Articles | Volume 15, issue 21
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6309-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6309-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
02 Nov 2022
Research article |
| 02 Nov 2022
| 02 Nov 2022
Calibrating networks of low-cost air quality sensors
Priyanka deSouza
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Department of Urban and Regional Planning, University of Colorado Denver, CO 80202, USA
CU Population Center, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80302, USA
Ralph Kahn
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, 20771, USA
Tehya Stockman
Denver Department of Public Health and Environment, Denver CO 80202, USA
Department of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering,
University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA
William Obermann
Denver Department of Public Health and Environment, Denver CO 80202, USA
Ben Crawford
Department of Geography and Environmental Sciences, University of
Colorado, Denver, CO 80202, USA
An Wang
Senseable City Lab, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
James Crooks
Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, National Jewish Health, Denver, CO 2930, USA
Department of Epidemiology, University of Colorado at Denver – Anschutz Medical Campus, Denver, CO 129263, USA
Jing Li
Department of Geography and the Environment, University of Denver, Denver, CO 80210, USA
Patrick Kinney
Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02118, USA
Related authors
No articles found.
Patrick C. Taylor, Armin Sorooshian, Rei Ueyama, Sebastian Schmidt, Ihab Abboud, Quincy Allison, Kevin Barry, Sebastian Becker, Holly A. Bender, Joseph R. Bennett, James B. Blair, Niklas Bohn, Linette Boisvert, Matthew D. Brown, Roelof Bruintjes, Anthony Bucholtz, Megan Buzanowicz, Brian Cairns, Filippo Calì Quaglia, Eduard Chemyakin, Bo Chen, Gao Chen, Hong Chen, Yu-Wen Chen, Zezhen Cheng, Swarup China, Dan Chirica, Yonghoon Choi, Peter Colarco, Brian Collister, Ewan Crosbie, Maurice J. Cross, Janet Daniels, Paul DeMott, Joshua P. DiGangi, Alcide Giorgio di Sarra, Glenn S. Diskin, Erica K. Dolinar, Eva-Lou Edwards, Samuel Ephraim, Nikolaos Evangeliou, Romanos Foskinis, Francesca Gallo, Lan Gao, José Luis Gómez-Amo, Daisy Gonzalez, Christine Groot Zwaaftink, Pawan Gupta, Ivan Heckman, Michael Hendrickson, Miguel Ricardo A. Hilario, Ken Hirata, Michelle Hofton, Andrew L. Holen, Ulas Im, Alia L. Khan, Ralph Kahn, Alexei V. Korolev, Sonia Kreidenweis, Thomas Krumpen, Nathan Kurtz, Leslie Lait, Bradley Lamkin, Jack Landy, Nurun Nahar Lata, Paul Lawson, Samuel LeBlanc, Sean Leavor, Jing Li, Thorsten Markus, Hal Maring, Andreas H. Massling, Camille Mavis, Flynn McGinnity, Kerry Meyer, Gabriel Mojica, Richard H. Moore, Parker Morris, Giovanni Muscari, Vikas Nataraja, Amin R. Nehrir, Athanasios Nenes, Edward P. Nowottnick, Matteo Ottaviani, Chelsea Parker, Ryan Patnaude, Michael Perez, Russell J. Perkins, Colten Peterson, Alek Petty, Stevie Phothisane, Chris Polashenski, Kerri A. Pratt, Kayla M. Preisler, John Prytherch, David Rabine, Jens Redemann, Ju-Mee Ryoo, Joseph S. Schlosser, Vanessa Selimovic, Michael A. Shook, Morgan Silverman, Henrik Skov, Alexander Smirnov, Cassidy Soloff, Amy Solomon, Snorre Stamnes, Azusa Takeishi, David R. Thompson, K. Lee Thornhill, Rachel Tilling, Michael Tjernström, Monica Tosco, Pedro C. Valdelomar, David Van Gilst, Jian Wang, Zhien Wang, Andrzej Wasilewski, Manfred Wendisch, Brent Wilder, Edward L. Winstead, Albert Wu, Peng Xian, Lauren M. Zamora, Jiaoshi Zhang, Lei Zhang, Lu Zhang, Luke Ziemba, and Paquita Zuidema
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2026-241, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2026-241, 2026
Preprint under review for ESSD
Short summary
Short summary
This article summarizes the data sets collected during the Arctic Radiation Cloud aerosol Sea ice Interaction eXperiment (ARCSIX), NASA's most comprehensive Arctic field campaign to date. The overarching goal was to quantify the contributions of surface, clouds, aerosol particles, and precipitation to summer sea ice melt. This paper describes the ARCSIX implementation including the flight strategy, instruments, complementary data sets, access, and usage details.
Michael Anstett, James Limbacher, and Ralph Kahn
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-342, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-342, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
This paper describes the Multi-angle Imaging SpectroRadiometer (MISR) Research Product Algorithm (MRPA) and analyzes its performance. The MRPA an aerosol retrieval algorithm based on the MISR aerosol Research Algorithm (RA), which explored and introduced innovations into MISR aerosol retrievals. Previously, the RA ran on a limited, case-by-case basis. The MRPA is an automated version optimized so users can create 1.1 km-resolution, quality aerosol-type results for most of the MISR data record.
Xiaohua Pan, Mian Chin, Ralph A. Kahn, Hitoshi Matsui, Toshihiko Takemura, Meiyun Lin, Yuanyu Xie, Dongchul Kim, and Maria Val Martin
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 171–196, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-171-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-171-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Wildfire smoke can travel far from its source, affecting air quality far from the fire itself. This study looks at how two key factors – how much smoke is emitted & how high it rises – affect how smoke spreads. Using data from a major 2008 Siberian wildfire, four models were tested. Results show that models often inject smoke too low & remove it too quickly, missing high-altitude smoke seen by satellites. Better estimates of smoke height and removal are crucial to improve air quality forecasts.
Katherine T. Junghenn Noyes and Ralph A. Kahn
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 13879–13901, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-13879-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-13879-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
With observations from NASA's Multi-Angle Imaging Spectroradiometer (MISR) satellite instrument, we can constrain wildfire plume heights, smoke age, and particle size, shape, and light-absorption properties. We study over 3600 wildfire plumes across Siberia by statistically comparing the MISR results to observations of fire strength, land cover type, and meteorology. We then stratify plumes by land cover type and infer the dominant aerosol aging mechanisms among different plume types.
Xin Xi, Jun Wang, Zhendong Lu, Andrew M. Sayer, Jaehwa Lee, Robert C. Levy, Yujie Wang, Alexei Lyapustin, Hongqing Liu, Istvan Laszlo, Changwoo Ahn, Omar Torres, Sabur Abdullaev, James Limbacher, and Ralph A. Kahn
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 7403–7429, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-7403-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-7403-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The Aralkum Desert is challenging for aerosol retrieval due to its bright, heterogeneous, and dynamic surfaces and the lack of in situ constraints on aerosol properties. The performance and consistency of satellite algorithms in observing Aralkum-generated saline dust remain unknown. This study compares multisensor UVAI (ultraviolet aerosol index), AOD (aerosol optical depth), and ALH (aerosol layer height) products and reveals inconsistencies and potential biases over the Aral Sea basin.
Mariya Petrenko, Ralph Kahn, Mian Chin, Susanne E. Bauer, Tommi Bergman, Huisheng Bian, Gabriele Curci, Ben Johnson, Johannes W. Kaiser, Zak Kipling, Harri Kokkola, Xiaohong Liu, Keren Mezuman, Tero Mielonen, Gunnar Myhre, Xiaohua Pan, Anna Protonotariou, Samuel Remy, Ragnhild Bieltvedt Skeie, Philip Stier, Toshihiko Takemura, Kostas Tsigaridis, Hailong Wang, Duncan Watson-Parris, and Kai Zhang
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 1545–1567, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-1545-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-1545-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We compared smoke plume simulations from 11 global models to each other and to satellite smoke amount observations aimed at constraining smoke source strength. In regions where plumes are thick and background aerosol is low, models and satellites compare well. However, the input emission inventory tends to underestimate in many places, and particle property and loss rate assumptions vary enormously among models, causing uncertainties that require systematic in situ measurements to resolve.
Myungje Choi, Alexei Lyapustin, Gregory L. Schuster, Sujung Go, Yujie Wang, Sergey Korkin, Ralph Kahn, Jeffrey S. Reid, Edward J. Hyer, Thomas F. Eck, Mian Chin, David J. Diner, Olga Kalashnikova, Oleg Dubovik, Jhoon Kim, and Hans Moosmüller
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 10543–10565, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-10543-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-10543-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This paper introduces a retrieval algorithm to estimate two key absorbing components in smoke (black carbon and brown carbon) using DSCOVR EPIC measurements. Our analysis reveals distinct smoke properties, including spectral absorption, layer height, and black carbon and brown carbon, over North America and central Africa. The retrieved smoke properties offer valuable observational constraints for modeling radiative forcing and informing health-related studies.
James A. Limbacher, Ralph A. Kahn, Mariel D. Friberg, Jaehwa Lee, Tyler Summers, and Hai Zhang
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 471–498, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-471-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-471-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We present the new Multi-Angle Geostationary Aerosol Retrieval Algorithm (MAGARA) that fuses observations from GOES-16 and GOES-17 to retrieve information about aerosol loading (at 10–15 min cadence) and aerosol particle properties (daily), all at pixel-level resolution. We present MAGARA results for three case studies: the 2018 California Camp Fire, the 2019 Williams Flats Fire, and the 2019 Kincade Fire. We also compare MAGARA aerosol loading and particle properties with AERONET.
Robert R. Nelson, Marcin L. Witek, Michael J. Garay, Michael A. Bull, James A. Limbacher, Ralph A. Kahn, and David J. Diner
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 4947–4960, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-4947-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-4947-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Shallow and coastal waters are nutrient-rich and turbid due to runoff. They are also located in areas where the atmosphere has more aerosols than open-ocean waters. NASA's Multi-angle Imaging SpectroRadiometer (MISR) has been monitoring aerosols for over 23 years but does not report results over shallow waters. We developed a new algorithm that uses all four of MISR’s bands and considers light leaving water surfaces. This algorithm performs well and increases over-water measurements by over 7 %.
Michail Mytilinaios, Sara Basart, Sergio Ciamprone, Juan Cuesta, Claudio Dema, Enza Di Tomaso, Paola Formenti, Antonis Gkikas, Oriol Jorba, Ralph Kahn, Carlos Pérez García-Pando, Serena Trippetta, and Lucia Mona
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 5487–5516, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-5487-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-5487-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Multiscale Online Non-hydrostatic AtmospheRe CHemistry model (MONARCH) dust reanalysis provides a high-resolution 3D reconstruction of past dust conditions, allowing better quantification of climate and socioeconomic dust impacts. We assess the performance of the reanalysis needed to reproduce dust optical depth using dust-related products retrieved from satellite and ground-based observations and show that it reproduces the spatial distribution and seasonal variability of atmospheric dust well.
Yunyao Li, Daniel Tong, Siqi Ma, Saulo R. Freitas, Ravan Ahmadov, Mikhail Sofiev, Xiaoyang Zhang, Shobha Kondragunta, Ralph Kahn, Youhua Tang, Barry Baker, Patrick Campbell, Rick Saylor, Georg Grell, and Fangjun Li
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 3083–3101, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-3083-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-3083-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Plume height is important in wildfire smoke dispersion and affects air quality and human health. We assess the impact of plume height on wildfire smoke dispersion and the exceedances of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards. A higher plume height predicts lower pollution near the source region, but higher pollution in downwind regions, due to the faster spread of the smoke once ejected, affects pollution exceedance forecasts and the early warning of extreme air pollution events.
James A. Limbacher, Ralph A. Kahn, and Jaehwa Lee
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 6865–6887, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6865-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6865-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Launched in December 1999, NASA’s Multi-angle Imaging SpectroRadiometer (MISR) has given researchers qualitative constraints on aerosol particle properties for the past 22 years. Here, we present a new MISR research aerosol retrieval algorithm (RA) that utilizes over-land surface reflectance data from the Multi-Angle Implementation of Atmospheric Correction (MAIAC) to address limitations of the MISR operational aerosol retrieval algorithm and improve retrievals of aerosol particle properties.
Mathew Lipson, Sue Grimmond, Martin Best, Winston T. L. Chow, Andreas Christen, Nektarios Chrysoulakis, Andrew Coutts, Ben Crawford, Stevan Earl, Jonathan Evans, Krzysztof Fortuniak, Bert G. Heusinkveld, Je-Woo Hong, Jinkyu Hong, Leena Järvi, Sungsoo Jo, Yeon-Hee Kim, Simone Kotthaus, Keunmin Lee, Valéry Masson, Joseph P. McFadden, Oliver Michels, Wlodzimierz Pawlak, Matthias Roth, Hirofumi Sugawara, Nigel Tapper, Erik Velasco, and Helen Claire Ward
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 5157–5178, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-5157-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-5157-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We describe a new openly accessible collection of atmospheric observations from 20 cities around the world, capturing 50 site years. The observations capture local meteorology (temperature, humidity, wind, etc.) and the energy fluxes between the land and atmosphere (e.g. radiation and sensible and latent heat fluxes). These observations can be used to improve our understanding of urban climate processes and to test the accuracy of urban climate models.
Lauren M. Zamora, Ralph A. Kahn, Nikolaos Evangeliou, Christine D. Groot Zwaaftink, and Klaus B. Huebert
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 12269–12285, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-12269-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-12269-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Arctic dust, smoke, and pollution particles can affect clouds and Arctic warming. The distributions of these particles were estimated in three different satellite, reanalysis, and model products. These products showed good agreement overall but indicate that it is important to include local dust in models. We hypothesize that mineral dust effects on ice processes in the Arctic atmosphere might be highest over Siberia, where it is cold, moist, and subject to relatively high dust levels.
Katherine T. Junghenn Noyes, Ralph A. Kahn, James A. Limbacher, and Zhanqing Li
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 10267–10290, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-10267-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-10267-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We compare retrievals of wildfire smoke particle size, shape, and light absorption from the MISR satellite instrument to modeling and other satellite data on land cover type, drought conditions, meteorology, and estimates of fire intensity (fire radiative power – FRP). We find statistically significant differences in the particle properties based on burning conditions and land cover type, and we interpret how changes in these properties point to specific aerosol aging mechanisms.
Matthew W. Christensen, Andrew Gettelman, Jan Cermak, Guy Dagan, Michael Diamond, Alyson Douglas, Graham Feingold, Franziska Glassmeier, Tom Goren, Daniel P. Grosvenor, Edward Gryspeerdt, Ralph Kahn, Zhanqing Li, Po-Lun Ma, Florent Malavelle, Isabel L. McCoy, Daniel T. McCoy, Greg McFarquhar, Johannes Mülmenstädt, Sandip Pal, Anna Possner, Adam Povey, Johannes Quaas, Daniel Rosenfeld, Anja Schmidt, Roland Schrödner, Armin Sorooshian, Philip Stier, Velle Toll, Duncan Watson-Parris, Robert Wood, Mingxi Yang, and Tianle Yuan
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 641–674, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-641-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-641-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Trace gases and aerosols (tiny airborne particles) are released from a variety of point sources around the globe. Examples include volcanoes, industrial chimneys, forest fires, and ship stacks. These sources provide opportunistic experiments with which to quantify the role of aerosols in modifying cloud properties. We review the current state of understanding on the influence of aerosol on climate built from the wide range of natural and anthropogenic laboratories investigated in recent decades.
Cited articles
Anderson, G. B. and Peng, R. D.: weathermetrics: Functions to convert between weather metrics (R package), http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/weathermetrics/index.html (last access: 26 October 2022), 2012.
Apte, J. S., Messier, K. P., Gani, S., Brauer, M., Kirchstetter, T. W.,
Lunden, M. M., Marshall, J. D., Portier, C. J., Vermeulen, R. C. H., and
Hamburg, S. P.: High-Resolution Air Pollution Mapping with Google Street
View Cars: Exploiting Big Data, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 6999–7008,
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b00891, 2017.
Barkjohn, K. K., Gantt, B., and Clements, A. L.: Development and application of a United States-wide correction for PM2.5 data collected with the PurpleAir sensor, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 4617–4637,
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-4617-2021, 2021.
Bean, J. K.: Evaluation methods for low-cost particulate matter sensors, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 7369–7379, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-7369-2021, 2021.
Bi, J., Wildani, A., Chang, H. H., and Liu, Y.: Incorporating Low-Cost
Sensor Measurements into High-Resolution PM2.5 Modeling at a Large Spatial Scale, Environ. Sci. Technol., 54, 2152–2162,
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b06046, 2020.
Brantley, H. L., Hagler, G. S. W., Herndon, S. C., Massoli, P., Bergin, M.
H., and Russell, A. G.: Characterization of Spatial Air Pollution Patterns
Near a Large Railyard Area in Atlanta, Georgia, Int. J. Env. Res. Pub. He., 16, 535, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16040535, 2019.
Castell, N., Dauge, F. R., Schneider, P., Vogt, M., Lerner, U., Fishbain,
B., Broday, D., and Bartonova, A.: Can commercial low-cost sensor platforms
contribute to air quality monitoring and exposure estimates?, Environ. Int.,
99, 293–302, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2016.12.007, 2017.
Clements, A. L., Griswold, W. G., RS, A., Johnston, J. E., Herting, M. M.,
Thorson, J., Collier-Oxandale, A., and Hannigan, M.: Low-Cost Air Quality
Monitoring Tools: From Research to Practice (A Workshop Summary), Sensors,
17, 2478, https://doi.org/10.3390/s17112478, 2017.
Considine, E. M., Reid, C. E., Ogletree, M. R., and Dye, T.: Improving
accuracy of air pollution exposure measurements: Statistical correction of a
municipal low-cost airborne particulate matter sensor network, Environ.
Pollut., 268, 115833, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115833, 2021.
Crawford, B., Hagan, D. H., Grossman, I., Cole, E., Holland, L., Heald, C. L.,
and Kroll, J. H.: Mapping pollution exposure and chemistry during an
extreme air quality event (the 2018 Kīlauea eruption) using a low-cost
sensor network, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 118, e2025540118, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2025540118, 2021.
Crilley, L. R., Shaw, M., Pound, R., Kramer, L. J., Price, R., Young, S., Lewis, A. C., and Pope, F. D.: Evaluation of a low-cost optical particle counter (Alphasense OPC-N2) for ambient air monitoring, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 709–720, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-709-2018, 2018.
Denver: Love My Air,
https://www.denvergov.org/Government/
Agencies-Departments-Offices/Agencies-Departments-Offices-Directory/Public-Health-Environment/Environmental-Quality/Air-Quality/Love-My-Air, last access: 22 October 2022.
deSouza, P. and Kinney, P. L.: On the distribution of low-cost PM2.5
sensors in the US: demographic and air quality associations, J. Expo. Sci.
Env. Epid., 31, 514–524, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-021-00328-2, 2021.
deSouza, P., Anjomshoaa, A., Duarte, F., Kahn, R., Kumar, P., and Ratti, C.:
Air quality monitoring using mobile low-cost sensors mounted on
trash-trucks: Methods development and lessons learned, Sustain. Cities Soc.,
60, 102239, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102239, 2020a.
deSouza, P., Lu, R., Kinney, P., and Zheng, S.: Exposures to multiple air
pollutants while commuting: Evidence from Zhengzhou, China, Atmos. Environ., 247, 118168, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.118168, 2020b.
deSouza, P. N.: Key Concerns and Drivers of Low-Cost Air Quality Sensor Use,
Sustainability, 14, 584, https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010584, 2022.
deSouza, P. N., Dey, S., Mwenda, K. M., Kim, R., Subramanian, S. V., and
Kinney, P. L.: Robust relationship between ambient air pollution and infant
mortality in India, Sci. Total Environ., 815, 152755,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152755, 2022.
Giordano, M. R., Malings, C., Pandis, S. N., Presto, A. A., McNeill, V. F.,
Westervelt, D. M., Beekmann, M., and Subramanian, R.: From low-cost sensors
to high-quality data: A summary of challenges and best practices for
effectively calibrating low-cost particulate matter mass sensors, J. Aerosol
Sci., 158, 105833, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2021.105833, 2021.
Hagler, G. S. W., Williams, R., Papapostolou, V., and Polidori, A.: Air
Quality Sensors and Data Adjustment Algorithms: When Is It No Longer a
Measurement?, Environ. Sci. Technol., 52, 5530–5531,
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b01826, 2018.
Holstius, D. M., Pillarisetti, A., Smith, K. R., and Seto, E.: Field calibrations of a low-cost aerosol sensor at a regulatory monitoring site in California, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 1121–1131, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-1121-2014, 2014.
Jin, X., Fiore, A. M., Civerolo, K., Bi, J., Liu, Y., Donkelaar, A. van,
Martin, R. V., Al-Hamdan, M., Zhang, Y., Insaf, T. Z., Kioumourtzoglou,
M.-A., He, M. Z., and Kinney, P. L.: Comparison of multiple PM2.5 exposure products for estimating health benefits of emission controls over New York State, USA, Environ. Res. Lett., 14, 084023,
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab2dcb, 2019.
Kim, K.-H., Kabir, E., and Kabir, S.: A review on the human health impact of
airborne particulate matter, Environ. Int., 74, 136–143,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2014.10.005, 2015.
Kuhn, M., Wing, J., Weston, S., Williams, A., Keefer, C., Engelhardt, A., Cooper, T., Mayer, Z., Kenkel, B., and R Core Team: Building predictive models in R using the caret package, R J., 223, 28, 1–26, 2020.
Kumar, P., Morawska, L., Martani, C., Biskos, G., Neophytou, M., Di
Sabatino, S., Bell, M., Norford, L., and Britter, R.: The rise of low-cost
sensing for managing air pollution in cities, Environ. Int., 75, 199–205,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2014.11.019, 2015.
Liang, L.: Calibrating low-cost sensors for ambient air monitoring:
Techniques, trends, and challenges, Environ. Res., 197, 111163,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.111163, 2021.
Magi, B. I., Cupini, C., Francis, J., Green, M., and Hauser, C.: Evaluation
of PM2.5 measured in an urban setting using a low-cost optical particle
counter and a Federal Equivalent Method Beta Attenuation Monitor, Aerosol
Sci. Technol., 54, 147–159, https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2019.1619915, 2020.
Malings, C., Tanzer, R., Hauryliuk, A., Saha, P. K., Robinson, A. L.,
Presto, A. A., and Subramanian, R.: Fine particle mass monitoring with
low-cost sensors: Corrections and long-term performance evaluation, Aerosol
Sci. Technol., 54, 160–174, https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2019.1623863, 2020.
Morawska, L., Thai, P. K., Liu, X., Asumadu-Sakyi, A., Ayoko, G., Bartonova,
A., Bedini, A., Chai, F., Christensen, B., Dunbabin, M., Gao, J., Hagler, G.
S. W., Jayaratne, R., Kumar, P., Lau, A. K. H., Louie, P. K. K., Mazaheri,
M., Ning, Z., Motta, N., Mullins, B., Rahman, M. M., Ristovski, Z., Shafiei,
M., Tjondronegoro, D., Westerdahl, D., and Williams, R.: Applications of
low-cost sensing technologies for air quality monitoring and exposure
assessment: How far have they gone?, Environ. Int., 116, 286–299,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2018.04.018, 2018.
Nilson, B., Jackson, P. L., Schiller, C. L., and Parsons, M. T.: Development and evaluation of correction models for a low-cost fine particulate matter monitor, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 3315–3328,
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2021-425, 2022.
Singh, A., Ng'ang'a, D., Gatari, M. J., Kidane, A. W., Alemu, Z. A.,
Derrick, N., Webster, M. J., Bartington, S. E., Thomas, G. N., Avis, W., and
Pope, F. D.: Air quality assessment in three East African cities using
calibrated low-cost sensors with a focus on road-based hotspots, Environ.
Res. Commun., 3, 075007, https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/ac0e0a, 2021.
Snyder, E. G., Watkins, T. H., Solomon, P. A., Thoma, E. D., Williams, R.
W., Hagler, G. S. W., Shelow, D., Hindin, D. A., Kilaru, V. J., and Preuss,
P. W.: The Changing Paradigm of Air Pollution Monitoring, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 47, 11369–11377, https://doi.org/10.1021/es4022602, 2013.
Health Effects Institute: State of Global Air 2020, https://www.stateofglobalair.org/ (last access: 26 October 2022), 2020.
Van der Laan, M. J., Polley, E. C., and Hubbard, A. E.: Super learner, Stat.
Appl. Genet. Mo. B., 6, 25, https://doi.org/10.2202/1544-6115.1309, 2007.
West, S. E., Buker, P., Ashmore, M., Njoroge, G., Welden, N., Muhoza, C.,
Osano, P., Makau, J., Njoroge, P., and Apondo, W.: Particulate matter
pollution in an informal settlement in Nairobi: Using citizen science to
make the invisible visible, Appl. Geogr., 114, 102133,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2019.102133, 2020.
Williams, R., Kilaru, V., Snyder, E., Kaufman, A., Dye, T., Rutter, A.,
Russel, A., and Hafner, H.: Air Sensor Guidebook, US Environmental
Protection Agency, Washington, DC, EPA/600/R-14/159 (NTIS PB2015-100610),
https://cfpub.epa.gov/si/si_public_record_Report.cfm?Lab=NERL&dirEntryId=277996 (last access: 26 October 2022), 2014.
Zimmerman, N., Presto, A. A., Kumar, S. P. N., Gu, J., Hauryliuk, A., Robinson, E. S., Robinson, A. L., and R. Subramanian: A machine learning calibration model using random forests to improve sensor performance for lower-cost air quality monitoring, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 291–313,
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-291-2018, 2018.
Zusman, M., Schumacher, C. S., Gassett, A. J., Spalt, E. W., Austin, E.,
Larson, T. V., Carvlin, G., Seto, E., Kaufman, J. D., and Sheppard, L.:
Calibration of low-cost particulate matter sensors: Model development for a
multi-city epidemiological study, Environ. Int., 134, 105329,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.105329, 2020.
Short summary
How sensitive are the spatial and temporal trends of PM2.5 derived from a network of low-cost sensors to the calibration adjustment used? How transferable are calibration equations developed at a few co-location sites to an entire network of low-cost sensors? This paper attempts to answer this question and offers a series of suggestions on how to develop the most robust calibration function for different end uses. It uses measurements from the Love My Air network in Denver as a test case.
How sensitive are the spatial and temporal trends of PM2.5 derived from a network of low-cost...
