Chwala, C. and Kunstmann, H.: Commercial microwave link networks for rainfall observation: assessment of the current status and future challenges, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, 6, e1337, https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1337, 2019.
Colli, M., Lanza, L. G., La Barbera, P., and Chan, P. W.: Measurement accuracy of weighing and tipping-bucket rainfall intensity gauges under dynamic laboratory testing, Atmos. Res., 144, 186–194, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2013.08.007, 2014.
de Vos, L., Leijnse, H., Overeem, A., and Uijlenhoet, R.: The potential of urban rainfall monitoring with crowdsourced automatic weather stations in Amsterdam, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 765–777, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-765-2017, 2017.
de Vos, L. W., Leijnse, H., Overeem, A., and Uijlenhoet, R.: Quality control for crowdsourced personal weather stations to enable operational rainfall monitoring, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 8820–8829, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL083731, 2019.
Droździoł, R. and Absalon, D.: Evaluation of selected amateur rain gauges with Hellmann rain gauge measurements, Climate, 11, 107, https://doi.org/10.3390/cli11050107, 2023.
Garcia-Marti, I., Overeem, A., Noteboom, J. W., de Vos, L., de Haij, M., and Whan, K.: From proof-of-concept to proof-of-value: Approaching third-party data to operational workflows of national meteorological services, Int. J. Climatol., 43, 275–292, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.7757, 2023.
Graf, M., El Hachem, A., Eisele, M., Seidel, J., Chwala, C., Kunstmann, H., and Bárdossy, A.: Rainfall estimates from opportunistic sensors in Germany across spatio-temporal scales, J. Hydrol., 37, 100883, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2021.100883, 2021.
Hahn, C., Garcia-Marti, I., Sugier, J., Emsley, F., Beaulant, A.-L., Oram, L., Strandberg, E., Lindgren, E., Sunter, M., and Ziska, F.: Observations from Personal Weather Stations – EUMETNET Interests and Experience, Climate, 10, 192, https://doi.org/10.3390/cli10120192, 2022.
Haselow, L., Meissner, R., Rupp, H., and Miegel, K.: Evaluation of precipitation measurements methods under field conditions during a summer season: A comparison of the standard rain gauge with a weighable lysimeter and a piezoelectric precipitation sensor, J. Hydrol., 575, 537–543, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.05.065, 2019.
Hoffmann, M., Schwartengräber, R., Wessolek, W., and Peters, A.: Comparison of simple rain gauge measurements with precision lysimeter data, Atmos. Res., 174–175, 120–123, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2016.01.016, 2016.
Hohmann, C., Kirchengast, G., O, S., Rieger, W., and Foelsche, U.: Small catchment runoff sensitivity to station density and spatial interpolation: hydrological modeling of heavy rainfall using a dense rain gauge network, Water, 13, 1381, https://doi.org/10.3390/w13101381, 2021.
Horita, F. E. A., Vilela, R. B., Martins, R. G., Bressiani, D. A., Palma, G., and Porto de Albuquerque, J.: Determining flooded areas using crowd sensing data and weather radar precipitation: a case study in Brazil, in: ISCRAM 2018, Rochester, NY, USA, 20–23 May 2018, Proceedings of the 15th ISCRAM Conference – Rochester, NY, USA May 2018, 1040–1050, ISBN 9780692127605, 2018.
IMGW-PIB: Dane publiczne,
https://danepubliczne.imgw.pl/pl/datastore?product=Meteo (last access: 7 July 2025), 2024a.
IMGW-PIB: Dane publiczne,
https://danepubliczne.imgw.pl/pl/datastore?product=COMPO_PAC.comp.pac (last access: 7 July 2025), 2024b.
Jurczyk, A., Szturc, J., and Ośródka, K.: Quality-based compositing of weather radar QPE estimates, Meteorol. Appl., 27, e1812, https://doi.org/10.1002/met.1812, 2020a.
Jurczyk, A., Szturc, J., Otop, I., Ośródka, K., and Struzik, P.: Quality-based combination of multi-source precipitation data, Remote Sens., 12, 1709, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12111709, 2020b.
Jurczyk, A., Ośródka, K., Szturc, J., Pasierb, M., and Kurcz, A.: Long-term multi-source precipitation estimation with high resolution (RainGRS Clim), Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 4067–4079, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-4067-2023, 2023.
Krennert, T., Pistotnik, G., Kaltenberger, R., and Csekits, C.: Crowdsourcing of weather observations at national meteorological and hydrological services in Europe, Adv. Sci. Res., 15, 71–76, https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-15-71-2018, 2018.
Lanza, L. G. and Vuerich, E.: The WMO Field Intercomparison of Rain Intensity Gauges, Atmos. Res., 94, 534–543, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2009.06.012, 2009.
Loritz, R., Hrachowitz, M., Neuper, M., and Zehe, E.: The role and value of distributed precipitation data in hydrological models, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 147–167, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-147-2021, 2021.
McKee, J. L. and Binns, A. D.: A review of gauge–radar merging methods for quantitative precipitation estimation in hydrology, Can. Water Resour. J., 41, 186–203, https://doi.org/10.1080/07011784.2015.1064786, 2016.
Muller, C. L., Chapman, L., Johnston, S., Kidd, C., Illingworth, S., Foody G., Overeem, A., and Lei, R. R.: Crowdsourcing for climate and atmospheric sciences: current status and future potential, Int. J. Climatol., 35, 3185–3203, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4210, 2015.
Nipen, T. N., Seierstad, I. A., Lussana, C., Kristiansen, J., and Hov, Ø.: Adopting citizen observations in operational weather prediction, B. Am. Meteor. Soc., 101, E43–E47, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0237.1, 2020.
Ośródka, K. and Szturc, J.: Improvement in algorithms for quality control of weather radar data (RADVOL-QC system), Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 261–277, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-261-2022, 2022.
Ośródka, K., Szturc J., and Jurczyk A.: Chain of data quality algorithms for 3-D single-polarization radar reflectivity (RADVOL-QC system), Meteorol. Appl., 21, 256–270, https://doi.org/10.1002/met.1323, 2014.
Ośródka, K., Otop, I., and Szturc, J.: Automatic quality control of telemetric rain gauge data providing quantitative quality information (RainGaugeQC), Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 5581–5597, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-5581-2022, 2022.
Overeem, A., Leijnse, H., van der Schrier, G., van den Besselaar, E., Garcia-Marti, I., and de Vos, L. W.: Merging with crowdsourced rain gauge data improves pan-European radar precipitation estimates, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 649–668, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-649-2024, 2024.
Pasierb, M., Bałdysz, Z., Szturc, J., Nykiel, G., Jurczyk, A., Osródka, K., Figurski, M., Wojtczak, M., and Wojtkowski, C.: Application of commercial microwave links (CMLs) attenuation for quantitative estimation of precipitation, Meteorol. Appl., 31, e2218, https://doi.org/10.1002/met.2218, 2024.
Polz, J., Chwala, C., Graf, M., and Kunstmann, H.: Rain event detection in commercial microwave link attenuation data using convolutional neural networks, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 3835–3853, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3835-2020, 2020.
Schnepper, T., Groh, J., Gerke, H. H., Reichert, B., and Pütz, T.: Evaluation of precipitation measurement methods using data from a precision lysimeter network, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 3265–3292, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3265-2023, 2023.
Segovia-Cardozo, D. A., Rodríguez-Sinobas, L., Díez-Herrero, A., Zubelzu, S., and Canales-Ide, F.: Understanding the Mechanical Biases of Tipping-Bucket Rain Gauges: A Semi-Analytical Calibration Approach, Water, 13, 2285, https://doi.org/10.3390/w13162285, 2021.
Sha, Y., Gagne II, D. J., West, G., and Stull, R.: Deep-Learning-Based Precipitation Observation Quality Control, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 38, 1075–1091, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-20-0081.1, 2021.
Sinclair, S. and Pegram, G.: Combining radar and rain gauge rainfall estimates using conditional merging, Atmos. Sci. Lett., 6, 19–22, https://doi.org/10.1002/asl.85, 2005.
Sokol, Z., Szturc, J., Orellana-Alvear, J., Popová, J., Jurczyk, A., and Célleri, R.: The role of weather radar in rainfall estimation and its application in meteorological and hydrological modelling – A review, Remote Sens., 13, 351, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13030351, 2021.
Szturc, J., Jurczyk, A., Ośródka, K., Wyszogrodzki, A., and Giszterowicz, M.: Precipitation estimation and nowcasting at IMGW (SEiNO system), Meteorology Hydrology and Water Management, 6, 3–12, https://doi.org/10.26491/mhwm/76120, 2018.
Szturc, J., Ośródka, K., Jurczyk, A., Otop, I., Linkowska, J., Bochenek, B., and Pasierb, M.: Quality control and verification of precipitation observations, estimates, and forecasts, in: Precipitation Science. Measurement, Remote Sensing, Microphysics and Modeling, edited by: Michaelides, S., Elsevier, 91–133, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-822973-6.00002-0, 2022.
Urban, G. and Strug, K.: Evaluation of precipitation measurements obtained from different types of rain gauges, Meteorol. Z., 30, 445–463, https://doi.org/10.1127/metz/2021/1084, 2021.
Urban, G., Kowalewski, M. K., Sawicki, J., and Borowiecki, K.: Assessment of the quality of measurements from selected amateur rain gauges, Meteorol. Z., 33, 159–174, https://doi.org/10.1127/metz/2024/1199, 2024.
van Andel, N.: Quality control development for near real-time rain gauge networks for operational rainfall monitoring, Master Thesis, Faculty of Physics, Utrecht University, Utrecht,
https://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/40939, 2021.
Villalobos-Herrera, R., Blenkinsop, S., Guerreiro, S. B., O'Hara, T., and Fowler, H. J.: Sub-hourly resolution quality control of rain gauge data significantly improves regional sub-daily return level estimates, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 148, 3252–3271, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.4357, 2022.
WMO-No. 488: Guide on the Global Observing System, World Meteorological Organization, updated in 2017, Geneva, 215 pp., ISBN 978-92-63-10488-5, 2015.
WMO-No. 1257: Guide to Operational Weather Radar Best Practices. Volume VI: Weather Radar Data Processing, World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, provisional edition, 166 pp., https://community.wmo.int/en/activity-areas/imop/new-provisional-2024-edition-guide-operational-weather-radar-best-practices (last access: 7 July 2025), 2024.
Wood, S. J., Jones, D. A., and Moore, R. J.: Accuracy of rainfall measurement for scales of hydrological interest, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 4, 531–543, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-4-531-2000, 2000.
Yan, Q., Zhang, B., Jiang, Y., Liu, Y., Yang, B., and Wang, H.: Quality control of hourly rain gauge data based on radar and satellite multi-source data, J. Hydroinform., 26, 1042–1058, https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2024.272, 2024.
Yousefi, K. P., Yilmaz, M. T., Öztürk, K., Yucel, I., and Yilmaz, K. Y.: Time-independent bias correction methods compared with gauge adjustment methods in improving radar-based precipitation estimates, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 68, 1963–1983, https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2023.2248108, 2023.
Zhang, Y., Ren, Y., Ren, G., and Wang G.: Bias Correction of Gauge Data and its Effect on Precipitation Climatology over Mainland China, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 58, 2177–2196, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-19-0049.1, 2019.
Zheng, F., Tao, R., Maier, H. R., See, L., Savic, D., Zhang, T., Chen, Q., Assumpção, T. A., Yang, P., Heidari, B., Rieckermann, J., Minsker, B., Bi, W., Cai, X., Solomatine, D., and Popescu, I.: Crowdsourcing methods for data collection in geophysics: State of the art, issues, and future directions, Rev. Geophys., 56, 698–740, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018RG000616, 2018.
