Articles | Volume 17, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-247-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-247-2024
Research article
 | 
15 Jan 2024
Research article |  | 15 Jan 2024

Assessing sampling and retrieval errors of GPROF precipitation estimates over the Netherlands

Linda Bogerd, Hidde Leijnse, Aart Overeem, and Remko Uijlenhoet

Related authors

Barriers of urban hydro-meteorological simulation: a review
Xuan Chen, Job Augustijn van der Werf, Arjan Droste, Miriam Coenders-Gerrits, and Remko Uijlenhoet
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3988,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3988, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS).
Short summary
Use of commercial microwave links as scintillometers: potential and limitations towards evaporation estimation
Luuk D. van der Valk, Oscar K. Hartogensis, Miriam Coenders-Gerrits, Rolf W. Hut, Bas Walraven, and Remko Uijlenhoet
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2974,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2974, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (AMT).
Short summary
Evaluation of high-intensity rainfall observations from personal weather stations in the Netherlands
Nathalie Rombeek, Markus Hrachowitz, Arjan Droste, and Remko Uijlenhoet
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3207,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3207, 2024
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS).
Short summary
Technical note: A guide to using three open-source quality control algorithms for rainfall data from personal weather stations
Abbas El Hachem, Jochen Seidel, Tess O'Hara, Roberto Villalobos Herrera, Aart Overeem, Remko Uijlenhoet, András Bárdossy, and Lotte de Vos
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4715–4731, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4715-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4715-2024, 2024
Short summary
Flood drivers and trends: a case study of the Geul River catchment (the Netherlands) over the past half century
Athanasios Tsiokanos, Martine Rutten, Ruud J. van der Ent, and Remko Uijlenhoet
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 3327–3345, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3327-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3327-2024, 2024
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Others (Wind, Precipitation, Temperature, etc.) | Technique: Remote Sensing | Topic: Validation and Intercomparisons
The added value and potential of long-term radio occultation data for climatological wind field monitoring
Irena Nimac, Julia Danzer, and Gottfried Kirchengast
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 265–286, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-265-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-265-2025, 2025
Short summary
Exploring dual-lidar mean and turbulence measurements over Perdigão's complex terrain
Isadora L. Coimbra, Jakob Mann, José M. L. M. Palma, and Vasco T. P. Batista
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 287–303, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-287-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-287-2025, 2025
Short summary
Description and validation of the Japanese algorithm for radiative flux and heating rate products with all four EarthCARE instruments: pre-launch test with A-Train
Akira Yamauchi, Kentaroh Suzuki, Eiji Oikawa, Miho Sekiguchi, Takashi M. Nagao, and Haruma Ishida
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 6751–6767, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6751-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6751-2024, 2024
Short summary
Improving the estimate of higher-order moments from lidar observations near the top of the convective boundary layer
Tessa E. Rosenberger, David D. Turner, Thijs Heus, Girish N. Raghunathan, Timothy J. Wagner, and Julia Simonson
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 6595–6602, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6595-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6595-2024, 2024
Short summary
Research on Atmospheric Temperature Fine Measurements from near surface to 60 km Altitude Based on An Integrated LIDAR System
Zhangjun Wang, Tiantian Guo, Xianxin Li, Chao Chen, Dong Liu, Luoyuan Qu, Hui Li, and Xiufen Wang
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2647,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2647, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Aberson, K.: The spatial and temporal variability of the vertical dimension of rainstorms and their relation with precipitation intensity, internal report, https://cdn.knmi.nl/knmi/pdf/bibliotheek/knmipubIR/IR2011-03.pdf (last access: 19 December 2023), 2011. a
Beekhuis, H. and Holleman, I.: Highlights of the digital-IF upgrade of the Dutch national radar network, online report, https://cdn.knmi.nl/system/data_center_publications/files/000/068/061/original/erad2008drup_0120.pdf?1495621011 (last access: 19 December 2023), 2008. a
Bogerd, L., Overeem, A., Leijnse, H., and Uijlenhoet, R.: A comprehensive five-year evaluation of IMERG late run precipitation estimates over the Netherlands, J. Hydrometeorol., 22, 1855–1868, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-21-0002.1, 2021. a, b
Casella, D., Panegrossi, G., Sanò, P., Milani, L., Petracca, M., and Dietrich, S.: A novel algorithm for detection of precipitation in tropical regions using PMW radiometers, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 1217–1232, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-1217-2015, 2015. a
Chang, N.-B. and Hong, Y.: Multiscale hydrologic remote sensing: perspectives and applications, CRC Press, ISBN 978-1-00-068727-9, 2012. a
Download
Short summary
Algorithms merge satellite radiometer data from various frequency channels, each tied to a different footprint size. We studied the uncertainty associated with sampling (over the Netherlands using 4 years of data) as precipitation is highly variable in space and time by simulating ground-based data as satellite footprints. Though sampling affects precipitation estimates, it doesn’t explain all discrepancies. Overall, uncertainties in the algorithm seem more influential than how data is sampled.