Articles | Volume 10, issue 9
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 3295–3311, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-3295-2017
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 3295–3311, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-3295-2017

Research article 11 Sep 2017

Research article | 11 Sep 2017

Intercomparison of open-path trace gas measurements with two dual-frequency-comb spectrometers

Eleanor M. Waxman et al.

Related authors

Estimating vehicle carbon dioxide emissions from Boulder, Colorado, using horizontal path-integrated column measurements
Eleanor M. Waxman, Kevin C. Cossel, Fabrizio Giorgetta, Gar-Wing Truong, William C. Swann, Ian Coddington, and Nathan R. Newbury
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 4177–4192, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-4177-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-4177-2019, 2019
Short summary
Instrument intercomparison of glyoxal, methyl glyoxal and NO2 under simulated atmospheric conditions
R. Thalman, M. T. Baeza-Romero, S. M. Ball, E. Borrás, M. J. S. Daniels, I. C. A. Goodall, S. B. Henry, T. Karl, F. N. Keutsch, S. Kim, J. Mak, P. S. Monks, A. Muñoz, J. Orlando, S. Peppe, A. R. Rickard, M. Ródenas, P. Sánchez, R. Seco, L. Su, G. Tyndall, M. Vázquez, T. Vera, E. Waxman, and R. Volkamer
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 1835–1862, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-1835-2015,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-1835-2015, 2015
Short summary
Simulation of semi-explicit mechanisms of SOA formation from glyoxal in aerosol in a 3-D model
C. Knote, A. Hodzic, J. L. Jimenez, R. Volkamer, J. J. Orlando, S. Baidar, J. Brioude, J. Fast, D. R. Gentner, A. H. Goldstein, P. L. Hayes, W. B. Knighton, H. Oetjen, A. Setyan, H. Stark, R. Thalman, G. Tyndall, R. Washenfelder, E. Waxman, and Q. Zhang
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 6213–6239, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-6213-2014,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-6213-2014, 2014

Related subject area

Subject: Gases | Technique: Remote Sensing | Topic: Validation and Intercomparisons
Validation of methane and carbon monoxide from Sentinel-5 Precursor using TCCON and NDACC-IRWG stations
Mahesh Kumar Sha, Bavo Langerock, Jean-François L. Blavier, Thomas Blumenstock, Tobias Borsdorff, Matthias Buschmann, Angelika Dehn, Martine De Mazière, Nicholas M. Deutscher, Dietrich G. Feist, Omaira E. García, David W. T. Griffith, Michel Grutter, James W. Hannigan, Frank Hase, Pauli Heikkinen, Christian Hermans, Laura T. Iraci, Pascal Jeseck, Nicholas Jones, Rigel Kivi, Nicolas Kumps, Jochen Landgraf, Alba Lorente, Emmanuel Mahieu, Maria V. Makarova, Johan Mellqvist, Jean-Marc Metzger, Isamu Morino, Tomoo Nagahama, Justus Notholt, Hirofumi Ohyama, Ivan Ortega, Mathias Palm, Christof Petri, David F. Pollard, Markus Rettinger, John Robinson, Sébastien Roche, Coleen M. Roehl, Amelie N. Röhling, Constantina Rousogenous, Matthias Schneider, Kei Shiomi, Dan Smale, Wolfgang Stremme, Kimberly Strong, Ralf Sussmann, Yao Té, Osamu Uchino, Voltaire A. Velazco, Corinne Vigouroux, Mihalis Vrekoussis, Pucai Wang, Thorsten Warneke, Tyler Wizenberg, Debra Wunch, Shoma Yamanouchi, Yang Yang, and Minqiang Zhou
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 6249–6304, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-6249-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-6249-2021, 2021
Short summary
Evaluation of the coupled high-resolution atmospheric chemistry model system MECO(n) using in situ and MAX-DOAS NO2 measurements
Vinod Kumar, Julia Remmers, Steffen Beirle, Joachim Fallmann, Astrid Kerkweg, Jos Lelieveld, Mariano Mertens, Andrea Pozzer, Benedikt Steil, Marc Barra, Holger Tost, and Thomas Wagner
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 5241–5269, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-5241-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-5241-2021, 2021
Short summary
Total ozone column intercomparison of Brewers, Dobsons, and BTS-Solar at Hohenpeißenberg and Davos in 2019/2020
Ralf Zuber, Ulf Köhler, Luca Egli, Mario Ribnitzky, Wolfgang Steinbrecht, and Julian Gröbner
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 4915–4928, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-4915-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-4915-2021, 2021
Short summary
A systematic assessment of water vapor products in the Arctic: from instantaneous measurements to monthly means
Susanne Crewell, Kerstin Ebell, Patrick Konjari, Mario Mech, Tatiana Nomokonova, Ana Radovan, David Strack, Arantxa M. Triana-Gómez, Stefan Noël, Raul Scarlat, Gunnar Spreen, Marion Maturilli, Annette Rinke, Irina Gorodetskaya, Carolina Viceto, Thomas August, and Marc Schröder
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 4829–4856, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-4829-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-4829-2021, 2021
Short summary
Quality assessment of Dobson spectrophotometers for ozone column measurements before and after automation at Arosa and Davos
René Stübi, Herbert Schill, Eliane Maillard Barras, Jörg Klausen, and Alexander Haefele
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 4203–4217, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-4203-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-4203-2021, 2021
Short summary

Cited articles

Bui, T. Q., Long, D. A., Cygan, A., Sironneau, V. T., Hogan, D. W., Rupasinghe, P. M., Ciuryło, R., Lisak, D., and Okumura, M.: Observations of Dicke narrowing and speed dependence in air-broadened CO2 lineshapes near 2.06 µm, J. Chem. Phys., 141, 174301, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4900502, 2014.
Chen, J., Viatte, C., Hedelius, J. K., Jones, T., Franklin, J. E., Parker, H., Gottlieb, E. W., Wennberg, P. O., Dubey, M. K., and Wofsy, S. C.: Differential column measurements using compact solar-tracking spectrometers, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 8479–8498, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-8479-2016, 2016.
Ciais, P., Rayner, P., Chevallier, F., Bousquet, P., Logan, M., Peylin, P., and Ramonet, M.: Atmospheric inversions for estimating CO2 fluxes: methods and perspectives, Climatic Change, 103, 69–92, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-010-9909-3, 2010.
Coddington, I., Swann, W. C., and Newbury, N. R.: Coherent multiheterodyne spectroscopy using stabilized optical frequency combs, Phys. Rev. Lett., 100, 013902, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.013902, 2008.
Coddington, I., Newbury, N., and Swann, W.: Dual-comb spectroscopy, Optica, 3, 414–426, https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.3.000414, 2016.
Download
Short summary
In this paper, we compare greenhouse gas measurements from two novel open-path instruments to determine how similarly they measure the same gas concentration. We do this over an outdoor path, so the two instruments measured the same outdoor air. We found that the two instruments agree extremely well, so in the future if the instruments were at two different locations we could reliably compare their measurements to determine differences between the two places.