Articles | Volume 15, issue 19
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-5841-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-5841-2022
Research article
 | 
14 Oct 2022
Research article |  | 14 Oct 2022

Comparing airborne algorithms for greenhouse gas flux measurements over the Alberta oil sands

Broghan M. Erland, Cristen Adams, Andrea Darlington, Mackenzie L. Smith, Andrew K. Thorpe, Gregory R. Wentworth, Steve Conley, John Liggio, Shao-Meng Li, Charles E. Miller, and John A. Gamon

Related authors

A deep learning-driven emission estimator utilizing a mixture of experts for local wind speed situations applied to high-resolution methane imagery
Thomas Plewa, André Butz, Christian Frankenberg, Andrew K. Thorpe, and Julia Marshall
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2572,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2572, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (AMT).
Short summary
Characterization of trace gas emissions from controlled laboratory burning of Canadian boreal forest fuels
Rowshon Afroz, Hongru Shen, Bradley H. Isenor, Samar G. Moussa, Amanda Hanashiro Moraes, Shakiba Talebian, Carolyn Liu-Kang, Jeremy J. B. Wentzell, Oscar Olfert, Amy Leithead, Ginny Marshall, Ralf M. Staebler, Cris Mihele, Arthur W. H. Chan, Jason Olfert, John Liggio, Jonathan Abbatt, Ran Zhao, and Sumi N. Wren
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2661,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2661, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary
UAV-based method for measuring CO2 emissions in forest ecosystems
Haijiong Sun, Shao-Meng Li, Yifei Wang, Yanrong Yang, Tianran Han, Keyu Chen, Chang Liu, Jietao Zhou, Zeqing Ma, Fengting Yang, Junfei Guo, and Xiangyu Gao
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-561,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-561, 2026
Short summary
Implementing riverine biogeochemical inputs in ECCO-Darwin: a sensitivity analysis of terrestrial fluxes in a data-assimilative global ocean biogeochemistry model
Raphaël Savelli, Dustin Carroll, Dimitris Menemenlis, Jonathan M. Lauderdale, Clément Bertin, Stephanie Dutkiewicz, Manfredi Manizza, A. Anthony Bloom, Karel Castro-Morales, Charles E. Miller, Marc Simard, Kevin W. Bowman, and Hong Zhang
Geosci. Model Dev., 19, 867–885, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-867-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-867-2026, 2026
Short summary
The Carbon Mapper emissions monitoring system
Riley Duren, Daniel Cusworth, Alana Ayasse, Katherine Howell, Alex Diamond, Tia Scarpelli, Jinsol Kim, Kelly O'neill, Judy Lai-Norling, Andrew Thorpe, Sander R. Zandbergen, Lucas Shaw, Mark Keremedjiev, Jeff Guido, Paul Giuliano, Malkam Goldstein, Ravi Nallapu, Geert Barentsen, David R. Thompson, Keely Roth, Daniel Jensen, Michael Eastwood, Frances Reuland, Taylor Adams, Adam Brandt, Eric A. Kort, James Mason, and Robert O. Green
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 6933–6958, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-6933-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-6933-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Alberta Environment and Parks (AEP), NOAA, Scientific Aviation, and UC Irvine: AEP-NOAA Greenhouse Gas Measurement Flights, Oil Sands Monitoring and Alberta Environment and Parks (OSM) and AEP [data set], http://ckandata01.canadacentral.cloudapp.azure.com/dataset/aep-noaa-greenhouse-gas-measurement-flights, last access: 4 December 2021. 
Alfieri, S., Amato, U., Carfora, M. F., Esposito, M., and Magliulo, V.: Quantifying trace gas emissions from composite landscapes: A mass-budget approach with aircraft measurements, Atmos. Environ., 44, 1866–1876, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.02.026, 2010. 
Allen, D. T.: Methane emissions from natural gas production and use: reconciling bottom-up and top-down measurements, Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng., 5, 78–83, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2014.05.004, 2014. 
Atherton, E., Risk, D., Fougère, C., Lavoie, M., Marshall, A., Werring, J., Williams, J. P., and Minions, C.: Mobile measurement of methane emissions from natural gas developments in northeastern British Columbia, Canada, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 12405–12420, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-12405-2017, 2017. 
Download
Short summary
Accurately estimating greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions is essential to reaching net-zero goals to combat the climate crisis. Airborne box-flights are ideal for assessing regional GHG emissions, as they can attain small error. We compare two box-flight algorithms and found they produce similar results, but daily variability must be considered when deriving emissions inventories. Increasing the consistency and agreement between airborne methods moves us closer to achieving more accurate estimates.
Share