Articles | Volume 4, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-485-2011
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-485-2011
08 Mar 2011
 | 08 Mar 2011

Results and recommendations from an intercomparison of six Hygroscopicity-TDMA systems

A. Massling, N. Niedermeier, T. Hennig, E. O. Fors, E. Swietlicki, M. Ehn, K. Hämeri, P. Villani, P. Laj, N. Good, G. McFiggans, and A. Wiedensohler

Related subject area

Subject: Aerosols | Technique: In Situ Measurement | Topic: Validation and Intercomparisons
Identifying optimal co-location calibration periods for low-cost sensors
Misti Levy Zamora, Colby Buehler, Abhirup Datta, Drew R. Gentner, and Kirsten Koehler
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 169–179, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-169-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-169-2023, 2023
Short summary
Intercomparison of airborne and surface-based measurements during the CLARIFY, ORACLES and LASIC field experiments
Paul A. Barrett, Steven J. Abel, Hugh Coe, Ian Crawford, Amie Dobracki, James Haywood, Steve Howell, Anthony Jones, Justin Langridge, Greg M. McFarquhar, Graeme J. Nott, Hannah Price, Jens Redemann, Yohei Shinozuka, Kate Szpek, Jonathan W. Taylor, Robert Wood, Huihui Wu, Paquita Zuidema, Stéphane Bauguitte, Ryan Bennett, Keith Bower, Hong Chen, Sabrina Cochrane, Michael Cotterell, Nicholas Davies, David Delene, Connor Flynn, Andrew Freedman, Steffen Freitag, Siddhant Gupta, David Noone, Timothy B. Onasch, James Podolske, Michael R. Poellot, Sebastian Schmidt, Stephen Springston, Arthur J. Sedlacek III, Jamie Trembath, Alan Vance, Maria A. Zawadowicz, and Jianhao Zhang
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 6329–6371, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6329-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6329-2022, 2022
Short summary
Balloon-borne aerosol–cloud interaction studies (BACIS): field campaigns to understand and quantify aerosol effects on clouds
Varaha Ravi Kiran, Madineni Venkat Ratnam, Masatomo Fujiwara, Herman Russchenberg, Frank G. Wienhold, Bomidi Lakshmi Madhavan, Mekalathur Roja Raman, Renju Nandan, Sivan Thankamani Akhil Raj, Alladi Hemanth Kumar, and Saginela Ravindra Babu
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 4709–4734, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4709-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4709-2022, 2022
Short summary
Correcting for filter-based aerosol light absorption biases at the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement program's Southern Great Plains site using photoacoustic measurements and machine learning
Joshin Kumar, Theo Paik, Nishit J. Shetty, Patrick Sheridan, Allison C. Aiken, Manvendra K. Dubey, and Rajan K. Chakrabarty
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 4569–4583, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4569-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4569-2022, 2022
Short summary
Development and evaluation of correction models for a low-cost fine particulate matter monitor
Brayden Nilson, Peter L. Jackson, Corinne L. Schiller, and Matthew T. Parsons
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 3315–3328, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3315-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3315-2022, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Birmili, W., Stratmann, F., Wiedensohler, A., Covert, D. S., Russell, L. M., and Berg, O.: Determination of differential mobility analyzer transfer functions using identical instruments in series, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 27(2), 215–223, 1997.
Biskos, G., Paulsen, D., Russell, L. M., Buseck, P. R., and Martin, S. T.: Prompt deliquescence and efflorescence of aerosol nanoparticles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 4633–4642, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-4633-2006, 2006.
Cheng, Y. F., Heintzenberg, J., Wehner, B., Wu, Z. J., Su, H., Hu, M., and Mao, J. T.: Traffic restrictions in Beijing during the Sino-African Summit 2006: aerosol size distribution and visibility compared to long-term in situ observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 7583–7594, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-7583-2008, 2008.
Cubison, M. J., Coe, H., and Gysel, M.: A modified hygroscopic tandem DMA and a data retrieval method based on optimal estimation, J. Aerosol Sci., 36, 846–865, 2005.
Download