Articles | Volume 12, issue 12
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-6489-2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-6489-2019
Research article
 | 
09 Dec 2019
Research article |  | 09 Dec 2019

A comparative evaluation of Aura-OMI and SKYNET near-UV single-scattering albedo products

Hiren Jethva and Omar Torres

Related authors

Retrieving UV–Vis spectral single-scattering albedo of absorbing aerosols above clouds from synergy of ORACLES airborne and A-train sensors
Hiren T. Jethva, Omar Torres, Richard A. Ferrare, Sharon P. Burton, Anthony L. Cook, David B. Harper, Chris A. Hostetler, Jens Redemann, Vinay Kayetha, Samuel LeBlanc, Kristina Pistone, Logan Mitchell, and Connor J. Flynn
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 2335–2366, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2335-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2335-2024, 2024
Short summary
Retrieval of UV–visible aerosol absorption using AERONET and OMI–MODIS synergy: spatial and temporal variability across major aerosol environments
Vinay Kayetha, Omar Torres, and Hiren Jethva
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 845–877, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-845-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-845-2022, 2022
Short summary
AEROCOM and AEROSAT AAOD and SSA study – Part 1: Evaluation and intercomparison of satellite measurements
Nick Schutgens, Oleg Dubovik, Otto Hasekamp, Omar Torres, Hiren Jethva, Peter J. T. Leonard, Pavel Litvinov, Jens Redemann, Yohei Shinozuka, Gerrit de Leeuw, Stefan Kinne, Thomas Popp, Michael Schulz, and Philip Stier
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 6895–6917, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6895-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6895-2021, 2021
Short summary
A new measurement approach for validating satellite-based above-cloud aerosol optical depth
Charles K. Gatebe, Hiren Jethva, Ritesh Gautam, Rajesh Poudyal, and Tamás Várnai
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 1405–1423, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-1405-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-1405-2021, 2021
Short summary
TROPOMI aerosol products: evaluation and observations of synoptic-scale carbonaceous aerosol plumes during 2018–2020
Omar Torres, Hiren Jethva, Changwoo Ahn, Glen Jaross, and Diego G. Loyola
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 6789–6806, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-6789-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-6789-2020, 2020
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Aerosols | Technique: Remote Sensing | Topic: Validation and Intercomparisons
An empirical characterization of the aerosol Ångström exponent interpolation bias using SAGE III/ISS data
Robert P. Damadeo, Viktoria F. Sofieva, Alexei Rozanov, and Larry W. Thomason
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3669–3678, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3669-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3669-2024, 2024
Short summary
Retrievals of aerosol optical depth over the western North Atlantic Ocean during ACTIVATE
Leong Wai Siu, Joseph S. Schlosser, David Painemal, Brian Cairns, Marta A. Fenn, Richard A. Ferrare, Johnathan W. Hair, Chris A. Hostetler, Longlei Li, Mary M. Kleb, Amy Jo Scarino, Taylor J. Shingler, Armin Sorooshian, Snorre A. Stamnes, and Xubin Zeng
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 2739–2759, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2739-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2739-2024, 2024
Short summary
Characterization of dust aerosols from ALADIN and CALIOP measurements
Rui Song, Adam Povey, and Roy G. Grainger
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 2521–2538, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2521-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2521-2024, 2024
Short summary
Lidar depolarization characterization using a reference system
Alkistis Papetta, Franco Marenco, Maria Kezoudi, Rodanthi-Elisavet Mamouri, Argyro Nisantzi, Holger Baars, Ioana Elisabeta Popovici, Philippe Goloub, Stéphane Victori, and Jean Sciare
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 1721–1738, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1721-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1721-2024, 2024
Short summary
Improved Mean Field Estimates of GEMS AOD L3 Product: Using Spatio-temporal Variability
Sooyon Kim, Yeseul Cho, Hanjeong Ki, Seyoung Park, Dagun Oh, Seungjun Lee, Yeonghye Cho, Jhoon Kim, Wonjin Lee, Jaewoo Park, Ick Hoon Jin, and Sangwook Kang
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-604,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-604, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Ahn, C., Torres, O., and Bhartia, P. K.: Comparison of Ozone Monitoring Instrument UV Aerosol Products with Aqua/Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer and Multiangle Imaging Spectroradiometer observations in 2006, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D16S27, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008832, 2008.  
Ahn, C., Torres, O., and Jethva, H.: Assessment of OMI near-UV aerosol optical depth over land, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020188, 2014. 
Boi, P., Tonna, G., Dalu, G., Nakajima, T., Olivieri, B., Pompei, A., Campanelli, M., and Rao, R.: Calibration and data elaboration procedure for sky irradiance measurements, Appl. Optics, 38, 896–907, 1999. 
Campanelli, M., Nakajima, T., and Olivieri, B.: Determination of the solar calibration constant for a sun-sky radiometer, Appl. Optics, 43, 651-659 https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.43.000651, 2004. 
Campanelli, M., Estelles, V., Tomasi, C., Nakajima, T., Malvestuto, V., and Martinez-Lozan, J. A.: Application of the SKYRAD improved Langley plot method for the in situ calibration of CIMEL sun-sky photometers, Appl. Optics, 46, 2688–2702, https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.46.002688, 2007. 
Download
Short summary
The intercomparison of satellite- and ground-measured aerosol absorption properties, such as presented here using Aura-OMI and SKYNET sensors, constitutes an important exercise to evaluate relative performance, track algorithm changes, and to diagnose retrieval accuracy and issues. The two datasets are found to agree reasonably well under moderate to higher aerosol loading but show disagreement under lower aerosol amounts due to retrieval issues in both techniques.