Articles | Volume 10, issue 4
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 1313–1321, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-1313-2017
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 1313–1321, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-1313-2017

Research article 03 Apr 2017

Research article | 03 Apr 2017

Assessment of 222radon progeny loss in long tubing based on static filter measurements in the laboratory and in the field

Ingeborg Levin et al.

Related authors

Effects of point source emission heights in WRF–STILT: a step towards exploiting nocturnal observations in models
Fabian Maier, Christoph Gerbig, Ingeborg Levin, Ingrid Super, Julia Marshall, and Samuel Hammer
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2021-386,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2021-386, 2021
Preprint under review for GMD
Short summary
Limitations of the radon tracer method (RTM) to estimate regional greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions – a case study for methane in Heidelberg
Ingeborg Levin, Ute Karstens, Samuel Hammer, Julian DellaColetta, Fabian Maier, and Maksym Gachkivskyi
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 17907–17926, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-17907-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-17907-2021, 2021
Short summary
A dedicated flask sampling strategy developed for Integrated Carbon Observation System (ICOS) stations based on CO2 and CO measurements and Stochastic Time-Inverted Lagrangian Transport (STILT) footprint modelling
Ingeborg Levin, Ute Karstens, Markus Eritt, Fabian Maier, Sabrina Arnold, Daniel Rzesanke, Samuel Hammer, Michel Ramonet, Gabriela Vítková, Sebastien Conil, Michal Heliasz, Dagmar Kubistin, and Matthias Lindauer
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 11161–11180, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-11161-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-11161-2020, 2020
Short summary
Intercomparison study of atmospheric 222Rn and 222Rn progeny monitors
Claudia Grossi, Scott D. Chambers, Olivier Llido, Felix R. Vogel, Victor Kazan, Alessandro Capuana, Sylvester Werczynski, Roger Curcoll, Marc Delmotte, Arturo Vargas, Josep-Anton Morguí, Ingeborg Levin, and Michel Ramonet
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 2241–2255, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2241-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2241-2020, 2020
Short summary
The influence of 14CO2 releases from regional nuclear facilities at the Heidelberg 14CO2 sampling site (1986–2014)
Matthias Kuderer, Samuel Hammer, and Ingeborg Levin
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 7951–7959, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7951-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7951-2018, 2018
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Aerosols | Technique: Laboratory Measurement | Topic: Instruments and Platforms
A study on the fragmentation of sulfuric acid and dimethylamine clusters inside an atmospheric pressure interface time-of-flight mass spectrometer
Dina Alfaouri, Monica Passananti, Tommaso Zanca, Lauri Ahonen, Juha Kangasluoma, Jakub Kubečka, Nanna Myllys, and Hanna Vehkamäki
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 11–19, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-11-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-11-2022, 2022
Short summary
A semi-automated instrument for cellular oxidative potential evaluation (SCOPE) of water-soluble extracts of ambient particulate matter
Sudheer Salana, Yixiang Wang, Joseph V. Puthussery, and Vishal Verma
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 7579–7593, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-7579-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-7579-2021, 2021
Short summary
Utilizing an electrical low-pressure impactor to indirectly probe water uptake via particle bounce measurements
Kevin B. Fischer and Giuseppe A. Petrucci
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 7565–7577, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-7565-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-7565-2021, 2021
Short summary
Calibration and evaluation of a broad supersaturation scanning (BS2) cloud condensation nuclei counter for rapid measurement of particle hygroscopicity and cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) activity
Najin Kim, Yafang Cheng, Nan Ma, Mira L. Pöhlker, Thomas Klimach, Thomas F. Mentel, Ovid O. Krüger, Ulrich Pöschl, and Hang Su
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 6991–7005, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-6991-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-6991-2021, 2021
Short summary
Correcting bias in log-linear instrument calibrations in the context of chemical ionization mass spectrometry
Chenyang Bi, Jordan E. Krechmer, Manjula R. Canagaratna, and Gabriel Isaacman-VanWertz
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 6551–6560, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-6551-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-6551-2021, 2021
Short summary

Cited articles

Brockmann, J. E.: Sampling and transport of aerosols, in: Aerosol Measurement – Principles, Techniques, and Applications, edited by: Willeke, K. and Baron, P. A., Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 77–111, 2005.
Chambers, S., Williams, A. G., Zahorowski, W., Griffiths, A. D., and Crawford, J.: Separating remote fetch and local mixing influences on vertical radon measurements in the lower atmosphere, Tellus, 63, 843–859, 2011.
Hammer, S. and Levin, I.: Seasonal variation of molecular hydrogen uptake by soils inferred from atmospheric observations in Heidelberg, south-west Germany, Tellus B, 61, 556–565, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2009.00417.x, 2009.
Jacob, D. J. and Prather, M. J.: Radon-222 as a test of convective transport in a general circulation model, Tellus B, 42, 118-134, 1990.
Jacobi, W. and André, K.: The Vertical Distribution of Radon 222, Radon 220 and their decay products in the atmosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 68, 3799–3814, 1963.
Short summary
222Radon is often used to parameterise atmospheric transport in the lower troposphere. It can be measured via its decay products, which are bound to aerosol. Air sampling through long tubing, which sometimes cannot be avoided at tall tower sites, may then cause severe aerosol and corresponding radon daughter activity loss. We have quantified this loss for 8.2 mm ID Decabon tubing used at European stations and provide a length-dependent correction function for this experimental setting.