Articles | Volume 15, issue 9
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-2667-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-2667-2022
Research article
 | 
03 May 2022
Research article |  | 03 May 2022

Inter-comparison of online and offline methods for measuring ambient heavy and trace elements and water-soluble inorganic ions (NO3, SO42−, NH4+, and Cl) in PM2.5 over a heavily polluted megacity, Delhi

Himadri Sekhar Bhowmik, Ashutosh Shukla, Vipul Lalchandani, Jay Dave, Neeraj Rastogi, Mayank Kumar, Vikram Singh, and Sachchida Nand Tripathi

Related authors

Gravimetrically Measured Water Content of Filter Sampled Fine Particulate Matter at Low Relative Humidity: Insight from the Surface Particulate Matter Network (SPARTAN)
Christopher R. Oxford, Haihui Zhu, Maya Mehrotra, Xuan Liu, Yuxuan Ren, Maya Arnott, Isaac Abionum Adimula, Taiye Benjamin Ajibolataiye, Clement Akoshile, Omar Amador-Munoz, Araya Asfaw, Rachel Ying-Wen Chang, Sagnik Dey, Ann M. Dillner, David J. Diner, Connor J. Flynn, Diana Francis, Paterne Gahungu, Rebecca M. Garland, Michel Grutter, Sina Hasheminassab, Fahad Imam, Jhoon Kim, Kristy Langerman, Pei-Chen Lee, Puji Lestari, Po-Hsiung Lin, S. Marcela Loria-Salazar, Tesfaye Mamo, Olga L. Mayol-Bracero, Mogesh Naidoo, Narendra Nelli, Sang Seo Park, Abdus Salam, Bighnaraj Sarangi, Trailokya Saud, Robyn Schofield, Yoav Schechner, Sachchida N. Tripathi, Emily K. West, Eli Windwer, Ming-Tsang Wu, Qiang Zhang, Michael Brauer, Yinon Rudich, Jay R. Turner, and Randall V. Martin
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3224,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3224, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (AMT).
Short summary
Distinct dual-isotopic signatures of major methane sources in South Asia
Peng Yao, Katja Belec, Henry Holmstrand, Josh Balacky, Abdus Salam, Krishnakant Budhavant, Mohanan Remani Manoj, Khaled Shaifullah Joy, Md. Alamin Hossain, Atinderpal Singh, Anil Patel, Neeraj Rastogi, Chinmay Mallik, Kirpa Ram, Gyanesh Kumar Singh, and Örjan Gustafsson
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 7765–7787, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-7765-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-7765-2026, 2026
Short summary
A Hybrid STL-Ensemble Framework for Multivariate Time-Series Forecasting of Source-Specific PM2.5 Emissions
Jintu Borah, Deepali Kushwaha, Sachchida Nand Tripathi, and Rajesh M. Hegde
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1103,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1103, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (AMT).
Short summary
Hyperlocal air quality monitoring and source apportionment of non-refractory PM2.5 at three urban sites using stationary van-based measurements: A Lucknow case study
Davender Sethi, Akanksha Lakra, Ambasht Kumar, Shoubhik Chakraborty, Himadri Sekhar Bhowmik, Vaishali Jain, and Sachchida Nand Tripathi
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-595,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-595, 2026
Short summary
Aerosol processing during long-range transport governs the chemical composition of haze over the northern Indian Ocean
Karin Stegelius, Pauline Thompson, Pia Karbiener, Piotr Markuszewski, Andre S. H. Prevot, Sachchida N. Tripathi, Claudia Mohr, Liine Heikkinen, Krishnakant Budhavant, and Sophie L. Haslett
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-914,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-914, 2026
Short summary

Cited articles

Bhowmik, H. S., Naresh, S., Bhattu, D., Rastogi, N., Prévôt, A. S. H., and Tripathi, S. N.: Temporal and spatial variability of carbonaceous species (EC; OC; WSOC and SOA) in PM2.5 aerosol over five sites of Indo-Gangetic Plain, Atmos. Pollut. Res., 12, 375–390, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2020.09.019, 2021. 
Canagaratna, M. R., Jayne, J. T., Jimenez, J. L., Allan, J. D., Alfarra, M. R., Zhang, Q., Onasch, T. B., Drewnick, F., Coe, H., Middlebrook, A., Delia, A., Williams, L. R., Trimborn, A. M., Northway, M. J., DeCarlo, P. F., Kolb, C. E., Davidovits, P., and Worsnop, D. R.: Chemical and microphysical characterization of ambient aerosols with the aerodyne aerosol mass spectrometer, Mass Spectrom. Rev., 26, 185–222, https://doi.org//10.1002/mas.20115, 2007. 
CEN: Ambient air – Standard gravimetric measurement method for the determination of the PM10 or PM2.5 mass concentration of suspended particulate matter (EN 12341:2014), European Committee for Standardization (CEN), Brussels, https://www.en-standard.eu/csn-en-12341-ambient-air-standard-gravimetric-measurement (last access: 2 May 2022), 2014. 
Chen, Y., Xu, L., Humphry, T., Hettiyadura, A. P. S., Ovadnevaite, J., Huang, S., Poulain, L., Schroder, J. C., Campuzano-Jost, P., Jimenez, J. L., Herrmann, H., O’Dowd, C., Stone, E. A., and Ng, N. L.: Response of the Aerodyne Aerosol Mass Spectrometer to Inorganic Sulfates and Organosulfur Compounds: Applications in Field and Laboratory Measurements, Environ. Sci. Technol., 53, 5176–5186, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b00884, 2019. 
Chow, J. C.: Measurement methods to determine compliance with ambient air quality standards for suspended particles, J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc., 45, 320–382, https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.1995.10467369, 1995. 
Download
Short summary
This study presents comparisons between online and offline measurements of both refractory and non-refractory aerosol. This study shows differences between the measurements, related to either the limitations of the instrument (e.g., aerosol mass spectrometer only observing non-refractory aerosol) or known interferences with the technique (e.g., volatilization or reactions). The findings highlight the measurement methods' accuracy and imply the particular type of measurements needed.
Share