Articles | Volume 3, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-177-2010
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-177-2010
09 Feb 2010
 | 09 Feb 2010

A comparison of spectrophotometric and denuder based approaches for the determination of gaseous molecular iodine

R. J. Chance, M. Shaw, L. Telgmann, M. Baxter, and L. J. Carpenter

Related subject area

Subject: Gases | Technique: In Situ Measurement | Topic: Validation and Intercomparisons
Evaluation of optimized flux chamber design for measurement of ammonia emission after field application of slurry with full-scale farm machinery
Johanna Pedersen, Sasha D. Hafner, Andreas Pacholski, Valthor I. Karlsson, Li Rong, Rodrigo Labouriau, and Jesper N. Kamp
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 4493–4505, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4493-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4493-2024, 2024
Short summary
Preparation of low-concentration H2 test gas mixtures in ambient air for calibration of H2 sensors
Niklas Karbach, Lisa Höhler, Peter Hoor, Heiko Bozem, Nicole Bobrowski, and Thorsten Hoffmann
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 4081–4086, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4081-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4081-2024, 2024
Short summary
Pico-Light H2O: intercomparison of in situ water vapour measurements during the AsA 2022 campaign
Mélanie Ghysels, Georges Durry, Nadir Amarouche, Dale Hurst, Emrys Hall, Kensy Xiong, Jean-Charles Dupont, Jean-Christophe Samake, Fabien Frérot, Raghed Bejjani, and Emmanuel D. Riviere
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3495–3513, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3495-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3495-2024, 2024
Short summary
Mobile air quality monitoring and comparison to fixed monitoring sites for instrument performance assessment
Andrew R. Whitehill, Melissa Lunden, Brian LaFranchi, Surender Kaushik, and Paul A. Solomon
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 2991–3009, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2991-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2991-2024, 2024
Short summary
Intercomparison of eddy-covariance software for urban tall-tower sites
Changxing Lan, Matthias Mauder, Stavros Stagakis, Benjamin Loubet, Claudio D'Onofrio, Stefan Metzger, David Durden, and Pedro-Henrique Herig-Coimbra
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 2649–2669, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2649-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2649-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Augdahl, E. and Klaeboe, P.: Spectroscopic studies of charge transfer complexes XIII. Dimethylcyanamide and iodine, iodine monochloride and iodine monobromide, Act. Chem. Scand., 19, 807–816, 1965.
Bates, F. L., French, D., and Rundle, R. E.: Amylose and amylopectin content of starches determined by their iodine complex formation, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 65, 142–148, 1943.
Black, A. P. and Whittle, G. P.: New methods for the colorimetric determination of halogen residuals. Part I. Iodine, iodide, and iodate, J. Am. Water Works Assn., 59, 471–490, 1967.
Calabrese, V. T. and Khan, A.: Amylose-iodine complex formation without KI: Evidence for absence of iodide ions within the complex, J. Polym. Sci. Pol. Chem., 37, 2711–2717, 1999.
Chen, H., Brand, T., Bandur, R., and Hoffmann, T.: Characterization of iodine species in the marine aerosol: to understand their roles in particle formation processes, Front. Chem. Chin., 2, 119–129, 2006.