Articles | Volume 15, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-655-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-655-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| Highlight paper
| 
09 Feb 2022
Research article | Highlight paper |
| 09 Feb 2022
| 09 Feb 2022
Evaluating the PurpleAir monitor as an aerosol light scattering instrument
James R. Ouimette
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Sonoma Ecology Center, Eldridge, CA 95431, USA
William C. Malm
Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA
Bret A. Schichtel
National Park Service Air Resources Division, Lakewood, CO 80225, USA
Patrick J. Sheridan
NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory, Boulder, CO 80305, USA
Elisabeth Andrews
NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory, Boulder, CO 80305, USA
Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences,
University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA
John A. Ogren
NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory, Boulder, CO 80305, USA
retired
W. Patrick Arnott
Department of Physics, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557, USA
Related authors
Daniel A. Jaffe, Colleen Miller, Katie Thompson, Brandon Finley, Manna Nelson, James Ouimette, and Elisabeth Andrews
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 1311–1322, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-1311-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-1311-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
PurpleAir sensors (PASs) are low-cost tools to measure fine particulate matter (PM) concentrations. However, the raw PAS data have significant biases, so the sensors must be corrected. We analyzed data from numerous sites and found that the standard correction to the PAS Purple Air data is accurate in urban pollution events and smoke events but leads to a 6-fold underestimate in the PM2.5 concentrations in dust events. We propose a new correction algorithm to address this problem.
Aidan D. Pantoya, Stephanie R. Simonsen, Elisabeth Andrews, Ross Burgener, Christopher J. Cox, Gijs de Boer, Bryan D. Thomas, and Naruki Hiranuma
Aerosol Research, 3, 253–270, https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-3-253-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-3-253-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We present continuous ice-nucleating particle data that were measured in the Alaskan Arctic from October 2021 to December 2023. We found a greater efficiency in the arctic immersion freezing during fall compared to those found previously at two mid-latitude sites, together with profound freezing efficiencies in spring, presumably due to arctic haze events. Our study will be useful for improving atmospheric models to simulate cloud feedback and determine their impact on the global radiative energy budget.
Lillian E. Naimie, Da Pan, Amy P. Sullivan, John T. Walker, Aleksandra Djurkovic, Bret A. Schichtel, and Jeffrey L. Collett Jr.
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1167, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1167, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The contribution of ammonia atmosphere-surface exchange to excess deposition of reactive nitrogen is poorly understood. Reactive nitrogen deposition has negative impacts on ecosystem health. Ammonia can be difficult and expensive to measure. We demonstrate that depositions modeled using low-cost measurements underestimate ecosystem inputs but can be corrected using typical daily concentration cycles. We also illustrate the limitations of reanalysis meteorology for ammonia deposition modeling.
Fernando Rejano, Andrea Casans, Marta Via, Juan Andrés Casquero-Vera, Sonia Castillo, Hassan Lyamani, Alberto Cazorla, Elisabeth Andrews, Daniel Pérez-Ramírez, Andrés Alastuey, Francisco Javier Gómez-Moreno, Lucas Alados-Arboledas, Francisco José Olmo, and Gloria Titos
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 13865–13888, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-13865-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-13865-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This study provides valuable insights to improve cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) estimations at a high-altitude remote site which is influenced by nearby urban pollution. Understanding the factors that affect CCN estimations is essential to improve the CCN data coverage worldwide and assess aerosol–cloud interactions on a global scale. This is crucial for improving climate models, since aerosol–cloud interactions are the most important source of uncertainty in climate projections.
Alessandro Bigi, Giorgio Veratti, Elisabeth Andrews, Martine Collaud Coen, Lorenzo Guerrieri, Vera Bernardoni, Dario Massabò, Luca Ferrero, Sergio Teggi, and Grazia Ghermandi
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 14841–14869, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-14841-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-14841-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Atmospheric particles include compounds that play a key role in the greenhouse effect and air toxicity. Concurrent observations of these compounds by multiple instruments are presented, following deployment within an urban environment in the Po Valley, one of Europe's pollution hotspots. The study compares these data, highlighting the impact of ground emissions, mainly vehicular traffic and biomass burning, on the absorption of sun radiation and, ultimately, on climate change and air quality.
Erin K. Boedicker, Elisabeth Andrews, Patrick J. Sheridan, and Patricia K. Quinn
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 9525–9547, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-9525-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-9525-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We present 15 years of measurements from a marine site on the northern California coast and characterize the seasonal trends of aerosol ion composition and optical properties at the site. We investigate the relationship between the chemical and optical properties and show that they both support similar seasonal variations in aerosol sources at the site. Additionally, we show through comparisons to other marine aerosol observations that the site is representative of a clean marine environment.
Daniel A. Jaffe, Colleen Miller, Katie Thompson, Brandon Finley, Manna Nelson, James Ouimette, and Elisabeth Andrews
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 1311–1322, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-1311-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-1311-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
PurpleAir sensors (PASs) are low-cost tools to measure fine particulate matter (PM) concentrations. However, the raw PAS data have significant biases, so the sensors must be corrected. We analyzed data from numerous sites and found that the standard correction to the PAS Purple Air data is accurate in urban pollution events and smoke events but leads to a 6-fold underestimate in the PM2.5 concentrations in dust events. We propose a new correction algorithm to address this problem.
Joshin Kumar, Theo Paik, Nishit J. Shetty, Patrick Sheridan, Allison C. Aiken, Manvendra K. Dubey, and Rajan K. Chakrabarty
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 4569–4583, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4569-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4569-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Accurate long-term measurement of aerosol light absorption is vital for assessing direct aerosol radiative forcing. Light absorption by aerosols at the US Department of Energy long-term climate monitoring SGP site is measured using the Particle Soot Absorption Photometer (PSAP), which suffers from artifacts and biases difficult to quantify. Machine learning offers a promising path forward to correct for biases in the long-term absorption dataset at the SGP site and similar Class-I areas.
Bruno Debus, Andrew T. Weakley, Satoshi Takahama, Kathryn M. George, Anahita Amiri-Farahani, Bret Schichtel, Scott Copeland, Anthony S. Wexler, and Ann M. Dillner
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 2685–2702, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-2685-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-2685-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
In the US, routine particulate matter composition is measured on samples collected on three types of filter media and analyzed using several techniques. We propose an alternate approach that uses one analytical technique, Fourier transform-infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), and one filter type to measure the chemical composition of particulate matter in a major US monitoring network. This method could be used to add low-cost sites to the network, fill-in missing data, or for quality control.
Aki Virkkula, Henrik Grythe, John Backman, Tuukka Petäjä, Maurizio Busetto, Christian Lanconelli, Angelo Lupi, Silvia Becagli, Rita Traversi, Mirko Severi, Vito Vitale, Patrick Sheridan, and Elisabeth Andrews
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 5033–5069, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-5033-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-5033-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Optical properties of surface aerosols at Dome C, Antarctica, in 2007–2013 and their potential source areas are presented. The equivalent black carbon (eBC) mass concentrations were compared with eBC measured at three other Antarctic sites: the South Pole (SPO) and two coastal sites, Neumayer and Syowa. Transport analysis suggests that South American BC emissions are the largest contributor to eBC at Dome C.
Julia Schmale, Sangeeta Sharma, Stefano Decesari, Jakob Pernov, Andreas Massling, Hans-Christen Hansson, Knut von Salzen, Henrik Skov, Elisabeth Andrews, Patricia K. Quinn, Lucia M. Upchurch, Konstantinos Eleftheriadis, Rita Traversi, Stefania Gilardoni, Mauro Mazzola, James Laing, and Philip Hopke
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 3067–3096, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-3067-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-3067-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Long-term data sets of Arctic aerosol properties from 10 stations across the Arctic provide evidence that anthropogenic influence on the Arctic atmospheric chemical composition has declined in winter, a season which is typically dominated by mid-latitude emissions. The number of significant trends in summer is smaller than in winter, and overall the pattern is ambiguous with some significant positive and negative trends. This reflects the mixed influence of natural and anthropogenic emissions.
Clémence Rose, Martine Collaud Coen, Elisabeth Andrews, Yong Lin, Isaline Bossert, Cathrine Lund Myhre, Thomas Tuch, Alfred Wiedensohler, Markus Fiebig, Pasi Aalto, Andrés Alastuey, Elisabeth Alonso-Blanco, Marcos Andrade, Begoña Artíñano, Todor Arsov, Urs Baltensperger, Susanne Bastian, Olaf Bath, Johan Paul Beukes, Benjamin T. Brem, Nicolas Bukowiecki, Juan Andrés Casquero-Vera, Sébastien Conil, Konstantinos Eleftheriadis, Olivier Favez, Harald Flentje, Maria I. Gini, Francisco Javier Gómez-Moreno, Martin Gysel-Beer, Anna Gannet Hallar, Ivo Kalapov, Nikos Kalivitis, Anne Kasper-Giebl, Melita Keywood, Jeong Eun Kim, Sang-Woo Kim, Adam Kristensson, Markku Kulmala, Heikki Lihavainen, Neng-Huei Lin, Hassan Lyamani, Angela Marinoni, Sebastiao Martins Dos Santos, Olga L. Mayol-Bracero, Frank Meinhardt, Maik Merkel, Jean-Marc Metzger, Nikolaos Mihalopoulos, Jakub Ondracek, Marco Pandolfi, Noemi Pérez, Tuukka Petäjä, Jean-Eudes Petit, David Picard, Jean-Marc Pichon, Veronique Pont, Jean-Philippe Putaud, Fabienne Reisen, Karine Sellegri, Sangeeta Sharma, Gerhard Schauer, Patrick Sheridan, James Patrick Sherman, Andreas Schwerin, Ralf Sohmer, Mar Sorribas, Junying Sun, Pierre Tulet, Ville Vakkari, Pieter Gideon van Zyl, Fernando Velarde, Paolo Villani, Stergios Vratolis, Zdenek Wagner, Sheng-Hsiang Wang, Kay Weinhold, Rolf Weller, Margarita Yela, Vladimir Zdimal, and Paolo Laj
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 17185–17223, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-17185-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-17185-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Aerosol particles are a complex component of the atmospheric system the effects of which are among the most uncertain in climate change projections. Using data collected at 62 stations, this study provides the most up-to-date picture of the spatial distribution of particle number concentration and size distribution worldwide, with the aim of contributing to better representation of aerosols and their interactions with clouds in models and, therefore, better evaluation of their impact on climate.
Sho Ohata, Tatsuhiro Mori, Yutaka Kondo, Sangeeta Sharma, Antti Hyvärinen, Elisabeth Andrews, Peter Tunved, Eija Asmi, John Backman, Henri Servomaa, Daniel Veber, Konstantinos Eleftheriadis, Stergios Vratolis, Radovan Krejci, Paul Zieger, Makoto Koike, Yugo Kanaya, Atsushi Yoshida, Nobuhiro Moteki, Yongjing Zhao, Yutaka Tobo, Junji Matsushita, and Naga Oshima
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 6723–6748, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-6723-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-6723-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Reliable values of mass absorption cross sections (MACs) of black carbon (BC) are required to determine mass concentrations of BC at Arctic sites using different types of filter-based absorption photometers. We successfully estimated MAC values for these instruments through comparison with independent measurements of BC by a continuous soot monitoring system called COSMOS. These MAC values are consistent with each other and applicable to study spatial and temporal variation in BC in the Arctic.
Gloria Titos, María A. Burgos, Paul Zieger, Lucas Alados-Arboledas, Urs Baltensperger, Anne Jefferson, James Sherman, Ernest Weingartner, Bas Henzing, Krista Luoma, Colin O'Dowd, Alfred Wiedensohler, and Elisabeth Andrews
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 13031–13050, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-13031-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-13031-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This paper investigates the impact of water uptake on aerosol optical properties, in particular the aerosol light-scattering coefficient. Although in situ measurements are performed at low relative humidity (typically at
RH < 40 %), to address the climatic impact of aerosol particles it is necessary to take into account the effect that water uptake may have on the aerosol optical properties.
Jonas Gliß, Augustin Mortier, Michael Schulz, Elisabeth Andrews, Yves Balkanski, Susanne E. Bauer, Anna M. K. Benedictow, Huisheng Bian, Ramiro Checa-Garcia, Mian Chin, Paul Ginoux, Jan J. Griesfeller, Andreas Heckel, Zak Kipling, Alf Kirkevåg, Harri Kokkola, Paolo Laj, Philippe Le Sager, Marianne Tronstad Lund, Cathrine Lund Myhre, Hitoshi Matsui, Gunnar Myhre, David Neubauer, Twan van Noije, Peter North, Dirk J. L. Olivié, Samuel Rémy, Larisa Sogacheva, Toshihiko Takemura, Kostas Tsigaridis, and Svetlana G. Tsyro
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 87–128, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-87-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-87-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Simulated aerosol optical properties as well as the aerosol life cycle are investigated for 14 global models participating in the AeroCom initiative. Considerable diversity is found in the simulated aerosol species emissions and lifetimes, also resulting in a large diversity in the simulated aerosol mass, composition, and optical properties. A comparison with observations suggests that, on average, current models underestimate the direct effect of aerosol on the atmosphere radiation budget.
Martine Collaud Coen, Elisabeth Andrews, Alessandro Bigi, Giovanni Martucci, Gonzague Romanens, Frédéric P. A. Vogt, and Laurent Vuilleumier
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 6945–6964, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-6945-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-6945-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The Mann–Kendall trend test requires prewhitening in the presence of serially correlated data. The effects of five prewhitening methods and time granularity, autocorrelation, temporal segmentation and length of the time series on the statistical significance and the slope are studies for seven atmospheric datasets. Finally, a new algorithm using three prewhitening methods is proposed in order to optimize the power of the test, the amount of erroneous false positive trends and the slope estimate.
Sho Ohata, Tatsuhiro Mori, Yutaka Kondo, Sangeeta Sharma, Antti Hyvärinen, Elisabeth Andrews, Peter Tunved, Eija Asmi, John Backman, Henri Servomaa, Daniel Veber, Makoto Koike, Yugo Kanaya, Atsushi Yoshida, Nobuhiro Moteki, Yongjing Zhao, Junji Matsushita, and Naga Oshima
Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2020-1190, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2020-1190, 2020
Preprint withdrawn
Short summary
Short summary
Reliable values of mass absorption cross sections (MAC) of black carbon (BC) are required to determine mass concentrations of BC at Arctic sites using different types of filter-based absorption photometers. We successfully estimated MAC values for these instruments through comparison with independent measurements of BC by continuous soot monitoring system called COSMOS. These MAC values are consistent with each other and applicable to study spatial and temporal variation of BC in the Arctic.
Augustin Mortier, Jonas Gliß, Michael Schulz, Wenche Aas, Elisabeth Andrews, Huisheng Bian, Mian Chin, Paul Ginoux, Jenny Hand, Brent Holben, Hua Zhang, Zak Kipling, Alf Kirkevåg, Paolo Laj, Thibault Lurton, Gunnar Myhre, David Neubauer, Dirk Olivié, Knut von Salzen, Ragnhild Bieltvedt Skeie, Toshihiko Takemura, and Simone Tilmes
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 13355–13378, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-13355-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-13355-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We present a multiparameter analysis of the aerosol trends over the last 2 decades in the different regions of the world. In most of the regions, ground-based observations show a decrease in aerosol content in both the total atmospheric column and at the surface. The use of climate models, assessed against these observations, reveals however an increase in the total aerosol load, which is not seen with the sole use of observation due to partial coverage in space and time.
W. Richard Leaitch, John K. Kodros, Megan D. Willis, Sarah Hanna, Hannes Schulz, Elisabeth Andrews, Heiko Bozem, Julia Burkart, Peter Hoor, Felicia Kolonjari, John A. Ogren, Sangeeta Sharma, Meng Si, Knut von Salzen, Allan K. Bertram, Andreas Herber, Jonathan P. D. Abbatt, and Jeffrey R. Pierce
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 10545–10563, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-10545-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-10545-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Black carbon is a factor in the warming of the Arctic atmosphere due to its ability to absorb light, but the uncertainty is high and few observations have been made in the high Arctic above 80° N. We combine airborne and ground-based observations in the springtime Arctic, at and above 80° N, with simulations from a global model to show that light absorption by black carbon may be much larger than modelled. However, the uncertainty remains high.
Cited articles
Abu-Rahmah, A., Arnott, W. P., and Moosmuller, H.: Integrating nephelometer
with a low truncation angle and an extended calibration scheme, Meas. Sci.
Technol. 17, 1723–1732, https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/17/7/010, 2006.
Anderson, T. L. and Ogren, J. A.: Determining aerosol radiative properties
using the TSI 3563 integrating nephelometer, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 29,
57–69, https://doi.org/10.1080/02786829808965551, 1998.
Anderson, T. L., Covert, D. S., Marshall, S. F., Laucks, M. L., Charlson, R.
J., Waggoner, A. P., Ogren, J. A., Caldow, R., Holm, R. L., Quant, F. R.,
Sem, G. J., Wiedensohler, A., Ahlquist, N. A., and Bates, T. S.: Performance
characteristics of a high-sensitivity, three-wavelength, total
scatter/backscatter nephelometer, J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol., 13, 967–986,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1996)013<0967:Pcoahs>2.0.Co;2,
1996.
Andrews, E., Sheridan, P. J., Ogren, J. A., Hageman, D., Jefferson, A.,
Wendell, J., Alastuey, A., Alados-Arboledas, L., Bergin, M., Ealo, M.,
Hallar, A. G., Hoffer, A., Kalapov, I., Keywood, M., Kim, J., Kim, S. W.,
Kolonjari, F., Labuschagne, C., Lin, N. H., Macdonald, A., Mayol-Bracero, O.
L., McCubbin, I. B., Pandolfi, M., Reisen, F., Sharma, S., Sherman, J. P.,
Sorribas, M., and Sun, J. Y.: Overview of the NOAA/ESRL Federated Aerosol
Network, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 100, 123–135, https://doi.org/10.1175/bams-d-17-0175.1, 2019.
Arnott, W. P., Walker, J. W., Moosmuller, H., Elleman, R. A., Jonsson, H.
H., Buzorius, G., Conant, W. C., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.:
Photoacoustic insight for aerosol light absorption aloft from meteorological
aircraft and comparison with particle soot absorption photometer
measurements: DOE Southern Great Plains climate research facility and the
coastal stratocumulus imposed perturbation experiments, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 111, D05S02, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005jd005964, 2006.
Barkjohn, K. K., Gantt, B., and Clements, A. L.: Development and application of a United States-wide correction for PM2.5 data collected with the PurpleAir sensor, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 4617–4637, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-4617-2021, 2021.
Beuttell, R. G. and Brewer, A. W.: Instruments for the measurement of the
visual range, J. Sci. Instr. Phys. Ind., 26, 357–359, https://doi.org/10.1088/0950-7671/26/11/302, 1949.
Bodhaine, B. A. and Mendonca, B. G.: Preliminary four wavelength
nephelometer measurements at Mauna Loa Observatory, Geophys. Res. Lett., 1,
119–122, https://doi.org/10.1029/GL001i003p00119, 1974.
Bodhaine, B. A., Mendonca, B. G., Harris, J. M., and Miller, J. M.: Seasonal
variations in aerosols and atmospheric transmission at Mauna Loa
Observatory, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 86, 7395–7398, https://doi.org/10.1029/JC086iC08p07395, 1981.
Bohren, C. F. and Huffman, D. R.: Absorption and Scattering of Light by
Small Particles, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, ISBN 0471057772X,
1983.
Brockman, J. E.: Aerosol transport in lines and inlets – Sample extraction
section 6.2, in: Aerosol Measurement: Principles, Techniques and Applications, 3rd edn., edited by: Kulkarni, P., Baron, P., and Willeke, K., John Wiley and Sons, ISBN 978-0-1033 470-38741-2, 2011.
Butcher, S. S. and Charlson, R. J.: An Introduction to Air Chemistry,
Academic Press, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-148250-3.X5001-X, 1972.
Chambers, S. D., Zahorowski, W., Williams, A. G., Crawford, J., and
Griffiths, A. D.: Identifying tropospheric baseline air masses at Mauna Loa
Observatory between 2004 and 2010 using Radon-222 and back trajectories, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 992–1004, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012jd018212, 2013.
Currie, L. A.: Limits for qualitative detection and quantitative
determination – Application to radiochemistry, Anal. Chem., 40, 586–593,
https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60259a007, 1968.
Friedlander, S. K.: Smoke, Dust and Haze: Fundamentals of Aerosol Behavior,
Wiley, New York, 333 pp., ISBN 9780471014683, 1977.
Gliß, J., Mortier, A., Schulz, M., Andrews, E., Balkanski, Y., Bauer, S. E., Benedictow, A. M. K., Bian, H., Checa-Garcia, R., Chin, M., Ginoux, P., Griesfeller, J. J., Heckel, A., Kipling, Z., Kirkevåg, A., Kokkola, H., Laj, P., Le Sager, P., Lund, M. T., Lund Myhre, C., Matsui, H., Myhre, G., Neubauer, D., van Noije, T., North, P., Olivié, D. J. L., Rémy, S., Sogacheva, L., Takemura, T., Tsigaridis, K., and Tsyro, S. G.: AeroCom phase III multi-model evaluation of the aerosol life cycle and optical properties using ground- and space-based remote sensing as well as surface in situ observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 87–128, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-87-2021, 2021.
Grinshpun, S., Willeke, K., and Kalatoor, S.: A general equation for aerosol
aspiration by thin-walled sampling probes in calm and moving air, Atmos.
Environ. A-Gen., 27, 1459–1470, https://doi.org/10.1016/0960-1686(93)90132-i, 1993.
Gupta, P., Doraiswamy, P., Levy, R., Pikelnaya, O., Maibach, J., Feenstra,
B., Polidori, A., Kiros, F., and Mills, K. C.: Impact of California fires on
local and regional air quality: The role of a low-cost sensor network and
satellite observations, Geohealth, 2, 172–181, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018gh000136,
2018.
Hagan, D. H. and Kroll, J. H.: Assessing the accuracy of low-cost optical particle sensors using a physics-based approach, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 6343–6355, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-6343-2020, 2020.
Hand, J. L. and Malm, W. C.: Review of aerosol mass scattering efficiencies
from ground-based measurements since 1990, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D16203,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008484, 2007.
Hangal, S. and Willeke, K.: Aspiration efficiency – Unified model for all
forward sampling angles, Environ. Sci. Technol., 24, 688–691, https://doi.org/10.1021/es00075a012, 1990.
Harris, J. M. and Kahl, J. D.: A descriptive atmospheric transport
climatology for the Mauna Loa Observatory, using clustered trajectories, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 95, 13651–13667, https://doi.org/10.1029/JD095iD09p13651,
1990.
He, M. L., Kuerbanjiang, N., and Dhaniyala, S.: Performance characteristics
of the low-cost Plantower PMS optical sensor, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 54,
232–241, https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2019.1696015, 2020.
Heintzenberg, J. and Charlson, R. J.: Design and applications of the
integrating nephelometer: A review, J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol., 13,
987–1000, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1996)013<0987:Daaoti>2.0.Co;2, 1996.
Heintzenberg, J., Wiedensohler, A., Tuch, T. M., Covert, D. S., Sheridan,
P., Ogren, J. A., Gras, J., Nessler, R., Kleefeld, C., Kalivitis, N.,
Aaltonen, V., Wilhelm, R. T., and Havlicek, M.: Intercomparisons and aerosol
calibrations of 12 commercial integrating nephelometers of three
manufacturers, J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol., 23, 902–914, https://doi.org/10.1175/jtech1892.1, 2006.
Hering, S. V.: Impactors, cyclones, and other inertial and gravitational
collectors, in: Air Sampling Instruments for Evaluation of Atmospheric Contaminants, edited by: Cohen, B. S. and Hering, S. V., American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, Cincinnati, 279–289, ISBN 9781882417087, available at:
http://calliope.dem.uniud.it/CLASS/DES-IND-PLA1/impactorscyclonesch14p1.pdf (last access: 31 January 2022), 1995.
Holder, A. L., Mebust, A. K., Maghran, L. A., McGown, M. R., Stewart, K. E.,
Vallano, D. M., Elleman, R. A., and Baker, K. R.: Field evaluation of
low-cost particulate matter sensors for measuring wildfire smoke, Sensors,
20, 4796, https://doi.org/10.3390/s20174796, 2020.
Hyslop, N. P. and White, W. H.: An empirical approach to estimating
detection limits using collocated data, Environ. Sci. Technol., 42,
5235–5240, https://doi.org/10.1021/es7025196, 2008.
Hyslop, N. P. and White, W. H.: Estimating precision using duplicate
measurements, J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc., 59, 1032–1039, https://doi.org/10.3155/1047-3289.59.9.1032, 2009.
Jayaratne, R., Liu, X. T., Ahn, K. H., Asumadu-Sakyi, A., Fisher, G., Gao,
J., Mabon, A., Mazaheri, M., Mullins, B., Nyaku, M., Ristovski, Z., Scorgie,
Y., Thai, P., Dunbabin, M., and Morawska, L.: Low-cost PM2.5 sensors: An
assessment of their suitability for various applications, Aerosol Air Qual.
Res., 20, 520–532, https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2018.10.0390, 2020.
JCGM100:GUM: Evaluation of measurement data – Guide to the Expression of
Uncertainty in Measurement, International Standardization Organization,
Geneva, available at:
https://www.bipm.org/en/publications/guides/gum.html (last access: 22 March 2021), 2008.
Kelly, K. E., Whitaker, J., Petty, A., Widmer, C., Dybwad, A., Sleeth, D.,
Martin, R., and Butterfield, A.: Ambient and laboratory evaluation of a
low-cost particulate matter sensor, Environ. Pollut., 221, 491–500, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.12.039, 2017.
Kuula, J., Mäkelä, T., Aurela, M., Teinilä, K., Varjonen, S., González, Ó., and Timonen, H.: Laboratory evaluation of particle-size selectivity of optical low-cost particulate matter sensors, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 2413–2423, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2413-2020, 2020.
Laj, P., Bigi, A., Rose, C., Andrews, E., Lund Myhre, C., Collaud Coen, M., Lin, Y., Wiedensohler, A., Schulz, M., Ogren, J. A., Fiebig, M., Gliß, J., Mortier, A., Pandolfi, M., Petäja, T., Kim, S.-W., Aas, W., Putaud, J.-P., Mayol-Bracero, O., Keywood, M., Labrador, L., Aalto, P., Ahlberg, E., Alados Arboledas, L., Alastuey, A., Andrade, M., Artíñano, B., Ausmeel, S., Arsov, T., Asmi, E., Backman, J., Baltensperger, U., Bastian, S., Bath, O., Beukes, J. P., Brem, B. T., Bukowiecki, N., Conil, S., Couret, C., Day, D., Dayantolis, W., Degorska, A., Eleftheriadis, K., Fetfatzis, P., Favez, O., Flentje, H., Gini, M. I., Gregorič, A., Gysel-Beer, M., Hallar, A. G., Hand, J., Hoffer, A., Hueglin, C., Hooda, R. K., Hyvärinen, A., Kalapov, I., Kalivitis, N., Kasper-Giebl, A., Kim, J. E., Kouvarakis, G., Kranjc, I., Krejci, R., Kulmala, M., Labuschagne, C., Lee, H.-J., Lihavainen, H., Lin, N.-H., Löschau, G., Luoma, K., Marinoni, A., Martins Dos Santos, S., Meinhardt, F., Merkel, M., Metzger, J.-M., Mihalopoulos, N., Nguyen, N. A., Ondracek, J., Pérez, N., Perrone, M. R., Petit, J.-E., Picard, D., Pichon, J.-M., Pont, V., Prats, N., Prenni, A., Reisen, F., Romano, S., Sellegri, K., Sharma, S., Schauer, G., Sheridan, P., Sherman, J. P., Schütze, M., Schwerin, A., Sohmer, R., Sorribas, M., Steinbacher, M., Sun, J., Titos, G., Toczko, B., Tuch, T., Tulet, P., Tunved, P., Vakkari, V., Velarde, F., Velasquez, P., Villani, P., Vratolis, S., Wang, S.-H., Weinhold, K., Weller, R., Yela, M., Yus-Diez, J., Zdimal, V., Zieger, P., and Zikova, N.: A global analysis of climate-relevant aerosol properties retrieved from the network of Global Atmosphere Watch (GAW) near-surface observatories, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 4353–4392, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-4353-2020, 2020.
Malings, C., Tanzer, R., Hauryliuk, A., Saha, P. K., Robinson, A. L.,
Presto, A. A., and Subramanian, R.: Fine particle mass monitoring with
low-cost sensors: Corrections and long-term performance evaluation, Aerosol
Sci. Technol., 54, 160–174, https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2019.1623863, 2020.
Malm, W. C., Sisler, J. F., Huffman, D., Eldred, R. A., and Cahill, T. A.:
Spatial and seasonal trends in particle concentration and optical extinction
in the United States, J. Geophys. Res., 99, 1347–1370, https://doi.org/10.1029/93JD02916, 1994.
Markowicz, K. M. and Chilinski, M. T.: Evaluation of two low-cost optical
particle counters for the measurement of ambient aerosol scattering
coefficient and Ångstrom exponent, Sensors, 20, 2617, https://doi.org/10.3390/s20092617, 2020.
Mehadi, A., Moosmueller, H., Campbell, D. E., Ham, W., Schweizer, D.,
Tarnay, L., and Hunter, J.: Laboratory and field evaluation of real-time and
near real-time PM2.5 smoke monitors, J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc., 70,
158–179, https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2019.1654036, 2020.
Middleton, W. E. K.: Vision Through the Atmosphere, University of Toronto
Press, Toronto, 250 pp., ISBN 9781487587109, 1952.
Miller, J. M.: A 5-year climatology of back trajectories from the Mauna Loa
Observatory, Hawaii, Atmos. Environ., 15, 1553–1558, https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(81)90138-4, 1981.
Molenar, J. V.: Analysis of the real world performance of the Optec NGN-2
ambient nephelometer, presented at the Air & Waste Management Association
confererence on Visual Air Quality: Aerosols and Global Radiation Balance, 9–12 September 1997, Bartlett, New Hampshire, USA, 243–265, available at:
https://www.optecinc.com/visibility/pdf/ngn_2_analysis_real_world.pdf (last access: 31 January 2022), 1997.
Morawska, L., Thai, P. K., Liu, X. T., Asumadu-Sakyi, A., Ayoko, G.,
Bartonova, A., Bedini, A., Chai, F. H., Christensen, B., Dunbabin, M., Gao,
J., Hagler, G. S. W., Jayaratne, R., Kumar, P., Lau, A. K. H., Louie, P. K.
K., Mazaheri, M., Ning, Z., Motta, N., Mullins, B., Rahman, M. M.,
Ristovski, Z., Shafiei, M., Tjondronegoro, D., Westerdahl, D., and Williams,
R.: Applications of low-cost sensing technologies for air quality monitoring
and exposure assessment: How far have they gone?, Environ. Int., 116,
286–299, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2018.04.018, 2018.
Mulholland, G. W. and Bryner, N. P.: Radiometric model of the transmission
cell-reciprocal nephelomeeter, Atmos. Environ., 28, 873–887, https://doi.org/10.1016/1352-2310(94)90246-1, 1994.
Müller, T., Laborde, M., Kassell, G., and Wiedensohler, A.: Design and performance of a three-wavelength LED-based total scatter and backscatter integrating nephelometer, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 4, 1291–1303, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-1291-2011, 2011.
Nakayama, T., Suzuki, H., Kagamitani, S., Ikeda, Y., Uchiyama, A., and
Matsumi, Y.: Characterization of a three wavelength Photoacoustic Soot
Spectrometer (PASS-3) and a Photoacoustic Extinctiometer (PAX), J. Meteorol.
Soc. Jpn., 93, 285–308, https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.2015-016, 2015.
Naqwi, A. and Durst, F.: Focusing of diode laser beams - A simple
mathematical model, Appl. Optics, 29, 1780–1785, https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.29.001780,
1990.
Ouimette, J., Malm, W., Schichtel, B., Sheridan, P., Andrews, E., Ogren, J. A., and Arnott, W. P.: Datasets for paper “Evaluating the PurpleAir monitor as an aerosol light scattering instrument” (1.0_20211215), Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5764982, 2021.
Pandolfi, M., Alados-Arboledas, L., Alastuey, A., Andrade, M., Angelov, C., Artiñano, B., Backman, J., Baltensperger, U., Bonasoni, P., Bukowiecki, N., Collaud Coen, M., Conil, S., Coz, E., Crenn, V., Dudoitis, V., Ealo, M., Eleftheriadis, K., Favez, O., Fetfatzis, P., Fiebig, M., Flentje, H., Ginot, P., Gysel, M., Henzing, B., Hoffer, A., Holubova Smejkalova, A., Kalapov, I., Kalivitis, N., Kouvarakis, G., Kristensson, A., Kulmala, M., Lihavainen, H., Lunder, C., Luoma, K., Lyamani, H., Marinoni, A., Mihalopoulos, N., Moerman, M., Nicolas, J., O'Dowd, C., Petäjä, T., Petit, J.-E., Pichon, J. M., Prokopciuk, N., Putaud, J.-P., Rodríguez, S., Sciare, J., Sellegri, K., Swietlicki, E., Titos, G., Tuch, T., Tunved, P., Ulevicius, V., Vaishya, A., Vana, M., Virkkula, A., Vratolis, S., Weingartner, E., Wiedensohler, A., and Laj, P.: A European aerosol phenomenology – 6: scattering properties of atmospheric aerosol particles from 28 ACTRIS sites, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 7877–7911, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7877-2018, 2018.
Papapostolou, V., Zhang, H., Feenstra, B. J., and Polidori, A.: Development
of an environmental chamber for evaluating the performance of low-cost air
quality sensors under controlled conditions, Atmos. Environ., 171, 82–90,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.10.003, 2017.
Pawar, H. and Sinha, B.: Humidity, density, and inlet aspiration efficiency
correction improve accuracy of a low-cost sensor during field calibration at
a suburban site in the North-Western Indo-Gangetic plain (NW-IGP), Aerosol
Sci. Technol., 54, 685–703, https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2020.1719971, 2020.
Ryan, S.: The wind field around Mauna Loa derived from surface and balloon
observations, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 102, 10711–10725, https://doi.org/10.1029/97jd00646, 1997.
Sayahi, T., Butterfield, A., and Kelly, K. E.: Long-term field evaluation of
the Plantower PMS low-cost particulate matter sensors, Environ. Pollut.,
245, 932–940, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.11.065, 2019.
Shaw, G. E.: Transport of Asian desert aerosol to the Hawaiian Islands, J.
Appl. Meteorol., 19, 1254–1259,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1980)019<1254:Toadat>2.0.Co;2, 1980.
Sherman, J. P., Sheridan, P. J., Ogren, J. A., Andrews, E., Hageman, D., Schmeisser, L., Jefferson, A., and Sharma, S.: A multi-year study of lower tropospheric aerosol variability and systematic relationships from four North American regions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 12487–12517, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-12487-2015, 2015.
Snider, G., Weagle, C. L., Martin, R. V., van Donkelaar, A., Conrad, K., Cunningham, D., Gordon, C., Zwicker, M., Akoshile, C., Artaxo, P., Anh, N. X., Brook, J., Dong, J., Garland, R. M., Greenwald, R., Griffith, D., He, K., Holben, B. N., Kahn, R., Koren, I., Lagrosas, N., Lestari, P., Ma, Z., Vanderlei Martins, J., Quel, E. J., Rudich, Y., Salam, A., Tripathi, S. N., Yu, C., Zhang, Q., Zhang, Y., Brauer, M., Cohen, A., Gibson, M. D., and Liu, Y.: SPARTAN: a global network to evaluate and enhance satellite-based estimates of ground-level particulate matter for global health applications, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 505–521, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-505-2015, 2015.
Tryner, J., L’Orange, C., Mehaffy, J., Miller-Lionberg, D., Hofstetter, J. C., Wilson, A., and Volckens, J.: Dataset associated with “Laboratory evaluation of low-cost PurpleAir PM monitors and in-field correction using co-located portable filter samplers”, Colorado State University [data set], https://doi.org/10.25675/10217/195445, 2019.
Tryner, J., Mehaffy, J., Miller-Lionberg, D., and Volckens, J.: Effects of aerosol type and simulated aging on performance of low-cost PM sensors, J. Aerosol Sci., 150, 105654, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2020.105654, 2020.
Tsai, C.-J., Nair, U., and Hafner, H. (Eds.): Low-cost Sensors for Air Quality Monitoring, Aerosol Air Qual. Res., 20, https://aaqr.org/articles/20/2 (last access: 31 January 2022), 2020.
Zheng, T., Bergin, M. H., Johnson, K. K., Tripathi, S. N., Shirodkar, S., Landis, M. S., Sutaria, R., and Carlson, D. E.: Field evaluation of low-cost particulate matter sensors in high- and low-concentration environments, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 4823–4846, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-4823-2018, 2018.
Zhou, Y.: Product data manual of PLANTOWER – PMS5003 series, Adafruit Industries LLC, available at:
https://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/aq-spec/resources-page/plantower-pms5003-manual_v2-3.pdf (last access: 15 March 2021), 2016.
Short summary
We show that the low-cost PurpleAir sensor can be characterized as a cell-reciprocal nephelometer. At two very different locations (Mauna Loa Observatory in Hawaii and the Table Mountain rural site in Colorado), the PurpleAir measurements are highly correlated with the submicrometer aerosol scattering coefficient measured by a research-grade integrating nephelometer. These results imply that, with care, PurpleAir data may be used to evaluate climate and air quality models.
We show that the low-cost PurpleAir sensor can be characterized as a cell-reciprocal...
