Articles | Volume 3, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-1577-2010
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-1577-2010
Research article
 | 
19 Nov 2010
Research article |  | 19 Nov 2010

Aerosol Optical Depth measurements at 340 nm with a Brewer spectrophotometer and comparison with Cimel sunphotometer observations at Uccle, Belgium

V. De Bock, H. De Backer, A. Mangold, and A. Delcloo

Related subject area

Subject: Aerosols | Technique: In Situ Measurement | Topic: Validation and Intercomparisons
A 2-year intercomparison of three methods for measuring black carbon concentration at a high-altitude research station in Europe
Sarah Tinorua, Cyrielle Denjean, Pierre Nabat, Véronique Pont, Mathilde Arnaud, Thierry Bourrianne, Maria Dias Alves, and Eric Gardrat
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3897–3915, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3897-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3897-2024, 2024
Short summary
Comparison of the LEO and CPMA-SP2 techniques for black-carbon mixing-state measurements
Arash Naseri, Joel C. Corbin, and Jason S. Olfert
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3719–3738, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3719-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3719-2024, 2024
Short summary
Aerosol trace element solubility determined using ultrapure water batch leaching: an intercomparison study of four different leaching protocols
Rui Li, Prema Piyusha Panda, Yizhu Chen, Zhenming Zhu, Fu Wang, Yujiao Zhu, He Meng, Yan Ren, Ashwini Kumar, and Mingjin Tang
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3147–3156, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3147-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3147-2024, 2024
Short summary
Field comparison of dual- and single-spot Aethalometers: equivalent black carbon, light absorption, Ångström exponent and secondary brown carbon estimations
Liangbin Wu, Cheng Wu, Tao Deng, Dui Wu, Mei Li, Yong Jie Li, and Zhen Zhou
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 2917–2936, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2917-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2917-2024, 2024
Short summary
Comparison of the imaginary parts of the atmospheric refractive index structure parameter and aerosol flux based on different measurement methods
Renmin Yuan, Hongsheng Zhang, Jiajia Hua, Hao Liu, Peizhe Wu, Xingyu Zhu, and Jianning Sun
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 2089–2102, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2089-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2089-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Andreae, M. O., Jones, C. D. and Fox, P. M.: Strong present-day aerosol cooling implies a hot future, Nature, 435, 1187–1190, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03671, 2005.
Arola, A. and Koskela, T.: On the sources of bias in aerosol optical depth retrieval in the UV range, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D08209, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD004375, 2004.
Bais, A. F.: Absolute spectral measurements of direct solar ultraviolet irradiance with a brewer spectrophotometer, Appl. Optics, 36(21), 5199–5204, https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.36.005199, 1997
Bäumer, D., Rinke, R., and Vogel, B.: Weekly periodicities of Aerosol Optical Thickness over Central Europe – evidence of an anthropogenic direct aerosol effect, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 83–90, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-83-2008, 2008.
Behnert, I., Matthias, V., and Doerffer, R.: Aerosol optical thickness and its spectral dependence derived from sun photometer measurements over the southern North Sea coastal region, Óptica pura y aplicada, 37(3), 3253–3257, 2004.