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This article documents the development and testing of a new near real-time (NRT) aerosol product from the MISR instrument on NASA’s Terra platform. The NRT product capitalizes on the unique attributes of the MISR retrieval approach, which leads to a high-quality and reliable aerosol data product. Several modifications are described that allow for rapid product generation within a 3 h window following acquisition. Implications for the product quality and consistency are discussed.
Zhihao Song, Bin Chen, Yue Huang, Li Dong, and Tingting Yang
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 5333–5347, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-5333-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-5333-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The linear hybrid machine learning model achieves the expected target well. The overall inversion accuracy (R2) of the model is 0.84, and the RMSE is 12.92 µg m−3. R2 was above 0.7 in more than 70 % of the sites, whereas RMSE and mean absolute error were below 20 and 15 µg m−3, respectively. There was severe pollution in winter with an average PM2.5 concentration of 62.10 µg m−3. However, there was only slight pollution in summer with an average PM2.5 concentration of 47.39 µg m−3.
Scott P. Seymour and Matthew R. Johnson
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 5179–5197, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-5179-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-5179-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Field measurements of gas flare emissions often assume that combustion species are spatially and temporally correlated in the plume. By measuring black carbon (BC) and water vapour in turbulent lab-scale flare plumes, this study shows that the well-correlated species assumption is not universally valid and that field measurements may be subject to large added uncertainty. Further analysis suggests that this uncertainty is easily avoided, and initial guidance is provided on sampling protocols.
William G. K. McLean, Guangliang Fu, Sharon P. Burton, and Otto P. Hasekamp
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 4755–4771, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-4755-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-4755-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, we present results from aerosol retrievals using both synthetic and real lidar datasets, including measurements from the ACEPOL (Aerosol Characterization from Polarimeter and Lidar) campaign, a combined initiative between NASA and SRON (the Netherlands Institute for Space Research). Aerosol microphysical retrievals were performed using the High Spectral Resolution Lidar-2 (HSRL-2) setup, alongside several others, with the ACEPOL retrievals also compared to polarimeter retrievals.
Hyunkwang Lim, Sujung Go, Jhoon Kim, Myungje Choi, Seoyoung Lee, Chang-Keun Song, and Yasuko Kasai
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 4575–4592, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-4575-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-4575-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Aerosol property observations by satellites from geostationary Earth orbit (GEO) in particular have advantages of frequent sampling better than 1 h in addition to broader spatial coverage. This study provides data fusion products of aerosol optical properties from four different algorithms for two different GEO satellites: GOCI and AHI. The fused aerosol products adopted ensemble-mean and maximum-likelihood estimation methods. The data fusion provides improved results with better accuracy.
Thomas Rieutord, Sylvain Aubert, and Tiago Machado
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 4335–4353, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-4335-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-4335-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This article describes two methods to estimate the height of the very first layer of the atmosphere. It is measured with aerosol lidars, and the two new methods are based on machine learning. Both are open source and available under free licenses. A sensitivity analysis and a 2-year evaluation against meteorological balloons were carried out. One method has a good agreement with balloons but is limited by training, and the other has less good agreement with balloons but is more flexible.
Meng Gao, Bryan A. Franz, Kirk Knobelspiesse, Peng-Wang Zhai, Vanderlei Martins, Sharon Burton, Brian Cairns, Richard Ferrare, Joel Gales, Otto Hasekamp, Yongxiang Hu, Amir Ibrahim, Brent McBride, Anin Puthukkudy, P. Jeremy Werdell, and Xiaoguang Xu
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 4083–4110, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-4083-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-4083-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Multi-angle polarimetric measurements can retrieve accurate aerosol properties over complex atmosphere and ocean systems; however, most retrieval algorithms require high computational costs. We propose a deep neural network (NN) forward model to represent the radiative transfer simulation of coupled atmosphere and ocean systems and then conduct simultaneous aerosol and ocean color retrievals on AirHARP measurements. The computational acceleration is 103 times with CPU or 104 times with GPU.
Thomas Wagner, Steffen Dörner, Steffen Beirle, Sebastian Donner, and Stefan Kinne
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 3871–3893, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-3871-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-3871-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We compare measured and simulated O4 absorptions for conditions of extremely low aerosol optical depth, for which the uncertainties related to imperfect knowledge of aerosol properties do not significantly affect the comparison results. The simulations underestimate the measurements by 15 % to 20 %. Even if no aerosols are considered, the simulated O4 absorptions are systematically lower than the measurements. Our results indicate a fundamental inconsistency between simulations and measurements.
Yingxi R. Shi, Robert C. Levy, Leiku Yang, Lorraine A. Remer, Shana Mattoo, and Oleg Dubovik
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 3449–3468, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-3449-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-3449-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Due to fast industrialization and development, China has been experiencing haze pollution episodes with both high frequencies and severity over the last 3 decades. This study improves the accuracy and data coverage of measured aerosol from satellites, which help quantify, characterize, and understand the impact of the haze phenomena over the entire East Asia region.
Rei Kudo, Henri Diémoz, Victor Estellés, Monica Campanelli, Masahiro Momoi, Franco Marenco, Claire L. Ryder, Osamu Ijima, Akihiro Uchiyama, Kouichi Nakashima, Akihiro Yamazaki, Ryoji Nagasawa, Nozomu Ohkawara, and Haruma Ishida
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 3395–3426, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-3395-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-3395-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
A new method, Skyrad pack MRI version 2, was developed to retrieve aerosol physical and optical properties, water vapor, and ozone column concentrations from the sky radiometer, a filter radiometer deployed in the SKYNET international network. Our method showed good performance in a radiative closure study using surface solar irradiances from the Baseline Surface Radiation Network and a comparison using aircraft in situ measurements of Saharan dust events during the SAVEX-D 2015 campaign.
Kirk Knobelspiesse, Amir Ibrahim, Bryan Franz, Sean Bailey, Robert Levy, Ziauddin Ahmad, Joel Gales, Meng Gao, Michael Garay, Samuel Anderson, and Olga Kalashnikova
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 3233–3252, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-3233-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-3233-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We assessed atmospheric aerosol and ocean surface wind speed remote sensing capability with NASA's Multi-angle Imaging SpectroRadiometer (MISR), using synthetic data and a Bayesian inference technique called generalized nonlinear retrieval analysis (GENRA). We found success using three aerosol parameters plus wind speed. This shows that MISR can perform an atmospheric correction for the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) on the same spacecraft (Terra).
Antti Lipponen, Ville Kolehmainen, Pekka Kolmonen, Antti Kukkurainen, Tero Mielonen, Neus Sabater, Larisa Sogacheva, Timo H. Virtanen, and Antti Arola
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 2981–2992, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-2981-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-2981-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We have developed a new computational method to post-process-correct the satellite aerosol retrievals. The proposed method combines the conventional satellite aerosol retrievals relying on physics-based models and machine learning. The results show significantly improved accuracy in the aerosol data over the operational satellite data products. The correction can be applied to the existing satellite aerosol datasets with no need to fully reprocess the much larger original radiance data.
Alexander Vasilkov, Nickolay Krotkov, Eun-Su Yang, Lok Lamsal, Joanna Joiner, Patricia Castellanos, Zachary Fasnacht, and Robert Spurr
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 2857–2871, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-2857-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-2857-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
To explicitly account for aerosol effects in the OMI cloud and nitrogen dioxide algorithms, we use a model of aerosol optical properties from a global aerosol assimilation system and radiative transfer computations. Accounting for anisotropic reflection of Earth's surface is an important feature of the approach. Comparisons of the cloud and tropospheric nitrogen dioxide retrievals with implicit and explicit aerosol corrections are carried out for a selected area with high pollution.
Verena Schenzinger and Axel Kreuter
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 2787–2798, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-2787-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-2787-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
When measuring the aerosol optical depth of the atmosphere, clouds in front of the sun lead to erroneously high values. Therefore, measurements that are potentially affected by clouds need to be removed from the dataset by an automatic process. As the currently used algorithm cannot reliably identify thin clouds, we developed a new one based on a method borrowed from machine learning. Tests with 10 years of data show improved performance of the new routine and therefore higher data quality.
Cited articles
Ackermann, J.: The extinction-to-backscatter ratio of tropospheric aerosol: A
numerical study, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 15,
1043–1050, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1998)015<1043:TETBRO>2.0.CO;2, 1998. a
Anon: U.S. Standard Atmosphere, Tech. rep., NASA, Washington, DC, US, 1976. a
Ansmann, A., Riebesell, M., and Weitkamp, C.: Measurement of atmospheric
aerosol extinction profiles with a Raman lidar, Opt. Lett., 15, 746–748,
https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.15.000746, 1990. a
Ansmann, A. and Müller, D.: Lidar and Atmospheric Aerosol Particles, in: Range-Resolved Optical Remote Sensing of the Atmosphere, 105–141, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2004.
Ansmann, A., Wandinger, U., Riebesell, M., Weitkamp, C., and Michaelis, W.:
Independent measurement of extinction and backscatter profiles in cirrus
clouds by using a combined Raman elastic-backscatter lidar,
Appl. Optics,
31, 7113, https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.31.007113, 1992. a
Ansmann, A., Neuber, R., Rairoux, P., and Wandinger, U.: Advances in
Atmospheric Remote Sensing with Lidar, vol. 34, Springer Berlin Heidelberg,
Berlin, Heidelberg, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60612-0, 1997. a
Ansmann, A., Baldasano, J., Calpini, B., Chaikovsky, Anatoly and Flamant, P.,
Mitev, V., Papayannis, A., Pelon, J., Resendes, D., Schneider, J., Trickl,
T., and Vaughan, G.: EARLINET: A European Aerosol Research Lidar Network,
Tech. rep., 2001. a
Baltensperger, U., Dommen, J., Alfarra, M. R., Duplissy, J., Gaeggeler, K., Metzger, A., Facchini, M. C., Decesari, S., Finessi, E., Reinnig, C., Schott, M., Warnke, J., Hoffmann, T., Klatzer, B., Puxbaum, H., Geiser, M., Savi, M., Lang, D., Kalberer, M., and Geiser, T.: Combined Determination of the Chemical Composition and of Health Effects of
Secondary Organic Aerosols: The POLYSOA Project,
J. Aerosol Med. Pulm. D., 21, 145–154, https://doi.org/10.1089/jamp.2007.0655,
2008. a
Berk, A., Acharya, P., and Bernstein, L.: Band model method for modeling
atmospheric propagation at arbitrarily fine spectral resolution, US Pat., available at: https://patents.google.com/patent/US7433806 (last access: 6 July 2019), 2008. a
Berk, A., Conforti, P., Kennett, R., Perkins, T., Hawes, F., and van den Bosch,
J.: MODTRAN6: a major upgrade of the MODTRAN radiative transfer code,
9088, 90880H, International Society for Optics and Photonics,
https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2050433, 2014. a
Bissonnette, L. R.: Multiple-scattering lidar equation, Appl. Optics, 35,
6449, https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.35.006449, 1996. a
Bodhaine, B. A., Wood, N. B., Dutton, E. G., and Slusser, J. R.: On Rayleigh
Optical Depth Calculations, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech.,
16, 1854–1861, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1999)016<1854:ORODC>2.0.CO;2, 1999. a
Bohlmann, S., Baars, H., Radenz, M., Engelmann, R., and Macke, A.: Ship-borne aerosol profiling with lidar over the Atlantic Ocean: from pure marine conditions to complex dust–smoke mixtures, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 9661–9679, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-9661-2018, 2018. a
Bréon, F.-M., Maignan, F., Leroy, M., and Grant, I.: Analysis of hot
spot directional signatures measured from space,
J. Geophys. Res., 107, 4282, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001094, 2002. a
Bucholtz, A.: Rayleigh-scattering calculations for the terrestrial
atmosphere, Appl. Optics, 34, 2765, https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.34.002765, 1995. a
Bufton, J. L.: Laser Altimetry Measurements from Aircraft and Spacecraft,
P. IEEE, 77, 463–477, https://doi.org/10.1109/5.24131, 1989. a
Cattrall, C., Reagan, J., Kurt, T., and Oleg, D.: Variability of aerosol and spectral lidar and backscatter and extinction ratios of key aerosol types derived from selected Aerosol Robotic Network locations, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 110, 1–13,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005124, 2005. a
Ceolato, R., Riviere, N., and Hespel, L.: Reflectances from a supercontinuum
laser-based instrument: hyperspectral, polarimetric and angular
measurements, Opt. Express, 20, 29413, https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.20.029413, 2012. a
Ceolato, R., Gaudfrin, F., Pujol, O., Riviere, N., Berg, M. J., and Sorensen,
C. M.: Lidar cross-sections of soot fractal aggregates: Assessment of
equivalent-sphere models,
J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 212, 39–44, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2017.12.004, 2018. a
Clark, W. E. and Whitby, K. T.: Concentration and Size Distribution
Measurements of Atmospheric Aerosols and a Test of the Theory of
Self-Preserving Size Distributions, J. Atmos. Sci., 24,
677–687, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1967)024<0677:CASDMO>2.0.CO;2, 1967. a
Collis, R. T. H. and Russell, P. B.: Lidar measurement of particles and gases
by elastic backscattering and differential absorption, in: Laser Monitoring of the Atmosphere, 71–151,
https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-07743-X_18, 1976. a
Comeron, A., Sicard, M., Kumar, D., and Rocadenbosch, F.: Use of a field lens
for improving the overlap function of a lidar system employing an optical
fiber in the receiver assembly, Appl. Optics, 50, 5538,
https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.50.005538, 2011. a
Dawson, K. W., Meskhidze, N., Josset, D., and Gassó, S.: Spaceborne observations of the lidar ratio of marine aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 3241–3255, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-3241-2015, 2015. a
DeMott, P. J., Prenni, A. J., Liu, X., Kreidenweis, S. M., Petters, M. D.,
Twohy, C. H., Richardson, M. S., Eidhammer, T., and Rogers, D. C.:
Predicting global atmospheric ice nuclei distributions and their impacts on
climate, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107,
11217–11222, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0910818107, 2010. a
Elias, T., Haeffelin, M., Drobinski, P., Gomes, L., Rangognio, J., Bergot, T.,
Chazette, P., Raut, J. C., and Colomb, M.: Particulate contribution to
extinction of visible radiation: Pollution, haze, and fog,
Atmos. Res., 92, 443–454, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2009.01.006, 2009. a
Fernald, F. G.: Analysis of atmospheric lidar observations: some comments,
Appl. Optics, 23, 652–653, https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.23.000652, 1984. a
Fernald, F. G., Herman, B. M., and Reagan, J. A.: Determination of Aerosol
Height Distributions by Lidar, J. Appl. Meteorol., 11, 482–489,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1972)011<0482:DOAHDB>2.0.CO;2, 1972. a
Finlayson-Pitts, B. J. and Pitts, J. N. J.: The Atmospheric System, Chemistry of the Upper and Lower Atmosphere: Theory, Experiments, and Applications,
15–42, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012257060-5/50004-6, 2000. a
Gaudfrin, F., Ceolato, R., Pujol, O., Riviere, N., and Hu, Q.: Supercontinuum
lidar for hydrometeors and aerosols optical properties determination, in:
EGU General Assembly 2018, 20, 14436, 2018a. a
Gaudfrin, F., Ceolato, R., Pujol, O., and Riviere, N.: A new-lidar inversion
technique using a surface reference target at short – range, in: The 29th
International Laser Radar Conference, 3–6, 24–28 June, Hefei, 2019. a
Getzewich, B. J., Vaughan, M. A., Hunt, W. H., Avery, M. A., Powell, K. A., Tackett, J. L., Winker, D. M., Kar, J., Lee, K.-P., and Toth, T. D.: CALIPSO lidar calibration at 532 nm: version 4 daytime algorithm, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 6309–6326, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-6309-2018, 2018. a
Glickman, T. and Zenk, W.: Glossary of Meteorology, American Meteorological
Society, Boston, 855 pp. 2, available at: http://oceanrep.geomar.de/6557/ (last access: 17 July 2019), 2000. a
Hadamard, J.: Théorie des équations aux dérivées
partielles linéaires hyperboliques et du problème de Cauchy,
Acta Math., 31, 333–380, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02415449, 1908. a
Hall, F. F. and Ageno, H. Y.: Absolute calibration of a laser system for
atmospheric probing, Appl. Optics, 9, 1820–1824,
https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.9.001820, 1970. a
Halldórsson, T. and Langerholc, J.: Geometrical form factors for the
lidar function, Appl. Optics, 17, 240–244, https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.17.000240, 1978. a
Haner, D. A., McGuckin, B. T., Menzies, R. T., Bruegge, C. J., and Duval, V.:
Directional–hemispherical reflectance for Spectralon by integration of its
bidirectional reflectance, Appl. Optics, 37, 3996,
https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.37.003996, 1998. a
Hansen, J., Sato, M., and Ruedy, R.: Radiative forcing and climate response,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 102, 6831–6864,
https://doi.org/10.1029/96JD03436, 1997. a
Haywood, J. and Boucher, O.: Estimates of the direct and indirect radiative forcing due to tropospheric
aerosols: A review, Rev. Geophys., 38, 513–543,
https://doi.org/10.1029/1999RG000078, 2000. a
Hess, M., Koepke, P., Schult, I., Hess, M., Koepke, P., and Schult, I.:
Optical Properties of Aerosols and Clouds: The Software Package OPAC,
B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 79, 831–844,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1998)079<0831:OPOAAC>2.0.CO;2, 1998. a
Hoff, R. M., Bösenberg, J., and Pappalardo, G.: The GAW Aerosol Lidar
Observation Network (GALION), in: International Geoscience and Remote Sensing
Symposium (IGARSS-08), 27–29 March, Boston (USA), 6–11, 2008. a
Horvath, H.: On the applicability of the Koschmieder visibility formula, Atmos. Environ., 5,
177–184, https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(71)90081-3, 1971. a
Hu, Y., Vaughan, M., Liu, Z., Powell, K., and Rodier, S.: Retrieving
Optical Depths and Lidar Ratios for Transparent Layers Above Opaque Water
Clouds From CALIPSO Lidar Measurements,
IEEE Geosci. Remote S., 4, 523–526, https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2007.901085, 2007. a
Hyslop, N. P.: Impaired visibility: the air pollution people see, Atmos.
Environ., 43, 182–195, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.09.067, 2009. a
Jäger, H.: Long-term record of lidar observations of the stratospheric
aerosol layer at Garmisch-Partenkirchen, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 110, 1–9, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005506, 2005. a
Josset, D., Pelon, J., Protat, A., and Flamant, C.: New approach to determine
aerosol optical depth from combined CALIPSO and CloudSat ocean surface
echoes, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL033442, 2008. a
Josset, D., Pelon, J., and Hu, Y.: Multi-Instrument Calibration Method Based
on a Multiwavelength Ocean Surface Model, IEEE Geosci. Remote S., 7, 195–199, https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2009.2030906,
2010a. a
Josset, D., Zhai, P.-W., Hu, Y., Pelon, J., and Lucker, P. L.: Lidar equation
for ocean surface and subsurface, Opt. Express, 18, 20862,
https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.18.020862, 2010b. a, b
Josset, D., Pelon, J., Garnier, A., Hu, Y., Vaughan, M., Zhai, P.-W., Kuehn,
R., and Lucker, P.: Cirrus optical depth and lidar ratio retrieval from
combined CALIPSO-CloudSat observations using ocean surface echo, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011jd016959,
2012. a
Josset, D., Pelon, J., Pascal, N., Hu, Y., and Hou, W.: On the Use of CALIPSO
Land Surface Returns to Retrieve Aerosol and Cloud Optical Depths, IEEE
T. Geosci. Remote, 56, 3256–3264,
https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2018.2796850, 2018. a, b
Kar, J., Vaughan, M. A., Lee, K.-P., Tackett, J. L., Avery, M. A., Garnier, A., Getzewich, B. J., Hunt, W. H., Josset, D., Liu, Z., Lucker, P. L., Magill, B., Omar, A. H., Pelon, J., Rogers, R. R., Toth, T. D., Trepte, C. R., Vernier, J.-P., Winker, D. M., and Young, S. A.: CALIPSO lidar calibration at 532 nm: version 4 nighttime algorithm, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 1459–1479, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1459-2018, 2018. a
Kavaya, M. J., Menzies, R. T., Haner, D. A., Oppenheim, U. P., and Flamant,
P. H.: Target reflectance measurements for calibration of lidar atmospheric
backscatter data, Appl. Optics, 22, 2619, https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.22.002619,
1983. a
Klett, J. D.: Stable analytical inversion solution for processing lidar
returns, Appl. Optics, 20, 211–220, https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.20.000211, 1981. a, b
Klett, J. D.: Lidar inversion with variable backscatter/extinction ratios,
Appl. Optics, 24, 1638, https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.24.001638, 1985. a, b
Kraft, D.: Software Package for Sequential Quadratic Programming, 1988. a
Kumar, D. and Rocadenbosch, F.: Determination of the overlap factor and its
enhancement for medium-size tropospheric lidar systems: a ray-tracing
approach, J. Appl. Remote Sens., 7, 073591,
https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JRS.7.073591, 2013. a
Labarre, L., Caillault, K., Fauqueux, S., Malherbe, C., Roblin, A., Rosier, B.,
and Simoneau, P.: An overview of MATISSE-v2.0, in: Optics in Atmospheric Propagation and Adaptive Systems XIII, 7828, edited by: Stein, K. and Gonglewski, J. D., 9–18,
https://doi.org/10.1117/12.868183, 2010. a
Leblanc, T., Trickl, T., and Vogelmann, H.: Lidar, vol. 102 of Springer
Series in Optical Sciences, Springer-Verlag, New York,
https://doi.org/10.1007/b106786, 2005. a
Li, J., Gong, W., and Ma, Y.: Atmospheric Lidar Noise Reduction Based on
Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition, Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XXXIX-B8,
127–129, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsarchives-XXXIX-B8-127-2012, 2012. a
Lobell, D. B. and Asner, G. P.: Moisture Effects on Soil Reflectance, Soil
Sci. Soc. Am. J., 66, 722–727, https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2002.7220,
2002. a
Mao, F., Gong, W., and Li, C.: Anti-noise algorithm of lidar data retrieval by
combining the ensemble Kalman filter and the Fernald method, Opt. Express,
21, 8286, https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.21.008286, 2013. a
Matsumoto, M. and Takeuchi, N.: Effects of misestimated far-end boundary
values on two common lidar inversion solutions, Appl. Optics, 33, 6451,
https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.33.006451, 1994. a
Mattis, I., Ansmann, A., Müller, D., Wandinger, U., and Althausen, D.:
Multilayer aerosol observations with dual-wavelength Raman lidar in the
framework of EARLINET, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109,
1–15, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004600, 2004. a
Measures, R. M.: Laser Remote Sensing: Fundamentals and Applications, reprint
ed edn., edited by: Wiley, J., Krieger publishing compagny, Malabar, Florida,
1992. a
Miesch, C., Poutier, L., Achard, V., Briottet, X., Lenot, X., and Boucher, Y.:
Direct and inverse radiative transfer solutions for visible and
near-infrared hyperspectral imagery, IEEE T. Geosci.
Remote, 43, 1552–1562, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2005.847793, 2005. a
Mishchenko, M. I., Dlugach, J. M., Yanovitskij, E. G., and Zakharova, N. T.:
Bidirectional reflectance of flat, optically thick particulate layers: an
efficient radiative transfer solution and applications to snow and soil
surfaces, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 63,
409–432, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4073(99)00028-X, 1999. a
Nicodemus, F. E.: Directional Reflectance and Emissivity of an Opaque
Surface, Appl. Optics, 4, 767–775, https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.4.000767, 1965. a
O'Connor, E. J., Illingworth, A. J., and Hogan, R. J.: A Technique for
Autocalibration of Cloud Lidar, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 21, 777–786, 2004. a
Painemal, D., Clayton, M., Ferrare, R., Burton, S., Josset, D., and Vaughan, M.: Novel aerosol extinction coefficients and lidar ratios over the ocean from CALIPSO–CloudSat: evaluation and global statistics, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 2201–2217, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-2201-2019, 2019. a
Paschotta, R.: Field Guide to Laser Pulse Generation, vol. FG14, SPIE.,
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1965.tb20241.x, 2008. a
Pedrós, R., Estellés, V., Sicard, M., Gómez-Amo, J. L.,
Utrillas, M. P., Martínez-Lozano, J. A., Rocadenbosch, F., Pérez,
C., and Recio Baldasano, J. M.: Climatology of the aerosol
extinction-to-backscatter ratio from sun-photometric measurements, IEEE
T. Geosci. Remote, 48, 237–249,
https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2009.2027699, 2010. a
Popovicheva, O. B., Engling, G., Ku, I.-T., Timofeev, M. A., and Shonija,
N. K.: Aerosol Emissions from Long-Lasting Smoldering of Boreal Peatlands:
Chemical Composition, Markers, and Microstructure, Aerosol Air Qual.
Res., 2, 213–218, https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2018.08.0302, 2019. a
Poutier, L., Miesch, C., Lenot, X., Achard, V., and Boucher, Y.: COMANCHE and
COCHISE: two reciprocal atmospheric codes for hyperspectral remote sensing,
Tech. rep.,
available at: http://wwwe.onecert.fr/pirrene/references_docs/poutier_et_al_AVIRIS_2002.pdf (last access: 4 April 2020),
2002. a
Rocadenbosch, F., Frasier, S., Kumar, D., Lange Vega, D., Gregorio, E., and
Sicard, M.: Backscatter error bounds for the elastic lidar two-component
inversion algorithm, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 50,
4791–4803, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2012.2194501, 2012. a
Sasano, Y., Browell, E. V., and Ismail, S.: Error caused by using a constant
extinction/backscattering ratio in the lidar solution, Appl. Optics, 24,
3929, https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.24.003929, 1985. a
Sicard, M., Chazette, P., Pelon, J., Won, J., and Yoon, S.-C.: Variational
method for the retrieval of the optical thickness and the backscatter
coefficient from multiangle lidar profiles, Appl. Optics, 41, 493–502,
https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.41.000493, 2002. a, b
Simoneau, P., Berton, R., Caillault, K., Durand, G., Huet, T., Labarre, L.,
Malherbe, C., Miesch, C., Roblin, A., and Rosier, B.: MATISSE: advanced
Earth modeling for imaging and scene simulation, in: Proceedings of SPIE,
edited by: Kohnle, A., Gonglewski, J. D., and Schmugge, T. J., 4538,
39, https://doi.org/10.1117/12.454410, 2002. a
SphereOptic: Diffusers, Zenith Polymer, Foil, nearly ideal Lambertian
SphereOptics EN,
available at: https://sphereoptics.de/en/product/zenith-polymer-diffusers/?c=79, last access: 4 April 2020. a
Stelmaszczyk, K., Dell'Aglio, M., Chudzyński, S., Stacewicz, T., and
Wöste, L.: Analytical function for lidar geometrical compression
form-factor calculations, Appl. Optics, 44, 1323,
https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.44.001323, 2005. a
Sun, X.: Lidar Sensors From Space, Elsevier,
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-409548-9.10327-6, 2018. a
Swinehart, D.: The Beer-Lambert law, J. Chem. Educ., 39, 335–335,
https://doi.org/10.1021/ed039p333, 1962. a
Vande Hey, J., Coupland, J., Foo, M. H., Richards, J., and Sandford, A.:
Determination of overlap in lidar systems, Appl. Optics, 50, 5791,
https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.50.005791, 2011.
a
Vande Hey, J. D.: Theory of Lidar, Springer International Publishing, 23–41,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12613-5_2, 2014. a, b, c
Vargas-Ubera, J., Aguilar, J. F., and Gale, D. M.: Reconstruction of
particle-size distributions from light-scattering patterns using three
inversion methods, Appl. Optics, 46, 124–132, https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.46.000124,
2007. a
Wandinger, U. and Ansmann, A.: Experimental determination of the lidar overlap
profile with Raman lidar, Appl. Optics, 41, 511–514,
https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.41.000511, 2002. a
Young, S. A.: Analysis of lidar backscatter profiles in optically thin clouds,
Appl. Opt., 34, 7019–7031, https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.34.007019,
1995. a
Zhang, J., Wei, E., Wu, L., Fang, X., Li, F., Yang, Z., Wang, T., and Mao, H.:
Elemental Composition and Health Risk Assessment of PM10 and PM2.5 in the
Roadside Microenvironment in Tianjin, China, Aerosol Air Qual.
Res., 18, 1817–1827, https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2017.10.0383, 2018. a
Short summary
A new elastic lidar inversion equation is presented. It is based on the backscattering signal from a surface reference target rather than that from a volumetric layer of reference as is usually done. The method presented can be used in the case of airborne elastic lidar measurements or when the lidar–target line is horizontal. Also, a new algorithm is described to retrieve the lidar ratio and the backscattering coefficient of an aerosol plume without any a priori assumptions about the plume.
A new elastic lidar inversion equation is presented. It is based on the backscattering signal...
