Articles | Volume 18, issue 13
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3051-2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3051-2025
Research article
 | 
11 Jul 2025
Research article |  | 11 Jul 2025

Development and validation of a NOx+ ratio method for the quantitative separation of inorganic and organic nitrate aerosol using a unit-mass-resolution time-of-flight aerosol chemical speciation monitor equipped with a capture vaporizer (CV-UMR-ToF-ACSM)

Farhan R. Nursanto, Douglas A. Day, Roy Meinen, Rupert Holzinger, Harald Saathoff, Jinglan Fu, Jan Mulder, Ulrike Dusek, and Juliane L. Fry

Related authors

What chemical species are responsible for new particle formation and growth in the Netherlands? A hybrid positive matrix factorization (PMF) analysis using aerosol composition (ACSM) and size (SMPS)
Farhan R. Nursanto, Roy Meinen, Rupert Holzinger, Maarten C. Krol, Xinya Liu, Ulrike Dusek, Bas Henzing, and Juliane L. Fry
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 10015–10034, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-10015-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-10015-2023, 2023
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Aerosols | Technique: In Situ Measurement | Topic: Data Processing and Information Retrieval
Inversion algorithm of black carbon mixing state based on machine learning
Zeyuan Tian, Jiandong Wang, Jiaping Wang, Chao Liu, Jia Xing, Jinbo Wang, Zhouyang Zhang, Yuzhi Jin, Sunan Shen, Bin Wang, Wei Nie, Xin Huang, and Aijun Ding
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 1149–1162, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1149-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1149-2025, 2025
Short summary
Implementation of Real-Time Source Apportionment Approaches Using the ACSM-Xact-Aethalometer (AXA) Set-Up with SoFi RT: The Athens Case Study
Manousos Ioannis Manousakas, Olga Zografou, Francesco Canonaco, Evangelia Diapouli, Stefanos Papagiannis, Maria Gini, Vasiliki Vasilatou, Anna Tobler, Stergios Vratolis, Jay G. Slowik, Kaspar R. Daellenbach, André S. H. Prevot, and Konstantinos Eleftheriadis
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-542,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-542, 2025
Short summary
Performance evaluation of Atmotube PRO sensors for air quality measurements in an urban location
Aishah I. Shittu, Kirsty J. Pringle, Stephen R. Arnold, Richard J. Pope, Ailish M. Graham, Carly Reddington, Richard Rigby, and James B. McQuaid
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 817–828, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-817-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-817-2025, 2025
Short summary
Retrieval of Bulk Hygroscopicity From PurpleAir PM2.5 Sensor Measurements
Jillian Psotka, Emily Tracey, and Robert Sica
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3618,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3618, 2024
Short summary
Spatial analysis of PM2.5 using a concentration similarity index applied to air quality sensor networks
Rósín Byrne, John C. Wenger, and Stig Hellebust
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 5129–5146, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5129-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5129-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Adams, P. J., Seinfeld, J. H., and Koch, D. M.: Global concentrations of tropospheric sulfate, nitrate, and ammonium aerosol simulated in a general circulation model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 104, 13791–13823, https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900083, 1999. a
Allan, J. D., Delia, A. E., Coe, H., Bower, K. N., Alfarra, M., Jimenez, J. L., Middlebrook, A. M., Drewnick, F., Onasch, T. B., Canagaratna, M. R., Jayne, J. T., and Worsnop, D. R.: A generalised method for the extraction of chemically resolved mass spectra from Aerodyne aerosol mass spectrometer data, J. Aerosol Sci., 35, 909–922, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2004.02.007, 2004. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i
Bahreini, R., Ervens, B., Middlebrook, A. M., Warneke, C., De Gouw, J. A., DeCarlo, P. F., Jimenez, J. L., Brock, C. A., Neuman, J. A., Ryerson, T. B., Stark, H., Atlas, E., Brioude, J., Fried, A., Holloway, J. S., Peischl, J., Richter, D., Walega, J., Weibring, P., Wollny, A. G., and Fehsenfeld, F. C.: Organic aerosol formation in urban and industrial plumes near Houston and Dallas, Texas, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, 2008JD011493, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011493, 2009. a
Bauer, S. E., Koch, D., Unger, N., Metzger, S. M., Shindell, D. T., and Streets, D. G.: Nitrate aerosols today and in 2030: a global simulation including aerosols and tropospheric ozone, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 5043–5059, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-5043-2007, 2007. a
Bian, H., Chin, M., Hauglustaine, D. A., Schulz, M., Myhre, G., Bauer, S. E., Lund, M. T., Karydis, V. A., Kucsera, T. L., Pan, X., Pozzer, A., Skeie, R. B., Steenrod, S. D., Sudo, K., Tsigaridis, K., Tsimpidi, A. P., and Tsyro, S. G.: Investigation of global particulate nitrate from the AeroCom phase III experiment, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 12911–12940, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-12911-2017, 2017. a
Download
Short summary
It is of increasing importance to monitor nitrate pollution that can harm ecosystems. However, commonly used aerosol monitoring equipment cannot distinguish inorganic from organic forms of nitrate, which may have different consequences for the environment. We describe a method to differentiate types of nitrates that can be applied to ambient monitoring to improve understanding of its formation and impact.
Share