Articles | Volume 12, issue 2
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 903–920, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-903-2019
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 903–920, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-903-2019
Research article
11 Feb 2019
Research article | 11 Feb 2019

Development of a general calibration model and long-term performance evaluation of low-cost sensors for air pollutant gas monitoring

Carl Malings et al.

Related authors

Performance characterization of low-cost air quality sensors for off-grid deployment in rural Malawi
Ashley S. Bittner, Eben S. Cross, David H. Hagan, Carl Malings, Eric Lipsky, and Andrew P. Grieshop
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 3353–3376, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3353-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3353-2022, 2022
Short summary
Application of low-cost fine particulate mass monitors to convert satellite aerosol optical depth to surface concentrations in North America and Africa
Carl Malings, Daniel M. Westervelt, Aliaksei Hauryliuk, Albert A. Presto, Andrew Grieshop, Ashley Bittner, Matthias Beekmann, and R. Subramanian
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 3873–3892, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3873-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3873-2020, 2020
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Gases | Technique: In Situ Measurement | Topic: Data Processing and Information Retrieval
Evaluation of two common source estimation measurement strategies using large-eddy simulation of plume dispersion under neutral atmospheric conditions
Anja Ražnjević, Chiel van Heerwaarden, and Maarten Krol
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 3611–3628, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3611-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3611-2022, 2022
Short summary
Machine learning techniques to improve the field performance of low-cost air quality sensors
Tony Bush, Nick Papaioannou, Felix Leach, Francis D. Pope, Ajit Singh, G. Neil Thomas, Brian Stacey, and Suzanne Bartington
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 3261–3278, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3261-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3261-2022, 2022
Short summary
Estimation of sulfuric acid concentration using ambient ion composition and concentration data obtained with atmospheric pressure interface time-of-flight ion mass spectrometer
Lisa J. Beck, Siegfried Schobesberger, Mikko Sipilä, Veli-Matti Kerminen, and Markku Kulmala
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 1957–1965, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-1957-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-1957-2022, 2022
Short summary
Importance of the Webb, Pearman, and Leuning (WPL) correction for the measurement of small CO2 fluxes
Katharina Jentzsch, Julia Boike, and Thomas Foken
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 7291–7296, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-7291-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-7291-2021, 2021
Short summary
Unravelling a black box: an open-source methodology for the field calibration of small air quality sensors
Seán Schmitz, Sherry Towers, Guillermo Villena, Alexandre Caseiro, Robert Wegener, Dieter Klemp, Ines Langer, Fred Meier, and Erika von Schneidemesser
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 7221–7241, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-7221-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-7221-2021, 2021
Short summary

Cited articles

Afshar-Mohajer, N., Zuidema, C., Sousan, S., Hallett, L., Tatum, M., Rule, A. M., Thomas, G., Peters, T. M., and Koehler, K.: Evaluation of low-cost electro-chemical sensors for environmental monitoring of ozone, nitrogen dioxide, and carbon monoxide, J. Occup. Environ. Hyg., 15, 87–98, https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2017.1388918, 2018. 
Aleksander, I. and Morton, H.: An introduction to neural computing, 2nd Edn., International Thomson Computer Press, London, 1995. 
Camalier, L., Eberly, S., Miller, J., and Papp, M.: Guideline on the Meaning and the Use of Precision and Bias Data Required by 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix A, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, available at: https://www3.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/files/ambient/monitorstrat/precursor/07workshopmeaning.pdf (last access: 5 February 2019), 2007. 
Castell, N., Dauge, F. R., Schneider, P., Vogt, M., Lerner, U., Fishbain, B., Broday, D., and Bartonova, A.: Can commercial low-cost sensor platforms contribute to air quality monitoring and exposure estimates?, Environ. Int., 99, 293–302, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2016.12.007, 2017. 
Cross, E. S., Williams, L. R., Lewis, D. K., Magoon, G. R., Onasch, T. B., Kaminsky, M. L., Worsnop, D. R., and Jayne, J. T.: Use of electrochemical sensors for measurement of air pollution: correcting interference response and validating measurements, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 3575–3588, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-3575-2017, 2017. 
Download
Short summary
This paper compares several methods for calibrating data from low-cost air quality monitors to reflect the concentrations of various gaseous pollutants in the atmosphere, identifying the best-performing approaches. With these calibration methods, such monitors can be used to gather information on air quality at a higher spatial resolution than is possible using traditional technologies and can be deployed to areas (e.g. developing countries) where there are no existing monitor networks.