Articles | Volume 12, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-2933-2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-2933-2019
Research article
 | 
28 May 2019
Research article |  | 28 May 2019

Strategies of method selection for fine-scale PM2.5 mapping in an intra-urban area using crowdsourced monitoring

Shan Xu, Bin Zou, Yan Lin, Xiuge Zhao, Shenxin Li, and Chenxia Hu

Related authors

Evaluation and comparison of multiangle implementation of the atmospheric correction algorithm, Dark Target, and Deep Blue aerosol products over China
Ning Liu, Bin Zou, Huihui Feng, Wei Wang, Yuqi Tang, and Yu Liang
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 8243–8268, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-8243-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-8243-2019, 2019
Short summary
SATELLITE-BASED CHINA’S PM2.5 POLLUTION AND ASSOCIATED PREMATURE MORTALITY MEASUREMENT OVER PAST TWO DECADES
S. Li, B. Zou, J. You, X. Fang, X. Zhao, and X. Yao
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-3-W5, 39–45, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-3-W5-39-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-3-W5-39-2018, 2018

Related subject area

Subject: Aerosols | Technique: In Situ Measurement | Topic: Validation and Intercomparisons
Identifying optimal co-location calibration periods for low-cost sensors
Misti Levy Zamora, Colby Buehler, Abhirup Datta, Drew R. Gentner, and Kirsten Koehler
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 169–179, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-169-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-169-2023, 2023
Short summary
Intercomparison of airborne and surface-based measurements during the CLARIFY, ORACLES and LASIC field experiments
Paul A. Barrett, Steven J. Abel, Hugh Coe, Ian Crawford, Amie Dobracki, James Haywood, Steve Howell, Anthony Jones, Justin Langridge, Greg M. McFarquhar, Graeme J. Nott, Hannah Price, Jens Redemann, Yohei Shinozuka, Kate Szpek, Jonathan W. Taylor, Robert Wood, Huihui Wu, Paquita Zuidema, Stéphane Bauguitte, Ryan Bennett, Keith Bower, Hong Chen, Sabrina Cochrane, Michael Cotterell, Nicholas Davies, David Delene, Connor Flynn, Andrew Freedman, Steffen Freitag, Siddhant Gupta, David Noone, Timothy B. Onasch, James Podolske, Michael R. Poellot, Sebastian Schmidt, Stephen Springston, Arthur J. Sedlacek III, Jamie Trembath, Alan Vance, Maria A. Zawadowicz, and Jianhao Zhang
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 6329–6371, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6329-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6329-2022, 2022
Short summary
Balloon-borne aerosol–cloud interaction studies (BACIS): field campaigns to understand and quantify aerosol effects on clouds
Varaha Ravi Kiran, Madineni Venkat Ratnam, Masatomo Fujiwara, Herman Russchenberg, Frank G. Wienhold, Bomidi Lakshmi Madhavan, Mekalathur Roja Raman, Renju Nandan, Sivan Thankamani Akhil Raj, Alladi Hemanth Kumar, and Saginela Ravindra Babu
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 4709–4734, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4709-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4709-2022, 2022
Short summary
Correcting for filter-based aerosol light absorption biases at the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement program's Southern Great Plains site using photoacoustic measurements and machine learning
Joshin Kumar, Theo Paik, Nishit J. Shetty, Patrick Sheridan, Allison C. Aiken, Manvendra K. Dubey, and Rajan K. Chakrabarty
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 4569–4583, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4569-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4569-2022, 2022
Short summary
Development and evaluation of correction models for a low-cost fine particulate matter monitor
Brayden Nilson, Peter L. Jackson, Corinne L. Schiller, and Matthew T. Parsons
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 3315–3328, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3315-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3315-2022, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Apte, J. S., Messier, K. P., Gani, S., Brauer, M., Kirchstetter, T. W., Lunden, M. M., Marshall, J. D., Portier, C. J., Vermeulen, R. C., and Hamburg, S. P.: High-resolution air pollution mapping with google street view cars: exploiting big data, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 6999–7009, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b00891, 2017. 
Badura, M., Batog, P., Drzeniecka-Osiadacz, A., and Modzel, P.: Evaluation of low-cost sensors for ambient PM2.5 monitoring, J. Sensors, 2018, 5096540, 1–16, https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5096540, 2018. 
Beverland, I. J., Cohen, G. R., Heal, M. R., Carder, M., Yap, C., Robertson, C., Hart, C. L., and Agius, R. M.: A comparison of short-term and long-term air pollution exposure associations with mortality in two cohorts in Scotland, Environ. Health Persp., 120, 1280–1285, https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1104509, 2012. 
Choi, G., Bell, M. L., and Lee, J. T.: A study on modeling nitrogen dioxide concentrations using land-use regression and conventionally used exposure assessment methods, Environ. Res. Lett., 12, 044003, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa6057, 2017. 
Download
Short summary
This study presents strategies of method selection for 100 m scale PM2.5 mapping using a crowdsourced sampling campaign. Interestingly, PM2.5 concentrations in micro-environments varied significantly in intra-urban areas. These local PM2.5 variations can be effectively revealed by crowdsourcing sampling rather than national air quality monitoring sites. The selection of models for fine-scale PM2.5 mapping should be adjusted with the changing sampling and pollution circumstances.