Articles | Volume 12, issue 12
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-6695-2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-6695-2019
Research article
 | 
19 Dec 2019
Research article |  | 19 Dec 2019

Detectability of CO2 emission plumes of cities and power plants with the Copernicus Anthropogenic CO2 Monitoring (CO2M) mission

Gerrit Kuhlmann, Grégoire Broquet, Julia Marshall, Valentin Clément, Armin Löscher, Yasjka Meijer, and Dominik Brunner

Related authors

Benchmarking data-driven inversion methods for the estimation of local CO2 emissions from synthetic satellite images of XCO2 and NO2
Diego Santaren, Janne Hakkarainen, Gerrit Kuhlmann, Erik Koene, Frédéric Chevallier, Iolanda Ialongo, Hannakaisa Lindqvist, Janne Nurmela, Johanna Tamminen, Laia Amorós, Dominik Brunner, and Grégoire Broquet
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 211–239, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-211-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-211-2025, 2025
Short summary
Evidence of successful methane mitigation in one of Europe's most important oil production region
Gerrit Kuhlmann, Foteini Stavropoulou, Stefan Schwietzke, Daniel Zavala-Araiza, Andrew Thorpe, Andreas Hueni, Lukas Emmenegger, Andreea Calcan, Thomas Röckmann, and Dominik Brunner
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3494,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3494, 2024
Short summary
Quantification of CO2 hotspot emissions from OCO-3 SAM CO2 satellite images using deep learning methods
Joffrey Dumont Le Brazidec, Pierre Vanderbecken, Alban Farchi, Grégoire Broquet, Gerrit Kuhlmann, and Marc Bocquet
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-156,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-156, 2024
Preprint under review for GMD
Short summary
A lightweight NO2-to-NOx conversion model for quantifying NOx emissions of point sources from NO2 satellite observations
Sandro Meier, Erik F. M. Koene, Maarten Krol, Dominik Brunner, Alexander Damm, and Gerrit Kuhlmann
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 7667–7686, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-7667-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-7667-2024, 2024
Short summary
The ddeq Python library for point source quantification from remote sensing images (version 1.0)
Gerrit Kuhlmann, Erik Koene, Sandro Meier, Diego Santaren, Grégoire Broquet, Frédéric Chevallier, Janne Hakkarainen, Janne Nurmela, Laia Amorós, Johanna Tamminen, and Dominik Brunner
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4773–4789, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4773-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4773-2024, 2024
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Gases | Technique: Remote Sensing | Topic: Data Processing and Information Retrieval
Developments on a 22 GHz microwave radiometer and reprocessing of 13-year time series for water vapour studies
Alistair Bell, Eric Sauvageat, Gunter Stober, Klemens Hocke, and Axel Murk
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 555–567, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-555-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-555-2025, 2025
Short summary
Optimal selection of satellite XCO2 images for urban CO2 emission monitoring
Alexandre Danjou, Grégoire Broquet, Andrew Schuh, François-Marie Bréon, and Thomas Lauvaux
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 533–554, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-533-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-533-2025, 2025
Short summary
Separating and quantifying facility-level methane emissions with overlapping plumes for spaceborne methane monitoring
Yiguo Pang, Longfei Tian, Denghui Hu, Shuang Gao, and Guohua Liu
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 455–470, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-455-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-455-2025, 2025
Short summary
Retrieving the atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide and methane from the European Copernicus CO2M satellite mission using artificial neural networks
Maximilian Reuter, Michael Hilker, Stefan Noël, Antonio Di Noia, Michael Weimer, Oliver Schneising, Michael Buchwitz, Heinrich Bovensmann, John P. Burrows, Hartmut Bösch, and Ruediger Lang
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 241–264, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-241-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-241-2025, 2025
Short summary
The differences between remote sensing and in situ air pollutant measurements over the Canadian oil sands
Xiaoyi Zhao, Vitali Fioletov, Debora Griffin, Chris McLinden, Ralf Staebler, Cristian Mihele, Kevin Strawbridge, Jonathan Davies, Ihab Abboud, Sum Chi Lee, Alexander Cede, Martin Tiefengraber, and Robert Swap
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 6889–6912, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6889-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6889-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Ackerman, S., Holz, R., Frey, R., Eloranta, E., Maddux, B., and McGill, M.: Cloud detection with MODIS. Part II: validation, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 25, 1073–1086, https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JTECHA1053.1, 2008. a
Ackerman, S., Menzel, P., Frey R., and Baum, B.: MODIS Atmosphere L2 Cloud Mask Product. NASA MODIS Adaptive Processing System, Goddard Space Flight Center, https://doi.org/10.5067/MODIS/MYD35_L2.061, 2017. a
Agustí-Panareda, A., Massart, S., Chevallier, F., Boussetta, S., Balsamo, G., Beljaars, A., Ciais, P., Deutscher, N. M., Engelen, R., Jones, L., Kivi, R., Paris, J.-D., Peuch, V.-H., Sherlock, V., Vermeulen, A. T., Wennberg, P. O., and Wunch, D.: Forecasting global atmospheric CO2, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 11959–11983, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-11959-2014, 2014. a
AVISO GmbH and IE Leipzig: Erstellung der Berliner Emissionskataster Industrie, Gebäudeheizung, sonstiger Verkehr, Kleingewerbe, sonstige Quellen, Baustellen – Schlussbericht Juni 2016, Tech. rep., available at: https://www.berlin.de/senuvk/umwelt/luftqualitaet/de/emissionen/download/Endbericht_Emissionkataster_2015.pdf (last access: 25 November 2019), 2016. a
Bacour, C., Boesch, H., Bovensmann, H., Breon, F.-M., Broquet, G., Buchwitz, M., Houweling, S., Klonecki, A., Krings, T., and Santaren, D.: LOGOFLUX 2 – CarbonSat Earth Explorer 8 Candidate Mission – Inverse Modelling and Mission Performance Study, Final report of ESA study contract n°4000109818/14/NL/FF/lf, project led by NOVELTIS (France), Report, 2015. a, b, c
Short summary
The Copernicus Anthropogenic CO2 Monitoring (CO2M) mission is a proposed constellation of imaging satellites with a CO2 instrument as main payload and optionally instruments for NO2, CO and aerosols. This study demonstrates the huge benefit of an NO2 instrument for detecting city plumes and weak point sources. Its main advantages are the higher signal-to-noise ratio and the lower sensitivity to clouds that significantly increases the number of observations available for quantifying CO2 emission.
Share