Articles | Volume 13, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1921-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1921-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
16 Apr 2020
Research article |
| 16 Apr 2020
| 16 Apr 2020
A new lidar inversion method using a surface reference target applied to the backscattering coefficient and lidar ratio retrievals of a fog-oil plume at short range
Florian Gaudfrin
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
ONERA, DOTA, Université de Toulouse, 31055 Toulouse, France
Univ. Lille, UMR 8518 - LOA - Laboratoire d'Optique Atmosphérique, 59000 Lille, France
LEUKOS SARL, 37 Rue Henri Giffard, 87280 Limoges, France
Olivier Pujol
Univ. Lille, UMR 8518 - LOA - Laboratoire d'Optique Atmosphérique, 59000 Lille, France
Romain Ceolato
ONERA, DOTA, Université de Toulouse, 31055 Toulouse, France
Guillaume Huss
LEUKOS SARL, 37 Rue Henri Giffard, 87280 Limoges, France
Nicolas Riviere
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
ONERA, DOTA, Université de Toulouse, 31055 Toulouse, France
Related authors
No articles found.
Romain Ceolato, Andres Bedoya-Velásquez, Gerald Lemineur, Pierrick Loyers, Charles Renard, Katharina Seeliger, Louise Ganeau, Alaric Vandestoc, Ismael Ortega, Mark Johnson, and David Delhaye
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2612, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2612, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (AMT).
Short summary
Short summary
We developed a new way to measure ultrafine particles released by aircraft engines using an aerosol lidar sensor. This method allows us to quickly check emissions from a distance, without needing to collect samples directly from the engines. Our results show that this approach works well and could help airports and regulators better monitor air quality and reduce the environmental impact of aviation.
África Barreto, Francisco Quirós, Omaira E. García, Jorge Pereda-de-Pablo, Daniel González-Fernández, Andrés Bedoya-Velásquez, Michael Sicard, Carmen Córdoba-Jabonero, Marco Iarlori, Vincenzo Rizi, Nickolay Krotkov, Simon Carn, Reijo Roininen, Antonio J. Molina-Arias, A. Fernando Almansa, Óscar Álvarez-Losada, Carla Aramo, Juan José Bustos, Romain Ceolato, Adolfo Comerón, Alicia Felpeto, Rosa D. García, Pablo González-Sicilia, Yenny González, Pascal Hedelt, Miguel Hernández, María-Ángeles López-Cayuela, Diego Loyola, Stavros Meletlidis, Constantino Muñoz-Porcar, Ermanno Pietropaolo, Ramón Ramos, Alejandro Rodríguez-Gómez, Roberto Román, Pedro M. Romero-Campos, Martin Stuefer, Carlos Toledano, and Elsworth Welton
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3164, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3164, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (AMT).
Short summary
Short summary
This manuscript describes the instrumental coverage deployed during the Tajogaite eruption (19 September–25 December 2021) by the Instituto Geográfico Nacional (IGN), the Spanish State Meteorological Agency (AEMET), and other Spanish members of ACTRIS (Aerosol, Clouds and Trace Gases Research Infrastructure) to monitor its atmospheric impact. Two complementary methods provide consistent plume height data for future operational surveillance.
Anna Gialitaki, Alexandra Tsekeri, Vassilis Amiridis, Romain Ceolato, Lucas Paulien, Anna Kampouri, Antonis Gkikas, Stavros Solomos, Eleni Marinou, Moritz Haarig, Holger Baars, Albert Ansmann, Tatyana Lapyonok, Anton Lopatin, Oleg Dubovik, Silke Groß, Martin Wirth, Maria Tsichla, Ioanna Tsikoudi, and Dimitris Balis
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 14005–14021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-14005-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-14005-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Stratospheric smoke particles are found to significantly depolarize incident light, while this effect is also accompanied by a strong spectral dependence. We utilize scattering simulations to show that this behaviour can be attributed to the near-spherical shape of the particles. We also examine whether an extension of the current AERONET scattering model to include the near-spherical shapes could be of benefit to the AERONET retrieval for stratospheric smoke associated with enhanced PLDR.
Y. Boucher, A. Amiez, P. Barillot, C. Chatelard, C. Coudrain, P. Déliot, N. Rivière, T. Rivière, and L. Roupioz
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-1, 65–70, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-1-65-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-1-65-2018, 2018
Related subject area
Subject: Aerosols | Technique: Remote Sensing | Topic: Data Processing and Information Retrieval
Producing aerosol size distributions consistent with optical particle counter measurements using space-based measurements of aerosol extinction coefficient
Star photometry with all-sky cameras to retrieve aerosol optical depth at nighttime
Improvements in aerosol layer height retrievals from TROPOMI oxygen A-band measurements by surface albedo fitting in optimal estimation
Using neural networks for near-real-time aerosol retrievals from OMPS Limb Profiler measurements
Retrieval algorithm for aerosol effective height from the Geostationary Environment Monitoring Spectrometer (GEMS)
ACDL/DQ-1 calibration algorithms – Part 1: Nighttime 532 nm polarization and the high-spectral-resolution channel
Aerosol composition retrieval from a combination of three different spaceborne instruments: information content analysis
Retrieval of Black Carbon Aerosol Surface Concentration Using Integrated MODIS and AERONET Data
Compact dual-wavelength depolarization lidar for aerosol characterization over the subtropical North Atlantic
Towards gridded nighttime aerosol optical thickness retrievals using VIIRS day–night band observations over regions with artificial light sources
Ångström exponent impact on the aerosol optical properties obtained from vibrational-rotational Raman lidar observations
Towards improved retrieval of aerosol properties with the new Meteosat Third Generation-Imager geostationary satellite
Multi-layer retrieval of aerosol optical depth in the troposphere using SEVIRI data: a case study of the European continent
Machine learning data fusion for high spatio-temporal resolution PM2.5
Ground-based contrail observations: comparisons with reanalysis weather data and contrail model simulations
Retrieval of stratospheric aerosol extinction coefficients from sun-normalized Ozone Mapper and Profiler Suite Limb Profiler (OMPS-LP) measurements
Total column optical depths retrieved from CALIPSO lidar ocean surface backscatter
ALICENET – an Italian network of automated lidar ceilometers for four-dimensional aerosol monitoring: infrastructure, data processing, and applications
Post-process correction improves the accuracy of satellite PM2.5 retrievals
Increasing aerosol optical depth spatial and temporal availability by merging datasets from geostationary and sun-synchronous satellites
Synergy of active and passive airborne observations for heating rates calculation during the AEROCLO-SA field campaign in Namibia
Multi-angle aerosol optical depth retrieval method based on improved surface reflectance
Comparison of diurnal aerosol products retrieved from combinations of micro-pulse lidar and sun photometer observations over the KAUST observation site
First atmospheric aerosol-monitoring results from the Geostationary Environment Monitoring Spectrometer (GEMS) over Asia
Aerosol optical depth data fusion with Geostationary Korea Multi-Purpose Satellite (GEO-KOMPSAT-2) instruments GEMS, AMI, and GOCI-II: statistical and deep neural network methods
Stratospheric aerosol characteristics from SCIAMACHY limb observations: two-parameter retrieval
Retrieval and analysis of the composition of an aerosol mixture through Mie–Raman–fluorescence lidar observations
Transport of the Hunga volcanic aerosols inferred from Himawari-8/9 limb measurements
A near-global multiyear climate data record of the fine-mode and coarse-mode components of atmospheric pure dust
Innovative aerosol hygroscopic growth study from Mie–Raman–fluorescence lidar and microwave radiometer synergy
Evaluation of calibration performance of a low-cost particulate matter sensor using collocated and distant NO2
Geostationary aerosol retrievals of extreme biomass burning plumes during the 2019–2020 Australian bushfires
Multi-wavelength dataset of aerosol extinction profiles retrieved from GOMOS stellar occultation measurements
Deep-Pathfinder: a boundary layer height detection algorithm based on image segmentation
An iterative algorithm to simultaneously retrieve aerosol extinction and effective radius profiles using CALIOP
Cloud detection from multi-angular polarimetric satellite measurements using a neural network ensemble approach
Retrieving UV–Vis spectral single-scattering albedo of absorbing aerosols above clouds from synergy of ORACLES airborne and A-train sensors
Characterization of stratospheric particle size distribution uncertainties using SAGE II and SAGE III/ISS extinction spectra
Parameterizing spectral surface reflectance relationships for the Dark Target aerosol algorithm applied to a geostationary imager
Aerosol and cloud data processing and optical property retrieval algorithms for the spaceborne ACDL/DQ-1
Derivation of depolarization ratios of aerosol fluorescence and water vapor Raman backscatters from lidar measurements
Long-term aerosol particle depolarization ratio measurements with HALO Photonics Doppler lidar
HETEAC-Flex: an optimal estimation method for aerosol typing based on lidar-derived intensive optical properties
MAGARA: a Multi-Angle Geostationary Aerosol Retrieval Algorithm
Multi-section reference value for the analysis of horizontally scanning aerosol lidar observations
Retrieval of aerosol optical depth over the Arctic cryosphere during spring and summer using satellite observations
Quantifying particulate matter optical properties and flow rate in industrial stack plumes from the PRISMA hyperspectral imager
Aerosol retrieval over snow using the RemoTAP algorithm
Combined sun-photometer–lidar inversion: lessons learned during the EARLINET/ACTRIS COVID-19 campaign
Simultaneous retrieval of aerosol and ocean properties from PACE HARP2 with uncertainty assessment using cascading neural network radiative transfer models
Nicholas Ernest, Larry W. Thomason, and Terry Deshler
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 2957–2968, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-2957-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-2957-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We use balloon-borne measurements of aerosol size distribution (ASD) made by the University of Wyoming (UW) to derive distributions which are representative of the ASDs that underlie measurements made by the Stratospheric Aerosol and Gas Experiment II (SAGE II). A simple single-mode log-normal distribution has in the past been used to derive ASD from SAGE II data; here we derive bimodal log-normal distributions, reproducing median aerosol properties measured by UW.
Roberto Román, Daniel González-Fernández, Juan Carlos Antuña-Sánchez, Celia Herrero del Barrio, Sara Herrero-Anta, África Barreto, Victoria E. Cachorro, Lionel Doppler, Ramiro González, Christoph Ritter, David Mateos, Natalia Kouremeti, Gustavo Copes, Abel Calle, María José Granados-Muñoz, Carlos Toledano, and Ángel M. de Frutos
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 2847–2875, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-2847-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-2847-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents a novel technique to extract starlight signals from all-sky images and retrieve aerosol optical depth (AOD). It is validated against lunar photometry, showing a strong correlation between data series. This innovative approach will expand nocturnal AOD measurements to more locations, as all-sky cameras are a simpler and more cost-effective alternative to stellar and lunar photometers.
Martin de Graaf, Maarten Sneep, Mark ter Linden, L. Gijsbert Tilstra, David P. Donovan, Gerd-Jan van Zadelhoff, and J. Pepijn Veefkind
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 2553–2571, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-2553-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-2553-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The aerosol layer height (ALH) from the TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI) has been constantly improved since its release in 2019. Over bright surfaces, fitting the albedo improved the retrieval, as shown for a set of situations, ranging from multiple layers of smoke to thick desert dust plumes and low-altitude industrial pollution. The latest results of the operational ALH are compared to profiles from the ATmospheric LIDar (ATLID) on board the recently launched EarthCARE mission.
Michael D. Himes, Ghassan Taha, Daniel Kahn, Tong Zhu, and Natalya A. Kramarova
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 2523–2536, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-2523-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-2523-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The Ozone Mapping and Profiler Suite's Limb Profiler (OMPS LP) yields near-global coverage and information about how aerosols from volcanic eruptions and major wildfires is vertically distributed through the atmosphere. We developed a machine learning method to characterize aerosols using OMPS LP measurements about 60 times faster than the current approach.
Sang Seo Park, Jhoon Kim, Yeseul Cho, Hanlim Lee, Junsung Park, Dong-Won Lee, Won-Jin Lee, and Deok-Rae Kim
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 2241–2259, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-2241-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-2241-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
An operational aerosol effective height (AEH) retrieval algorithm for the Geostationary Environment Monitoring Spectrometer (GEMS) was developed that solely uses the O2–O2 absorption band considering aerosol and surface properties. AEH retrievals are only performed when aerosol optical depth is larger than 0.3. The retrieval results show significant estimations by comparing the aerosol height from the Cloud–Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization and the Tropospheric Monitoring Instrument.
Fanqian Meng, Junwu Tang, Guangyao Dai, Wenrui Long, Kangwen Sun, Zhiyu Zhang, Xiaoquan Song, Jiqiao Liu, Weibiao Chen, and Songhua Wu
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 2021–2039, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-2021-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-2021-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents a comprehensive calibration procedure for the first spaceborne high-spectral-resolution lidar with an iodine vapor absorption filter Aerosol and Carbon Detection Lidar (ACDL) on board DQ-1 by utilizing nighttime 532 nm multi-channel data. We analyzed the error sources of the multi-channel calibration coefficients and assessed the results. The results indicate that the uncertainty of the clear-air scattering ratio was within the anticipated range of 7.9 %.
Ulrike Stöffelmair, Thomas Popp, Marco Vountas, and Hartmut Bösch
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 2005–2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-2005-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-2005-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Aerosol composition has a large influence on the climate system. This study uses realistic simulated scenarios to look at the information content of a combination of three satellite-based instruments (SLSTR, IASI and GOME-2). It shows that it is possible to retrieve 6 to 15 different aerosol components in addition to the aerosol optical depth (AOD) and different surface parameters. The results are used for the development of a synergistic multi-sensor retrieval algorithm.
Xingxing Jiang, Yong Xue, Mariarosaria Calvello, Shuhui Wu, and Pei Li
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-435, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-435, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
A novel BC surface concentration retrieval algorithm was developed based on MODIS data. The algorithm determined the seasonal background aerosol model based on AERONET V3 daily product, calculated the complex refractive index of the internal mixed aerosol, and combined 6SV2.1 to establish lookup tables to achieve the optimal estimation of BC fraction and column concentration. Using conversion coefficient generated by MERRA-2, column concentration was converted to surface concentration.
Yenny González, María F. Sánchez-Barrero, Ioana Popovici, África Barreto, Stephane Victori, Ellsworth J. Welton, Rosa D. García, Pablo G. Sicilia, Fernando A. Almansa, Carlos Torres, and Philippe Goloub
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 1885–1908, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1885-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1885-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We characterize the optical properties of various aerosols using a compact dual-wavelength depolarization lidar (CIMEL CE376) at 532 and 808 nm. Through a modified two-wavelength Klett inversion method, we assess the vertical distribution and temporal evolution of Saharan dust, volcanic aerosols and wildfire smoke in the subtropical North Atlantic from August 2021 to August 2023. The study confirms the CE376 lidar's effectiveness in monitoring and characterizing atmospheric aerosols over time.
Jianglong Zhang, Jeffrey S. Reid, Blake T. Sorenson, Steven D. Miller, Miguel O. Román, Zhuosen Wang, Robert J. D. Spurr, Shawn Jaker, Thomas F. Eck, and Juli I. Rubin
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 1787–1810, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1787-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1787-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Using observations from the Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite day–night band, we developed a method for constructing gridded nighttime aerosol optical thickness (AOT) data based on the spatial derivative of measured top-of-atmosphere attenuated upwelling artificial lights at night. The gridded nighttime AOT retrievals, compared against Aerosol Robotic Network data, show reasonable skill levels for potential data assimilation, air quality, and climate studies of significant events.
Gladiola Malollari, Albert Ansmann, Holger Baars, Cristofer Jimenez, Julian Hofer, Ronny Engelmann, Nathan Skupin, and Seit Shallari
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1386, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1386, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study presents, for the first time, the uncertainty analysis of the Ångström exponent assumption on the full set of retrievable optical properties obtained with Raman lidar. A quantitative comparison between the pure rotational and vibrational-rotational Raman lidar approaches is presented. A minor impact of a wrong Ångström exponent on the determined aerosol optical properties is found.
Adèle Georgeot, Xavier Ceamanos, Jean-Luc Attié, Daniel Juncu, Josef Gasteiger, and Mathieu Compiègne
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1353, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1353, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This work investigates the aerosol remote sensing capabilities offered by the new Meteosat Third Generation-Imager geostationary satellite. First, aerosol load retrieval performance is demonstrated based on realistic synthetic data. Second, the potential for aerosol type characterization is proven, with the estimation of fine mode fraction. This work opens pathways for the future study of diurnal aerosol variations from space thanks to the high temporal resolution of geostationary satellites.
Maryam Pashayi, Mehran Satari, and Mehdi Momeni Shahraki
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 1415–1439, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1415-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1415-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Multi-layer aerosol optical depth (AOD) is retrieved using the geostationary Spinning Enhanced Visible and Infrared Imager (SEVIRI) and machine learning, trained on Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization (CALIOP) data. The model provides AOD at a 3 km × 3 km spatial and 15 min temporal resolution over Europe. It accurately captured multi-layer AOD dynamics during Saharan dust transport and the Mount Etna eruption, demonstrating consistent physical accuracy.
Andrea Porcheddu, Ville Kolehmainen, Timo Lähivaara, and Antti Lipponen
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-4056, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-4056, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study proposes a novel machine learning method to estimate pollution levels (PM2.5) on urban areas at fine scale. Our model generates hourly PM2.5 maps with high spatial resolution (100 meters), by combining satellite data, ground measurements, geophysical model data, and different geographical indicators. The model properly accounts for spatial and temporal variability of the urban pollution levels, offering relevant insights for air quality monitoring and health protection.
Jade Low, Roger Teoh, Joel Ponsonby, Edward Gryspeerdt, Marc Shapiro, and Marc E. J. Stettler
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 37–56, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-37-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-37-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The radiative forcing due to contrails is of the same order of magnitude as aviation CO2 emissions but has a higher uncertainty. Observations are vital to improve our understanding of the contrail lifecycle, improve models, and measure the effect of mitigation action. Here, we use ground-based cameras combined with flight telemetry to track visible contrails and measure their lifetime and width. We evaluate model predictions and demonstrate the capability of this approach.
Alexei Rozanov, Christine Pohl, Carlo Arosio, Adam Bourassa, Klaus Bramstedt, Elizaveta Malinina, Landon Rieger, and John P. Burrows
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 6677–6695, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6677-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6677-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We developed a new algorithm to retrieve vertical distributions of aerosol extinction coefficients in the stratosphere. The algorithm is applied to measurements of scattered solar light from the spaceborne OMPS-LP (Ozone Mapper and Profiler Suite Limb Profiler) instrument. The retrieval results are compared to data from other spaceborne instruments and used to investigate the evolution of the aerosol plume following the eruption of the Hunga Tonga–Hunga Ha'apai volcano in January 2022.
Robert A. Ryan, Mark A. Vaughan, Sharon D. Rodier, Jason L. Tackett, John A. Reagan, Richard A. Ferrare, Johnathan W. Hair, John A. Smith, and Brian J. Getzewich
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 6517–6545, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6517-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6517-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We introduce Ocean Derived Column Optical Depth (ODCOD), a new way to estimate column optical depths using Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization (CALIOP) measurements from the ocean surface. ODCOD estimates include contributions from particulates in the full column, which CALIOP estimates do not, making it a complement measurement to CALIOP’s standard estimates. We find that ODCOD compares well with other established data sets in the daytime but tends to estimate higher at night.
Annachiara Bellini, Henri Diémoz, Luca Di Liberto, Gian Paolo Gobbi, Alessandro Bracci, Ferdinando Pasqualini, and Francesca Barnaba
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 6119–6144, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6119-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6119-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We provide a comprehensive overview of the Italian Automated LIdar-CEilometer network, ALICENET, describing its infrastructure, aerosol retrievals, and main applications. The supplement covers data-processing details. We include examples of output products, comparisons with independent data, and examples of the network capability to provide near-real-time aerosol fields over Italy. ALICENET is expected to benefit the sectors of air quality, radiative budget/solar energy, and aviation safety.
Andrea Porcheddu, Ville Kolehmainen, Timo Lähivaara, and Antti Lipponen
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 5747–5764, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5747-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5747-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This study focuses on improving the accuracy of satellite-based PM2.5 retrieval, crucial for monitoring air quality and its impact on health. It employs machine learning to correct the AOD-to-PM2.5 conversion ratio using various data sources. The approach produces high-resolution PM2.5 estimates with improved accuracy. The method is flexible and can incorporate additional training data from different sources, making it a valuable tool for air quality monitoring and epidemiological studies.
Pawan Gupta, Robert C. Levy, Shana Mattoo, Lorraine A. Remer, Zhaohui Zhang, Virginia Sawyer, Jennifer Wei, Sally Zhao, Min Oo, V. Praju Kiliyanpilakkil, and Xiaohua Pan
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 5455–5476, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5455-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5455-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, for the first time, we combined aerosol data from six satellites using a unified algorithm. The global datasets are generated at a high spatial resolution of about 25 km with an interval of 30 min. The new datasets are compared against ground truth and verified. They will be useful for various applications such as air quality monitoring, climate research, pollution diurnal variability, long-range smoke and dust transport, and evaluation of regional and global models.
Mégane Ventura, Fabien Waquet, Isabelle Chiapello, Gérard Brogniez, Frédéric Parol, Frédérique Auriol, Rodrigue Loisil, Cyril Delegove, Luc Blarel, Oleg Dubovik, Marc Mallet, Cyrille Flamant, and Paola Formenti
Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2024-121, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2024-121, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for AMT
Short summary
Short summary
Biomass burning aerosols (BBA) from Central Africa, are transported above stratocumulus clouds. The absorption of solar energy by aerosols induce warming, altering the clouds dynamics. We developed an approach that combines polarimeter and lidar to quantify it. This methodology is assessed during the AEROCLO-SA campaign. To validate it, we used flux measurements acquired during aircraft loop descents. Major perspective is the generalization of this method to the global level.
Lijuan Chen, Ren Wang, Ying Fei, Peng Fang, Yong Zha, and Haishan Chen
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 4411–4424, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4411-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4411-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This study explores the problems of surface reflectance estimation from previous MISR satellite remote sensing images and develops an error correction model to obtain a higher-precision aerosol optical depth (AOD) product. High-accuracy AOD is important not only for the daily monitoring of air pollution but also for the study of energy exchange between land and atmosphere. This will help further improve the retrieval accuracy of multi-angle AOD on large spatial scales and for long time series.
Anton Lopatin, Oleg Dubovik, Georgiy Stenchikov, Ellsworth J. Welton, Illia Shevchenko, David Fuertes, Marcos Herreras-Giralda, Tatsiana Lapyonok, and Alexander Smirnov
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 4445–4470, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4445-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4445-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We compare aerosol properties over the King Abdullah University of Science and Technology campus using Generalized Retrieval of Aerosol and Surface Properties (GRASP) and the Micro-Pulse Lidar Network (MPLNET). We focus on the impact of different aerosol retrieval assumptions on daytime and nighttime retrievals and analyze seasonal variability in aerosol properties, aiding in understanding aerosol behavior and improving retrieval. Our work has implications for climate and public health.
Yeseul Cho, Jhoon Kim, Sujung Go, Mijin Kim, Seoyoung Lee, Minseok Kim, Heesung Chong, Won-Jin Lee, Dong-Won Lee, Omar Torres, and Sang Seo Park
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 4369–4390, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4369-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4369-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Aerosol optical properties have been provided by the Geostationary Environment Monitoring Spectrometer (GEMS), the world’s first geostationary-Earth-orbit (GEO) satellite instrument designed for atmospheric environmental monitoring. This study describes improvements made to the GEMS aerosol retrieval algorithm (AERAOD) and presents its validation results. These enhancements aim to provide more accurate and reliable aerosol-monitoring results for Asia.
Minseok Kim, Jhoon Kim, Hyunkwang Lim, Seoyoung Lee, Yeseul Cho, Yun-Gon Lee, Sujung Go, and Kyunghwa Lee
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 4317–4335, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4317-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4317-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Information about aerosol loading in the atmosphere can be collected from various satellite instruments. Aerosol products from various satellite instruments have their own error characteristics. This study statistically merged aerosol optical depth datasets from multiple instruments aboard geostationary satellites considering uncertainties. Also, a deep neural network technique is adopted for aerosol data merging.
Christine Pohl, Felix Wrana, Alexei Rozanov, Terry Deshler, Elizaveta Malinina, Christian von Savigny, Landon A. Rieger, Adam E. Bourassa, and John P. Burrows
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 4153–4181, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4153-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4153-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Knowledge of stratospheric aerosol characteristics is important for understanding chemical and climate aerosol feedbacks. Two particle size distribution parameters, the aerosol extinction coefficient and the effective radius, are obtained from SCIAMACHY limb observations. The aerosol characteristics show good agreement with independent data sets from balloon-borne and satellite observations. This data set expands the limited knowledge of stratospheric aerosol characteristics.
Igor Veselovskii, Boris Barchunov, Qiaoyun Hu, Philippe Goloub, Thierry Podvin, Mikhail Korenskii, Gaël Dubois, William Boissiere, and Nikita Kasianik
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 4137–4152, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4137-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4137-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The paper presents a new method that categorizes atmospheric aerosols by analyzing their optical properties with a Mie–Raman–fluorescence lidar. The research specifically looks into understanding the presence of smoke, urban, and dust aerosols in the mixtures identified by this lidar. The reliability of the results is evaluated using the Monte Carlo technique. The effectiveness of this approach is successfully demonstrated through testing in ATOLL, an observatory influenced by diverse aerosols.
Fred Prata
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3751–3764, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3751-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3751-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Geostationary satellite data have been used to measure the stratospheric aerosols from the explosive Hunga volcanic eruption by using the data in a novel way. The onboard imager views part of the Earth's limb and data from this region were analysed to generate vertical cross-sections of aerosols high in the atmosphere. The analyses show the hemispheric spread of the aerosols and their vertical structure in layers from 22–28 km in the stratosphere.
Emmanouil Proestakis, Antonis Gkikas, Thanasis Georgiou, Anna Kampouri, Eleni Drakaki, Claire L. Ryder, Franco Marenco, Eleni Marinou, and Vassilis Amiridis
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3625–3667, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3625-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3625-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
A new four-dimensional, multiyear, and near-global climate data record of the fine-mode (submicrometer diameter) and coarse-mode (supermicrometer diameter) components of atmospheric pure dust is presented. The dataset is considered unique with respect to a wide range of potential applications, including climatological, time series, and trend analysis over extensive geographical domains and temporal periods, validation of atmospheric dust models and datasets, and air quality.
Robin Miri, Olivier Pujol, Qiaoyun Hu, Philippe Goloub, Igor Veselovskii, Thierry Podvin, and Fabrice Ducos
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3367–3375, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3367-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3367-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This paper focuses on the use of fluorescence to study aerosols with lidar. An innovative method for aerosol hygroscopic growth study using fluorescence is presented. The paper presents case studies to showcase the effectiveness and potential of the proposed approach. These advancements will contribute to better understanding the interactions between aerosols and water vapor, with future work expected to be dedicated to aerosol–cloud interaction.
Kabseok Ko, Seokheon Cho, and Ramesh R. Rao
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3303–3322, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3303-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3303-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
In our study, we examined how NO2, temperature, and relative humidity influence the calibration of PurpleAir PA-II sensors. We found that incorporating NO2 data from collocated reliable instruments enhances PM2.5 calibration performance. Due to the impracticality of collocating reliable NO2 instruments with sensors, we suggest using distant NO2 data for calibration. We demonstrated that performance improves when distant NO2 correlates highly with collocated NO2 measurements.
Daniel J. V. Robbins, Caroline A. Poulsen, Steven T. Siems, Simon R. Proud, Andrew T. Prata, Roy G. Grainger, and Adam C. Povey
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3279–3302, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3279-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3279-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Extreme wildfire events are becoming more common with climate change. The smoke plumes associated with these wildfires are not captured by current operational satellite products due to their high optical thickness. We have developed a novel aerosol retrieval for the Advanced Himawari Imager to study these plumes. We find very high values of optical thickness not observed in other operational satellite products, suggesting these plumes have been missed in previous studies.
Viktoria F. Sofieva, Monika Szelag, Johanna Tamminen, Didier Fussen, Christine Bingen, Filip Vanhellemont, Nina Mateshvili, Alexei Rozanov, and Christine Pohl
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3085–3101, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3085-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3085-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We have developed the new multi-wavelength dataset of aerosol extinction profiles, which are retrieved from the averaged transmittance spectra by the Global Ozone Monitoring by Occultation of Stars instrument aboard Envisat. The retrieved aerosol extinction profiles are provided in the altitude range 10–40 km at 400, 440, 452, 470, 500, 525, 550, 672 and 750 nm for the period 2002–2012. FMI-GOMOSaero aerosol profiles have improved quality; they are in good agreement with other datasets.
Jasper S. Wijnands, Arnoud Apituley, Diego Alves Gouveia, and Jan Willem Noteboom
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3029–3045, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3029-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3029-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The mixing of air in the lower atmosphere influences the concentration of air pollutants and greenhouse gases. Our study developed a new method, Deep-Pathfinder, to estimate mixing layer height. Deep-Pathfinder analyses imagery with aerosol observations using artificial intelligence techniques for computer vision. Compared to existing methods, it improves temporal consistency and resolution and can be used in real time, which is valuable for aviation, forecasting, and air quality monitoring.
Liang Chang, Jing Li, Jingjing Ren, Changrui Xiong, and Lu Zhang
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 2637–2648, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2637-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2637-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We described a modified lidar inversion algorithm to retrieve aerosol extinction and size distribution simultaneously from two-wavelength elastic lidar measurements. Its major advantage is that the lidar ratio of each layer is determined iteratively by a lidar ratio–Ångström exponent lookup table. The algorithm was applied to the Raman lidar and CALIOP measurements. The retrieved results by our method are in good agreement with those achieved by Raman method.
Zihao Yuan, Guangliang Fu, Bastiaan van Diedenhoven, Hai Xiang Lin, Jan Willem Erisman, and Otto P. Hasekamp
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 2595–2610, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2595-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2595-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Currently, aerosol properties from spaceborne multi-angle polarimeter (MAP) instruments can only be retrieved in cloud-free areas or in areas where an aerosol layer is located above a cloud. Therefore, it is important to be able to identify cloud-free pixels for which an aerosol retrieval algorithm can provide meaningful output. The developed neural network cloud screening demonstrates that cloud masking for MAP aerosol retrieval can be based on the MAP measurements themselves.
Hiren T. Jethva, Omar Torres, Richard A. Ferrare, Sharon P. Burton, Anthony L. Cook, David B. Harper, Chris A. Hostetler, Jens Redemann, Vinay Kayetha, Samuel LeBlanc, Kristina Pistone, Logan Mitchell, and Connor J. Flynn
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 2335–2366, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2335-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2335-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We introduce a novel synergy algorithm applied to ORALCES airborne measurements of above-cloud aerosol optical depth and UV–Vis satellite observations from OMI and MODIS to retrieve spectral aerosol single-scattering albedo of lofted layers of carbonaceous smoke aerosols over clouds. The development of the proposed aerosol–cloud algorithm implies a possible synergy of CALIOP and OMI–MODIS passive sensors to deduce a global product of AOD and SSA of absorbing aerosols above clouds.
Travis N. Knepp, Mahesh Kovilakam, Larry Thomason, and Stephen J. Miller
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 2025–2054, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2025-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2025-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
An algorithm is presented to derive a new SAGE III/ISS (Stratospheric Aerosol and Gas Experiment III on the International Space Station) Level-2 product: the size distribution of stratospheric particles. This is a significant improvement over previous techniques in that we now provide uncertainty estimates for all inferred parameters. We also evaluated the stability of this method in retrieving bimodal distribution parameters. We present a special application to the 2022 eruption of Hunga Tonga.
Mijin Kim, Robert C. Levy, Lorraine A. Remer, Shana Mattoo, and Pawan Gupta
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 1913–1939, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1913-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1913-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The study focused on evaluating and modifying the surface reflectance parameterization (SRP) of the Dark Target (DT) algorithm for geostationary observation. When using the DT SRP with the ABIs sensor on GOES-R, artificial diurnal signatures were present in AOD retrieval. To overcome this issue, a new SRP was developed, incorporating solar zenith angle and land cover type. The revised SRP resulted in improved AOD retrieval, demonstrating reduced bias around local noon.
Guangyao Dai, Songhua Wu, Wenrui Long, Jiqiao Liu, Yuan Xie, Kangwen Sun, Fanqian Meng, Xiaoquan Song, Zhongwei Huang, and Weibiao Chen
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 1879–1890, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1879-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1879-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
An overview is given of the main algorithms applied to derive the aerosol and cloud optical property product of the Aerosol and Carbon Detection Lidar (ACDL), which is capable of globally profiling aerosol and cloud optical properties with high accuracy. The paper demonstrates the observational capabilities of ACDL for aerosol and cloud vertical structure and global distribution through two optical property product measurement cases and global aerosol optical depth profile observations.
Igor Veselovskii, Qiaoyun Hu, Philippe Goloub, Thierry Podvin, William Boissiere, Mikhail Korenskiy, Nikita Kasianik, Sergey Khaykyn, and Robin Miri
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 1023–1036, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1023-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1023-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Measurements of transported smoke layers were performed with a lidar in Lille and a five-channel fluorescence lidar in Moscow. Results show the peak of fluorescence in the boundary layer is at 438 nm, while in the smoke layer it shifts to longer wavelengths. The fluorescence depolarization is 45 % to 55 %. The depolarization ratio of the water vapor channel is low (2 ± 0.5 %) in the absence of fluorescence and can be used to evaluate the contribution of fluorescence to water vapor signal.
Viet Le, Hannah Lobo, Ewan J. O'Connor, and Ville Vakkari
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 921–941, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-921-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-921-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This study offers a long-term overview of aerosol particle depolarization ratio at the wavelength of 1565 nm obtained from vertical profiling measurements by Halo Doppler lidars during 4 years at four different locations across Finland. Our observations support the long-term usage of Halo Doppler lidar depolarization ratio such as the detection of aerosols that may pose a safety risk for aviation. Long-range Saharan dust transport and pollen transport are also showcased here.
Athena Augusta Floutsi, Holger Baars, and Ulla Wandinger
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 693–714, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-693-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-693-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We introduce an aerosol-typing scheme (HETEAC-Flex) based on lidar-derived intensive optical properties and applicable to ground-based and spaceborne lidars. HETEAC-Flex utilizes the optimal estimation method and enables the identification of up to four different aerosol components, as well as the determination of their contribution to the aerosol mixture in terms of relative volume. The aerosol components represent common aerosol types such as dust, sea salt, smoke and pollution.
James A. Limbacher, Ralph A. Kahn, Mariel D. Friberg, Jaehwa Lee, Tyler Summers, and Hai Zhang
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 471–498, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-471-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-471-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We present the new Multi-Angle Geostationary Aerosol Retrieval Algorithm (MAGARA) that fuses observations from GOES-16 and GOES-17 to retrieve information about aerosol loading (at 10–15 min cadence) and aerosol particle properties (daily), all at pixel-level resolution. We present MAGARA results for three case studies: the 2018 California Camp Fire, the 2019 Williams Flats Fire, and the 2019 Kincade Fire. We also compare MAGARA aerosol loading and particle properties with AERONET.
Juseon Shin, Gahyeong Kim, Dukhyeon Kim, Matthias Tesche, Gahyeon Park, and Youngmin Noh
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 397–406, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-397-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-397-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We introduce the multi-section method, a novel approach for stable extinction coefficient retrievals in horizontally scanning aerosol lidar measurements, in this study. Our method effectively removes signal–noise-induced irregular peaks and derives a reference extinction coefficient, αref, from multiple scans, resulting in a strong correlation (>0.74) with PM2.5 mass concentrations. Case studies demonstrate its utility in retrieving spatio-temporal aerosol distributions and PM2.5 concentrations.
Basudev Swain, Marco Vountas, Adrien Deroubaix, Luca Lelli, Yanick Ziegler, Soheila Jafariserajehlou, Sachin S. Gunthe, Andreas Herber, Christoph Ritter, Hartmut Bösch, and John P. Burrows
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 359–375, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-359-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-359-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Aerosols are suspensions of particles dispersed in the air. In this study, we use a novel retrieval of satellite data to investigate an optical property of aerosols, the aerosol optical depth, in the high Arctic to assess their direct and indirect roles in climate change. This study demonstrates that the presented approach shows good quality and very promising potential.
Gabriel Calassou, Pierre-Yves Foucher, and Jean-François Léon
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 57–71, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-57-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-57-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We propose analyzing the aerosol composition of plumes emitted by different industrial stacks using PRISMA satellite hyperspectral observations. Three industrial sites have been observed: a coal-fired power plant in South Africa, a steel plant in China, and gas flaring at an oil extraction site in Algeria. Aerosol optical thickness and particle radius are retrieved within the plumes. The mass flow rate of particulate matter is estimated in the plume using the integrated mass enhancement method.
Zihan Zhang, Guangliang Fu, and Otto Hasekamp
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 6051–6063, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-6051-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-6051-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In order to conduct accurate aerosol retrieval over snow, the Remote Sensing of Trace Gases and Aerosol Products (RemoTAP) algorithm is extended with a bi-directional reflection distribution function for snow surfaces. The experiments with both synthetic and real data show that the extended RemoTAP maintains capability for snow-free pixels and has obvious advantages in accuracy and the fraction of successful retrievals for retrieval over snow, especially over surfaces with snow cover > 75 %.
Alexandra Tsekeri, Anna Gialitaki, Marco Di Paolantonio, Davide Dionisi, Gian Luigi Liberti, Alnilam Fernandes, Artur Szkop, Aleksander Pietruczuk, Daniel Pérez-Ramírez, Maria J. Granados Muñoz, Juan Luis Guerrero-Rascado, Lucas Alados-Arboledas, Diego Bermejo Pantaleón, Juan Antonio Bravo-Aranda, Anna Kampouri, Eleni Marinou, Vassilis Amiridis, Michael Sicard, Adolfo Comerón, Constantino Muñoz-Porcar, Alejandro Rodríguez-Gómez, Salvatore Romano, Maria Rita Perrone, Xiaoxia Shang, Mika Komppula, Rodanthi-Elisavet Mamouri, Argyro Nisantzi, Diofantos Hadjimitsis, Francisco Navas-Guzmán, Alexander Haefele, Dominika Szczepanik, Artur Tomczak, Iwona S. Stachlewska, Livio Belegante, Doina Nicolae, Kalliopi Artemis Voudouri, Dimitris Balis, Athena A. Floutsi, Holger Baars, Linda Miladi, Nicolas Pascal, Oleg Dubovik, and Anton Lopatin
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 6025–6050, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-6025-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-6025-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
EARLINET/ACTRIS organized an intensive observational campaign in May 2020, with the objective of monitoring the atmospheric state over Europe during the COVID-19 lockdown and relaxation period. The work presented herein focuses on deriving a common methodology for applying a synergistic retrieval that utilizes the network's ground-based passive and active remote sensing measurements and deriving the aerosols from anthropogenic activities over Europe.
Meng Gao, Bryan A. Franz, Peng-Wang Zhai, Kirk Knobelspiesse, Andrew M. Sayer, Xiaoguang Xu, J. Vanderlei Martins, Brian Cairns, Patricia Castellanos, Guangliang Fu, Neranga Hannadige, Otto Hasekamp, Yongxiang Hu, Amir Ibrahim, Frederick Patt, Anin Puthukkudy, and P. Jeremy Werdell
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 5863–5881, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-5863-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-5863-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This study evaluated the retrievability and uncertainty of aerosol and ocean properties from PACE's HARP2 instrument using enhanced neural network models with the FastMAPOL algorithm. A cascading retrieval method is developed to improve retrieval performance. A global set of simulated HARP2 data is generated and used for uncertainty evaluations. The performance assessment demonstrates that the FastMAPOL algorithm is a viable approach for operational application to HARP2 data after PACE launch.
Cited articles
Ackermann, J.: The extinction-to-backscatter ratio of tropospheric aerosol: A
numerical study, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 15,
1043–1050, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1998)015<1043:TETBRO>2.0.CO;2, 1998. a
Anon: U.S. Standard Atmosphere, Tech. rep., NASA, Washington, DC, US, 1976. a
Ansmann, A., Riebesell, M., and Weitkamp, C.: Measurement of atmospheric
aerosol extinction profiles with a Raman lidar, Opt. Lett., 15, 746–748,
https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.15.000746, 1990. a
Ansmann, A. and Müller, D.: Lidar and Atmospheric Aerosol Particles, in: Range-Resolved Optical Remote Sensing of the Atmosphere, 105–141, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2004.
Ansmann, A., Wandinger, U., Riebesell, M., Weitkamp, C., and Michaelis, W.:
Independent measurement of extinction and backscatter profiles in cirrus
clouds by using a combined Raman elastic-backscatter lidar,
Appl. Optics,
31, 7113, https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.31.007113, 1992. a
Ansmann, A., Neuber, R., Rairoux, P., and Wandinger, U.: Advances in
Atmospheric Remote Sensing with Lidar, vol. 34, Springer Berlin Heidelberg,
Berlin, Heidelberg, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60612-0, 1997. a
Ansmann, A., Baldasano, J., Calpini, B., Chaikovsky, Anatoly and Flamant, P.,
Mitev, V., Papayannis, A., Pelon, J., Resendes, D., Schneider, J., Trickl,
T., and Vaughan, G.: EARLINET: A European Aerosol Research Lidar Network,
Tech. rep., 2001. a
Baltensperger, U., Dommen, J., Alfarra, M. R., Duplissy, J., Gaeggeler, K., Metzger, A., Facchini, M. C., Decesari, S., Finessi, E., Reinnig, C., Schott, M., Warnke, J., Hoffmann, T., Klatzer, B., Puxbaum, H., Geiser, M., Savi, M., Lang, D., Kalberer, M., and Geiser, T.: Combined Determination of the Chemical Composition and of Health Effects of
Secondary Organic Aerosols: The POLYSOA Project,
J. Aerosol Med. Pulm. D., 21, 145–154, https://doi.org/10.1089/jamp.2007.0655,
2008. a
Berk, A., Acharya, P., and Bernstein, L.: Band model method for modeling
atmospheric propagation at arbitrarily fine spectral resolution, US Pat., available at: https://patents.google.com/patent/US7433806 (last access: 6 July 2019), 2008. a
Berk, A., Conforti, P., Kennett, R., Perkins, T., Hawes, F., and van den Bosch,
J.: MODTRAN6: a major upgrade of the MODTRAN radiative transfer code,
9088, 90880H, International Society for Optics and Photonics,
https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2050433, 2014. a
Bissonnette, L. R.: Multiple-scattering lidar equation, Appl. Optics, 35,
6449, https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.35.006449, 1996. a
Bodhaine, B. A., Wood, N. B., Dutton, E. G., and Slusser, J. R.: On Rayleigh
Optical Depth Calculations, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech.,
16, 1854–1861, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1999)016<1854:ORODC>2.0.CO;2, 1999. a
Bohlmann, S., Baars, H., Radenz, M., Engelmann, R., and Macke, A.: Ship-borne aerosol profiling with lidar over the Atlantic Ocean: from pure marine conditions to complex dust–smoke mixtures, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 9661–9679, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-9661-2018, 2018. a
Bréon, F.-M., Maignan, F., Leroy, M., and Grant, I.: Analysis of hot
spot directional signatures measured from space,
J. Geophys. Res., 107, 4282, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001094, 2002. a
Bucholtz, A.: Rayleigh-scattering calculations for the terrestrial
atmosphere, Appl. Optics, 34, 2765, https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.34.002765, 1995. a
Bufton, J. L.: Laser Altimetry Measurements from Aircraft and Spacecraft,
P. IEEE, 77, 463–477, https://doi.org/10.1109/5.24131, 1989. a
Cattrall, C., Reagan, J., Kurt, T., and Oleg, D.: Variability of aerosol and spectral lidar and backscatter and extinction ratios of key aerosol types derived from selected Aerosol Robotic Network locations, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 110, 1–13,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005124, 2005. a
Ceolato, R., Riviere, N., and Hespel, L.: Reflectances from a supercontinuum
laser-based instrument: hyperspectral, polarimetric and angular
measurements, Opt. Express, 20, 29413, https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.20.029413, 2012. a
Ceolato, R., Gaudfrin, F., Pujol, O., Riviere, N., Berg, M. J., and Sorensen,
C. M.: Lidar cross-sections of soot fractal aggregates: Assessment of
equivalent-sphere models,
J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 212, 39–44, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2017.12.004, 2018. a
Clark, W. E. and Whitby, K. T.: Concentration and Size Distribution
Measurements of Atmospheric Aerosols and a Test of the Theory of
Self-Preserving Size Distributions, J. Atmos. Sci., 24,
677–687, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1967)024<0677:CASDMO>2.0.CO;2, 1967. a
Collis, R. T. H. and Russell, P. B.: Lidar measurement of particles and gases
by elastic backscattering and differential absorption, in: Laser Monitoring of the Atmosphere, 71–151,
https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-07743-X_18, 1976. a
Comeron, A., Sicard, M., Kumar, D., and Rocadenbosch, F.: Use of a field lens
for improving the overlap function of a lidar system employing an optical
fiber in the receiver assembly, Appl. Optics, 50, 5538,
https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.50.005538, 2011. a
Dawson, K. W., Meskhidze, N., Josset, D., and Gassó, S.: Spaceborne observations of the lidar ratio of marine aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 3241–3255, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-3241-2015, 2015. a
DeMott, P. J., Prenni, A. J., Liu, X., Kreidenweis, S. M., Petters, M. D.,
Twohy, C. H., Richardson, M. S., Eidhammer, T., and Rogers, D. C.:
Predicting global atmospheric ice nuclei distributions and their impacts on
climate, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107,
11217–11222, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0910818107, 2010. a
Elias, T., Haeffelin, M., Drobinski, P., Gomes, L., Rangognio, J., Bergot, T.,
Chazette, P., Raut, J. C., and Colomb, M.: Particulate contribution to
extinction of visible radiation: Pollution, haze, and fog,
Atmos. Res., 92, 443–454, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2009.01.006, 2009. a
Fernald, F. G.: Analysis of atmospheric lidar observations: some comments,
Appl. Optics, 23, 652–653, https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.23.000652, 1984. a
Fernald, F. G., Herman, B. M., and Reagan, J. A.: Determination of Aerosol
Height Distributions by Lidar, J. Appl. Meteorol., 11, 482–489,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1972)011<0482:DOAHDB>2.0.CO;2, 1972. a
Finlayson-Pitts, B. J. and Pitts, J. N. J.: The Atmospheric System, Chemistry of the Upper and Lower Atmosphere: Theory, Experiments, and Applications,
15–42, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012257060-5/50004-6, 2000. a
Gaudfrin, F., Ceolato, R., Pujol, O., Riviere, N., and Hu, Q.: Supercontinuum
lidar for hydrometeors and aerosols optical properties determination, in:
EGU General Assembly 2018, 20, 14436, 2018a. a
Gaudfrin, F., Ceolato, R., Pujol, O., and Riviere, N.: A new-lidar inversion
technique using a surface reference target at short – range, in: The 29th
International Laser Radar Conference, 3–6, 24–28 June, Hefei, 2019. a
Getzewich, B. J., Vaughan, M. A., Hunt, W. H., Avery, M. A., Powell, K. A., Tackett, J. L., Winker, D. M., Kar, J., Lee, K.-P., and Toth, T. D.: CALIPSO lidar calibration at 532 nm: version 4 daytime algorithm, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 6309–6326, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-6309-2018, 2018. a
Glickman, T. and Zenk, W.: Glossary of Meteorology, American Meteorological
Society, Boston, 855 pp. 2, available at: http://oceanrep.geomar.de/6557/ (last access: 17 July 2019), 2000. a
Hadamard, J.: Théorie des équations aux dérivées
partielles linéaires hyperboliques et du problème de Cauchy,
Acta Math., 31, 333–380, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02415449, 1908. a
Hall, F. F. and Ageno, H. Y.: Absolute calibration of a laser system for
atmospheric probing, Appl. Optics, 9, 1820–1824,
https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.9.001820, 1970. a
Halldórsson, T. and Langerholc, J.: Geometrical form factors for the
lidar function, Appl. Optics, 17, 240–244, https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.17.000240, 1978. a
Haner, D. A., McGuckin, B. T., Menzies, R. T., Bruegge, C. J., and Duval, V.:
Directional–hemispherical reflectance for Spectralon by integration of its
bidirectional reflectance, Appl. Optics, 37, 3996,
https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.37.003996, 1998. a
Hansen, J., Sato, M., and Ruedy, R.: Radiative forcing and climate response,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 102, 6831–6864,
https://doi.org/10.1029/96JD03436, 1997. a
Haywood, J. and Boucher, O.: Estimates of the direct and indirect radiative forcing due to tropospheric
aerosols: A review, Rev. Geophys., 38, 513–543,
https://doi.org/10.1029/1999RG000078, 2000. a
Hess, M., Koepke, P., Schult, I., Hess, M., Koepke, P., and Schult, I.:
Optical Properties of Aerosols and Clouds: The Software Package OPAC,
B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 79, 831–844,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1998)079<0831:OPOAAC>2.0.CO;2, 1998. a
Hoff, R. M., Bösenberg, J., and Pappalardo, G.: The GAW Aerosol Lidar
Observation Network (GALION), in: International Geoscience and Remote Sensing
Symposium (IGARSS-08), 27–29 March, Boston (USA), 6–11, 2008. a
Horvath, H.: On the applicability of the Koschmieder visibility formula, Atmos. Environ., 5,
177–184, https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(71)90081-3, 1971. a
Hu, Y., Vaughan, M., Liu, Z., Powell, K., and Rodier, S.: Retrieving
Optical Depths and Lidar Ratios for Transparent Layers Above Opaque Water
Clouds From CALIPSO Lidar Measurements,
IEEE Geosci. Remote S., 4, 523–526, https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2007.901085, 2007. a
Hyslop, N. P.: Impaired visibility: the air pollution people see, Atmos.
Environ., 43, 182–195, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.09.067, 2009. a
Jäger, H.: Long-term record of lidar observations of the stratospheric
aerosol layer at Garmisch-Partenkirchen, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 110, 1–9, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005506, 2005. a
Josset, D., Pelon, J., Protat, A., and Flamant, C.: New approach to determine
aerosol optical depth from combined CALIPSO and CloudSat ocean surface
echoes, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL033442, 2008. a
Josset, D., Pelon, J., and Hu, Y.: Multi-Instrument Calibration Method Based
on a Multiwavelength Ocean Surface Model, IEEE Geosci. Remote S., 7, 195–199, https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2009.2030906,
2010a. a
Josset, D., Zhai, P.-W., Hu, Y., Pelon, J., and Lucker, P. L.: Lidar equation
for ocean surface and subsurface, Opt. Express, 18, 20862,
https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.18.020862, 2010b. a, b
Josset, D., Pelon, J., Garnier, A., Hu, Y., Vaughan, M., Zhai, P.-W., Kuehn,
R., and Lucker, P.: Cirrus optical depth and lidar ratio retrieval from
combined CALIPSO-CloudSat observations using ocean surface echo, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011jd016959,
2012. a
Josset, D., Pelon, J., Pascal, N., Hu, Y., and Hou, W.: On the Use of CALIPSO
Land Surface Returns to Retrieve Aerosol and Cloud Optical Depths, IEEE
T. Geosci. Remote, 56, 3256–3264,
https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2018.2796850, 2018. a, b
Kar, J., Vaughan, M. A., Lee, K.-P., Tackett, J. L., Avery, M. A., Garnier, A., Getzewich, B. J., Hunt, W. H., Josset, D., Liu, Z., Lucker, P. L., Magill, B., Omar, A. H., Pelon, J., Rogers, R. R., Toth, T. D., Trepte, C. R., Vernier, J.-P., Winker, D. M., and Young, S. A.: CALIPSO lidar calibration at 532 nm: version 4 nighttime algorithm, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 1459–1479, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1459-2018, 2018. a
Kavaya, M. J., Menzies, R. T., Haner, D. A., Oppenheim, U. P., and Flamant,
P. H.: Target reflectance measurements for calibration of lidar atmospheric
backscatter data, Appl. Optics, 22, 2619, https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.22.002619,
1983. a
Klett, J. D.: Stable analytical inversion solution for processing lidar
returns, Appl. Optics, 20, 211–220, https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.20.000211, 1981. a, b
Klett, J. D.: Lidar inversion with variable backscatter/extinction ratios,
Appl. Optics, 24, 1638, https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.24.001638, 1985. a, b
Kraft, D.: Software Package for Sequential Quadratic Programming, 1988. a
Kumar, D. and Rocadenbosch, F.: Determination of the overlap factor and its
enhancement for medium-size tropospheric lidar systems: a ray-tracing
approach, J. Appl. Remote Sens., 7, 073591,
https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JRS.7.073591, 2013. a
Labarre, L., Caillault, K., Fauqueux, S., Malherbe, C., Roblin, A., Rosier, B.,
and Simoneau, P.: An overview of MATISSE-v2.0, in: Optics in Atmospheric Propagation and Adaptive Systems XIII, 7828, edited by: Stein, K. and Gonglewski, J. D., 9–18,
https://doi.org/10.1117/12.868183, 2010. a
Leblanc, T., Trickl, T., and Vogelmann, H.: Lidar, vol. 102 of Springer
Series in Optical Sciences, Springer-Verlag, New York,
https://doi.org/10.1007/b106786, 2005. a
Li, J., Gong, W., and Ma, Y.: Atmospheric Lidar Noise Reduction Based on
Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition, Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XXXIX-B8,
127–129, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsarchives-XXXIX-B8-127-2012, 2012. a
Lobell, D. B. and Asner, G. P.: Moisture Effects on Soil Reflectance, Soil
Sci. Soc. Am. J., 66, 722–727, https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2002.7220,
2002. a
Mao, F., Gong, W., and Li, C.: Anti-noise algorithm of lidar data retrieval by
combining the ensemble Kalman filter and the Fernald method, Opt. Express,
21, 8286, https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.21.008286, 2013. a
Matsumoto, M. and Takeuchi, N.: Effects of misestimated far-end boundary
values on two common lidar inversion solutions, Appl. Optics, 33, 6451,
https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.33.006451, 1994. a
Mattis, I., Ansmann, A., Müller, D., Wandinger, U., and Althausen, D.:
Multilayer aerosol observations with dual-wavelength Raman lidar in the
framework of EARLINET, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109,
1–15, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004600, 2004. a
Measures, R. M.: Laser Remote Sensing: Fundamentals and Applications, reprint
ed edn., edited by: Wiley, J., Krieger publishing compagny, Malabar, Florida,
1992. a
Miesch, C., Poutier, L., Achard, V., Briottet, X., Lenot, X., and Boucher, Y.:
Direct and inverse radiative transfer solutions for visible and
near-infrared hyperspectral imagery, IEEE T. Geosci.
Remote, 43, 1552–1562, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2005.847793, 2005. a
Mishchenko, M. I., Dlugach, J. M., Yanovitskij, E. G., and Zakharova, N. T.:
Bidirectional reflectance of flat, optically thick particulate layers: an
efficient radiative transfer solution and applications to snow and soil
surfaces, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 63,
409–432, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4073(99)00028-X, 1999. a
Nicodemus, F. E.: Directional Reflectance and Emissivity of an Opaque
Surface, Appl. Optics, 4, 767–775, https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.4.000767, 1965. a
O'Connor, E. J., Illingworth, A. J., and Hogan, R. J.: A Technique for
Autocalibration of Cloud Lidar, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 21, 777–786, 2004. a
Painemal, D., Clayton, M., Ferrare, R., Burton, S., Josset, D., and Vaughan, M.: Novel aerosol extinction coefficients and lidar ratios over the ocean from CALIPSO–CloudSat: evaluation and global statistics, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 2201–2217, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-2201-2019, 2019. a
Paschotta, R.: Field Guide to Laser Pulse Generation, vol. FG14, SPIE.,
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1965.tb20241.x, 2008. a
Pedrós, R., Estellés, V., Sicard, M., Gómez-Amo, J. L.,
Utrillas, M. P., Martínez-Lozano, J. A., Rocadenbosch, F., Pérez,
C., and Recio Baldasano, J. M.: Climatology of the aerosol
extinction-to-backscatter ratio from sun-photometric measurements, IEEE
T. Geosci. Remote, 48, 237–249,
https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2009.2027699, 2010. a
Popovicheva, O. B., Engling, G., Ku, I.-T., Timofeev, M. A., and Shonija,
N. K.: Aerosol Emissions from Long-Lasting Smoldering of Boreal Peatlands:
Chemical Composition, Markers, and Microstructure, Aerosol Air Qual.
Res., 2, 213–218, https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2018.08.0302, 2019. a
Poutier, L., Miesch, C., Lenot, X., Achard, V., and Boucher, Y.: COMANCHE and
COCHISE: two reciprocal atmospheric codes for hyperspectral remote sensing,
Tech. rep.,
available at: http://wwwe.onecert.fr/pirrene/references_docs/poutier_et_al_AVIRIS_2002.pdf (last access: 4 April 2020),
2002. a
Rocadenbosch, F., Frasier, S., Kumar, D., Lange Vega, D., Gregorio, E., and
Sicard, M.: Backscatter error bounds for the elastic lidar two-component
inversion algorithm, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 50,
4791–4803, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2012.2194501, 2012. a
Sasano, Y., Browell, E. V., and Ismail, S.: Error caused by using a constant
extinction/backscattering ratio in the lidar solution, Appl. Optics, 24,
3929, https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.24.003929, 1985. a
Sicard, M., Chazette, P., Pelon, J., Won, J., and Yoon, S.-C.: Variational
method for the retrieval of the optical thickness and the backscatter
coefficient from multiangle lidar profiles, Appl. Optics, 41, 493–502,
https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.41.000493, 2002. a, b
Simoneau, P., Berton, R., Caillault, K., Durand, G., Huet, T., Labarre, L.,
Malherbe, C., Miesch, C., Roblin, A., and Rosier, B.: MATISSE: advanced
Earth modeling for imaging and scene simulation, in: Proceedings of SPIE,
edited by: Kohnle, A., Gonglewski, J. D., and Schmugge, T. J., 4538,
39, https://doi.org/10.1117/12.454410, 2002. a
SphereOptic: Diffusers, Zenith Polymer, Foil, nearly ideal Lambertian
SphereOptics EN,
available at: https://sphereoptics.de/en/product/zenith-polymer-diffusers/?c=79, last access: 4 April 2020. a
Stelmaszczyk, K., Dell'Aglio, M., Chudzyński, S., Stacewicz, T., and
Wöste, L.: Analytical function for lidar geometrical compression
form-factor calculations, Appl. Optics, 44, 1323,
https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.44.001323, 2005. a
Sun, X.: Lidar Sensors From Space, Elsevier,
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-409548-9.10327-6, 2018. a
Swinehart, D.: The Beer-Lambert law, J. Chem. Educ., 39, 335–335,
https://doi.org/10.1021/ed039p333, 1962. a
Vande Hey, J., Coupland, J., Foo, M. H., Richards, J., and Sandford, A.:
Determination of overlap in lidar systems, Appl. Optics, 50, 5791,
https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.50.005791, 2011.
a
Vande Hey, J. D.: Theory of Lidar, Springer International Publishing, 23–41,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12613-5_2, 2014. a, b, c
Vargas-Ubera, J., Aguilar, J. F., and Gale, D. M.: Reconstruction of
particle-size distributions from light-scattering patterns using three
inversion methods, Appl. Optics, 46, 124–132, https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.46.000124,
2007. a
Wandinger, U. and Ansmann, A.: Experimental determination of the lidar overlap
profile with Raman lidar, Appl. Optics, 41, 511–514,
https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.41.000511, 2002. a
Young, S. A.: Analysis of lidar backscatter profiles in optically thin clouds,
Appl. Opt., 34, 7019–7031, https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.34.007019,
1995. a
Zhang, J., Wei, E., Wu, L., Fang, X., Li, F., Yang, Z., Wang, T., and Mao, H.:
Elemental Composition and Health Risk Assessment of PM10 and PM2.5 in the
Roadside Microenvironment in Tianjin, China, Aerosol Air Qual.
Res., 18, 1817–1827, https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2017.10.0383, 2018. a
Short summary
A new elastic lidar inversion equation is presented. It is based on the backscattering signal from a surface reference target rather than that from a volumetric layer of reference as is usually done. The method presented can be used in the case of airborne elastic lidar measurements or when the lidar–target line is horizontal. Also, a new algorithm is described to retrieve the lidar ratio and the backscattering coefficient of an aerosol plume without any a priori assumptions about the plume.
A new elastic lidar inversion equation is presented. It is based on the backscattering signal...
