Articles | Volume 15, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-21-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-21-2022
Research article
 | 
03 Jan 2022
Research article |  | 03 Jan 2022

Towards operational multi-GNSS tropospheric products at GFZ Potsdam

Karina Wilgan, Galina Dick, Florian Zus, and Jens Wickert

Related authors

4DVAR assimilation of GNSS zenith path delays and precipitable water into a numerical weather prediction model WRF
Witold Rohm, Jakub Guzikowski, Karina Wilgan, and Maciej Kryza
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 345–361, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-345-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-345-2019, 2019
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Others (Wind, Precipitation, Temperature, etc.) | Technique: Remote Sensing | Topic: Validation and Intercomparisons
Radiative closure tests of collocated hyperspectral microwave and infrared radiometers
Lei Liu, Natalia Bliankinshtein, Yi Huang, John R. Gyakum, Philip M. Gabriel, Shiqi Xu, and Mengistu Wolde
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 2219–2233, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2219-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2219-2024, 2024
Short summary
Effects of clouds and aerosols on downwelling surface solar irradiance nowcasting and short-term forecasting
Kyriakoula Papachristopoulou, Ilias Fountoulakis, Alkiviadis F. Bais, Basil E. Psiloglou, Nikolaos Papadimitriou, Ioannis-Panagiotis Raptis, Andreas Kazantzidis, Charalampos Kontoes, Maria Hatzaki, and Stelios Kazadzis
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 1851–1877, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1851-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1851-2024, 2024
Short summary
Verification of parameterizations for clear sky downwelling longwave irradiance in the Arctic
Giandomenico Pace, Alcide di Sarra, Filippo Cali Quaglia, Virginia Ciardini, Tatiana Di Iorio, Antonio Iaccarino, Daniela Meloni, Giovanni Muscari, and Claudio Scarchilli
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 1617–1632, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1617-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1617-2024, 2024
Short summary
Global evaluation of fast radiative transfer model coefficients for early meteorological satellite sensors
Bruna Barbosa Silveira, Emma Catherine Turner, and Jérôme Vidot
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 1279–1296, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1279-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1279-2024, 2024
Short summary
GPROF V7 and beyond: assessment of current and potential future versions of the GPROF passive microwave precipitation retrievals against ground radar measurements over the continental US and the Pacific Ocean
Simon Pfreundschuh, Clément Guilloteau, Paula J. Brown, Christian D. Kummerow, and Patrick Eriksson
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 515–538, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-515-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-515-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Bar-Sever, Y. E., Kroger, P. M., and Borjesson, J. A.: Estimating horizontal gradients of tropospheric path delay with a single GPS receiver, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 103, 5019–5035, https://doi.org/10.1029/97jb03534, 1998. a, b, c
Bender, M., Dick, G., Wickert, J., Schmidt, T., Song, S., Gendt, G., Ge, M., and Rothacher, M.: Validation of GPS slant delays using water vapour radiometers and weather models, Meteorol. Z., 17, 807–812, https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2008/0341, 2008. a
Benevides, P., Catalao, J., and Miranda, P. M. A.: On the inclusion of GPS precipitable water vapour in the nowcasting of rainfall, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 2605–2616, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-2605-2015, 2015. a
Benjamin, S. G., Weygandt, S. S., Brown, J. M., Hu, M., Alexander, C. R., Smirnova, T. G., Olson, J. B., James, E. P., Dowell, D. C., Grell, G. A., Lin, H., Peckham, S. E., Smith, T. L., Moninger, W. R., Kenyon, J. S., and Manikin, G. S.: A North American hourly assimilation and model forecast cycle: The Rapid Refresh, Mon. Weather Rev., 144, 1669–1694, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-15-0242.1, 2016. a
Bennitt, G. V. and Jupp, A.: Operational assimilation of GPS zenith total delay observations into the Met Office numerical weather prediction models, Mon. Weather Rev., 140, 2706–2719, 2012. a, b
Download
Short summary
The assimilation of GNSS data in weather models has a positive impact on the forecasts. The impact is still limited due to using only the GPS zenith direction parameters. We calculate and validate more advanced tropospheric products from three satellite systems: the US American GPS, Russian GLONASS and European Galileo. The quality of all the solutions is comparable; however, combining more GNSS systems enhances the observations' geometry and improves the quality of the weather forecasts.