Articles | Volume 15, issue 9
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-2839-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-2839-2022
Research article
 | 
09 May 2022
Research article |  | 09 May 2022

Scan strategies for wind profiling with Doppler lidar – an large-eddy simulation (LES)-based evaluation

Charlotte Rahlves, Frank Beyrich, and Siegfried Raasch

Related authors

Verifying triple and single Doppler lidar wind measurements with sonic anemometer data based on a new filter strategy for virtual tower measurements
Kevin Wolz, Christopher Holst, Frank Beyrich, Eileen Paeschke, and Matthias Mauder
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1704,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1704, 2023
Short summary
A new scanning scheme and flexible retrieval for mean winds and gusts from Doppler lidar measurements
Julian Steinheuer, Carola Detring, Frank Beyrich, Ulrich Löhnert, Petra Friederichs, and Stephanie Fiedler
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 3243–3260, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3243-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3243-2022, 2022
Short summary
Wake properties and power output of very large wind farms for different meteorological conditions and turbine spacings: a large-eddy simulation case study for the German Bight
Oliver Maas and Siegfried Raasch
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 715–739, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-715-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-715-2022, 2022
Short summary
Mesoscale nesting interface of the PALM model system 6.0
Eckhard Kadasch, Matthias Sühring, Tobias Gronemeier, and Siegfried Raasch
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 5435–5465, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5435-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5435-2021, 2021
Short summary
Evaluation of the dynamic core of the PALM model system 6.0 in a neutrally stratified urban environment: comparison between LES and wind-tunnel experiments
Tobias Gronemeier, Kerstin Surm, Frank Harms, Bernd Leitl, Björn Maronga, and Siegfried Raasch
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 3317–3333, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3317-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3317-2021, 2021
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Others (Wind, Precipitation, Temperature, etc.) | Technique: Remote Sensing | Topic: Validation and Intercomparisons
Effects of clouds and aerosols on downwelling surface solar irradiance nowcasting and short-term forecasting
Kyriakoula Papachristopoulou, Ilias Fountoulakis, Alkiviadis F. Bais, Basil E. Psiloglou, Nikolaos Papadimitriou, Ioannis-Panagiotis Raptis, Andreas Kazantzidis, Charalampos Kontoes, Maria Hatzaki, and Stelios Kazadzis
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 1851–1877, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1851-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1851-2024, 2024
Short summary
Verification of parameterizations for clear sky downwelling longwave irradiance in the Arctic
Giandomenico Pace, Alcide di Sarra, Filippo Cali Quaglia, Virginia Ciardini, Tatiana Di Iorio, Antonio Iaccarino, Daniela Meloni, Giovanni Muscari, and Claudio Scarchilli
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 1617–1632, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1617-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1617-2024, 2024
Short summary
Global evaluation of fast radiative transfer model coefficients for early meteorological satellite sensors
Bruna Barbosa Silveira, Emma Catherine Turner, and Jérôme Vidot
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 1279–1296, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1279-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1279-2024, 2024
Short summary
GPROF V7 and beyond: assessment of current and potential future versions of the GPROF passive microwave precipitation retrievals against ground radar measurements over the continental US and the Pacific Ocean
Simon Pfreundschuh, Clément Guilloteau, Paula J. Brown, Christian D. Kummerow, and Patrick Eriksson
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 515–538, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-515-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-515-2024, 2024
Short summary
Assessing sampling and retrieval errors of GPROF precipitation estimates over the Netherlands
Linda Bogerd, Hidde Leijnse, Aart Overeem, and Remko Uijlenhoet
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 247–259, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-247-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-247-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Antoniou, I., Courtney, M., Jorgensen, H. E., Mikkelsen, T., Von Hünerbein, S., Bradley, S., Piper, B., Harris, M., Marti, I., Aristu, M., Foussekis, D., and Nielsen, M. P.: Remote sensing the wind using lidars and sodars, in: European Wind Energy Conference and Exhibition 2007, EWEC 2007, 7–10 May 2007, Milan, Italy, vol. 3, 2007. a
Arakawa, A. and Lamb, V. R.: Computational design of the basic dynamical processes of the UCLA general circulation model, in: Methods in Computational Physics – General circulation models of the atmosphere, Academic Press, vol. 17, 173–265, https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-460817-7.50009-4, 1977. a
Bingöl, F., Mann, J., and Foussekis, D.: Lidar error estimation with WAsP engineering, in: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 14th International Symposium for the Advancement of Boundary Layer Remote Sensing, 23–25 June 2008, Roskilde, Denmark, IOP Publishing, vol. 1, https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1/1/012058, 2008. a
Bingöl, F., Mann, J., and Foussekis, D.: Conically scanning lidar error in complex terrain, Meteorol. Z., 18, 189–195, https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2009/0368, 2009a. a
Bingöl, F., Mann, J., and Foussekis, D.: Lidar performance in complex terrain modelled by WAsP Engineering, in: Proceedings of the European Wind Energy Conference, 16–19 May 2009, Marseille, France, 2009b. a
Download
Short summary
Lidars can measure the wind profile in the lower part of the atmosphere, provided that the wind field is horizontally uniform and does not change during the time of the measurement. These requirements are mostly not fulfilled in reality, and the lidar wind measurement will thus hold a certain error. We investigate different strategies for lidar wind profiling using a lidar simulator implemented in a numerical simulation of the wind field. Our findings can help to improve wind measurements.