Articles | Volume 14, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-1941-2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-1941-2021
Research article
 | 
09 Mar 2021
Research article |  | 09 Mar 2021

Using machine learning to model uncertainty for water vapor atmospheric motion vectors

Joaquim V. Teixeira, Hai Nguyen, Derek J. Posselt, Hui Su, and Longtao Wu

Related authors

Functional analysis of variance (ANOVA) for carbon flux estimates from remote sensing data
Jonathan Hobbs, Matthias Katzfuss, Hai Nguyen, Vineet Yadav, and Junjie Liu
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1133–1151, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1133-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1133-2024, 2024
Short summary
AMV Error Characterization and Bias Correction by Leveraging Independent Lidar Data: a Simulation using OSSE and Optical Flow AMVs
Hai Nguyen, Derek Posselt, Igor Yanovsky, Longtao Wu, and Svetla Hristova-Veleva
Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2023-239,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2023-239, 2023
Revised manuscript accepted for AMT
Short summary
Simulated multispectral temperature and atmospheric composition retrievals for the JPL GEO-IR Sounder
Vijay Natraj, Ming Luo, Jean-Francois Blavier, Vivienne H. Payne, Derek J. Posselt, Stanley P. Sander, Zhao-Cheng Zeng, Jessica L. Neu, Denis Tremblay, Longtao Wu, Jacola A. Roman, Yen-Hung Wu, and Leonard I. Dorsky
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 1251–1267, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-1251-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-1251-2022, 2022
Short summary
On the role of aerosol radiative effect in the wet season onset timing over the Congo rainforest during boreal autumn
Sudip Chakraborty, Jonathon H. Jiang, Hui Su, and Rong Fu
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 12855–12866, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-12855-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-12855-2021, 2021
Short summary
Observations and hypotheses related to low to middle free tropospheric aerosol, water vapor and altocumulus cloud layers within convective weather regimes: a SEAC4RS case study
Jeffrey S. Reid, Derek J. Posselt, Kathleen Kaku, Robert A. Holz, Gao Chen, Edwin W. Eloranta, Ralph E. Kuehn, Sarah Woods, Jianglong Zhang, Bruce Anderson, T. Paul Bui, Glenn S. Diskin, Patrick Minnis, Michael J. Newchurch, Simone Tanelli, Charles R. Trepte, K. Lee Thornhill, and Luke D. Ziemba
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 11413–11442, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-11413-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-11413-2019, 2019
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Others (Wind, Precipitation, Temperature, etc.) | Technique: Remote Sensing | Topic: Validation and Intercomparisons
Verification of parameterizations for clear sky downwelling longwave irradiance in the Arctic
Giandomenico Pace, Alcide di Sarra, Filippo Cali Quaglia, Virginia Ciardini, Tatiana Di Iorio, Antonio Iaccarino, Daniela Meloni, Giovanni Muscari, and Claudio Scarchilli
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 1617–1632, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1617-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1617-2024, 2024
Short summary
Global evaluation of fast radiative transfer model coefficients for early meteorological satellite sensors
Bruna Barbosa Silveira, Emma Catherine Turner, and Jérôme Vidot
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 1279–1296, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1279-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1279-2024, 2024
Short summary
GPROF V7 and beyond: assessment of current and potential future versions of the GPROF passive microwave precipitation retrievals against ground radar measurements over the continental US and the Pacific Ocean
Simon Pfreundschuh, Clément Guilloteau, Paula J. Brown, Christian D. Kummerow, and Patrick Eriksson
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 515–538, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-515-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-515-2024, 2024
Short summary
Assessing sampling and retrieval errors of GPROF precipitation estimates over the Netherlands
Linda Bogerd, Hidde Leijnse, Aart Overeem, and Remko Uijlenhoet
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 247–259, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-247-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-247-2024, 2024
Short summary
Comparisons and quality control of wind observations in a mountainous city using wind profile radar and the Aeolus satellite
Hua Lu, Min Xie, Wei Zhao, Bojun Liu, Tijian Wang, and Bingliang Zhuang
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 167–179, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-167-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-167-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Bormann, N., Hernandez-Carrascal, A., Borde, R., Lutz, H. J., Otkin, J. A., and Wanzong, S.: Atmospheric motion vectors from model simulations. Part I: Methods and characterization as single-level estimates of wind, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 53, 47–64, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-12-0336.1, 2014. 
Breiman, L.: Random forests, Mach. Learn., 45, 5–32, 2001. 
Cassola, F. and Burlando, M.: Wind speed and wind energy forecast through Kalman filtering of Numerical Weather Prediction model output, Appl. Energ., 99, 154–166, 2012. 
Coulston, J. W., Blinn, C. E., Thomas, V. A., and Wynne, R. H.: Approximating prediction uncertainty for random forest regression models, Photogramm. Eng. Rem. S., 82, 189–197, 2016. 
Fraley, C. and Raftery, A. E.: MCLUST: Software for model-based clustering, density estimation and discriminant analysis (No. TR-415), Washington University, Seattle Department of Statistics, Seattle, Washington, USA, 2002. 
Download
Short summary
Wind-tracking algorithms produce atmospheric motion vectors (AMVs) by tracking satellite observations. Accurately characterizing the uncertainties in AMVs is essential in assimilating them into data assimilation models. We develop a machine-learning-based approach for error characterization which involves Gaussian mixture model clustering and random forest using a simulation dataset of water vapor, AMVs, and true winds. We show that our method improves on existing AMV error characterizations.