Articles | Volume 16, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-195-2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-195-2023
Research article
 | 
17 Jan 2023
Research article |  | 17 Jan 2023

Performance and polarization response of slit homogenizers for the GeoCarb mission

Sean Crowell, Tobias Haist, Michael Tscherpel, Jérôme Caron, Eric Burgh, and Berrien Moore III

Related authors

Surface reflectance biases in XCH4 retrievals from the 2.3 µm band are enhanced in the presence of aerosols
Peter Somkuti, Gregory McGarragh, Christopher O'Dell, Antonio Di Noia, Leif Vogel, Sean Crowell, Lesley E. Ott, and Hartmut Bösch
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 4647–4663, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-4647-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-4647-2025, 2025
Short summary
Seasonality and synchrony of photosynthesis in African forests inferred from spaceborne chlorophyll fluorescence and vegetation indices
Russell Doughty, Michael C. Wimberly, Dan Wanyama, Helene Peiro, Nicholas Parazoo, Sean Crowell, and Moses Azong Cho
Biogeosciences, 22, 1985–2004, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-1985-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-1985-2025, 2025
Short summary
A novel data-driven global model of photosynthesis using solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence
Russell Doughty, Yujie Wang, Jennifer Johnson, Nicholas Parazoo, Troy Magney, Zoe Pierrat, Xiangming Xiao, Luis Guanter, Philipp Köhler, Christian Frankenberg, Peter Somkuti, Shuang Ma, Yuanwei Qin, Sean Crowell, and Berrien Moore III
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.22541/essoar.168167172.20799710/v1,https://doi.org/10.22541/essoar.168167172.20799710/v1, 2024
Preprint archived
Short summary
The GeoCarb greenhouse gas retrieval algorithm: simulations and sensitivity to sources of uncertainty
Gregory R. McGarragh, Christopher W. O'Dell, Sean M. R. Crowell, Peter Somkuti, Eric B. Burgh, and Berrien Moore III
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 1091–1121, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1091-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1091-2024, 2024
Short summary
A nonlinear data-driven approach to bias correction of XCO2 for NASA's OCO-2 ACOS version 10
William R. Keely, Steffen Mauceri, Sean Crowell, and Christopher W. O'Dell
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 5725–5748, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-5725-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-5725-2023, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

Bauer, M., Meister, C., Keim, C., and Irizar, J.: Sentinel-5/UVNS instrument: the principle ability of a slit homogenizer to reduce scene contrast for earth observation spectrometer, in: Sensors, Systems, and Next-Generation Satellites XXI, edited by: Meynart, R., Neeck, S. P., Shimoda, H., Kimura, T., and Bézy, J.-L., September, 48 p., SPIE, https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2278619, 2017. a, b, c, d, e, f, g
Butz, A., Galli, A., Hasekamp, O., Landgraf, J., Tol, P., and Aben, I.: TROPOMI aboard Sentinel-5 Precursor: Prospective performance of CH4 retrievals for aerosol and cirrus loaded atmospheres, Remote Sens. Environ., 120, 267–276, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2011.05.030, 2012. a
Caron, J., Kruizinga, B., and Vink, R.: Slit homogenizers for Earth observation spectrometers: overview on performance, present and future designs, in: International Conference on Space Optics – ICSO 2018, edited by: Karafolas, N., Sodnik, Z., and Cugny, B., Vol. 11180, 37 p., SPIE, https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2535957, 2019. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h
Connor, B., Bösch, H., McDuffie, J., Taylor, T., Fu, D., Frankenberg, C., O'Dell, C., Payne, V. H., Gunson, M., Pollock, R., Hobbs, J., Oyafuso, F., and Jiang, Y.: Quantification of uncertainties in OCO-2 measurements of XCO2: simulations and linear error analysis, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 5227–5238, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-5227-2016, 2016. a
Crowell, S.: Slit Homogenizer Measurements, Measurements and analysis code for slit homogenizers designed for the GeoCarb mission, OSF Home [data set, code], https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/KZBYR, 2023. a
Download

The requested paper has a corresponding corrigendum published. Please read the corrigendum first before downloading the article.

Short summary
Variations in brightness in radiance measurements cause errors that can be mitigated with hardware that scrambles the pattern of the incoming light. GeoCarb took this route to minimize this source of errors, but lab testing determined that the solution chosen was too sensitive to the the polarization of the incoming light. Modeling found that this was a predictable result of using gold coatings in the design, which is typical of spaceflight optical instruments.
Share