Articles | Volume 3, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-723-2010
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-723-2010
28 Jun 2010
 | 28 Jun 2010

Comparison of one- and two-filter detectors for atmospheric 222Rn measurements under various meteorological conditions

Y. Xia, H. Sartorius, C. Schlosser, U. Stöhlker, F. Conen, and W. Zahorowski

Related subject area

Subject: Gases | Technique: In Situ Measurement | Topic: Validation and Intercomparisons
Evaluation of optimized flux chamber design for measurement of ammonia emission after field application of slurry with full-scale farm machinery
Johanna Pedersen, Sasha D. Hafner, Andreas Pacholski, Valthor I. Karlsson, Li Rong, Rodrigo Labouriau, and Jesper N. Kamp
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 4493–4505, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4493-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4493-2024, 2024
Short summary
Preparation of low-concentration H2 test gas mixtures in ambient air for calibration of H2 sensors
Niklas Karbach, Lisa Höhler, Peter Hoor, Heiko Bozem, Nicole Bobrowski, and Thorsten Hoffmann
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 4081–4086, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4081-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4081-2024, 2024
Short summary
Pico-Light H2O: intercomparison of in situ water vapour measurements during the AsA 2022 campaign
Mélanie Ghysels, Georges Durry, Nadir Amarouche, Dale Hurst, Emrys Hall, Kensy Xiong, Jean-Charles Dupont, Jean-Christophe Samake, Fabien Frérot, Raghed Bejjani, and Emmanuel D. Riviere
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3495–3513, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3495-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3495-2024, 2024
Short summary
Mobile air quality monitoring and comparison to fixed monitoring sites for instrument performance assessment
Andrew R. Whitehill, Melissa Lunden, Brian LaFranchi, Surender Kaushik, and Paul A. Solomon
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 2991–3009, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2991-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2991-2024, 2024
Short summary
Intercomparison of eddy-covariance software for urban tall-tower sites
Changxing Lan, Matthias Mauder, Stavros Stagakis, Benjamin Loubet, Claudio D'Onofrio, Stefan Metzger, David Durden, and Pedro-Henrique Herig-Coimbra
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 2649–2669, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2649-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2649-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Akata, N., Kawabata, H., Hasegawa, H., Sato, T., Chikuchi, Y., Kondo, K., Hisamatsu, S., and Inaba, J.: Total deposition velocities and scavenging ratios of 7Be and 210Pb at Rokkasho, Japan, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Ch., 277(2) 347–355, 2008.
Biraud, S., Ciais, P., Ramonet, M., Simmonds, P., Kazan, V., Monfray, P., O'Doherty, S., Spain, T. G., and Jennings, S. G.: European greenhouse gas emissions estimated from continuous atmospheric measurement and radon-222 at Mace Head, Ireland, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 105, 1351–1366, 2000.
Brunke, E. G., Labuschagne, C., Parker, B., van der Spuy, D., and Whittlestone, S.: Cape point GAW station 222Rn detector: factors affecting sensitivity and accuracy, Atmos. Environ., 36, 2257–2262, 2002.
Collé, R., Unterweger, M. P., Hutchinson, J. M. R., Whittlestone, S., Polian, G., Ardouin, B., Kay, J. G., Friend, J. P., Blomquist, B. W., Nadler, W., Dang, T. T., Larsen, R. J., and Hutter, A. R.: An international marine-atmospheric 222Rn measurement intercomparison in Bermuda Part II: Results for the participating laboratories, J. Res. Natl. Inst. Stan., 101, 21– , 1996.
Conen, F., Neftel, A., Schmid, M., and Lehmann, B. E.: N2O/Rn-222-soil flux calibration in the stable nocturnal surface layer, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29(2), 1025, , 2002.