Articles | Volume 15, issue 24
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-7395-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-7395-2022
Research article
 | 
22 Dec 2022
Research article |  | 22 Dec 2022

Evaluation of a low-cost dryer for a low-cost optical particle counter

Miriam Chacón-Mateos, Bernd Laquai, Ulrich Vogt, and Cosima Stubenrauch

Related authors

Performance analysis of the NanoScan SMPS and the Mini WRAS Ultrafine Aerosol Particle Size Spectrometers
Ajit Ahlawat, Kay Weinhold, Jesus Marval, Paolo Tronville, Ari Leskinen, Mika Komppula, Holger Gerwig, Lars Gerling, Stephan Weber, Rikke Bramming Jørgensen, Thomas Nørregaard Jensen, Marouane Merizak, Ulrich Vogt, Carla Ribalta, Mar Viana, Andre Schmitz, Maria Chiesa, Giacomo Gerosa, Lothar Keck, Markus Pesch, Gerhard Steiner, Thomas Krinke, Torsten Tritscher, Wolfram Birmili, and Alfred Wiedensohler
Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2022-155,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2022-155, 2022
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Aerosols | Technique: Laboratory Measurement | Topic: Instruments and Platforms
A comprehensive evaluation of enhanced temperature influence on gas and aerosol chemistry in the lamp-enclosed oxidation flow reactor (OFR) system
Tianle Pan, Andrew T. Lambe, Weiwei Hu, Yicong He, Minghao Hu, Huaishan Zhou, Xinming Wang, Qingqing Hu, Hui Chen, Yue Zhao, Yuanlong Huang, Doug R. Worsnop, Zhe Peng, Melissa A. Morris, Douglas A. Day, Pedro Campuzano-Jost, Jose-Luis Jimenez, and Shantanu H. Jathar
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 4915–4939, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4915-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4915-2024, 2024
Short summary
An oxidation flow reactor for simulating and accelerating secondary aerosol formation in aerosol liquid water and cloud droplets
Ningjin Xu, Chen Le, David R. Cocker, Kunpeng Chen, Ying-Hsuan Lin, and Don R. Collins
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 4227–4243, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4227-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4227-2024, 2024
Short summary
Surface equilibrium vapor pressure of organic nanoparticles measured from the dynamic-aerosol-size electrical mobility spectrometer
Ella Häkkinen, Huan Yang, Runlong Cai, and Juha Kangasluoma
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 4211–4225, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4211-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4211-2024, 2024
Short summary
Quality assurance and quality control of atmospheric organosulfates measured using hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC)
Ping Liu, Xiang Ding, Bo-Xuan Li, Yu-Qing Zhang, Daniel J. Bryant, and Xin-Ming Wang
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3067–3079, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3067-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3067-2024, 2024
Short summary
Micro-PINGUIN: microtiter-plate-based instrument for ice nucleation detection in gallium with an infrared camera
Corina Wieber, Mads Rosenhøj Jeppesen, Kai Finster, Claus Melvad, and Tina Šantl-Temkiv
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 2707–2719, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2707-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2707-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Alphasense Ltd.: OPC-R1 Optical Particle Counter User Manual: Issue 1, 072-0500, 2019. 
Angelov, K., Todorov, P., and Pérez-Díaz, J. L.: Aerosol generation devices suitable for simulating fogs in laboratory conditions, Security & Future, 1, 38–41, https://stumejournals.com/journals/confsec/2017/1/38.full.pdf (last access: 21 December 2022), 2017. 
Badura, M., Batog, P., Drzeniecka-Osiadacz, A., and Modzel, P.: Regression methods in the calibration of low-cost sensors for ambient particulate matter measurements, SN Appl. Sci., 1, 622, https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019-0630-1, 2019. 
Barkjohn, K. K., Gantt, B., and Clements, A. L.: Development and application of a United States-wide correction for PM2.5 data collected with the PurpleAir sensor, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 4617–4637, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-4617-2021, 2021. 
Boucher, O.: Atmospheric Aerosols: Properties and Climate Impacts, Springer-Verlag, s.l., 311 pp., https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9649-1, 2015. 
Download
Short summary
The study evaluates a low-cost dryer to avoid the negative effect of hygroscopic growth and fog droplets in the particulate matter (PM) concentrations of sensors. The results show a reduction in the overestimation of the PM but also an underestimation compared to reference devices. Special care is needed when designing a dryer as high temperatures change the sampled air by evaporating the most volatile particulate species. Low-cost dryers are very promising for different sensor applications.