Articles | Volume 15, issue 1
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 21–39, 2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-21-2022
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 21–39, 2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-21-2022

Research article 03 Jan 2022

Research article | 03 Jan 2022

Towards operational multi-GNSS tropospheric products at GFZ Potsdam

Karina Wilgan et al.

Related authors

GNSS-based water vapor estimation and validation during the MOSAiC expedition
Benjamin Männel, Florian Zus, Galina Dick, Susanne Glaser, Maximilian Semmling, Kyriakos Balidakis, Jens Wickert, Marion Maturilli, Sandro Dahlke, and Harald Schuh
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 5127–5138, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-5127-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-5127-2021, 2021
Short summary
Consistency and structural uncertainty of multi-mission GPS radio occultation records
Andrea K. Steiner, Florian Ladstädter, Chi O. Ao, Hans Gleisner, Shu-Peng Ho, Doug Hunt, Torsten Schmidt, Ulrich Foelsche, Gottfried Kirchengast, Ying-Hwa Kuo, Kent B. Lauritsen, Anthony J. Mannucci, Johannes K. Nielsen, William Schreiner, Marc Schwärz, Sergey Sokolovskiy, Stig Syndergaard, and Jens Wickert
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 2547–2575, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2547-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2547-2020, 2020
Short summary
Occurrence climatology of equatorial plasma bubbles derived using FormoSat-3 ∕ COSMIC GPS radio occultation data
Ankur Kepkar, Christina Arras, Jens Wickert, Harald Schuh, Mahdi Alizadeh, and Lung-Chih Tsai
Ann. Geophys., 38, 611–623, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-611-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-611-2020, 2020
Short summary
Sensitivity of GNSS tropospheric gradients to processing options
Michal Kačmařík, Jan Douša, Florian Zus, Pavel Václavovic, Kyriakos Balidakis, Galina Dick, and Jens Wickert
Ann. Geophys., 37, 429–446, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-429-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-429-2019, 2019
Short summary
Estimating trends in atmospheric water vapor and temperature time series over Germany
Fadwa Alshawaf, Kyriakos Balidakis, Galina Dick, Stefan Heise, and Jens Wickert
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 3117–3132, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-3117-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-3117-2017, 2017
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Others (Wind, Precipitation, Temperature, etc.) | Technique: Remote Sensing | Topic: Validation and Intercomparisons
Inter-comparison of wind measurements in the atmospheric boundary layer and the lower troposphere with Aeolus and a ground-based coherent Doppler lidar network over China
Songhua Wu, Kangwen Sun, Guangyao Dai, Xiaoye Wang, Xiaoying Liu, Bingyi Liu, Xiaoquan Song, Oliver Reitebuch, Rongzhong Li, Jiaping Yin, and Xitao Wang
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 131–148, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-131-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-131-2022, 2022
Short summary
Validation of Aeolus Level 2B wind products using wind profilers, ground-based Doppler wind lidars, and radiosondes in Japan
Hironori Iwai, Makoto Aoki, Mitsuru Oshiro, and Shoken Ishii
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 7255–7275, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-7255-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-7255-2021, 2021
Short summary
Monitoring the Tropospheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI) short-wave infrared (SWIR) module instrument stability using desert sites
Tim A. van Kempen, Filippo Oggionni, and Richard M. van Hees
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 6711–6722, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-6711-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-6711-2021, 2021
Short summary
Three-way Calibration Checks Using Ground-Based, Ship-Based and Spaceborne Radars
Alain Protat, Valentin Louf, Joshua Soderholm, Jordan Brook, and William Ponsonby
Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2021-257,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2021-257, 2021
Revised manuscript accepted for AMT
Short summary
Evaluating the use of Aeolus satellite observations in the regional numerical weather prediction (NWP) model Harmonie–Arome
Susanna Hagelin, Roohollah Azad, Magnus Lindskog, Harald Schyberg, and Heiner Körnich
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 5925–5938, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-5925-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-5925-2021, 2021
Short summary

Cited articles

Bar-Sever, Y. E., Kroger, P. M., and Borjesson, J. A.: Estimating horizontal gradients of tropospheric path delay with a single GPS receiver, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 103, 5019–5035, https://doi.org/10.1029/97jb03534, 1998. a, b, c
Bender, M., Dick, G., Wickert, J., Schmidt, T., Song, S., Gendt, G., Ge, M., and Rothacher, M.: Validation of GPS slant delays using water vapour radiometers and weather models, Meteorol. Z., 17, 807–812, https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2008/0341, 2008. a
Benevides, P., Catalao, J., and Miranda, P. M. A.: On the inclusion of GPS precipitable water vapour in the nowcasting of rainfall, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 2605–2616, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-2605-2015, 2015. a
Benjamin, S. G., Weygandt, S. S., Brown, J. M., Hu, M., Alexander, C. R., Smirnova, T. G., Olson, J. B., James, E. P., Dowell, D. C., Grell, G. A., Lin, H., Peckham, S. E., Smith, T. L., Moninger, W. R., Kenyon, J. S., and Manikin, G. S.: A North American hourly assimilation and model forecast cycle: The Rapid Refresh, Mon. Weather Rev., 144, 1669–1694, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-15-0242.1, 2016. a
Bennitt, G. V. and Jupp, A.: Operational assimilation of GPS zenith total delay observations into the Met Office numerical weather prediction models, Mon. Weather Rev., 140, 2706–2719, 2012. a, b
Download
Short summary
The assimilation of GNSS data in weather models has a positive impact on the forecasts. The impact is still limited due to using only the GPS zenith direction parameters. We calculate and validate more advanced tropospheric products from three satellite systems: the US American GPS, Russian GLONASS and European Galileo. The quality of all the solutions is comparable; however, combining more GNSS systems enhances the observations' geometry and improves the quality of the weather forecasts.