Articles | Volume 17, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-247-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-247-2024
Research article
 | 
15 Jan 2024
Research article |  | 15 Jan 2024

Assessing sampling and retrieval errors of GPROF precipitation estimates over the Netherlands

Linda Bogerd, Hidde Leijnse, Aart Overeem, and Remko Uijlenhoet

Related authors

Rain-on-wet-soil compound floods in lowlands: the combined effect of large rain events and shallow groundwater on discharge peaks in a changing climate
Claudia C. Brauer, Ruben O. Imhoff, and Remko Uijlenhoet
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1712,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1712, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS).
Short summary
Torrential rainfall in Valencia (Spain) recorded by personal weather stations preceding and during the 29 October 2024 floods
Nathalie Rombeek, Markus Hrachowitz, and Remko Uijlenhoet
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1502,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1502, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS).
Short summary
Evaporation measurements using commercial microwave links as scintillometers
Luuk D. van der Valk, Oscar K. Hartogensis, Miriam Coenders-Gerrits, Rolf W. Hut, and Remko Uijlenhoet
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1128,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1128, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS).
Short summary
The Dutch real-time gauge-adjusted radar precipitation product
Aart Overeem, Hidde Leijnse, Mats Veldhuizen, and Bastiaan Anker
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-160,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-160, 2025
Preprint under review for ESSD
Short summary
Barriers of urban hydro-meteorological simulation: a review
Xuan Chen, Job Augustijn van der Werf, Arjan Droste, Miriam Coenders-Gerrits, and Remko Uijlenhoet
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3988,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3988, 2025
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Others (Wind, Precipitation, Temperature, etc.) | Technique: Remote Sensing | Topic: Validation and Intercomparisons
Atmospheric stability from numerical weather prediction models and microwave radiometer observations for onshore and offshore wind energy applications
Domenico Cimini, Rémi Gandoin, Stephanie Fiedler, Claudia Acquistapace, Andrea Balotti, Sabrina Gentile, Edoardo Geraldi, Christine Knist, Pauline Martinet, Saverio T. Nilo, Giandomenico Pace, Bernhard Pospichal, and Filomena Romano
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 2041–2067, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-2041-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-2041-2025, 2025
Short summary
Solar background radiation temperature calibration of a pure rotational Raman lidar
Vasura Jayaweera, Robert J. Sica, Giovanni Martucci, and Alexander Haefele
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 1461–1469, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1461-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1461-2025, 2025
Short summary
Exploring commercial Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) radio occultation (RO) products for planetary boundary layer studies in the Arctic
Manisha Ganeshan, Dong L. Wu, Joseph A. Santanello, Jie Gong, Chi Ao, Panagiotis Vergados, and Kevin J. Nelson
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 1389–1403, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1389-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1389-2025, 2025
Short summary
Research on atmospheric temperature fine measurements from the near surface to 60 km altitude based on an integrated lidar system
Zhangjun Wang, Tiantian Guo, Xianxin Li, Chao Chen, Dong Liu, Luoyuan Qu, Hui Li, and Xiufen Wang
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 1405–1414, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1405-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1405-2025, 2025
Short summary
Testing ground-based observations of wave activity in the (lower and upper) atmosphere as possible (complementary) indicators of streamer events
Michal Kozubek, Lisa Kuchelbacher, Jaroslav Chum, Tereza Sindelarova, Franziska Trinkl, and Katerina Podolska
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 1373–1388, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1373-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1373-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Aberson, K.: The spatial and temporal variability of the vertical dimension of rainstorms and their relation with precipitation intensity, internal report, https://cdn.knmi.nl/knmi/pdf/bibliotheek/knmipubIR/IR2011-03.pdf (last access: 19 December 2023), 2011. a
Beekhuis, H. and Holleman, I.: Highlights of the digital-IF upgrade of the Dutch national radar network, online report, https://cdn.knmi.nl/system/data_center_publications/files/000/068/061/original/erad2008drup_0120.pdf?1495621011 (last access: 19 December 2023), 2008. a
Bogerd, L., Overeem, A., Leijnse, H., and Uijlenhoet, R.: A comprehensive five-year evaluation of IMERG late run precipitation estimates over the Netherlands, J. Hydrometeorol., 22, 1855–1868, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-21-0002.1, 2021. a, b
Casella, D., Panegrossi, G., Sanò, P., Milani, L., Petracca, M., and Dietrich, S.: A novel algorithm for detection of precipitation in tropical regions using PMW radiometers, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 1217–1232, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-1217-2015, 2015. a
Chang, N.-B. and Hong, Y.: Multiscale hydrologic remote sensing: perspectives and applications, CRC Press, ISBN 978-1-00-068727-9, 2012. a
Download
Short summary
Algorithms merge satellite radiometer data from various frequency channels, each tied to a different footprint size. We studied the uncertainty associated with sampling (over the Netherlands using 4 years of data) as precipitation is highly variable in space and time by simulating ground-based data as satellite footprints. Though sampling affects precipitation estimates, it doesn’t explain all discrepancies. Overall, uncertainties in the algorithm seem more influential than how data is sampled.
Share