Articles | Volume 17, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-899-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-899-2024
Research article
 | 
02 Feb 2024
Research article |  | 02 Feb 2024

Introducing the Video In Situ Snowfall Sensor (VISSS)

Maximilian Maahn, Dmitri Moisseev, Isabelle Steinke, Nina Maherndl, and Matthew D. Shupe

Related authors

How does riming influence the observed spatial variability of ice water in mixed-phase clouds?
Nina Maherndl, Manuel Moser, Imke Schirmacher, Aaron Bansemer, Johannes Lucke, Christiane Voigt, and Maximilian Maahn
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1214,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1214, 2024
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary
Overview: Quasi-Lagrangian observations of Arctic air mass transformations – Introduction and initial results of the HALO–(AC)3 aircraft campaign
Manfred Wendisch, Susanne Crewell, André Ehrlich, Andreas Herber, Benjamin Kirbus, Christof Lüpkes, Mario Mech, Steven J. Abel, Elisa F. Akansu, Felix Ament, Clémantyne Aubry, Sebastian Becker, Stephan Borrmann, Heiko Bozem, Marlen Brückner, Hans-Christian Clemen, Sandro Dahlke, Georgios Dekoutsidis, Julien Delanoë, Elena De La Torre Castro, Henning Dorff, Regis Dupuy, Oliver Eppers, Florian Ewald, Geet George, Irina V. Gorodetskaya, Sarah Grawe, Silke Groß, Jörg Hartmann, Silvia Henning, Lutz Hirsch, Evelyn Jäkel, Philipp Joppe, Olivier Jourdan, Zsofia Jurányi, Michail Karalis, Mona Kellermann, Marcus Klingebiel, Michael Lonardi, Johannes Lucke, Anna Luebke, Maximilian Maahn, Nina Maherndl, Marion Maturilli, Bernhard Mayer, Johanna Mayer, Stephan Mertes, Janosch Michaelis, Michel Michalkov, Guillaume Mioche, Manuel Moser, Hanno Müller, Roel Neggers, Davide Ori, Daria Paul, Fiona Paulus, Christian Pilz, Felix Pithan, Mira Pöhlker, Veronika Pörtge, Maximilian Ringel, Nils Risse, Gregory C. Roberts, Sophie Rosenburg, Johannes Röttenbacher, Janna Rückert, Michael Schäfer, Jonas Schäfer, Vera Schemannn, Imke Schirmacher, Jörg Schmidt, Sebastian Schmidt, Johannes Schneider, Sabrina Schnitt, Anja Schwarz, Holger Siebert, Harald Sodemann, Tim Sperzel, Gunnar Spreen, Bjorn Stevens, Frank Stratmann, Gunilla Svensson, Christian Tatzelt, Thomas Tuch, Timo Vihma, Christiane Voigt, Lea Volkmer, Andreas Walbröl, Anna Weber, Birgit Wehner, Bruno Wetzel, Martin Wirth, and Tobias Zinner
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-783,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-783, 2024
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary
Quantifying riming from airborne data during the HALO-(AC)3 campaign
Nina Maherndl, Manuel Moser, Johannes Lucke, Mario Mech, Nils Risse, Imke Schirmacher, and Maximilian Maahn
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 1475–1495, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1475-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1475-2024, 2024
Short summary
Numerical evidence that the impact of CCN and INP concentrations on mixed-phase clouds is observable with cloud radars
Junghwa Lee, Patric Seifert, Tempei Hashino, Maximilian Maahn, Fabian Senf, and Oswald Knoth
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1887,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1887, 2023
Short summary
Classification of flying insects in polarimetric weather radar using machine learning and aphid trap data
Samuel Kwakye, Heike Kalesse-Los, Maximilian Maahn, Patric Seifert, Roel van Klink, Christian Wirth, and Johannes Quaas
Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2023-69,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2023-69, 2023
Publication in AMT not foreseen
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Others (Wind, Precipitation, Temperature, etc.) | Technique: In Situ Measurement | Topic: Instruments and Platforms
Modelling of cup anemometry and dynamic overspeeding in average wind speed measurements
Troels Friis Pedersen and Jan-Åke Dahlberg
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 1441–1461, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1441-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1441-2024, 2024
Short summary
Quality evaluation for measurements of wind field and turbulent fluxes from a UAV-based eddy covariance system
Yibo Sun, Bilige Sude, Xingwen Lin, Bing Geng, Bo Liu, Shengnan Ji, Junping Jing, Zhiping Zhu, Ziwei Xu, Shaomin Liu, and Zhanjun Quan
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 5659–5679, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-5659-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-5659-2023, 2023
Short summary
A new reference-quality precipitation gauge wind shield
John Kochendorfer, Tilden P. Meyers, Mark E. Hall, Scott D. Landolt, Justin Lentz, and Howard J. Diamond
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 5647–5657, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-5647-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-5647-2023, 2023
Short summary
Cost Effective Off-Grid Automatic Precipitation Samplers for Pollutant and Biogeochemical Atmospheric Deposition
Alessia A. Colussi, Daniel Persaud, Melodie Lao, Bryan K. Place, Rachel F. Hems, Susan E. Ziegler, Kate A. Edwards, Cora J. Young, and Trevor C. VandenBoer
Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2023-231,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2023-231, 2023
Revised manuscript accepted for AMT
Short summary
Long-term airborne measurements of pollutants over the United Kingdom to support air quality model development and evaluation
Angela Mynard, Joss Kent, Eleanor R. Smith, Andy Wilson, Kirsty Wivell, Noel Nelson, Matthew Hort, James Bowles, David Tiddeman, Justin M. Langridge, Benjamin Drummond, and Steven J. Abel
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 4229–4261, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-4229-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-4229-2023, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

Battaglia, A., Rustemeier, E., Tokay, A., Blahak, U., and Simmer, C.: PARSIVEL Snow Observations: A Critical Assessment, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 27, 333–344, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JTECHA1332.1, 2010. a, b, c, d, e, f
Beard, K. V., Bringi, V. N., and Thurai, M.: A New Understanding of Raindrop Shape, Atmos. Res., 97, 396–415, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2010.02.001, 2010. a
Cooper, S. J., Wood, N. B., and L'Ecuyer, T. S.: A variational technique to estimate snowfall rate from coincident radar, snowflake, and fall-speed observations, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 2557–2571, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-2557-2017, 2017. a
Cooper, S. J., L'Ecuyer, T. S., Wolff, M. A., Kuhn, T., Pettersen, C., Wood, N. B., Eliasson, S., Schirle, C. E., Shates, J., Hellmuth, F., Engdahl, B. J. K., Vásquez-Martín, S., Ilmo, T., and Nygård, K.: Exploring Snowfall Variability through the High-Latitude Measurement of Snowfall (HiLaMS) Field Campaign, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 103, E1762–E1780, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-21-0007.1, 2022. a
Del Guasta, M.: ICE-CAMERA: a flatbed scanner to study inland Antarctic polar precipitation, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 6521–6544, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6521-2022, 2022. a, b
Download
Short summary
The open-source Video In Situ Snowfall Sensor (VISSS) is a novel instrument for characterizing particle shape, size, and sedimentation velocity in snowfall. It combines a large observation volume with relatively high resolution and a design that limits wind perturbations. The open-source nature of the VISSS hardware and software invites the community to contribute to the development of the instrument, which has many potential applications in atmospheric science and beyond.