Articles | Volume 11, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-709-2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-709-2018
Research article
 | 
07 Feb 2018
Research article |  | 07 Feb 2018

Evaluation of a low-cost optical particle counter (Alphasense OPC-N2) for ambient air monitoring

Leigh R. Crilley, Marvin Shaw, Ryan Pound, Louisa J. Kramer, Robin Price, Stuart Young, Alastair C. Lewis, and Francis D. Pope

Related authors

Radical chemistry and ozone production at a UK coastal receptor site
Robert Woodward-Massey, Roberto Sommariva, Lisa K. Whalley, Danny R. Cryer, Trevor Ingham, William J. Bloss, Stephen M. Ball, Sam Cox, James D. Lee, Chris P. Reed, Leigh R. Crilley, Louisa J. Kramer, Brian J. Bandy, Grant L. Forster, Claire E. Reeves, Paul S. Monks, and Dwayne E. Heard
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 14393–14424, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-14393-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-14393-2023, 2023
Short summary
Impact of HO2 aerosol uptake on radical levels and O3 production during summertime in Beijing
Joanna E. Dyson, Lisa K. Whalley, Eloise J. Slater, Robert Woodward-Massey, Chunxiang Ye, James D. Lee, Freya Squires, James R. Hopkins, Rachel E. Dunmore, Marvin Shaw, Jacqueline F. Hamilton, Alastair C. Lewis, Stephen D. Worrall, Asan Bacak, Archit Mehra, Thomas J. Bannan, Hugh Coe, Carl J. Percival, Bin Ouyang, C. Nicholas Hewitt, Roderic L. Jones, Leigh R. Crilley, Louisa J. Kramer, W. Joe F. Acton, William J. Bloss, Supattarachai Saksakulkrai, Jingsha Xu, Zongbo Shi, Roy M. Harrison, Simone Kotthaus, Sue Grimmond, Yele Sun, Weiqi Xu, Siyao Yue, Lianfang Wei, Pingqing Fu, Xinming Wang, Stephen R. Arnold, and Dwayne E. Heard
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 5679–5697, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-5679-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-5679-2023, 2023
Short summary
Development and validation of a new in situ technique to measure total gaseous chlorine in air
Teles C. Furlani, RenXi Ye, Jordan Stewart, Leigh R. Crilley, Peter M. Edwards, Tara F. Kahan, and Cora J. Young
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 181–193, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-181-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-181-2023, 2023
Short summary
Measurement report: Interpretation of wide-range particulate matter size distributions in Delhi
Ülkü Alver Şahin, Roy M. Harrison, Mohammed S. Alam, David C. S. Beddows, Dimitrios Bousiotis, Zongbo Shi, Leigh R. Crilley, William Bloss, James Brean, Isha Khanna, and Rulan Verma
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 5415–5433, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-5415-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-5415-2022, 2022
Short summary
Radical chemistry at a UK coastal receptor site – Part 1: observations of OH, HO2, RO2, and OH reactivity and comparison to MCM model predictions
Robert Woodward-Massey, Roberto Sommariva, Lisa K. Whalley, Danny R. Cryer, Trevor Ingham, William J1 Bloss, Sam Cox, James D. Lee, Chris P. Reed, Leigh R. Crilley, Louisa J. Kramer, Brian J. Bandy, Grant L. Forster, Claire E. Reeves, Paul S. Monks, and Dwayne E. Heard
Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2022-207,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2022-207, 2022
Preprint withdrawn
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Aerosols | Technique: In Situ Measurement | Topic: Instruments and Platforms
Deriving the hygroscopicity of ambient particles using low-cost optical particle counters
Wei-Chieh Huang, Hui-Ming Hung, Ching-Wei Chu, Wei-Chun Hwang, and Shih-Chun Candice Lung
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 6073–6084, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6073-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6073-2024, 2024
Short summary
Fast and sensitive measurements of sub-3 nm particles using Condensation Particle Counters For Atmospheric Rapid Measurements (CPC FARM)
Darren Cheng, Stavros Amanatidis, Gregory S. Lewis, and Coty N. Jen
Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2024-157,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2024-157, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for AMT
Short summary
Performance evaluation of an online monitor based on X-ray fluorescence for detecting elemental concentrations in ambient particulate matter
Ivonne Trebs, Céline Lett, Andreas Krein, Erika Matsumoto Kawaguchi, and Jürgen Junk
Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2024-134,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2024-134, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for AMT
Short summary
Simulations of the collection of mesospheric dust particles with a rocket instrument
Adrien Pineau, Henriette Trollvik, Herman Greaker, Sveinung Olsen, Yngve Eilertsen, and Ingrid Mann
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3843–3861, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3843-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3843-2024, 2024
Short summary
Characterisation of particle single-scattering albedo with a modified airborne dual-wavelength CAPS monitor
Chenjie Yu, Edouard Pangui, Kevin Tu, Mathieu Cazaunau, Maxime Feingesicht, Landsheere Xavier, Thierry Bourrianne, Vincent Michoud, Christopher Cantrell, Timothy B. Onasch, Andrew Freedman, and Paola Formenti
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3419–3437, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3419-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3419-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Andreae, M. O. and Rosenfeld, D.: Aerosol–cloud–precipitation interactions. Part 1. The nature and sources of cloud-active aerosols, Earth-Sci. Rev., 89, 13–41, 2008. 
Castellini, S., Moroni, B., and Cappelletti, D.: PMetro: Measurement of urban aerosols on a mobile platform, Measurement, 49, 99–106, 2014. 
Charron, A., Harrison, R. M., Moorcroft, S., and Booker, J.: Quantitative interpretation of divergence between PM10 and PM2.5 mass measurement by TEOM and gravimetric (Partisol) instruments, Atmos. Environ., 38, 415–423, 2004. 
de Nazelle, A., Bode, O., and Orjuela, J. P.: Comparison of air pollution exposures in active vs. passive travel modes in European cities: A quantitative review, Environ. Int., 99, 151–160, 2017. 
Download
Short summary
The affordability and small size of low-cost particle sensors make them attractive for air pollution experiments that require multiple instruments, or take place in hard-to-access locations or low-income countries. For any sensor to be useful, its accuracy and precision need to be known. We evaluate the Alphasense OPC-N2 for monitoring airborne particles at typical UK urban background sites. The devices were found to be accurate provided they are correctly calibrated.