Articles | Volume 16, issue 15
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-3561-2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-3561-2023
Research article
 | 
01 Aug 2023
Research article |  | 01 Aug 2023

Turbulence kinetic energy dissipation rate: assessment of radar models from comparisons between 1.3 GHz wind profiler radar (WPR) and DataHawk UAV measurements

Hubert Luce, Lakshmi Kantha, Hiroyuki Hashiguchi, Dale Lawrence, Abhiram Doddi, Tyler Mixa, and Masanori Yabuki

Related authors

Statistical assessment of a Doppler radar model of TKE dissipation rate for low Richardson numbers
Hubert Luce, Lakshmi Kantha, and Hiroyuki Hashiguchi
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 5091–5101, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-5091-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-5091-2023, 2023
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Others (Wind, Precipitation, Temperature, etc.) | Technique: Remote Sensing | Topic: Validation and Intercomparisons
Atmospheric motion vector (AMV) error characterization and bias correction by leveraging independent lidar data: a simulation using an observing system simulation experiment (OSSE) and optical flow AMVs
Hai Nguyen, Derek Posselt, Igor Yanovsky, Longtao Wu, and Svetla Hristova-Veleva
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3103–3119, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3103-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3103-2024, 2024
Short summary
Rotary-wing drone-induced flow – comparison of simulations with lidar measurements
Liqin Jin, Mauro Ghirardelli, Jakob Mann, Mikael Sjöholm, Stephan Thomas Kral, and Joachim Reuder
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 2721–2737, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2721-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2721-2024, 2024
Short summary
Application of Doppler sodar in short-term forecasting of PM10 concentration in the air in Krakow (Poland)
Ewa Agnieszka Krajny, Leszek Ośródka, and Marek Jan Wojtylak
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 2451–2464, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2451-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2451-2024, 2024
Short summary
Radiative closure tests of collocated hyperspectral microwave and infrared radiometers
Lei Liu, Natalia Bliankinshtein, Yi Huang, John R. Gyakum, Philip M. Gabriel, Shiqi Xu, and Mengistu Wolde
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 2219–2233, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2219-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2219-2024, 2024
Short summary
Effects of clouds and aerosols on downwelling surface solar irradiance nowcasting and short-term forecasting
Kyriakoula Papachristopoulou, Ilias Fountoulakis, Alkiviadis F. Bais, Basil E. Psiloglou, Nikolaos Papadimitriou, Ioannis-Panagiotis Raptis, Andreas Kazantzidis, Charalampos Kontoes, Maria Hatzaki, and Stelios Kazadzis
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 1851–1877, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1851-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1851-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Baumert, H. and Peters H.: Second-moment closures and length scales for weakly stratified turbulent shear flows, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 6453–6468, 2000. 
Basu, S. and Holtslag, A. A. M.: Turbulent Prandtl number and characteristic length scales in stably stratified flows: steady-state analytical solutions, Environ. Fluid Mech., 21, 1273–1302, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-021-09820-7, 2021. 
Basu, S. and Holtslag, A. A. M.: Revisiting and revising Tatarskii's formulation for the temperature structure parameter CT2 in atmospheric flows, Environ. Fluid Mech., 22, 1107–1119, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-022-09880-3, 2022. 
Basu, S., He, P., and De Marco, A. W.: Parameterizing the energy dissipation rate in stably stratified flows, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 178, 167–184, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-020-00559-0, 2021. 
Bertin, F., Barat, J., and Wilson, R.: Energy dissipation rates, eddy diffusivity, and the Prandtl number: An in situ experimental approach and its consequences on radar estimate of turbulent parameters, Radio Sci., 32, 791–804, https://doi.org/10.1029/96RS03691,1997. 
Download
Short summary
Doppler radars can be used to estimate turbulence kinetic energy dissipation rates in the atmosphere. The performance of various models is evaluated from comparisons between UHF wind profiler and in situ measurements with UAVs. For the first time, we assess a model supposed to be valid for weak stratification or strong shear conditions. This model provides better agreements with in situ measurements than the classical model based on the hypothesis of a stable stratification.