Articles | Volume 10, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-1609-2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-1609-2017
Research article
 | 
26 Apr 2017
Research article |  | 26 Apr 2017

Comparison of aerosol lidar retrieval methods for boundary layer height detection using ceilometer aerosol backscatter data

Vanessa Caicedo, Bernhard Rappenglück, Barry Lefer, Gary Morris, Daniel Toledo, and Ruben Delgado

Related authors

Technical note: Challenges in detecting free tropospheric ozone trends in a sparsely sampled environment
Kai-Lan Chang, Owen R. Cooper, Audrey Gaudel, Irina Petropavlovskikh, Peter Effertz, Gary Morris, and Brian C. McDonald
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 6197–6218, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-6197-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-6197-2024, 2024
Short summary
South Pole Station ozonesondes: variability and trends in the springtime Antarctic ozone hole 1986–2021
Bryan J. Johnson, Patrick Cullis, John Booth, Irina Petropavlovskikh, Glen McConville, Birgit Hassler, Gary A. Morris, Chance Sterling, and Samuel Oltmans
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 3133–3146, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-3133-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-3133-2023, 2023
Short summary
Cluster-based characterization of multi-dimensional tropospheric ozone variability in coastal regions: an analysis of lidar measurements and model results
Claudia Bernier, Yuxuan Wang, Guillaume Gronoff, Timothy Berkoff, K. Emma Knowland, John T. Sullivan, Ruben Delgado, Vanessa Caicedo, and Brian Carroll
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 15313–15331, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-15313-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-15313-2022, 2022
Short summary
Development and testing of a novel sulfur dioxide sonde
Subin Yoon, Alexander Kotsakis, Sergio L. Alvarez, Mark G. Spychala, Elizabeth Klovenski, Paul Walter, Gary Morris, Ernesto Corrales, Alfredo Alan, Jorge A. Diaz, and James H. Flynn
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 4373–4384, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4373-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4373-2022, 2022
Short summary
Urban aerosol chemistry at a land–water transition site during summer – Part 2: Aerosol pH and liquid water content
Michael A. Battaglia Jr., Nicholas Balasus, Katherine Ball, Vanessa Caicedo, Ruben Delgado, Annmarie G. Carlton, and Christopher J. Hennigan
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 18271–18281, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-18271-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-18271-2021, 2021
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Others (Wind, Precipitation, Temperature, etc.) | Technique: Remote Sensing | Topic: Validation and Intercomparisons
Closing the gap in the tropics: the added value of radio-occultation data for wind field monitoring across the Equator
Julia Danzer, Magdalena Pieler, and Gottfried Kirchengast
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 4979–4995, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4979-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4979-2024, 2024
Short summary
Verification of weather-radar-based hail metrics with crowdsourced observations from Switzerland
Jérôme Kopp, Alessandro Hering, Urs Germann, and Olivia Martius
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 4529–4552, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4529-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4529-2024, 2024
Short summary
Atmospheric motion vector (AMV) error characterization and bias correction by leveraging independent lidar data: a simulation using an observing system simulation experiment (OSSE) and optical flow AMVs
Hai Nguyen, Derek Posselt, Igor Yanovsky, Longtao Wu, and Svetla Hristova-Veleva
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3103–3119, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3103-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3103-2024, 2024
Short summary
Rotary-wing drone-induced flow – comparison of simulations with lidar measurements
Liqin Jin, Mauro Ghirardelli, Jakob Mann, Mikael Sjöholm, Stephan Thomas Kral, and Joachim Reuder
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 2721–2737, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2721-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2721-2024, 2024
Short summary
Improving the Estimate of Higher Order Moments from Lidar Observations Near the Top of the Convective Boundary Layer
Tessa Rosenberger, David D. Turner, Thijs Heus, Girish N. Raghunathan, Timothy J. Wagner, and Julia Simonson
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-868,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-868, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Anderberg, M. R.: Cluster Analysis for Applications, Academic Press, 1973.
André , J. C. and Mahrt, L.: The Nocturnal Surface Inversion and Influence of Clear-Air Radiative Cooling, J. Atmos. Sci., 39, 864–878, 1982.
Baars, H., Ansmann, A., Engelmann, R., and Althausen, D.: Continuous monitoring of the boundary-layer top with lidar, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 7281–7296, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-7281-2008, 2008.
Berman, S., Ku, J. Y., and Rao, S. T.: Spatial and temporal variation in the mixing depth over the northeastern United States during the summer of 1995, J. Appl. Meteor., 38, 1661–1673, 1999.
Biavati, G., Feist, D. G., Gerbig, C., and Kretschmer, R.: Error estimation for localized signal properties: application to atmospheric mixing height retrievals, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 4215–4230, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-4215-2015, 2015.
Download
Short summary
Three methods for estimating the boundary layer height using aerosol backscatter measurements are evaluated here. Radiosonde profiles are used to evaluate aerosol-backscatter-derived boundary layer heights. Overall good agreement between radiosonde and all aerosol-derived boundary layer heights was found, and specific limitations to each method are discussed. A recommended method is given for future aerosol backscatter retrieval of the boundary layer height.