Articles | Volume 17, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-181-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-181-2024
Research article
 | 
15 Jan 2024
Research article |  | 15 Jan 2024

Research of low-cost air quality monitoring models with different machine learning algorithms

Gang Wang, Chunlai Yu, Kai Guo, Haisong Guo, and Yibo Wang

Related subject area

Subject: Gases | Technique: In Situ Measurement | Topic: Data Processing and Information Retrieval
New insights from the Jülich Ozone Sonde Intercomparison Experiment: calibration functions traceable to one ozone reference instrument
Herman G. J. Smit, Deniz Poyraz, Roeland Van Malderen, Anne M. Thompson, David W. Tarasick, Ryan M. Stauffer, Bryan J. Johnson, and Debra E. Kollonige
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 73–112, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-73-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-73-2024, 2024
Short summary
Identification of spikes in continuous ground-based in situ time series of CO2, CH4 and CO: an extended experiment within the European ICOS Atmosphere network
Paolo Cristofanelli, Cosimo Fratticioli, Lynn Hazan, Mali Chariot, Cedric Couret, Orestis Gazetas, Dagmar Kubistin, Antti Laitinen, Ari Leskinen, Tuomas Laurila, Matthias Lindauer, Giovanni Manca, Michel Ramonet, Pamela Trisolino, and Martin Steinbacher
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 5977–5994, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-5977-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-5977-2023, 2023
Short summary
Data treatment and corrections for estimating H2O and CO2 isotope fluxes from high-frequency observations
Robbert P. J. Moonen, Getachew A. Adnew, Oscar K. Hartogensis, Jordi Vilà-Guerau de Arellano, David J. Bonell Fontas, and Thomas Röckmann
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 5787–5810, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-5787-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-5787-2023, 2023
Short summary
Measurements of volatile organic compounds in ambient air by gas-chromatography and real-time Vocus PTR-TOF-MS: calibrations, instrument background corrections, and introducing a PTR Data Toolkit
Andrew R. Jensen, Abigail R. Koss, Ryder B. Hales, and Joost A. de Gouw
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 5261–5285, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-5261-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-5261-2023, 2023
Short summary
Development of low-cost air quality stations for next-generation monitoring networks: calibration and validation of NO2 and O3 sensors
Alice Cavaliere, Lorenzo Brilli, Bianca Patrizia Andreini, Federico Carotenuto, Beniamino Gioli, Tommaso Giordano, Marco Stefanelli, Carolina Vagnoli, Alessandro Zaldei, and Giovanni Gualtieri
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 4723–4740, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-4723-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-4723-2023, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

Alexopoulos, E. C.: Inroduction to Multivariate Regression Analysis, Hippokratia, 14, 23–28, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3049417/ (last access: 12 January 2024), 2010. 
Ali, S., Glass, T., Parr, B., Potgieter, J., and Alam, F.: Low Cost Sensor With IoT LoRaWAN Connectivity and Machine Learning-Based Calibration for Air Pollution Monitoring, IEEE T. Instrum. Meas., 70, 5500511, https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2020.3034109, 2021. 
Amuthadevi, C., Vijayan, D. S., and Ramachandran, V.: Development of air quality monitoring (AQM) models using different machine learning approaches, J. Amb. Intel. Hum. Comp., 13, 33, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-020-02724-2, 2021.​​​​​​​ 
Ari, D. and Alagoz, B. B.: An effective integrated genetic programming and neural network model for electronic nose calibration of air pollution monitoring application, Neural Comput. Appl., 34, 12633–12652, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-022-07129-0, 2022. 
Bakiler, H. and Guney, S.: Estimation of Concentration Values of Different Gases Based on Long Short-Term Memory by Using Electronic Nose, Biomed. Signal Proces., 69, 102908, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2021.102908, 2021.​​​​​​​ 
Download
Short summary
A low-cost multi-parameter air quality monitoring system (LCS) based on different machine learning algorithms is proposed. The LCS can measure particulate matter (PM) and gas pollutants simultaneously. The performance of the different algorithms (RF, MLR, KNN, BP, GA-BP) with the parameters such as R2 and RMSE are compared and discussed. These measurements indicate the LCS based on the machine learning algorithms can be used to predict the concentrations of PM and gas pollution.