Articles | Volume 11, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1777-2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1777-2018
Research article
 | 
28 Mar 2018
Research article |  | 28 Mar 2018

Intra-urban spatial variability of surface ozone in Riverside, CA: viability and validation of low-cost sensors

Kira Sadighi, Evan Coffey, Andrea Polidori, Brandon Feenstra, Qin Lv, Daven K. Henze, and Michael Hannigan

Related authors

Development of the adjoint of the GEOS-Chem unified tropospheric-stratospheric chemistry extension (UCX) in GEOS-Chem Adjoint v36
Irene Constantina Dedoussi, Daven K. Henze, Sebastian D. Eastham, Raymond L. Speth, and Steven R. H. Barrett
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2023-233,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2023-233, 2024
Revised manuscript under review for GMD
Short summary
Aggravated surface O3 pollution primarily driven by meteorological variation in China during the early COVID-19 pandemic lockdown period
Zhendong Lu, Jun Wang, Yi Wang, Daven K. Henze, Xi Chen, Tong Sha, and Kang Sun
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2723,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2723, 2023
Short summary
Performance evaluation of MOMA (MOment MAtching) – a remote network calibration technique for PM2.5 and PM10 sensors
Lena Francesca Weissert, Geoff Steven Henshaw, David Edward Williams, Brandon Feenstra, Randy Lam, Ashley Collier-Oxandale, Vasileios Papapostolou, and Andrea Polidori
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 4709–4722, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-4709-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-4709-2023, 2023
Short summary
AMORE-Isoprene v1.0: a new reduced mechanism for gas-phase isoprene oxidation
Forwood Wiser, Bryan K. Place, Siddhartha Sen, Havala O. T. Pye, Benjamin Yang, Daniel M. Westervelt, Daven K. Henze, Arlene M. Fiore, and V. Faye McNeill
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1801–1821, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1801-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1801-2023, 2023
Short summary
A high-resolution satellite-based map of global methane emissions reveals missing wetland, fossil fuel, and monsoon sources
Xueying Yu, Dylan B. Millet, Daven K. Henze, Alexander J. Turner, Alba Lorente Delgado, A. Anthony Bloom, and Jianxiong Sheng
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 3325–3346, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-3325-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-3325-2023, 2023
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Gases | Technique: In Situ Measurement | Topic: Validation and Intercomparisons
Assessment of current methane emission quantification techniques for natural gas midstream applications
Yunsong Liu, Jean-Daniel Paris, Gregoire Broquet, Violeta Bescós Roy, Tania Meixus Fernandez, Rasmus Andersen, Andrés Russu Berlanga, Emil Christensen, Yann Courtois, Sebastian Dominok, Corentin Dussenne, Travis Eckert, Andrew Finlayson, Aurora Fernández de la Fuente, Catlin Gunn, Ram Hashmonay, Juliano Grigoleto Hayashi, Jonathan Helmore, Soeren Honsel, Fabrizio Innocenti, Matti Irjala, Torgrim Log, Cristina Lopez, Francisco Cortés Martínez, Jonathan Martinez, Adrien Massardier, Helle Gottschalk Nygaard, Paula Agregan Reboredo, Elodie Rousset, Axel Scherello, Matthias Ulbricht, Damien Weidmann, Oliver Williams, Nigel Yarrow, Murès Zarea, Robert Ziegler, Jean Sciare, Mihalis Vrekoussis, and Philippe Bousquet
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 1633–1649, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1633-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1633-2024, 2024
Short summary
Inter-comparison of Eddy-Covariance Software for Urban Tall Tower Sites
Changxing Lan, Matthias Mauder, Stavros Stagakis, Benjamin Loubet, Claudio D'Onofrio, Stefan Metzger, David Durden, and Pedro-Henrique Herig-Coimbra
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-35,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-35, 2024
Short summary
Performance assessment of state-of-the-art and novel methods for remote compliance monitoring of sulfur emissions from shipping
Jörg Beecken, Andreas Weigelt, Simone Griesel, Johan Mellqvist, Alexander V. Conde Jacobo, Daniëlle van Dinther, Jan Duyzer, Jon Knudsen, Bettina Knudsen, and Leonidas Ntziachristos
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 5883–5895, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-5883-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-5883-2023, 2023
Short summary
Intercomparison of detection and quantification methods for methane emissions from the natural gas distribution network in Hamburg, Germany
Hossein Maazallahi, Antonio Delre, Charlotte Scheutz, Anders M. Fredenslund, Stefan Schwietzke, Hugo Denier van der Gon, and Thomas Röckmann
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 5051–5073, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-5051-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-5051-2023, 2023
Short summary
Pico-Light H2O: Intercomparison of in situ water vapour measurements during the AsA 2022 campaign
Mélanie Ghysels, Georges Durry, Nadir Amarouche, Dale Hurst, Emrys Hall, Kensy Xiong, Jean-Charles Dupont, Jean-Christophe Samake, Fabien Frérot, Raghed Bejjani, and Emmanuel Damien Riviere
Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2023-191,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2023-191, 2023
Revised manuscript accepted for AMT
Short summary

Cited articles

Barsan, N. and Weimar, U.: Conduction model of metal oxide gas sensors, J. Electroceram., 7, 143–167, 2001.
Bart, M., Williams, D. E., Ainslie, B., McKendry, I., Salmond, J., Grange, S. K., Alavi-Shoshtari, M., Steyn, D., and Henshaw, G. S.: High Density Ozone Monitoring Using Gas Sensitive Semi-Conductor Sensors in the Lower Fraser Valley, British Columbia, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48, 3970–3977, https://doi.org/10.1021/es404610t, 2014.
Blanchard, C. L., Tanenbaum, S., and Hidy, G. M.: Spatial and temporal variability of air pollution in Birmingham, Alabama, Atmos. Environ., 89, 382–391, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.01.006, 2014.
California Air Resources Board: Annual Monitoring Network Report for Twenty-three Districts in California, July 2013, available at: https://www.arb.ca.gov/aqd/amnr/amnr2013.pdf (last access: 1 February 2017), 2013.
California Department of Transportation: 2015 Traffic Volumes on California State Highway, available at: http://www.dot.ca.gov/trafficops/census/volumes2015/ (last access: 3 February 2016), 2015.
Download
Short summary
Ground-level ozone has negative human health impacts. In the summer of 2015, 13 low-cost sensor monitors were deployed to several neighborhoods around Riverside, California. There were significant spatial differences between monitors. This is important because it means that ozone in certain places may be higher than what EPA monitors report for an area, which is pertinent for residents of those communities. This research helps inform the limitations and advantages of low-cost sensor networks.