Articles | Volume 9, issue 6
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 2633–2646, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-2633-2016
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 2633–2646, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-2633-2016
Research article
21 Jun 2016
Research article | 21 Jun 2016

Differential absorption radar techniques: water vapor retrievals

Luis Millán et al.

Related authors

Water vapour and ozone in the upper troposphere–lower stratosphere: global climatologies from three Canadian limb-viewing instruments
Paul S. Jeffery, Kaley A. Walker, Chris E. Sioris, Chris D. Boone, Doug Degenstein, Gloria L. Manney, C. Thomas McElroy, Luis Millán, David A. Plummer, Niall J. Ryan, Patrick E. Sheese, and Jiansheng Zou
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 14709–14734, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-14709-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-14709-2022, 2022
Short summary
Upper stratospheric ClO and HOCl trends (2005–2020): Aura Microwave Limb Sounder and model results
Lucien Froidevaux, Douglas E. Kinnison, Michelle L. Santee, Luis F. Millán, Nathaniel J. Livesey, William G. Read, Charles G. Bardeen, John J. Orlando, and Ryan A. Fuller
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 4779–4799, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-4779-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-4779-2022, 2022
Short summary
Investigation and amelioration of long-term instrumental drifts in water vapor and nitrous oxide measurements from the Aura Microwave Limb Sounder (MLS) and their implications for studies of variability and trends
Nathaniel J. Livesey, William G. Read, Lucien Froidevaux, Alyn Lambert, Michelle L. Santee, Michael J. Schwartz, Luis F. Millán, Robert F. Jarnot, Paul A. Wagner, Dale F. Hurst, Kaley A. Walker, Patrick E. Sheese, and Gerald E. Nedoluha
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 15409–15430, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-15409-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-15409-2021, 2021
Short summary
Reanalysis intercomparison of potential vorticity and potential-vorticity-based diagnostics
Luis F. Millán, Gloria L. Manney, and Zachary D. Lawrence
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 5355–5376, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-5355-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-5355-2021, 2021
Short summary
Odd hydrogen response thresholds for indication of solar proton and electron impact in the mesosphere and stratosphere
Tuomas Häkkilä, Pekka T. Verronen, Luis Millán, Monika E. Szeląg, Niilo Kalakoski, and Antti Kero
Ann. Geophys., 38, 1299–1312, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-1299-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-1299-2020, 2020
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Clouds | Technique: Remote Sensing | Topic: Instruments and Platforms
3D cloud envelope and cloud development velocity from simulated CLOUD (C3IEL) stereo images
Paolo Dandini, Céline Cornet, Renaud Binet, Laetitia Fenouil, Vadim Holodovsky, Yoav Y. Schechner, Didier Ricard, and Daniel Rosenfeld
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 6221–6242, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6221-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6221-2022, 2022
Short summary
Passive ground-based remote sensing of radiation fog
Heather Guy, David D. Turner, Von P. Walden, Ian M. Brooks, and Ryan R. Neely
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 5095–5115, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-5095-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-5095-2022, 2022
Short summary
Locations for the best lidar view of mid-level and high clouds
Matthias Tesche and Vincent Noel
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 4225–4240, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4225-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4225-2022, 2022
Short summary
VELOX – a new thermal infrared imager for airborne remote sensing of cloud and surface properties
Michael Schäfer, Kevin Wolf, André Ehrlich, Christoph Hallbauer, Evelyn Jäkel, Friedhelm Jansen, Anna Elizabeth Luebke, Joshua Müller, Jakob Thoböll, Timo Röschenthaler, Bjorn Stevens, and Manfred Wendisch
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 1491–1509, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-1491-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-1491-2022, 2022
Short summary
Above-aircraft cirrus cloud and aerosol optical depth from hyperspectral irradiances measured by a total-diffuse radiometer
Matthew S. Norgren, John Wood, K. Sebastian Schmidt, Bastiaan van Diedenhoven, Snorre A. Stamnes, Luke D. Ziemba, Ewan C. Crosbie, Michael A. Shook, A. Scott Kittelman, Samuel E. LeBlanc, Stephen Broccardo, Steffen Freitag, and Jeffrey S. Reid
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 1373–1394, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-1373-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-1373-2022, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Abel, S. J. and Boutle, I. A.: An improved representation of the raindrop size distribution for single-moment microphysics schemes, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 138, 2151–2162, 2012.
Anderson, E.: Statement of guidance for global numerical weather prediction (NWP), available at: https://www.wmo.int/pages/prog/www/OSY/GOS-RRR.html (last access: 1 March 2016), 2014.
Ao, C. O., Meehan, T. K., Hajj, G. A., Mannucci, A. J., and Beyerle, G.: Lower troposphere refractivity bias in GPS occultation retrievals, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4577, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD003216, 2003. Meteorol. Soc., 133, 1473–1485, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.112, 2007.
Aumann, H. H., Chahine, M. T., Gautier, C., Goldberg, M. D., Kalnay, E., McMillin, L. M., Revercomb, H., Rosenkranz, P. W., Smith, W. L., Staelin, D. H., Strow, L. L., and Susskind, J.: AIRS/AMSU/HSB on the Aqua mission: Design, science objectives, data products and processing system, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 41, 253–264, 2003.
Download
Short summary
We discuss the theoretical capabilities of a radar technique to measure profiles of water vapor in cloudy/precipitating areas. The method uses two radar pulses at different frequencies near the 183 GHz H2O absorption line to determine water vapor profiles by measuring the differential absorption on and off the line. Results of inverting synthetic data assuming a satellite radar are presented.