Articles | Volume 17, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-181-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-181-2024
Research article
 | 
15 Jan 2024
Research article |  | 15 Jan 2024

Research of low-cost air quality monitoring models with different machine learning algorithms

Gang Wang, Chunlai Yu, Kai Guo, Haisong Guo, and Yibo Wang

Related subject area

Subject: Gases | Technique: In Situ Measurement | Topic: Data Processing and Information Retrieval
Transferability of machine-learning-based global calibration models for NO2 and NO low-cost sensors
Ayah Abu-Hani, Jia Chen, Vigneshkumar Balamurugan, Adrian Wenzel, and Alessandro Bigi
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3917–3931, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3917-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3917-2024, 2024
Short summary
Detection and long-term quantification of methane emissions from an active landfill
Pramod Kumar, Christopher Caldow, Grégoire Broquet, Adil Shah, Olivier Laurent, Camille Yver-Kwok, Sebastien Ars, Sara Defratyka, Susan Warao Gichuki, Luc Lienhardt, Mathis Lozano, Jean-Daniel Paris, Felix Vogel, Caroline Bouchet, Elisa Allegrini, Robert Kelly, Catherine Juery, and Philippe Ciais
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 1229–1250, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1229-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1229-2024, 2024
Short summary
Field assessments on impact of CO2 concentration fluctuations along with complex terrain flows on the estimation of the net ecosystem exchange of temperate forests
Dexiong Teng, Jiaojun Zhu, Tian Gao, Fengyuan Yu, Yuan Zhu, Xinhua Zhou, and Bai Yang
Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2024-6,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2024-6, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for AMT
Short summary
New insights from the Jülich Ozone Sonde Intercomparison Experiment: calibration functions traceable to one ozone reference instrument
Herman G. J. Smit, Deniz Poyraz, Roeland Van Malderen, Anne M. Thompson, David W. Tarasick, Ryan M. Stauffer, Bryan J. Johnson, and Debra E. Kollonige
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 73–112, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-73-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-73-2024, 2024
Short summary
Identification of spikes in continuous ground-based in situ time series of CO2, CH4 and CO: an extended experiment within the European ICOS Atmosphere network
Paolo Cristofanelli, Cosimo Fratticioli, Lynn Hazan, Mali Chariot, Cedric Couret, Orestis Gazetas, Dagmar Kubistin, Antti Laitinen, Ari Leskinen, Tuomas Laurila, Matthias Lindauer, Giovanni Manca, Michel Ramonet, Pamela Trisolino, and Martin Steinbacher
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 5977–5994, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-5977-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-5977-2023, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

Alexopoulos, E. C.: Inroduction to Multivariate Regression Analysis, Hippokratia, 14, 23–28, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3049417/ (last access: 12 January 2024), 2010. 
Ali, S., Glass, T., Parr, B., Potgieter, J., and Alam, F.: Low Cost Sensor With IoT LoRaWAN Connectivity and Machine Learning-Based Calibration for Air Pollution Monitoring, IEEE T. Instrum. Meas., 70, 5500511, https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2020.3034109, 2021. 
Amuthadevi, C., Vijayan, D. S., and Ramachandran, V.: Development of air quality monitoring (AQM) models using different machine learning approaches, J. Amb. Intel. Hum. Comp., 13, 33, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-020-02724-2, 2021.​​​​​​​ 
Ari, D. and Alagoz, B. B.: An effective integrated genetic programming and neural network model for electronic nose calibration of air pollution monitoring application, Neural Comput. Appl., 34, 12633–12652, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-022-07129-0, 2022. 
Bakiler, H. and Guney, S.: Estimation of Concentration Values of Different Gases Based on Long Short-Term Memory by Using Electronic Nose, Biomed. Signal Proces., 69, 102908, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2021.102908, 2021.​​​​​​​ 
Download
Short summary
A low-cost multi-parameter air quality monitoring system (LCS) based on different machine learning algorithms is proposed. The LCS can measure particulate matter (PM) and gas pollutants simultaneously. The performance of the different algorithms (RF, MLR, KNN, BP, GA-BP) with the parameters such as R2 and RMSE are compared and discussed. These measurements indicate the LCS based on the machine learning algorithms can be used to predict the concentrations of PM and gas pollution.