Articles | Volume 11, issue 4
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 2051–2066, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-2051-2018

Special issue: Observing Atmosphere and Climate with Occultation Techniques...

Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 2051–2066, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-2051-2018

Research article 11 Apr 2018

Research article | 11 Apr 2018

Evaluating the lower-tropospheric COSMIC GPS radio occultation sounding quality over the Arctic

Xiao Yu et al.

Related authors

An Assessment of Reprocessed GPS/MET Observations Spanning 1995–1997
Anthony James Mannucci, Chi On Ao, Byron A. Iijima, Thomas K. Meehan, Panagiotis Vergados, E. Robert Kursinski, Sean Healy, Andras Horányi, and William S. Schreiner
Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2021-241,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2021-241, 2021
Preprint under review for AMT
Short summary
Consistency and structural uncertainty of multi-mission GPS radio occultation records
Andrea K. Steiner, Florian Ladstädter, Chi O. Ao, Hans Gleisner, Shu-Peng Ho, Doug Hunt, Torsten Schmidt, Ulrich Foelsche, Gottfried Kirchengast, Ying-Hwa Kuo, Kent B. Lauritsen, Anthony J. Mannucci, Johannes K. Nielsen, William Schreiner, Marc Schwärz, Sergey Sokolovskiy, Stig Syndergaard, and Jens Wickert
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 2547–2575, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2547-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2547-2020, 2020
Short summary
Calibration and validation of the Polarimetric Radio Occultation and Heavy Precipitation experiment aboard the PAZ satellite
Ramon Padullés, Chi O. Ao, F. Joseph Turk, Manuel de la Torre Juárez, Byron Iijima, Kuo Nung Wang, and Estel Cardellach
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 1299–1313, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1299-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1299-2020, 2020
Short summary
Assessment of global navigation satellite system (GNSS) radio occultation refractivity under heavy precipitation
Ramon Padullés, Estel Cardellach, Kuo-Nung Wang, Chi O. Ao, F. Joseph Turk, and Manuel de la Torre-Juárez
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 11697–11708, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11697-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11697-2018, 2018
Short summary
Comparisons of the tropospheric specific humidity from GPS radio occultations with ERA-Interim, NASA MERRA, and AIRS data
Panagiotis Vergados, Anthony J. Mannucci, Chi O. Ao, Olga Verkhoglyadova, and Byron Iijima
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 1193–1206, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1193-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1193-2018, 2018
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Others (Wind, Precipitation, Temperature, etc.) | Technique: Remote Sensing | Topic: Validation and Intercomparisons
Monitoring the Tropospheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI) short-wave infrared (SWIR) module instrument stability using desert sites
Tim A. van Kempen, Filippo Oggionni, and Richard M. van Hees
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 6711–6722, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-6711-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-6711-2021, 2021
Short summary
Evaluating the use of Aeolus satellite observations in the regional numerical weather prediction (NWP) model Harmonie–Arome
Susanna Hagelin, Roohollah Azad, Magnus Lindskog, Harald Schyberg, and Heiner Körnich
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 5925–5938, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-5925-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-5925-2021, 2021
Short summary
Interpreting estimated observation error statistics of weather radar measurements using the ICON-LAM-KENDA system
Yuefei Zeng, Tijana Janjic, Yuxuan Feng, Ulrich Blahak, Alberto de Lozar, Elisabeth Bauernschubert, Klaus Stephan, and Jinzhong Min
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 5735–5756, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-5735-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-5735-2021, 2021
Short summary
Validation of Aeolus Level 2B wind products using wind profilers, ground-based Doppler wind lidars, and radiosondes in Japan
Hironori Iwai, Makoto Aoki, Mitsuru Oshiro, and Shoken Ishii
Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2021-243,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2021-243, 2021
Revised manuscript accepted for AMT
Short summary
Validation of Aeolus winds using ground-based radars in Antarctica and in northern Sweden
Evgenia Belova, Sheila Kirkwood, Peter Voelger, Sourav Chatterjee, Karathazhiyath Satheesan, Susanna Hagelin, Magnus Lindskog, and Heiner Körnich
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 5415–5428, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-5415-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-5415-2021, 2021
Short summary

Cited articles

Ao, C. O., Meehan, T. K., Hajj, G. A., Manucci, A. J., and Beyerle, G.: Lower troposphere refractivity bias in GPS occultation retrievals, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4577, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD003216, 2003.
Ao, C. O., Hajj, G. A., Meehan, T. K., Dong, D., Iijima, B. A., Mannucci, A. J., and Kursinski, E. R.: Rising and setting GPS occupations by use of open-loop tracking, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, 1–15, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010483, 2009.
Ao, C. O., Waliser, D. E., Chan, S. K., Li, J. L., Tian, B., Xie, F., and Mannucci, A. J.: Planetary boundary layer heights from GPS radio occultation refractivity and humidity profiles, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, 1–18, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD017598, 2012.
Download
Short summary
Atmospheric observations from GPS receiver satellites offer uniform spatial coverage over the Arctic. The GPS profiles sensing deep into the lowest 300 m of the atmosphere only reach 50–60 % in summer but over 70 % in other seasons. The profile uncertainty due to different data centers is within 0.07 % in refractivity, 0.72 K in temperature, and 0.05 g kg-1 in humidity below 10 km. A systematic negative bias of 1 % in refractivity below 2 km is only seen in the summer due to moisture impact.