Articles | Volume 11, issue 12
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-6409-2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-6409-2018
Research article
 | 
30 Nov 2018
Research article |  | 30 Nov 2018

Can turbulence within the field of view cause significant biases in radiative transfer modeling at the 183 GHz band?

Xavier Calbet, Niobe Peinado-Galan, Sergio DeSouza-Machado, Emil Robert Kursinski, Pedro Oria, Dale Ward, Angel Otarola, Pilar Rípodas, and Rigel Kivi

Related authors

Measurement report: Can zenith wet delay from GNSS “see” atmospheric turbulence? Insights from case studies across diverse climate zones
Gaël Kermarrec, Xavier Calbet, Zhiguo Deng, and Cintia Carbajal Henken
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 3567–3581, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-3567-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-3567-2025, 2025
Short summary
Optimal Estimation Retrieval Framework for Daytime Clear-Sky Total Column Water Vapour from MTG-FCI Near-Infrared Measurements
Jan El Kassar, Cintia Carbajal Henken, Xavier Calbet, Pilar Rípodas, Rene Preusker, and Jürgen Fischer
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3605,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3605, 2024
Short summary
Evaluation of total column water vapour products from satellite observations and reanalyses within the GEWEX Water Vapor Assessment
Tim Trent, Marc Schröder, Shu-Peng Ho, Steffen Beirle, Ralf Bennartz, Eva Borbas, Christian Borger, Helene Brogniez, Xavier Calbet, Elisa Castelli, Gilbert P. Compo, Wesley Ebisuzaki, Ulrike Falk, Frank Fell, John Forsythe, Hans Hersbach, Misako Kachi, Shinya Kobayashi, Robert E. Kursinski, Diego Loyola, Zhengzao Luo, Johannes K. Nielsen, Enzo Papandrea, Laurence Picon, Rene Preusker, Anthony Reale, Lei Shi, Laura Slivinski, Joao Teixeira, Tom Vonder Haar, and Thomas Wagner
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 9667–9695, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-9667-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-9667-2024, 2024
Short summary
Horizontal small-scale variability of water vapor in the atmosphere: implications for intercomparison of data from different measuring systems
Xavier Calbet, Cintia Carbajal Henken, Sergio DeSouza-Machado, Bomin Sun, and Tony Reale
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 7105–7118, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-7105-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-7105-2022, 2022
Short summary
Use of automatic radiosonde launchers to measure temperature and humidity profiles from the GRUAN perspective
Fabio Madonna, Rigel Kivi, Jean-Charles Dupont, Bruce Ingleby, Masatomo Fujiwara, Gonzague Romanens, Miguel Hernandez, Xavier Calbet, Marco Rosoldi, Aldo Giunta, Tomi Karppinen, Masami Iwabuchi, Shunsuke Hoshino, Christoph von Rohden, and Peter William Thorne
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 3621–3649, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3621-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3621-2020, 2020
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Others (Wind, Precipitation, Temperature, etc.) | Technique: Remote Sensing | Topic: Data Processing and Information Retrieval
TanSat-2: a new satellite for mapping solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence at both red and far-red bands with high spatiotemporal resolution
Dianrun Zhao, Shanshan Du, Chu Zou, Longfei Tian, Meng Fan, Yulu Du, and Liangyun Liu
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 3647–3667, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3647-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3647-2025, 2025
Short summary
Propagating information content: an example with advection
David D. Turner, Maria P. Cadeddu, Julia M. Simonson, and Timothy J. Wagner
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 3533–3546, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3533-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3533-2025, 2025
Short summary
Best estimate of the planetary boundary layer height from multiple remote sensing measurements
Damao Zhang, Jennifer Comstock, Chitra Sivaraman, Kefei Mo, Raghavendra Krishnamurthy, Jingjing Tian, Tianning Su, Zhanqing Li, and Natalia Roldán-Henao
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 3453–3475, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3453-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3453-2025, 2025
Short summary
Observing atmospheric rivers using multi-GNSS airborne radio occultation: system description and data evaluation
Bing Cao, Jennifer S. Haase, Michael J. Murphy Jr., and Anna M. Wilson
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 3361–3392, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3361-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3361-2025, 2025
Short summary
Evolution of wind field in the atmospheric boundary layer using multiple-source observations during the passage of Super Typhoon Doksuri (2305)
Xiaoye Wang, Jing Xu, Songhua Wu, Qichao Wang, Guangyao Dai, Peizhi Zhu, Zhizhong Su, Sai Chen, Xiaomeng Shi, and Mengqi Fan
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 3305–3320, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3305-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3305-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Behrendt, A., Wulfmeyer, V., Hammann, E., Muppa, S. K., and Pal, S.: Profiles of second- to fourth-order moments of turbulent temperature fluctuations in the convective boundary layer: first measurements with rotational Raman lidar, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 5485–5500, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5485-2015, 2015. a
Bobryshev, O., Buehler, S. A., John, V. O., Brath, M., and Brogniez, H.: Is There Really a Closure Gap Between 183.31-GHz Satellite Passive Microwave and In Situ Radiosonde Water Vapor Measurements?, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 56, 2904–2910, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2017.2786548, 2018. a, b
Brogniez, H., English, S., and Mahfouf, J. F.: Joint Workshop on uncertainties at 183 GHz; 29–30 June 2015, available at: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01213862/document (last access: 19 November 2018), 2015. a
Brogniez, H., English, S., Mahfouf, J.-F., Behrendt, A., Berg, W., Boukabara, S., Buehler, S. A., Chambon, P., Gambacorta, A., Geer, A., Ingram, W., Kursinski, E. R., Matricardi, M., Odintsova, T. A., Payne, V. H., Thorne, P. W., Tretyakov, M. Yu., and Wang, J.: A review of sources of systematic errors and uncertainties in observations and simulations at 183 GHz, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 2207–2221, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-2207-2016, 2016. a, b, c, d, e, f, g
Buehler, S. A., Kuvatov, M., John, V. O., Leiterer, U., and Dier, H.: Comparison of Microwave Satellite Humidity Data and Radiosonde Profiles: A Case Study, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D13103, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004605, 2004. a
Download
Short summary
The hypothesis whether turbulence within the passive microwave sounders field of view can cause significant biases in radiative transfer modelling at the 183 GHz water vapour absorption band is tested. It is shown that this effect can cause significant biases, which can match the observed ones by Brogniez et al. (2016). They can be explained by locating intense turbulence in the high troposphere, such as the one present in clear air turbulence, cumulus clouds or storms.
Share