Articles | Volume 15, issue 24
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-7395-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-7395-2022
Research article
 | 
22 Dec 2022
Research article |  | 22 Dec 2022

Evaluation of a low-cost dryer for a low-cost optical particle counter

Miriam Chacón-Mateos, Bernd Laquai, Ulrich Vogt, and Cosima Stubenrauch

Related authors

Performance analysis of the NanoScan SMPS and the Mini WRAS Ultrafine Aerosol Particle Size Spectrometers
Ajit Ahlawat, Kay Weinhold, Jesus Marval, Paolo Tronville, Ari Leskinen, Mika Komppula, Holger Gerwig, Lars Gerling, Stephan Weber, Rikke Bramming Jørgensen, Thomas Nørregaard Jensen, Marouane Merizak, Ulrich Vogt, Carla Ribalta, Mar Viana, Andre Schmitz, Maria Chiesa, Giacomo Gerosa, Lothar Keck, Markus Pesch, Gerhard Steiner, Thomas Krinke, Torsten Tritscher, Wolfram Birmili, and Alfred Wiedensohler
Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2022-155,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2022-155, 2022
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Aerosols | Technique: Laboratory Measurement | Topic: Instruments and Platforms
The AERosol and TRACe gas Collector (AERTRACC): an online-measurement-controlled sampler for source-resolved emission analysis
Julia Pikmann, Lasse Moormann, Frank Drewnick, and Stephan Borrmann
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 1323–1341, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-1323-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-1323-2023, 2023
Short summary
Quantitative chemical assay of nanogram-level particulate matter using aerosol mass spectrometry: characterization of particles collected from uncrewed atmospheric measurement platforms
Christopher R. Niedek, Fan Mei, Maria A. Zawadowicz, Zihua Zhu, Beat Schmid, and Qi Zhang
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 955–968, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-955-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-955-2023, 2023
Short summary
An optimised organic carbon ∕ elemental carbon (OC ∕ EC) fraction separation method for radiocarbon source apportionment applied to low-loaded Arctic aerosol filters
Martin Rauber, Gary Salazar, Karl Espen Yttri, and Sönke Szidat
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 825–844, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-825-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-825-2023, 2023
Short summary
Investigating the dependence of mineral dust depolarization on complex refractive index and size with a laboratory polarimeter at 180.0° lidar backscattering angle
Alain Miffre, Danaël Cholleton, Clément Noël, and Patrick Rairoux
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 403–417, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-403-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-403-2023, 2023
Short summary
Effects of temperature and salinity on bubble-bursting aerosol formation simulated with a bubble-generating chamber
Svetlana Sofieva, Eija Asmi, Nina S. Atanasova, Aino E. Heikkinen, Emeline Vidal, Jonathan Duplissy, Martin Romantschuk, Rostislav Kouznetsov, Jaakko Kukkonen, Dennis H. Bamford, Antti-Pekka Hyvärinen, and Mikhail Sofiev
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 6201–6219, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6201-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6201-2022, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Alphasense Ltd.: OPC-R1 Optical Particle Counter User Manual: Issue 1, 072-0500, 2019. 
Angelov, K., Todorov, P., and Pérez-Díaz, J. L.: Aerosol generation devices suitable for simulating fogs in laboratory conditions, Security & Future, 1, 38–41, https://stumejournals.com/journals/confsec/2017/1/38.full.pdf (last access: 21 December 2022), 2017. 
Badura, M., Batog, P., Drzeniecka-Osiadacz, A., and Modzel, P.: Regression methods in the calibration of low-cost sensors for ambient particulate matter measurements, SN Appl. Sci., 1, 622, https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019-0630-1, 2019. 
Barkjohn, K. K., Gantt, B., and Clements, A. L.: Development and application of a United States-wide correction for PM2.5 data collected with the PurpleAir sensor, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 4617–4637, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-4617-2021, 2021. 
Boucher, O.: Atmospheric Aerosols: Properties and Climate Impacts, Springer-Verlag, s.l., 311 pp., https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9649-1, 2015. 
Download
Short summary
The study evaluates a low-cost dryer to avoid the negative effect of hygroscopic growth and fog droplets in the particulate matter (PM) concentrations of sensors. The results show a reduction in the overestimation of the PM but also an underestimation compared to reference devices. Special care is needed when designing a dryer as high temperatures change the sampled air by evaporating the most volatile particulate species. Low-cost dryers are very promising for different sensor applications.