Articles | Volume 8, issue 10
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 4243–4264, 2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-4243-2015
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 4243–4264, 2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-4243-2015
Research article
14 Oct 2015
Research article | 14 Oct 2015

Intercomparison of the comparative reactivity method (CRM) and pump–probe technique for measuring total OH reactivity in an urban environment

R. F. Hansen et al.

Related authors

Differences in BVOC oxidation and SOA formation above and below the forest canopy
Benjamin C. Schulze, Henry W. Wallace, James H. Flynn, Barry L. Lefer, Matt H. Erickson, B. Tom Jobson, Sebastien Dusanter, Stephen M. Griffith, Robert F. Hansen, Philip S. Stevens, Timothy VanReken, and Robert J. Griffin
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 1805–1828, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1805-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1805-2017, 2017
Short summary
Detailed characterizations of the new Mines Douai comparative reactivity method instrument via laboratory experiments and modeling
V. Michoud, R. F. Hansen, N. Locoge, P. S. Stevens, and S. Dusanter
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 3537–3553, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-3537-2015,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-3537-2015, 2015
Short summary
Measurements of total hydroxyl radical reactivity during CABINEX 2009 – Part 1: field measurements
R. F. Hansen, S. M. Griffith, S. Dusanter, P. S. Rickly, P. S. Stevens, S. B. Bertman, M. A. Carroll, M. H. Erickson, J. H. Flynn, N. Grossberg, B. T. Jobson, B. L. Lefer, and H. W. Wallace
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 2923–2937, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2923-2014,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2923-2014, 2014

Related subject area

Subject: Gases | Technique: In Situ Measurement | Topic: Validation and Intercomparisons
Performance characterization of low-cost air quality sensors for off-grid deployment in rural Malawi
Ashley S. Bittner, Eben S. Cross, David H. Hagan, Carl Malings, Eric Lipsky, and Andrew P. Grieshop
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 3353–3376, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3353-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3353-2022, 2022
Short summary
Comment on “Comparison of ozone measurement methods in biomass burning smoke: an evaluation under field and laboratory conditions” by Long et al. (2021)
Noah Bernays, Daniel A. Jaffe, Irina Petropavlovskikh, and Peter Effertz
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 3189–3192, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3189-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3189-2022, 2022
Short summary
Homogenization of the Observatoire de Haute Provence electrochemical concentration cell (ECC) ozonesonde data record: comparison with lidar and satellite observations
Gérard Ancellet, Sophie Godin-Beekmann, Herman G. J. Smit, Ryan M. Stauffer, Roeland Van Malderen, Renaud Bodichon, and Andrea Pazmiño
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 3105–3120, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3105-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3105-2022, 2022
Short summary
Long-term behavior and stability of calibration models for NO and NO2 low-cost sensors
Horim Kim, Michael Müller, Stephan Henne, and Christoph Hüglin
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 2979–2992, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-2979-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-2979-2022, 2022
Short summary
Controlled-release experiment to investigate uncertainties in UAV-based emission quantification for methane point sources
Randulph Morales, Jonas Ravelid, Katarina Vinkovic, Piotr Korbeń, Béla Tuzson, Lukas Emmenegger, Huilin Chen, Martina Schmidt, Sebastian Humbel, and Dominik Brunner
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 2177–2198, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-2177-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-2177-2022, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Amedro, D., Parker, A. E., Schoemaecker, C., and Fittschen, C.: Direct observation of OH radicals after 565 nm multi-photon excitation of NO2 in the presence of H2O, Chem. Phys. Lett., 513, 12–16, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2011.07.062, 2011.
Amedro, D., Miyazaki, K., Parker, A., Schoemaecker, C., and Fittschen, C.: Atmospheric and kinetic studies of OH and HO2 by the FAGE technique, J. Environ. Sci., 24, 78–86, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(11)60723-7, 2012.
Ashmore, M. R.: Assessing the future global impacts of ozone on vegetation, Plant Cell Environ., 28, 949–964, 2005.
Atkinson, R. and Arey, J.: Atmospheric Degradation of Volatile Organic Compounds, Chem. Rev., 103, 4605–4638, 2003.
Atkinson, R., Baulch, D. L., Cox, R. A., Crowley, J. N., Hampson, R. F., Hynes, R. G., Jenkin, M. E., Rossi, M. J., Troe, J., and IUPAC Subcommittee: Evaluated kinetic and photochemical data for atmospheric chemistry: Volume II – gas phase reactions of organic species, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 3625–4055, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3625-2006, 2006.
Download
Short summary
This paper describes and presents results from a intercomparison, in an environment rich in NOx (i.e., NO+NO2), of two OH reactivity instruments: one based on the comparative reactivity method, and one based on the pump-probe method. Co-located measurements were made of both ambient air and standard mixtures. Ambient OH reactivity values measured by both instruments were found to be in good agreement for ambient NOx mixing ratios as high as 100 ppbv.